My summation was that the Western Oligarchy and Eastern Oligarchy are in a competitive contest for control over the UN, with each side establishing competing International Monetary Systems.
Like you point out, both the Western and Eastern Oligarchies are adherents to, and proponents of, the UN-WEF Agenda 21/2030 SDG/ESG/DEI dictates.
But there’s a monkey wrench in the machinery gumming-up the forward progress.
That monkey wrench is Populism.
The “people” are rising up and protesting against the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
In the USA, Trump’s “America First MAGA Patriot” movement is growing stronger with African-Americans and Latino-Hispanics and women and young adults realizing that the UniParty of Democrats and Republican Establishment RINOs are more inclined to represent the interests of the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy rather than the interests of the people who are their local constituents.
One thing that I do wonder about is if there ever actually came to be a “One World” Global Technocracy, then what would become of the Military-Industrial Complex?
It’s becoming more and more apparent that the future role of NATO, most likely its intended role from its inception, is to be the Global Enforcer of the Globalist’s dictates. But how many officers and troops/airmen/sailors, tanks, fighter jets, bombers, missiles, and naval combat ships will the future NATO actually need?
I hear what you're saying and you make a fair amount of sense - the sense that 'all in it together' is not the same thing as 'doing the same stuff'. Likewise, they (these MWO leaders, that is) pretty much all have similar characters/personalities (ruthless, a little despotic, etc.), so the policies/pillars of a NWO are useful to each of them.
For example, if one thinks about the horrific child abuse network, and how exposing it to the public would make the public bring down the entire western empire from within, then it does beg the question 'why doesn't Putin or Xi order their intelligence services to expose the whole network?' - it's what I would do if I were them. It's a very elegant solution. One can say the same about 9-11 - why didn't Putin expose it on the very day it happened? He's not dumb enough to believe the official narrative. Rhetorical questions, perhaps.
However: I think there is one, let's call it a 'hidden variable' that you may be missing here. And that's the idea of 'coercion'. In layperson's terms 'if you don't do X, Mr. Putin/Xi/[insert national leader] then we [the oligarchs, the real controllers] will do Y'.
Think about the psychology of it this way - does, say, Putin really seem like the kind of guy who would gladly just bend over and pick up the soap for some weasel like Mr. Rothschild & associates? No, I really can't see Putin 'only following orders' - he would have to be seriously coerced into it, and this means the 'threat' involved has to be exceptional.
Having considered this, I am currently leaning towards the nuclear threat (so-called Samson Option - weapons stashed, along with the necessary cells, in hundreds of major cities across the world, with less than a 30-60 minute time-to-target). It's not actually the immediate loss of life, it's the extinction level event caused by nuclear winter and destruction of the ozone layer.
Mind you, if I was Putin and Xi and aware of this, I would've already developed the tech to disperse all that soot and end the nuclear winter, and also repair the ozone layer.
Serious points to think about, I think.
But you are right about infighting amongst the cabal playing out in wars on the world stage. In the final reckoning, only one faction will win. I think these real conflicts are pre-empting this. It's in their psychopathic nature, after all, not to trust other psychopaths. i.e. each other. Thus - all of them require deterrents (if I go down, you go down with me).
I’ve come to the same conclusion. I remember when this system would have done anything to keep Russia and China apart. I also remember when leaders merely hinting they will price their natural resources in anything other than $$ would have been eliminated in no time. Now, Saudis are joining the BRICS block! None of these things would have happened if they were really going against the Western Imperial Oligarchy. The current track goes through “multi-polarity” through engineered “tensions” and the destruction of the West (to prevent rebellion) to their ultimate dream - the NWO, incorporating the Earth.
"China maintains that for the world, there is only one system, which is the international system with the United Nations at its core, that there is only one order, which is the international order based on international law, and that there is only one set of rules, which is the basic norms governing international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter..."
A UN Charter that'll impose a "Pandemic Treaty" on the world's population designed to randomly declare a series of scamdemics coercing billions to be injected with a new mRNA toxic concoction which is ultimately intended to continually heighten the power of "Global biosecurity governance," as well as providing economic opportunities for pharmaceutical companies and all other ancillary industries eager to exploit humanity with a "medical IMF."
Thank you Iain, it requires a certain detachment and clear thinking to be able to see the larger picture in geo politics. Although it does mean facing the dissolution of false hope or hopium.
I agree with Iain. All governments are tied to Digital currency slavery, track tracing and Public Private Partnership scams among other pillars of malfeasance...Kman, editor, DIGILEAK News Not Noise
So, what's the solution? Can we the masses stop this rolling Jugganath at this point, when most of the media-saturated masses will giggle at the very mention of the silly conspiracy theory of a New World Order? More and more are slowly emerging from their stupor, but many have been thoroughly trained such that they just shift from one ideology to another spouting the requisite buzzwords as defined by others. Can we hope to stop this?
RE: ...like claiming that professional boxers beating each other to a pulp proves the pugilists are determined to resist the international boxing federation.
To me this is pretty much the same as saying that capitalists may ruthlessly compete with each other but they are united in support of the capitalist system - and united in the manipulation, suppression, exploitation of the masses. Wars, for example, are historically the major method of making sweeping changes in society (social engineering) to the benefit of the ruling classes (to say nothing of their profitability).
I agree with most of your arguments and look forward to your articles. But I don't entirely agree on one axis: values. I think there is a genuine pushback against materialist/mechanistic values and a push towards something more spiritual / romantic. Dugin has been wrestling with this for decades and is often cited as one of the philosophical progenitors of the multipolarity concept.
Of course his grand vision may not be what the movers and shakers making multipolarity happen actually have in mind. But the populist thrust in the US, for example, is genuine and not entirely due to oligarch mind control interference etc. People DO want their countries back. They want a more traditional world view back that includes some sense of human beings being below and within a larger cosmos, a larger order with elements of primordial wisdom, compassion, of sacredness which everyone feels in the love between man and wife, parent and child.
So perhaps I agree on the pragmatic level where materialists of all stripes are pushing for the SDG-CBDC world as you so well describe, but however hopeless, I believe there is a very real drive towards 'throwing the oligarchic bums' out.
Multipolar is not better per se, just a different system. Whether it is good or bad, only time will tell. Whatever systems form around us are a reflection of current levels of consciousness of the masses, it can't get any better until we all change. Don't forget behemoths such as Vanguard or Blackrock straddle the globe and operate regardless of whatever systems are in place.
The world is already under the full control of a worldwide crime syndicate. Everything we see is just window dressing.
There are long term ugly plans.
I wrote about them here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-mother-of-all-false-flag-events
Excellent article, Iain! Thank you!
I tried to say something very similar with my article,
WORLD WAR III
Nationalism Vs Globalism
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/world-war-iii?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
My summation was that the Western Oligarchy and Eastern Oligarchy are in a competitive contest for control over the UN, with each side establishing competing International Monetary Systems.
Like you point out, both the Western and Eastern Oligarchies are adherents to, and proponents of, the UN-WEF Agenda 21/2030 SDG/ESG/DEI dictates.
But there’s a monkey wrench in the machinery gumming-up the forward progress.
That monkey wrench is Populism.
The “people” are rising up and protesting against the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
In the USA, Trump’s “America First MAGA Patriot” movement is growing stronger with African-Americans and Latino-Hispanics and women and young adults realizing that the UniParty of Democrats and Republican Establishment RINOs are more inclined to represent the interests of the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy rather than the interests of the people who are their local constituents.
One thing that I do wonder about is if there ever actually came to be a “One World” Global Technocracy, then what would become of the Military-Industrial Complex?
It’s becoming more and more apparent that the future role of NATO, most likely its intended role from its inception, is to be the Global Enforcer of the Globalist’s dictates. But how many officers and troops/airmen/sailors, tanks, fighter jets, bombers, missiles, and naval combat ships will the future NATO actually need?
I hear what you're saying and you make a fair amount of sense - the sense that 'all in it together' is not the same thing as 'doing the same stuff'. Likewise, they (these MWO leaders, that is) pretty much all have similar characters/personalities (ruthless, a little despotic, etc.), so the policies/pillars of a NWO are useful to each of them.
For example, if one thinks about the horrific child abuse network, and how exposing it to the public would make the public bring down the entire western empire from within, then it does beg the question 'why doesn't Putin or Xi order their intelligence services to expose the whole network?' - it's what I would do if I were them. It's a very elegant solution. One can say the same about 9-11 - why didn't Putin expose it on the very day it happened? He's not dumb enough to believe the official narrative. Rhetorical questions, perhaps.
However: I think there is one, let's call it a 'hidden variable' that you may be missing here. And that's the idea of 'coercion'. In layperson's terms 'if you don't do X, Mr. Putin/Xi/[insert national leader] then we [the oligarchs, the real controllers] will do Y'.
Think about the psychology of it this way - does, say, Putin really seem like the kind of guy who would gladly just bend over and pick up the soap for some weasel like Mr. Rothschild & associates? No, I really can't see Putin 'only following orders' - he would have to be seriously coerced into it, and this means the 'threat' involved has to be exceptional.
Having considered this, I am currently leaning towards the nuclear threat (so-called Samson Option - weapons stashed, along with the necessary cells, in hundreds of major cities across the world, with less than a 30-60 minute time-to-target). It's not actually the immediate loss of life, it's the extinction level event caused by nuclear winter and destruction of the ozone layer.
Mind you, if I was Putin and Xi and aware of this, I would've already developed the tech to disperse all that soot and end the nuclear winter, and also repair the ozone layer.
Serious points to think about, I think.
But you are right about infighting amongst the cabal playing out in wars on the world stage. In the final reckoning, only one faction will win. I think these real conflicts are pre-empting this. It's in their psychopathic nature, after all, not to trust other psychopaths. i.e. each other. Thus - all of them require deterrents (if I go down, you go down with me).
I’ve come to the same conclusion. I remember when this system would have done anything to keep Russia and China apart. I also remember when leaders merely hinting they will price their natural resources in anything other than $$ would have been eliminated in no time. Now, Saudis are joining the BRICS block! None of these things would have happened if they were really going against the Western Imperial Oligarchy. The current track goes through “multi-polarity” through engineered “tensions” and the destruction of the West (to prevent rebellion) to their ultimate dream - the NWO, incorporating the Earth.
"China maintains that for the world, there is only one system, which is the international system with the United Nations at its core, that there is only one order, which is the international order based on international law, and that there is only one set of rules, which is the basic norms governing international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter..."
A UN Charter that'll impose a "Pandemic Treaty" on the world's population designed to randomly declare a series of scamdemics coercing billions to be injected with a new mRNA toxic concoction which is ultimately intended to continually heighten the power of "Global biosecurity governance," as well as providing economic opportunities for pharmaceutical companies and all other ancillary industries eager to exploit humanity with a "medical IMF."
Thank you Iain, it requires a certain detachment and clear thinking to be able to see the larger picture in geo politics. Although it does mean facing the dissolution of false hope or hopium.
https://open.substack.com/pub/slavlandchronicles/p/putins-prophets-larry-johnson?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b7m4j this is a long but fascinating insight - cross posted by Edward Slavsquat (nice nom de plume). Love your work Iain
This is again excellent! Iain is the man!
Iian. This is needed. I’m sharing widely. The rock solid common sense arguments are well articulated. Fabio Vighi and others see this too.
Thanks
I agree with Iain. All governments are tied to Digital currency slavery, track tracing and Public Private Partnership scams among other pillars of malfeasance...Kman, editor, DIGILEAK News Not Noise
So, what's the solution? Can we the masses stop this rolling Jugganath at this point, when most of the media-saturated masses will giggle at the very mention of the silly conspiracy theory of a New World Order? More and more are slowly emerging from their stupor, but many have been thoroughly trained such that they just shift from one ideology to another spouting the requisite buzzwords as defined by others. Can we hope to stop this?
RE: ...like claiming that professional boxers beating each other to a pulp proves the pugilists are determined to resist the international boxing federation.
To me this is pretty much the same as saying that capitalists may ruthlessly compete with each other but they are united in support of the capitalist system - and united in the manipulation, suppression, exploitation of the masses. Wars, for example, are historically the major method of making sweeping changes in society (social engineering) to the benefit of the ruling classes (to say nothing of their profitability).
I agree with most of your arguments and look forward to your articles. But I don't entirely agree on one axis: values. I think there is a genuine pushback against materialist/mechanistic values and a push towards something more spiritual / romantic. Dugin has been wrestling with this for decades and is often cited as one of the philosophical progenitors of the multipolarity concept.
Of course his grand vision may not be what the movers and shakers making multipolarity happen actually have in mind. But the populist thrust in the US, for example, is genuine and not entirely due to oligarch mind control interference etc. People DO want their countries back. They want a more traditional world view back that includes some sense of human beings being below and within a larger cosmos, a larger order with elements of primordial wisdom, compassion, of sacredness which everyone feels in the love between man and wife, parent and child.
So perhaps I agree on the pragmatic level where materialists of all stripes are pushing for the SDG-CBDC world as you so well describe, but however hopeless, I believe there is a very real drive towards 'throwing the oligarchic bums' out.
What a mess, eh?
Spot on Iain, thanks
A great article about China and their fake opposition "socialism".
https://michelchossudovsky.substack.com/p/its-not-socialism-china-is-a-capitalist
Multipolar is not better per se, just a different system. Whether it is good or bad, only time will tell. Whatever systems form around us are a reflection of current levels of consciousness of the masses, it can't get any better until we all change. Don't forget behemoths such as Vanguard or Blackrock straddle the globe and operate regardless of whatever systems are in place.