Yes pushing fake as real is a big sign of conops - shills. I also chatted shortly with Mark Tokarski of "Piece of Mindful blog" fame and he suggestes Hall pushed the McCann (=33) case as real like other limited hangouts have done w/ another case he covered at his blog. This was a girl "Jo Bennet Ramsey" most likely also a fake like the McCann one.
Whow, thx for this one.... lots of "funny" insider joke names... ofc when main person has the COCKs already. .. but I may compile a list of the others I found. Also was re-visiting the JFK hoax and there we have lots of asses too :) Eg. the AZ can also be a code for as(s) (here PLAZA and ZAPRUDER for example)
LOL: When taken to Southend police station, Ali told the booking officer that he had committed "terror". When asked for his motive, he said "religious".[60] In a police interview, he said "I mean, I guess yeah, I killed an MP. I done it, so yeah", then said he regretted that statement because it sounded like a Little Britain sketch. He said that Amess was suspicious of him and thought he was an undercover reporter. He said that he surrendered to the police "cos my sister was on the phone crying her eyes out".[61] these ops are now more comedy then anything :)
I guess this is already some good reserach from him - i have not "followed" his work for years. Was put off by his support for the Jewdy Woods/Hutchison DEW/Starwars beams bullcrap and then forgot about him. And then suddenly here found him back this time at this trial... :) The "crowd" named above seems to be like a rabid dog in trolling people questioning their "theories" and this word is already a very friendly description. And also was suprised it still has traction here at this SS.. and seems MrH never distanced himself from it, but seem even in 2021 he was "pushing" it.
I've never known quite what to make of Judy Woods' 9/11 research. She's sound on the problem of the 'missing' towers - where did all that material go? - but I can't see how a highly secret, previously untested on such a scale, yet 100% reliable, directed energy weapon of unimaginable power could've been solely responsible for their destruction.
But, as I've said elsewhere, the same rationale applies to 9/11 as to the Manchester Arena case. All we need to demonstrate is that the officially proffered explanation is bogus and cannot be true. That has been done multiple times in respect of 9/11 and now R D Hall, Iain Davis and David Hughes have provided us with a similar level of confidence that Abedi was not the MA bomber, because there simply was no bomb!
Yes.. I wrote 2 "notes" for the Woods stuff here one of them, leading to Francis substack and a "blast from the past" website " (visibility 911 proving JW is an agent of sorts (and a very bad one cuz she does not even know the basic details of her "theory" LOOL): https://substack.com/@schlafschaf77/note/c-73543398
So we need to ask WHY would RDH promote all these shady figures-.. another one ofc is A.Johnson and even the barrister he used in this case is "strange" :P Plus like i heard he pushes fake events as real..
I meant "strange" in case of the "lawyer" (or barrister or whatever). Reason being: Even the lawyer(s) have a "strange backstory"... see above my comments with the researcher.
Yes, the Joke Ox fiasco! Hall dismantled that one pretty thoroughly, too.
What did MrHall conclude in this case?
Another hoax. Of course Hall promotes hoaxes as real. Which is his purpose as a limited hangout.
https://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/the-joe-cox-murder-birstall-uk-6th-june-2016/page/3/
Yes pushing fake as real is a big sign of conops - shills. I also chatted shortly with Mark Tokarski of "Piece of Mindful blog" fame and he suggestes Hall pushed the McCann (=33) case as real like other limited hangouts have done w/ another case he covered at his blog. This was a girl "Jo Bennet Ramsey" most likely also a fake like the McCann one.
Whow, thx for this one.... lots of "funny" insider joke names... ofc when main person has the COCKs already. .. but I may compile a list of the others I found. Also was re-visiting the JFK hoax and there we have lots of asses too :) Eg. the AZ can also be a code for as(s) (here PLAZA and ZAPRUDER for example)
The A-Mess hoax is even dumber and more obvious.
https://goodf.forumotion.com/t5383-another-mp-david-amess-stabbing-hoax-666
тАЬThe CrownтАЭ is THE CROWN TEMPLE SYNDICATE. ItтАЩs not the monarchy.
https://thebridgelifeinthemix.info/british-law/crown-temple/
Yes, the CROWN is like a telescope or Russian Doll.
& If that statement confuses people then they is already confused.
LOL: When taken to Southend police station, Ali told the booking officer that he had committed "terror". When asked for his motive, he said "religious".[60] In a police interview, he said "I mean, I guess yeah, I killed an MP. I done it, so yeah", then said he regretted that statement because it sounded like a Little Britain sketch. He said that Amess was suspicious of him and thought he was an undercover reporter. He said that he surrendered to the police "cos my sister was on the phone crying her eyes out".[61] these ops are now more comedy then anything :)
Yes. TheyтАЩre bad comedy scripts, mind numbingly asinine. They never make any sense.
People wonтАЩt believe politicians, police, courts and governments are mocking their stupidity and gullibility.
So did RDH also say this " A-Mess hoax" was real, like M33ann and Jo COCK ?
I answered this question further up the thread and also posted it as a note.
The only thing he asserted with confidence was that the murder couldn't have been done by Thomas Mair.
I guess this is already some good reserach from him - i have not "followed" his work for years. Was put off by his support for the Jewdy Woods/Hutchison DEW/Starwars beams bullcrap and then forgot about him. And then suddenly here found him back this time at this trial... :) The "crowd" named above seems to be like a rabid dog in trolling people questioning their "theories" and this word is already a very friendly description. And also was suprised it still has traction here at this SS.. and seems MrH never distanced himself from it, but seem even in 2021 he was "pushing" it.
I've never known quite what to make of Judy Woods' 9/11 research. She's sound on the problem of the 'missing' towers - where did all that material go? - but I can't see how a highly secret, previously untested on such a scale, yet 100% reliable, directed energy weapon of unimaginable power could've been solely responsible for their destruction.
But, as I've said elsewhere, the same rationale applies to 9/11 as to the Manchester Arena case. All we need to demonstrate is that the officially proffered explanation is bogus and cannot be true. That has been done multiple times in respect of 9/11 and now R D Hall, Iain Davis and David Hughes have provided us with a similar level of confidence that Abedi was not the MA bomber, because there simply was no bomb!
Yes.. I wrote 2 "notes" for the Woods stuff here one of them, leading to Francis substack and a "blast from the past" website " (visibility 911 proving JW is an agent of sorts (and a very bad one cuz she does not even know the basic details of her "theory" LOOL): https://substack.com/@schlafschaf77/note/c-73543398
So we need to ask WHY would RDH promote all these shady figures-.. another one ofc is A.Johnson and even the barrister he used in this case is "strange" :P Plus like i heard he pushes fake events as real..
What was shady about Hall's barrister?
I've read parts of the transcript of the trial and he seemed to be very much on the ball.
Is being 'on the ball' like what seals can do ?
Being on a ball sounds like a trick of agilities , do you have a good Olympic team to perform such feats in UK ?
I like this new phrase for me to use, it is like opposite of being 'on the level' !!!! ЁЯШВ
So on the level = mason ?
On the ball = ? unaware of nature of Earths surface, like indoctrinated & slightly clueless globe fanatic ?
So you are saying he is not a mason, but instead performer who does not comprehend topology basics?
I meant "strange" in case of the "lawyer" (or barrister or whatever). Reason being: Even the lawyer(s) have a "strange backstory"... see above my comments with the researcher.