Recently, as Jordan Peterson announced his alternative WEF, the journalist Keean Bexte, contrasted Peterson with WEF gobshite Klaus Schwab, and posed the question:
There is a limit to what computers can do, but it's way beyond binary choices. Three in binary is 10, no problem. Computers excel at finding signals in complex data sets.
You suggest one reason for binary choices in the form of Divide and Conquer.
A second reason may be the promotion of "quick thinking". If you are in danger or afraid, the brain quickly chooses between Fight or Flight, for example. When you "think slow" you evaluate multiple options using thought processes like reductive or holistic reasoning. To steer us, our shepherds place us in "quick thinking" mode, and provide two alternatives that both suit the shepherds.
The fight-flight response of the reptilian or primitive brain set up the binary of friend or foe, asset or liability, basis of identity in conflict. This predicated in what I call separation trauma to think, interpret, perceive and react according to the stamp of it past on the present.
Machine thinking doesn't know you, even though it is tasked with protecting what you wished and feared to have become.
The 'binary choices' theme is of being framed in a masking protection from feared reality. So yes if you don't want to be responsible for your thought as the creation of your now, set an emotional investment of identity in 'choosing between' as a diversion from the masking idea - in the above example of a mindgame of choosing who to trust with the future of humanity.
So the payload of the psyop is WEF is defacto representing the intent of determining the future of humanity - would you prefer a different face to the idea?
So to vote is to consent to be led. You may not realise you gave it! But those running the ruse take it as a contract signed - and act from it.
The other part of a flight flight is inducing immediate reaction - either by threat or by seduction.
Our capacity to pause and notice our own reactive patterns of thought and emotion is truly conscious of any conflict or dissonances present. But the seeming comforts of running on auto - or machined thinking - runs conflict evasion - such as to protect and manage identity from true feedback. Not unlike Narcissus. Real relationship is lost to self-judgements identified as real.
I was just writing a list of what we can do about our being "transitioned" in to an Orwellian world when this article popped into my inbox.
"...we simply need to look in the mirror and take personal responsibility. Only when we understand that it is our duty as human beings to think critically and question everything will we be ready to truly cooperate" goes straight to the top of the list! Everything else will follow.
Thank you. For what's it worth the list I jotted down follows. It took me 5 minutes but came from 3 years of pain. Some of it is just immediate, practical stuff and some is on a deeper level which is where as you quite rightly point out, is where we need to go.
As individuals:
don't comply
use cash
protest
speak up - locally (be brave)!
write to MPs
share and speak on social media and other media especially main stream
leaflet
support other freedom fighters
stand in elections
support local businesses
set up community support systems eg health
Other:
sue individuals administering the "vaccines" using civil law
That's a great list, but also a bit of a wish-list!
I would add, support any and all politicians who stand up and do the right thing. I've written to all the MPs that stuck their necks out during the pseudo-pandemic, the latest one being Andrew Bridgen. I'm sure that messages of support are greatly appreciated.
You kind of said that already, but just wanted to clarify that specifically.
Yes, and that only adds to my feelings of anger and frustration. It is like banging my head against a brick wall. I do wonder if with some it is the inability to link together the pieces in this puzzle. Or even to look at them. It is too complex. This leads to an unwillingness to engage in discussion and they just get on with their lives. At times, I even wonder if this is the sanest option.
"This is a tried and tested online marketing strategy"
Yeah, as a marketer, this is called A/B split-testing, and as you say has been used in affiliate marketing (then later social media marketing) for at least the last fifteen years.
On any issue, I always try and stand back and work out what "pysop" may be in play (can we call this "the third way", or "middle way"?). This always upsets the normies but also occasionally upsets people on our side too. E.g. after following Riley Waggaman, I'm not convinced that Putin isn't some kind of controlled opposition. The latest Project Veritas/Pfizer kerfuffle doesn't add up for me either, and that seems to be another binary choice that's being pushed.
I have arrived at my modus vivendi and it is that humanity lives in a world of binary choices executed via the if/then conditional and based solely on self interest. We are after all simply a living organism and are merely fulfilling the primary secondary and tertiary functions of all living organisms.
Many people don't realise what the EU have in store for them. The "Smart" term is actually a veil/camouflage for installation of tracking or information devices for monitoring of people. THE SMART GRID
I was reading up on Smart energy devices and noticed this.
Workpackage D (WPD) of ESSnet Big Data focuses on smart energy meters and more particularly on electricity meters which can be monitored continuously at a distance. Its objective is to implement smart meter data for the production of statistics on businesses and households <bold>and for identifying vacant or seasonally/temporarily occupied dwellings,<bold> by linking the electricity data with data from administrative sources.
I wrote about it myself here, and information warfare, in my own strange way. I write about my journey towards self-sufficiency in the face of 4IR. You use the flock metaphor - I watch mine daily. What it reveals is often more heartening than might be feared.
Dear Iain, why I am not allowed to pay you the Euro 70? It's the second time failing! Tomorrow morning I will be in my bank and give them the order personally! Your work is sooo special! I read your book, some months ago, and saw your talk with Witney Webb again! YouTube banned me totally! It is because it is!
There is a limit to what computers can do, but it's way beyond binary choices. Three in binary is 10, no problem. Computers excel at finding signals in complex data sets.
You suggest one reason for binary choices in the form of Divide and Conquer.
A second reason may be the promotion of "quick thinking". If you are in danger or afraid, the brain quickly chooses between Fight or Flight, for example. When you "think slow" you evaluate multiple options using thought processes like reductive or holistic reasoning. To steer us, our shepherds place us in "quick thinking" mode, and provide two alternatives that both suit the shepherds.
The fight-flight response of the reptilian or primitive brain set up the binary of friend or foe, asset or liability, basis of identity in conflict. This predicated in what I call separation trauma to think, interpret, perceive and react according to the stamp of it past on the present.
Machine thinking doesn't know you, even though it is tasked with protecting what you wished and feared to have become.
The 'binary choices' theme is of being framed in a masking protection from feared reality. So yes if you don't want to be responsible for your thought as the creation of your now, set an emotional investment of identity in 'choosing between' as a diversion from the masking idea - in the above example of a mindgame of choosing who to trust with the future of humanity.
So the payload of the psyop is WEF is defacto representing the intent of determining the future of humanity - would you prefer a different face to the idea?
So to vote is to consent to be led. You may not realise you gave it! But those running the ruse take it as a contract signed - and act from it.
The other part of a flight flight is inducing immediate reaction - either by threat or by seduction.
Our capacity to pause and notice our own reactive patterns of thought and emotion is truly conscious of any conflict or dissonances present. But the seeming comforts of running on auto - or machined thinking - runs conflict evasion - such as to protect and manage identity from true feedback. Not unlike Narcissus. Real relationship is lost to self-judgements identified as real.
I was just writing a list of what we can do about our being "transitioned" in to an Orwellian world when this article popped into my inbox.
"...we simply need to look in the mirror and take personal responsibility. Only when we understand that it is our duty as human beings to think critically and question everything will we be ready to truly cooperate" goes straight to the top of the list! Everything else will follow.
Glad you found it helpful. I've written more about possible solutions, if you're interested:
https://iaindavis.com/inalienable-rights/
https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/
https://iaindavis.com/towards-freedom/
Thank you. For what's it worth the list I jotted down follows. It took me 5 minutes but came from 3 years of pain. Some of it is just immediate, practical stuff and some is on a deeper level which is where as you quite rightly point out, is where we need to go.
As individuals:
don't comply
use cash
protest
speak up - locally (be brave)!
write to MPs
share and speak on social media and other media especially main stream
leaflet
support other freedom fighters
stand in elections
support local businesses
set up community support systems eg health
Other:
sue individuals administering the "vaccines" using civil law
prosecute leaders for treason
break up WEF etc
ban those with allegiance to WEF etc from leading
put leaders on trial for war crimes
break up large banks
stop financial speculation by banks
separate banks and govt
set up community banks
repeal all draconian laws
break up monopolies
change voting system
That's a great list, but also a bit of a wish-list!
I would add, support any and all politicians who stand up and do the right thing. I've written to all the MPs that stuck their necks out during the pseudo-pandemic, the latest one being Andrew Bridgen. I'm sure that messages of support are greatly appreciated.
You kind of said that already, but just wanted to clarify that specifically.
The challenge being that the vast majority of people are not willing to even entertain such notions.
These people simply obey what authority tells them to do and thereby the retof us re dragged into the pits of hell with them.
Yes, and that only adds to my feelings of anger and frustration. It is like banging my head against a brick wall. I do wonder if with some it is the inability to link together the pieces in this puzzle. Or even to look at them. It is too complex. This leads to an unwillingness to engage in discussion and they just get on with their lives. At times, I even wonder if this is the sanest option.
Superb article.
"This is a tried and tested online marketing strategy"
Yeah, as a marketer, this is called A/B split-testing, and as you say has been used in affiliate marketing (then later social media marketing) for at least the last fifteen years.
On any issue, I always try and stand back and work out what "pysop" may be in play (can we call this "the third way", or "middle way"?). This always upsets the normies but also occasionally upsets people on our side too. E.g. after following Riley Waggaman, I'm not convinced that Putin isn't some kind of controlled opposition. The latest Project Veritas/Pfizer kerfuffle doesn't add up for me either, and that seems to be another binary choice that's being pushed.
Very interesting indeed. Thanks!
Here is a piece about what is going on in Russia. https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/moscow-vs-davos-lets-ask-russian
Thanks Munchy, I subscribe to Riley's work. It was actually a comment by Iain on Riley's Sub that alerted me to the fact that Iain has a Sub as well.
168 / 5.000
Übersetzungsergebnisse
Übersetzung
I have never voted in my life... I have always known and understood that the idiots are in the majority, so it is certain that they will win.
I have arrived at my modus vivendi and it is that humanity lives in a world of binary choices executed via the if/then conditional and based solely on self interest. We are after all simply a living organism and are merely fulfilling the primary secondary and tertiary functions of all living organisms.
You have it in a nutshell.
"Obedience empowers the tyrants. Without obedience, they are powerless." Vera Sharav
Many people don't realise what the EU have in store for them. The "Smart" term is actually a veil/camouflage for installation of tracking or information devices for monitoring of people. THE SMART GRID
I was reading up on Smart energy devices and noticed this.
Workpackage D (WPD) of ESSnet Big Data focuses on smart energy meters and more particularly on electricity meters which can be monitored continuously at a distance. Its objective is to implement smart meter data for the production of statistics on businesses and households <bold>and for identifying vacant or seasonally/temporarily occupied dwellings,<bold> by linking the electricity data with data from administrative sources.
Just a quick one to say thank you for another perceptive and timely post Iain.
Just excellent, Iain, as ever. Thank you.
I'm upgrading.
We will evolve.
I wrote about it myself here, and information warfare, in my own strange way. I write about my journey towards self-sufficiency in the face of 4IR. You use the flock metaphor - I watch mine daily. What it reveals is often more heartening than might be feared.
:)
https://walkingwithgoats.substack.com/p/sheep-against-satan
Dear Iain, why I am not allowed to pay you the Euro 70? It's the second time failing! Tomorrow morning I will be in my bank and give them the order personally! Your work is sooo special! I read your book, some months ago, and saw your talk with Witney Webb again! YouTube banned me totally! It is because it is!
Greetings from Greece
With best regards,
Gerhard Paul Burger.
Iain
I was re reading your GcMAF article just the other day.
The evils of pharma and their pet regulators are something to behold.
Would an update regarding the technology and the fate of Noakes etc be possible?
Thanks
Tim
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/gcmaf-and-persecution-david-noakes-lyn-thyer-immuno-biotech