We know the standards that are being applied to Richard D Hall as an independent journalist are not and will not be applied to the main stream journalists . The actions of Marianna Spring in sending many emails to Richard and door stepping him after he had informed them he did not wish to be contacted. Is a far more obvious case of harassment.
I am reminded of the case of Brenda Leyland who was door stepped by a Sky reporter and publicly shamed in the media. She committed suicide as a result "Jonathan Levy, senior manager at Sky News, said the approach was in line with the broadcaster’s guidelines on doorstepping: deemed to be warranted when public good outweighed intrusion, and as long as the method was proportionate."
"The team at Sky News followed its editorial guidelines and pursued a story in a responsible manner that we believed was firmly in the public interest.”"
What harm does Martin Hibbert claim he suffered by encountering Richards work.
Martin has said he was first told about it and only after a time did he find out more .
It is not clear if Martin himself watched or read any of Richards work.. Some of his statements indicate more that it is what he has been told. But did not talk until recently of it causing him any distress.
It is said that any corrupt organisation arranges rules to protect itself. Like most rules it is more the threat than reality. But occasionally a high profile enforcement is required to maintain the fear and thus self policing that the rules intend.
I wonder what happened to poor Tommy Mair. What a sweet man he seems to be. So disturbing, really haunting, to remember seeing the footage of him walking in his cheerful way to what he thought would be a gardening job, then later being jumped and manhandled like that by the police. 😞
How do we know he's "a sweet man"? In my view he's complicit in a massive psy-op against the British people and I don't want to live in a society based on mass manipulation. We need and deserve and open and democratic society. Shame on Mair for participating in this fraud.
Richard Hall covered this in an episode of Richplanet where he revealed that the day before the Jo Cox incident neighbours reporting Tommy Mair taking a carrier bag full of photos to his mother's house. (The inference being that he knew he was going away somewhere to live incognito and would not be seeing her in the future). Also postmarks from correspondence received by Hall and others from Mair show Northumberland rather than Durham (which would be the case if he was replying from HMP Durham). Hall concluded that Mair was a willing participant in this faked event and was possibly living in isolation in Scotland. I'm sure you can find the relevant episode of Richplanet which covers these revelations.
It's fairly apparent that the Manchester false flag hoax "bombing" is just one in a long series of such hoaxes by the Intel agencies or "deep state" actors. In case anyone here hasn't heard of him, Ole Dammegard is the main man on these types of events and he's done numerous podcast interviews, written books, etc. about his research into them. Manchester, Boston, Sandy Hook, Vegas, London, Paris, Nice, Melbourne, Christchurch, the Norwegian mass shooting, Uvalde, the most recent "terror" attack at the Westfield Mall at Bondi, Sydney - all of these incidents are suspect and most likely contrived hoax events. Often they are disguised as "drills" to the participants - police, emergency services, and so on.
It's incredible how our governments and agencies are allowed to get away with this. There is something deeply rotten about the present world order that relies on lies and phantom terror to function.
It's well documented now if you cared to look deeper that *they* got fed up with doing real bombings, false flags and assassinations due to the sheer number of relatives (particularly mothers) who would not give up trying to find out the truth. The case of the mothers in Argentina (made famous but the Sting song being a case in point). So they moved to using paid Crisis actors once they had complete control of the mainstream media and could basically sell a story any way they liked. As for why they do it? If you have to ask that, you are clearly not paying attention.
I think the next one to be questioned is the TV Doctor Michael moseley who goes walking alone in 40 degree heat, dressed in black and not taking any water with him. Has anyone got suspicions?
I do not believe in the hoax theory but fully support Richard's work 100%. He should be allowed to question these narratives. Even if his conclusions are ultimately proven wrong, any and all such questions asked should be answered by counter arguments backed up with evidence. Not by performative 'doorstepping', public shaming & spurious court cases.
But there is no evidence they can provide, as Richard’s evidence proves. Because it couldn’t have been a bomb that blew up the lobby and the merchandise stand, so how can they provide evidence that it did?... When there’s evidence that it didn’t.
I guess since no mention has been made about Eve, that it's accepted that she's the same young lady who was photographed with MH in the nearby restaurant before the concert? If so I wonder how she became disabled. Anyone know?
Breivik attack in Norway 22nd July- Russian attack 22nd March this year, the Glasgow helicopter crash into a bar officially recorded as 22:22 hours on 19/11/13; it is stated that 22 US vets per day kill themselves etc etc - and so it goes. And not forgetting Armistice day is the 11 hour of the 11 month - and equals... Very powerful manifestation numbers and the overlords know it.
Coincidentally the most dramatic phoney Canadian shooting near and inside the Parliament in Ottawa occurred on October !22!, 2014. Perhaps death was actually involved, but the narrative was essentially comedic from start to finish. For example, vigorously pumping the chest of a soldier who had been shot twice in the back with a rifle seemed as if it would do him more harm than good. The posed photos of laughing police officers scanning the tops of buildings were inconsistent with the purported gravity of the situation. However, the best part of the show was when the Sergeant-at-Arms paraded down a corridor waving a gun and declaring that he had neutralized the shooter. Our "national broadcaster" (CBC) reported a "scoop" description of how this "went down"; to wit, the patently out of shape Sergeant-at-Arms dove, Dirty-Harry-style, through the air in front of the alcove where the shooter (who already had reportedly been shot while entering the building) was hiding and, in mid-air, emptied the clip of his 9-mm pistol into him. However, this wasn't enough immobilization for the police, four of whom stalked openly down the corridor in a bizarre equidistant formation and proceeded to blast the perp's body with (so the coroner apparently reported) another 31 bullets. Nobody seemed to think that, considering his at least shot-up condition, it might be sensible to subdue the perp, say with knock-out gas. After all, he was pinned by a small army in a tiny alcove with no possibility of escape--especially if he was already dead.
It's maddening that the "authorities" play these charades with the public, but also, when they botch them very badly, somehow a bit endearing. The Manchester fiasco shows that the illusion-creating abilities of the Canucks and the Brits are comparable. But, because it would topple the Establishment of which he/she is gratefully a part, no judge is going to rule that such events are fraudulent.
Richard will lose the case, it was decided before it took place, and ironside wouldn't have risked it if it wasn't.. Not that i believe Richard should lose the case of course. I can't fault his documentary and clearly a powerful wet fart going off would have caused far more damage than the so called bomb that day . I know this for a fact after drinking a pint of prune juice the other morning! The courts are corrupted to death, but only when it matters to the real rulers of this country. All other times courts are left to chance and luck and of course the mental state of our Judges and their mood at the time. I have experienced courts since a child over 60 years ago. Put in care etc, moved on to borstal and prisons as a young adult. In later life i have 'witnessed cases' in the high court and Southwark Crown Court. Where the dishonesty and corruption really did beggar belief. It's hard for the 'normie' public to accept just how bent the courts are. It takes a lifetime and many hard knocks to prepare you and give you true vision. They will try and bust Richard and then they will move in for the kill.. But even if they do, it can't take away what he has already done on Rich Planet. A credit to him, even if you don't believe a lot of his stuff. He is a brave man and obviously you are by adding to the story. I used to write on symbolism myself quite a while back, which I linked my stuff to emotions etc, and believe me there was plenty of stuff on show in this event. From the artist to the bees and far beyond. I believe Richard is a good man. I wish him well. E M Delooze
We know the standards that are being applied to Richard D Hall as an independent journalist are not and will not be applied to the main stream journalists . The actions of Marianna Spring in sending many emails to Richard and door stepping him after he had informed them he did not wish to be contacted. Is a far more obvious case of harassment.
I am reminded of the case of Brenda Leyland who was door stepped by a Sky reporter and publicly shamed in the media. She committed suicide as a result "Jonathan Levy, senior manager at Sky News, said the approach was in line with the broadcaster’s guidelines on doorstepping: deemed to be warranted when public good outweighed intrusion, and as long as the method was proportionate."
"The team at Sky News followed its editorial guidelines and pursued a story in a responsible manner that we believed was firmly in the public interest.”"
What harm does Martin Hibbert claim he suffered by encountering Richards work.
Martin has said he was first told about it and only after a time did he find out more .
It is not clear if Martin himself watched or read any of Richards work.. Some of his statements indicate more that it is what he has been told. But did not talk until recently of it causing him any distress.
It is said that any corrupt organisation arranges rules to protect itself. Like most rules it is more the threat than reality. But occasionally a high profile enforcement is required to maintain the fear and thus self policing that the rules intend.
The Jo Cox video was well done too. No way it went down the way they said.
Yes, indeed: another clear set up.
I'd love to know if she's still alive and enjoying herself in another country.
Yup, reckon she was under Milliband to take one for the team and do one.
https://youtu.be/PxqhU6nEy6c?feature=shared
I wonder what happened to poor Tommy Mair. What a sweet man he seems to be. So disturbing, really haunting, to remember seeing the footage of him walking in his cheerful way to what he thought would be a gardening job, then later being jumped and manhandled like that by the police. 😞
Indeed. The guy in court was not even him.
How do we know he's "a sweet man"? In my view he's complicit in a massive psy-op against the British people and I don't want to live in a society based on mass manipulation. We need and deserve and open and democratic society. Shame on Mair for participating in this fraud.
What evidence formed your view?
Richard Hall covered this in an episode of Richplanet where he revealed that the day before the Jo Cox incident neighbours reporting Tommy Mair taking a carrier bag full of photos to his mother's house. (The inference being that he knew he was going away somewhere to live incognito and would not be seeing her in the future). Also postmarks from correspondence received by Hall and others from Mair show Northumberland rather than Durham (which would be the case if he was replying from HMP Durham). Hall concluded that Mair was a willing participant in this faked event and was possibly living in isolation in Scotland. I'm sure you can find the relevant episode of Richplanet which covers these revelations.
I knew from the first moment I saw that Story breaking, it was a false flag
It's fairly apparent that the Manchester false flag hoax "bombing" is just one in a long series of such hoaxes by the Intel agencies or "deep state" actors. In case anyone here hasn't heard of him, Ole Dammegard is the main man on these types of events and he's done numerous podcast interviews, written books, etc. about his research into them. Manchester, Boston, Sandy Hook, Vegas, London, Paris, Nice, Melbourne, Christchurch, the Norwegian mass shooting, Uvalde, the most recent "terror" attack at the Westfield Mall at Bondi, Sydney - all of these incidents are suspect and most likely contrived hoax events. Often they are disguised as "drills" to the participants - police, emergency services, and so on.
It's incredible how our governments and agencies are allowed to get away with this. There is something deeply rotten about the present world order that relies on lies and phantom terror to function.
I remember the Brendan Leyland story. She was raising perfectly legitimate questions about Maddie McCann's disappearance, I recall.
No words are adequate, to express the contempt I feel for pond-life like that Sky reporter and his bosses.
Needless to say, in comparison with Richard's plight, the hypocrisy is off the charts!
Thanks again, Iain.
Richard's trial is just about as compellingly relevant as it's possible to imagine.
So many fundamental issues are tied up in this case.
Did it finish today then, Friday 26th?
I hardly dare believe there's been a favourable outcome.
It's well documented now if you cared to look deeper that *they* got fed up with doing real bombings, false flags and assassinations due to the sheer number of relatives (particularly mothers) who would not give up trying to find out the truth. The case of the mothers in Argentina (made famous but the Sting song being a case in point). So they moved to using paid Crisis actors once they had complete control of the mainstream media and could basically sell a story any way they liked. As for why they do it? If you have to ask that, you are clearly not paying attention.
I think the next one to be questioned is the TV Doctor Michael moseley who goes walking alone in 40 degree heat, dressed in black and not taking any water with him. Has anyone got suspicions?
For what purposes might that have been fabricated? I can't see any.
MiriAF has a good theory. She’s so often proved right.
Great work Iain. 🙏🏻.
Iain, check out David Whelan’s work if you think Mark Chapman assassinated John Lennon.
I do not believe in the hoax theory but fully support Richard's work 100%. He should be allowed to question these narratives. Even if his conclusions are ultimately proven wrong, any and all such questions asked should be answered by counter arguments backed up with evidence. Not by performative 'doorstepping', public shaming & spurious court cases.
But there is no evidence they can provide, as Richard’s evidence proves. Because it couldn’t have been a bomb that blew up the lobby and the merchandise stand, so how can they provide evidence that it did?... When there’s evidence that it didn’t.
I guess since no mention has been made about Eve, that it's accepted that she's the same young lady who was photographed with MH in the nearby restaurant before the concert? If so I wonder how she became disabled. Anyone know?
Started on the 22nd, did it? Methinks they have some pathology going on with that number.
Indeed. If memeory serves didn't Hibbert himself have 22 shrapnel wounds?
I believe so. Good call.
Breivik attack in Norway 22nd July- Russian attack 22nd March this year, the Glasgow helicopter crash into a bar officially recorded as 22:22 hours on 19/11/13; it is stated that 22 US vets per day kill themselves etc etc - and so it goes. And not forgetting Armistice day is the 11 hour of the 11 month - and equals... Very powerful manifestation numbers and the overlords know it.
Or simply a calling card for those on the inside? A numerical wink.
All adds up to the fact that 'they are fucking with us'
22 is a "master number" of occult significance. Also the Yale secret society Skull and Bones is Order 322 - think George Bush and many others.
Coincidentally the most dramatic phoney Canadian shooting near and inside the Parliament in Ottawa occurred on October !22!, 2014. Perhaps death was actually involved, but the narrative was essentially comedic from start to finish. For example, vigorously pumping the chest of a soldier who had been shot twice in the back with a rifle seemed as if it would do him more harm than good. The posed photos of laughing police officers scanning the tops of buildings were inconsistent with the purported gravity of the situation. However, the best part of the show was when the Sergeant-at-Arms paraded down a corridor waving a gun and declaring that he had neutralized the shooter. Our "national broadcaster" (CBC) reported a "scoop" description of how this "went down"; to wit, the patently out of shape Sergeant-at-Arms dove, Dirty-Harry-style, through the air in front of the alcove where the shooter (who already had reportedly been shot while entering the building) was hiding and, in mid-air, emptied the clip of his 9-mm pistol into him. However, this wasn't enough immobilization for the police, four of whom stalked openly down the corridor in a bizarre equidistant formation and proceeded to blast the perp's body with (so the coroner apparently reported) another 31 bullets. Nobody seemed to think that, considering his at least shot-up condition, it might be sensible to subdue the perp, say with knock-out gas. After all, he was pinned by a small army in a tiny alcove with no possibility of escape--especially if he was already dead.
It's maddening that the "authorities" play these charades with the public, but also, when they botch them very badly, somehow a bit endearing. The Manchester fiasco shows that the illusion-creating abilities of the Canucks and the Brits are comparable. But, because it would topple the Establishment of which he/she is gratefully a part, no judge is going to rule that such events are fraudulent.
If you pitched that to a producer, they'd tell you to f off! Which is the point...
HARM is also an anagram of MHRA.
MHRA: "enablers", not regulators, according Dame June Raine (Rain Doom Jane).
*to
Richard Dee, he,s the man for me.
Richard will lose the case, it was decided before it took place, and ironside wouldn't have risked it if it wasn't.. Not that i believe Richard should lose the case of course. I can't fault his documentary and clearly a powerful wet fart going off would have caused far more damage than the so called bomb that day . I know this for a fact after drinking a pint of prune juice the other morning! The courts are corrupted to death, but only when it matters to the real rulers of this country. All other times courts are left to chance and luck and of course the mental state of our Judges and their mood at the time. I have experienced courts since a child over 60 years ago. Put in care etc, moved on to borstal and prisons as a young adult. In later life i have 'witnessed cases' in the high court and Southwark Crown Court. Where the dishonesty and corruption really did beggar belief. It's hard for the 'normie' public to accept just how bent the courts are. It takes a lifetime and many hard knocks to prepare you and give you true vision. They will try and bust Richard and then they will move in for the kill.. But even if they do, it can't take away what he has already done on Rich Planet. A credit to him, even if you don't believe a lot of his stuff. He is a brave man and obviously you are by adding to the story. I used to write on symbolism myself quite a while back, which I linked my stuff to emotions etc, and believe me there was plenty of stuff on show in this event. From the artist to the bees and far beyond. I believe Richard is a good man. I wish him well. E M Delooze
“ Freedom of speech and the right to express a genuinely held opinion ”
I’d take it further than you and have any opinion I want and stop there. Why must I have to prove that it is genuinely held?
Yes, how can anyone prove their opinions are genuine? I don't even know myself, some of the time!
They want to put people in a defensive position, and this kind of speculative 'analysis' can be used for this purpose against targeted individuals.
This is why my response is always, “I do not have to defend my rights. You have to justify taking them away.”