Nice one, Iain - loads of pertinent stuff in that one!
This bit sparks a question in my mind (capitalisation of 'SCREENING' is mine);
'For events where more than 800 people attend, enhanced “invacuation”—entry—security will be imposed. This will include, but is not limited to, “comprehensive security systems,” “searching and SCREENING individuals,” and behaviour monitoring, etc. Martyn’s Law will certainly help the Establishment corral us into accepting Digital ID. '
I wonder what that means?
Is the idea that large venues are going to have to submit ticket sales lists to some sort of agency who will run them against databases of 'persons of interest' or similar?
If so, the Manchester Arena event would be a poor case to use for such a measure, as Abedi didn't attempt to gain entry to the main arena, and the 'bang' occurred in a space which was NOT within the supposed bag search & ticket-entry area.
I also wonder (and have wondered before), if the fairly constant hammering here of the 'Eve doesn't exist' theory has some sort of ulterior intention?
Perhaps people are being baited into suggesting that (and this is CERTAINLY NOT what I would suggest!) people should go and further surveil her mother's home, or anywhere else where it's possible Eve might be?
I repeat, just to be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR, that I DON'T think this would be appropriate, for several reasons.
Firstly, it would risk the person who did it ending up in court for criminal harassment, or similar offence - especially given the precedent which is being set through Richard's case.
Second, it would almost certainly be leapt on by the State as evidence that Richard's investigation & work 'encouraged his followers' to carry out such activities.
Thirdly, without actually capturing video of Eve, even if they reported what they saw to people on the internet (or anywhere), it would just be more hearsay. And if video WAS captured, it would likely be used as evidence against the person who captured it of some sort of crime - possibly even leading to jail time if they managed to make a criminal harassment charge stick. (and we've seen how the injustice system works fairly - incidentally I notice Kemi Badenoch getting quite a bit of fire on twitter for her statement that 'the UK justice system is fair' - that was good to see, that many people are fully aware of this lie!)
Richard has previously made it clear that he is totally against other people who have read/viewed his work, or are associated with him in any way, pursuing such further investigation, as it would be potentially dangerous both for them, for him and for the upcoming fight to prevent the curtailment of future independent investigative journalism.
Of course, knowing how the minds of some people work, what I say above will probably be cited as evidence that I am trying to prevent the alleged mystery of whether Eve Hibbert actually exists or not being further investigated.
There is obviously a 'double bind' of sorts around this particular issue, that without some clear, solid evidence (recent video, for example) that she exists, people will continue to claim that she doesn't (despite several pieces of evidence suggesting she does), and then this will be used to try to prove that the court case against Richard is not 'real', as we have seen constantly here over the course of this year.
And also that if anyone does actually manage to capture & post evidence that Eve truly does exist, it will be probably used against Richard in further lawfare and/or the political move to pass 'Eve's Law', and may well provide another victim for lawfare - any court case against them likely being used to garner public support for such a legal change.
Difficult issue to overcome, either way.
If anyone has any suggestions as to how Eve's existence could be further evidenced, WITHOUT approaching her or being laid open to criticism or lawfare as a result of activity, I would like to hear it.
PROVING she DOESN'T exist would be near impossible, in my opinion, (other than by presumptive interpretation of the existing evidence for her existence, which has been demonstrated here many times to be riddled with logical fallacies), as 'proving a negative' like this is almost always impossible.
Interested in any constructive thoughts on this one.
But obviously be aware that what we write here will almost certainly be being monitored by 'the eyes who spy on everything' (hello lads & ladies - I hope you are very proud of the evil that you do!)
You see, what you have done there Protrue is make the mistake of assuming some sort of logic applies to any of this. Yes Abedi didn't go anywhere near the ticket entry point but that's no reason not to use the stories made up about him to bring in new unconnected legislation.
Yep, Richard has made it very clear that he doesn't support anyone "harassing" anybody, including himself. But that's no reason not to find him guilty of harassment depsite the fact there isn't any evidence of him ever harassing anybody.
As for the contention that Eve Hibbert doesn't exist that is undoubtedly just as illogical as the rest of the whole shit show. So probably fits in quite well somehow.
From my very first observation of photos being posted on twitter (which I regret I didn't download at the time) from about 11pm on 22nd May 2017, which showed the row of doors between the City Room & the concourse from the concourse side which showed all those little windows completely intact & no signs of physical bomb damage to the room (small sections of which were visible through a couple of the open doors), while there were claims being screamed all over the msm & social media of a devastating huge shrapnel explosion causing enormous damage & many, many casualties, I have seen almost nothing in the msm or claimed by the State, it's agents, and more recently the courts and, apparently, many so-called 'researchers' that makes almost ANY logical sense at all.
It often strikes me when I've posted about this event on social media that posting the John Barr video causes a shock of cognitive dissonance to many 'Joe Normies' who are triggered by the emotive msm coverage, and that the conflict between the scene they carry in their mind's eye and the scene as portrayed in the Barr video are totally at odds.
I've encountered a range of reactions to that dissonance - denial & anger, generally, but also occasionally I see a seed of doubt planted which may develop.
It's one of the reasons I continue to post about Manchester Arena - it's a great vehicle for opening people's eyes to the corruption of the State & the constant toxic soup of lies which is pumped out by the BBC, et al.
What has been EXTREMELY disappointing (and maybe tells several tales, in itself) is that the so-called 'alternative media' have been so reluctant to focus on Richard's case, the credible & pertinent research into the Manchester Arena event, and, now, what will be a political fight (against Eve's Law), which will seriously affect the ability of 'alt media' to conduct investigative journalism of any kind.
I hope I made it clear in the piece that I share your frustration about some of the alleged "independent media" in the UK. It infuriates me that they not only haven't bothered to report the evidence showing a domestic false flag in the UK but have sat idly by allowing the state to rollout horrendous censorship rulings with barely a murmer of dissent.
Believe me, I have been trying to point out how incredibly important this case was to some of those voices since Hall was first made aware of the claim. Nothing, nada, zilch came in response. Frankly, my frustration has turned into a suspicion. I do not trust the motives of these outlets at all.
I was a paid up member of uk column until August 2024 when my subs became due and I chose not to renew over this very issue. Before it expired, I made one last attempt to contact Mike Robinson to ask his reasons for the complete silence on the Hibbert v Hall trial. It seemed weird because he and Ben Rubin were both keen to cover the Summary Judgement case in January, and they discussed the unprecedented legal implications for Independent Media. Mike was pleased when Richard joined the chat box around that time, but after that something seemed to change. They didn't even give viewers a heads up about the dates of the Summary Judgement appeal or the trial. Anyway, needless to say that I didn't get a reply from Mike. I broached the subject on the forum and a few others felt the same way, but our strength of feeling was never going to make a difference to U K Column editorial decision on this.
Quite a few people, including myself, encouraged UKC to closely cover this case but, beyond a couple of quite brief articles, they almost completely failed to do so.
It stank, considering they must know the implications of this legal precedent and how it's likely to be used to prevent independent journalists conducting investigations into future events.
They also appeared to be sceptical that false flag and/or hoax terror events have ever been conducted in the UK, when the evidence for this is (in my opinion) now incontrovertible.
I'm frankly disgusted with Mike over this, and other editorial decisions.
Protrue said: "I'm frankly disgusted with Mike over this, and other editorial decisions. I could go on, but it's probably best I don't!"
My feelings exactly. Must admit to being suckered-in to UKC at the start of Covid, and I was an avid follower during those weird times, but the scales fell from my eyes when Patrick Henningsen disappeared. It was obvious there'd been a serious bust-up behind the scenes, but his permanent departure was never even acknowledged by Mike or Brian. Many members were naturally asking questions on the forum because we missed him. The thread ran for a couple of weeks with more and more people expressing concern about Patrick, wanting to know what had happened and whether he'd be back. Mike finally muscled in and yelled at us to stop asking questions, it was none of our business, and he shut down the thread.
Of the 5 images available of EVE on the net & relatively easy to find- 2 are obvious & proven constructs, 2 are the restaurant images & one is as a child with make up smeared on her pre nubile features. Only some sort of mental cripple, or gullible tool, would imagine she 'actually exists as depicted'. The are no convincing images of EVE with either parent, & so far none have been published throughout her entire life ! She & her friends are the only children in the UK who never take photos of each other or selfies... as if.
You are so busy entertaining elitist poseurs like the proven STALKER PROLIES , aka- 'From Another World (Britain)' account, ignoring valid views of feisty commentators such as the DubSurgeOn work & missing important connections such as Judge Karen Stains family that your credibility is becoming increasingly restricted Iain, soon your status will be comparable to other moderate shills on substack... & there is already an excess of them clamouring for our attention & valuable time.
Being founded on the fallacious notion that a 33kg bomb exploded at the event, Dame Steyn's 'blueprint' is, in truth, a lawful and logical nullity. It needs to be rejected as the piece of excrement it is.
I looked at your video where you suggested the judgment could be 'declared void'.
I had a quick look into that idea, and this is apparently only possible where a 'procedural irregularity' has occurred.
Maybe I'm mistaken about that, but I don't think so.
I am not aware of any such 'procedural irregularity' having occurred during the case.
The only thing that is blatantly 'irregular' is that Steyn's judgment basically ignores the evidence presented.
But they appeared to stick to 'procedures' in the actual conducting of the trial.
It's all corrupt, of course, but can you see a way a 'procedural irregularity' could be cited, in order to request a voiding of the judgment?
Just saying 'the judge ignored the evidence' just isn't going to do it.
Sorry.
So the appeal process to higher courts (if neccessary, all the way up to the ECHR, given that the likelihood would be that EVERY UK court would be just as corrupt as the High Court) would appear to be the only course of action open.
Prolie , you are proven wrong almost every time you affirm anything!
''I would dearly love to be proven wrong though.''
Another classic brain strain anal eruption from you !
Now, tell us all why 'vocabullaryless' is a word you use instead of inarticulate... & how did BRAT become this years new trendy word for the academics?
It's so funny that you picked up the word I invented, to show your limited lexicon.
It's perfectly acceptable in English to add the suffix '-less' to a noun or many adjectives to create a new word to describe the absence of that thing.
I found the word 'vocabularyless' rolled off my tongue quite satisfyingly, so used it to describe how you repeat the same few insults endlessly.
That you've then obsessed about that very word just further demonstrates how thick you really are. :-)
And you've 'proven' NOTHING, EVER! (other than that you are clearly a sociopath).
Iain May I thank you for defending Richard in his attempts to expose the corruption and deceit which emanate not only from the Government but the Judiciary as well.
The most harrowing fact about all of this is not only are the Lamestream Media Outlets Aiding and Abetting the aforementioned so are Alternative Media Outlets.
Over to you UK Column, Unity News, The Light etc,etc.
Richard should bring a counter plaint against the BBC and Mariana Spring for harassment...and we should crowd fund it.
This is one of many places where we should and can resist the establishment, resist the manipulation of the law for political purposes.
I feel we must do this before the door of opportunity closes on us all.
Democracy is not at all perfect. It simply doesn't exist without freedom of speech and journalism. 17% of the voting population established this government. This makes a mockery of democracy. Effectively a vote of no confidence from the vast majority.
If we don't succeed in the courts..... I have some excellent, reasonably priced pitch forks for sale if anyone's interested 😁
Richard D. Hall could have simply ignored this nonsensical claim and watched from afar as the legal process ground on to its inevitable conclusion. But, being the smart guy that he is, he probably hoped that any publicity the case received would alert the general public to the reality behind the so-called Manchester bombing. So he chose to defend himself in court and thereby, as Iain Davis rightly states, wrongfooted the Establishment.
Maybe a few people are asking the right questions as a result of learning about this case? Maybe something has started that will only grow and grow? Time will tell.
Personally I would love to see Richard D. Hall return to exposing the many other lies being perpetrated on the people. But he has done his bit - more than done his bit I would say. So who could blame him if he now decides to call it a day?
Many seeds have been planted, many eyes have been opened and, in the light of Richard's solid defence, the kangaroo show trial judgment just further exposes the corruption of State organs, and highlighted that Fibbert was unable to produce evidence to back his story, which confirms what many thought - that he & Eve were not there that night.
This fight (and others) will continue, no matter what.
It has occurred to me that the establishment is binding Richard D Hall in this labyrinth of lawfare for another reason, so far unstated.
The establishment intends further faked events which must be accepted as real by the public. Engaging Richard, yourself and other astute citizen journalists with this fiasco discourages or even prevents us from working on exposing them when they happen.
They are wearing us down because they cannot produce air-tight faked events because they have to use actors and amateurs who invariably slip up.
What we euphemistically call the 'establishment' is under orders from a global criminal syndicate and there is a timetable and an international plan underway. I think I know what that plan is:
'They' have a transitional 'Reset' plan, and we know some of the major narratives that are likely to be played. The timings are more difficult to predict though.
That stuff you posted on your page about GAP/CORE division of the world is something I hadn't seen before, but I can see reasons why that could be the plan - it also fits with other known agendas like '30 by 30' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_by_30, which appears to be another depopulation / rewilding / landgrab process.
Among the narratives I expect to see played in the next 5 years or so are WW3, probably climaxing in a 'limited nuclear exchange' (which could be real or perhaps simulated in some way), the 'Cyberpandemic' that Schwab promised us (which, again, could well be a kind of 'fake flag' event, but blamed on Russia, Iran, China, or whatever bogeyman du jour), a widescale avian flu pandemic or possibly something like Marburg or a biowarfare attack (the exact truth of which could be as difficult to prove as covid has been - we're still arguing over whether there really was a pathogen, it was an aerial sprayed chemical toxin, it was just a nasty flu season, something else like microwave radiation, or any or all of the above - They do 'plausible deniability' so well when They want to!), and probably also a lot more unnatural/natural disasters (like earthquakes, tsunamis & weather events).
There's also the solar maximum coming up, and magnetic pole shift appears to be a real possibility too - it's all going on, innit!
We know They want to vastly reduce the human population ASAP.
We know They want to re-engineer what they keep of the herd into kind of 'borg slaves'.
And we know They will be utterly ruthless and devious in how They will go about all this.
I think you're right that we're fighting a kind of war of attrition where we're under attack from many, many different directions and types of warfare simultaneously, and that the intention is that we are being steadily ground down, divided, undermined & psychologically/spiritually degraded.
Much of what is being done is almost purely to try to invoke fear & despair, and events like Manchester, and now where Richard is being lawfared for daring to put his name to exposing it, are such an assault.
We must remain vigilant, and try to keep our focus on what's important as events occur.
Some, like the Trump 'assassination attempt' seem to be largely distractions - they really don't matter in the bigger scheme, but they are able to suck up a huge amount of our energy if we let them.
Sometimes it's difficult to know where to direct energy, and the 'truth & freedom movement' (for want of a better term) is frankly now a shambles.
It did some fairly strong work though in knocking down the covid narrative, and I would say we won that battle (in terms of preventing mandatory jabs & vax passports, if nothing else), although the damage from the shots that people took has been appalling, & will have caused millions of casualties.
But it's also opened many peoples eyes - far more, I think, than They planned for.
It's my own suspicion that the 'Cyberpandemic' will be the next major narrative, and I have a feeling about next Spring Equinox (the Ides on 15th is a big financial settlement date, then 20th is the Equinox, then 22nd is '322', the 'Skull & Bones Lodge date' when They seem to like to kill a load of people) - halfway to 2030, and the covid narrative was (according to the SPARS modelling exercise) supposed to continue full-on until 2025. Also there are many critical path deadlines, such as for the mass roll out of Digital ID, the infrastructure for CBDC systems, and multiple new legal statutes, to be in place 'BY 2025'.
So if They start switching bits of the old system off (and blaming the Russians or whoever), the new systems are there ready to switch people onto.
'Ordo ab chao' is one of Their mottos, of course.
I'm always hesitant to make solid predictions, so I'm not - I just see there being a load of pieces on the board in positions where that move could occur at that time.
And if/when that occurs, it will be a huge crisis for the Normies who are totally dependent on those systems for their daily bread & circuses.
It was only when They switched off the football that my neighbours here started to panic, in March 2020!
So They know exactly how to 'get their attention' (as Billy Goats might say).
It's difficult to know how to frontrun such an event, but the predictive priming has gone out in the form of the movie last year (co-produced by the Obamas) 'Leave the World Behind', and a 2022 Channel 4 dramamentary series called 'The Undeclared War' - both of which portray possible scenarios from a large scale cyberattack event.
So, many people will have been implanted with ideas which may lead to them falling for another 'pseudo-crisis' like covid was, in a similar way to how the movie 'Contagion' appeared to be used to freak out half the planet while 24/7 propaganda constructed the illusion that covid really was a 'killer plague'.
If this is the case, and such a cyber-event is massively overblown by clever psychological warfare techniques, those of us with some experience in dissecting these big events may be able to play a crucial part in derailing or negating some of the worst effects.
I would also be wary of 'snatch squads' rounding up potential 'troublemakers' during any period of chaos when communications systems may be down - much dark stuff may occur while the lights are off!
I know, from personal experience, that 'the Butterfly Effect' CAN be used consciously sometimes, when one identifies the right place and time to waft ones wings in just the right direction.
We just need to keep our wits about us, and our wings strong & ready to flap like hell when needed!
Wing wafting is an essential skill! Thanks a lot for taking the time to read my work and comment so comprehensively. I agree with every point you make and foresee a quickening pace of totalitarian brutality ahead. I certainly do not underestimate the determination of our enemy.
Francis you are my enemy, I genuinely hate you for your fear mongering & blind arrogance.. the naive or malicious promotion of Nuclear threat scenarios & evasion of taking the ideas of Freud seriously, resulting in a cowering & ignorant fanbase you've amassed.
So if it was a choice between the oppressive shits we have now, or YOU I wouldn't could chose either of you as allies.
So who are you really fighting for Francis..yourself, or a diverse population that will probably resent you & what you keep promoting?
Francis Leader is so dim witted & decrepit that she here perpetrates the idea that a Labyrinth is akin to a MAZE !!! You can't get lost in a labyrinth Francis , it is a type of psychic machinery /psychogeographical device, devised to stimulate internal senses with its windings .
''A labyrinth typically consists of a single, winding path that leads to a central point and then back out again, symbolizing a journey of self-discovery or spiritual enlightenment''.
No wonder she's so deluded & deranged about so much when basic forms have become confabulated in her bigoted imagination.
Excellent extrapolation of the motives of the Establishment that lie behind all of these false flag events. In Australia, Port Arthur and the poor patsy, Martin Bryant = tougher gun laws; Lindt Chocolate Factory = tougher anti-terrorism laws; Bourke Street Mall = heightened surveillance networks, and I could go on and on.
If only the general public had the ability to step out of their (engineered) state of fear for one moment and see how each of these ‘events’ has, over a long period of time, stripped them of more of their freedoms, leading right up to the massive hoax/false flag that was Convid.
"“Lawfare” is defined as “the use of legal action to cause problems for an opponent.” It is the illegitimate use of claimed legal authority to persecute and punish those who challenge power."
That is very correct Iain. Frédéric Bastiat called it Legal Plunder so we must always refer to Lawfare as an act of Legal Plunder
Iain May I thank you for defending Richard in his attempts to expose the corruption and deceit which emanate not only from the Government but the Judiciary as well.
The most harrowing fact about all of this is not only are the Lamestream Media Outlets Aiding and Abetting the aforementioned so are Alternative Media Outlets.
Over to you UK Column, Unity News, The Light etc,etc.
Another spot on article Iain. Having worked in housing I've been involved in a few Protection from Harassment cases. The thing that struck me about this case is that at the very worse there was one incident of harassment but zero evidence of sustained harassment. On that basis alone the decision is surely challengeable and unlikely to be upheld.
Are you aware of the sublimated linguistic racism such expressions expose?
Only petty fascist twats , such as Prolies here, would justify such lazy thinking & cliched jargon.. let's see if it wades in being a moron again about this?
Nice one, Iain - loads of pertinent stuff in that one!
This bit sparks a question in my mind (capitalisation of 'SCREENING' is mine);
'For events where more than 800 people attend, enhanced “invacuation”—entry—security will be imposed. This will include, but is not limited to, “comprehensive security systems,” “searching and SCREENING individuals,” and behaviour monitoring, etc. Martyn’s Law will certainly help the Establishment corral us into accepting Digital ID. '
I wonder what that means?
Is the idea that large venues are going to have to submit ticket sales lists to some sort of agency who will run them against databases of 'persons of interest' or similar?
If so, the Manchester Arena event would be a poor case to use for such a measure, as Abedi didn't attempt to gain entry to the main arena, and the 'bang' occurred in a space which was NOT within the supposed bag search & ticket-entry area.
I also wonder (and have wondered before), if the fairly constant hammering here of the 'Eve doesn't exist' theory has some sort of ulterior intention?
Perhaps people are being baited into suggesting that (and this is CERTAINLY NOT what I would suggest!) people should go and further surveil her mother's home, or anywhere else where it's possible Eve might be?
I repeat, just to be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR, that I DON'T think this would be appropriate, for several reasons.
Firstly, it would risk the person who did it ending up in court for criminal harassment, or similar offence - especially given the precedent which is being set through Richard's case.
Second, it would almost certainly be leapt on by the State as evidence that Richard's investigation & work 'encouraged his followers' to carry out such activities.
Thirdly, without actually capturing video of Eve, even if they reported what they saw to people on the internet (or anywhere), it would just be more hearsay. And if video WAS captured, it would likely be used as evidence against the person who captured it of some sort of crime - possibly even leading to jail time if they managed to make a criminal harassment charge stick. (and we've seen how the injustice system works fairly - incidentally I notice Kemi Badenoch getting quite a bit of fire on twitter for her statement that 'the UK justice system is fair' - that was good to see, that many people are fully aware of this lie!)
Richard has previously made it clear that he is totally against other people who have read/viewed his work, or are associated with him in any way, pursuing such further investigation, as it would be potentially dangerous both for them, for him and for the upcoming fight to prevent the curtailment of future independent investigative journalism.
Of course, knowing how the minds of some people work, what I say above will probably be cited as evidence that I am trying to prevent the alleged mystery of whether Eve Hibbert actually exists or not being further investigated.
There is obviously a 'double bind' of sorts around this particular issue, that without some clear, solid evidence (recent video, for example) that she exists, people will continue to claim that she doesn't (despite several pieces of evidence suggesting she does), and then this will be used to try to prove that the court case against Richard is not 'real', as we have seen constantly here over the course of this year.
And also that if anyone does actually manage to capture & post evidence that Eve truly does exist, it will be probably used against Richard in further lawfare and/or the political move to pass 'Eve's Law', and may well provide another victim for lawfare - any court case against them likely being used to garner public support for such a legal change.
Difficult issue to overcome, either way.
If anyone has any suggestions as to how Eve's existence could be further evidenced, WITHOUT approaching her or being laid open to criticism or lawfare as a result of activity, I would like to hear it.
PROVING she DOESN'T exist would be near impossible, in my opinion, (other than by presumptive interpretation of the existing evidence for her existence, which has been demonstrated here many times to be riddled with logical fallacies), as 'proving a negative' like this is almost always impossible.
Interested in any constructive thoughts on this one.
But obviously be aware that what we write here will almost certainly be being monitored by 'the eyes who spy on everything' (hello lads & ladies - I hope you are very proud of the evil that you do!)
Cheers again, Iain.
You see, what you have done there Protrue is make the mistake of assuming some sort of logic applies to any of this. Yes Abedi didn't go anywhere near the ticket entry point but that's no reason not to use the stories made up about him to bring in new unconnected legislation.
Yep, Richard has made it very clear that he doesn't support anyone "harassing" anybody, including himself. But that's no reason not to find him guilty of harassment depsite the fact there isn't any evidence of him ever harassing anybody.
As for the contention that Eve Hibbert doesn't exist that is undoubtedly just as illogical as the rest of the whole shit show. So probably fits in quite well somehow.
Do you see what I mean?
I see EXACTLY what you mean, and totally agree.
From my very first observation of photos being posted on twitter (which I regret I didn't download at the time) from about 11pm on 22nd May 2017, which showed the row of doors between the City Room & the concourse from the concourse side which showed all those little windows completely intact & no signs of physical bomb damage to the room (small sections of which were visible through a couple of the open doors), while there were claims being screamed all over the msm & social media of a devastating huge shrapnel explosion causing enormous damage & many, many casualties, I have seen almost nothing in the msm or claimed by the State, it's agents, and more recently the courts and, apparently, many so-called 'researchers' that makes almost ANY logical sense at all.
It often strikes me when I've posted about this event on social media that posting the John Barr video causes a shock of cognitive dissonance to many 'Joe Normies' who are triggered by the emotive msm coverage, and that the conflict between the scene they carry in their mind's eye and the scene as portrayed in the Barr video are totally at odds.
I've encountered a range of reactions to that dissonance - denial & anger, generally, but also occasionally I see a seed of doubt planted which may develop.
It's one of the reasons I continue to post about Manchester Arena - it's a great vehicle for opening people's eyes to the corruption of the State & the constant toxic soup of lies which is pumped out by the BBC, et al.
What has been EXTREMELY disappointing (and maybe tells several tales, in itself) is that the so-called 'alternative media' have been so reluctant to focus on Richard's case, the credible & pertinent research into the Manchester Arena event, and, now, what will be a political fight (against Eve's Law), which will seriously affect the ability of 'alt media' to conduct investigative journalism of any kind.
Again, highly illogical, Captain! (to quote Mr Spock)
I hope I made it clear in the piece that I share your frustration about some of the alleged "independent media" in the UK. It infuriates me that they not only haven't bothered to report the evidence showing a domestic false flag in the UK but have sat idly by allowing the state to rollout horrendous censorship rulings with barely a murmer of dissent.
Believe me, I have been trying to point out how incredibly important this case was to some of those voices since Hall was first made aware of the claim. Nothing, nada, zilch came in response. Frankly, my frustration has turned into a suspicion. I do not trust the motives of these outlets at all.
I was a paid up member of uk column until August 2024 when my subs became due and I chose not to renew over this very issue. Before it expired, I made one last attempt to contact Mike Robinson to ask his reasons for the complete silence on the Hibbert v Hall trial. It seemed weird because he and Ben Rubin were both keen to cover the Summary Judgement case in January, and they discussed the unprecedented legal implications for Independent Media. Mike was pleased when Richard joined the chat box around that time, but after that something seemed to change. They didn't even give viewers a heads up about the dates of the Summary Judgement appeal or the trial. Anyway, needless to say that I didn't get a reply from Mike. I broached the subject on the forum and a few others felt the same way, but our strength of feeling was never going to make a difference to U K Column editorial decision on this.
Quite a few people, including myself, encouraged UKC to closely cover this case but, beyond a couple of quite brief articles, they almost completely failed to do so.
It stank, considering they must know the implications of this legal precedent and how it's likely to be used to prevent independent journalists conducting investigations into future events.
They also appeared to be sceptical that false flag and/or hoax terror events have ever been conducted in the UK, when the evidence for this is (in my opinion) now incontrovertible.
I'm frankly disgusted with Mike over this, and other editorial decisions.
I could go on, but it's probably best I don't!
With all respect, but have you examined whether or not UKC `s remit is actually what it seems?
Have you heard of DrJudy Wood ,authoress of "Where Did The Towers Go?"
She showed scientific factual evidence as to the "how" behind 911. after being approached ,Gerrish finally ran from her work ...?
(see Checktheevidence .com).
Sadly, like all "gate-keepers", they cannot be trusted.
P.S. Have the UKC ever covered impartially ,the the 7/7 , Hill "trial"?
no don't...🙄😂
you lack substance & insight anyway, so it would be just more time vampirism from you Prolies.
Protrue said: "I'm frankly disgusted with Mike over this, and other editorial decisions. I could go on, but it's probably best I don't!"
My feelings exactly. Must admit to being suckered-in to UKC at the start of Covid, and I was an avid follower during those weird times, but the scales fell from my eyes when Patrick Henningsen disappeared. It was obvious there'd been a serious bust-up behind the scenes, but his permanent departure was never even acknowledged by Mike or Brian. Many members were naturally asking questions on the forum because we missed him. The thread ran for a couple of weeks with more and more people expressing concern about Patrick, wanting to know what had happened and whether he'd be back. Mike finally muscled in and yelled at us to stop asking questions, it was none of our business, and he shut down the thread.
I gave up all vestiges of trust in UK Column years ago. I ignore them in the same way that they ignore me.
Ben Rubin certainly isnt jewish is he?
Martin Hibbert doesn't look at all jewish does he?
Ask Mike what happened to the intriguing SWILLIAMSON & if you can watch his face change colour & his coenobite features scrunge like face-ache.
https://uk.pinterest.com/pin/313844667753721563/
Not really interested in your anti-Semitism, Grotbags.
Don't you have a cauldron to stir or something?
You did, I think, but it ought to be strongly highlighted.
Likewise, I've tried to encourage & facilitate coverage of this case on several channels, and their almost deafening silence has perturbed me.
There may be a range of reasons why they've kept their distance from this case but, in my opinion, they are ALL poor excuses!
Proteaus 8 Prolapse aka Prolie aka 'From Another World Britian, aka risable twat stalker clown.....
in regards to your presence & pretence here- 'It's life ...but not as we know it'.
Still pushing the idea there are 8 of me?
AND that I'm Sarah Plumley?
'Stalker'?
You're the one who has just replied to every one of my posts with abuse.
Of the 5 images available of EVE on the net & relatively easy to find- 2 are obvious & proven constructs, 2 are the restaurant images & one is as a child with make up smeared on her pre nubile features. Only some sort of mental cripple, or gullible tool, would imagine she 'actually exists as depicted'. The are no convincing images of EVE with either parent, & so far none have been published throughout her entire life ! She & her friends are the only children in the UK who never take photos of each other or selfies... as if.
You are so busy entertaining elitist poseurs like the proven STALKER PROLIES , aka- 'From Another World (Britain)' account, ignoring valid views of feisty commentators such as the DubSurgeOn work & missing important connections such as Judge Karen Stains family that your credibility is becoming increasingly restricted Iain, soon your status will be comparable to other moderate shills on substack... & there is already an excess of them clamouring for our attention & valuable time.
If your time is valuable, why do you waste it trolling here?
EDIT: Also, I would add, it was me who found the two images on Eve's twitter profile - not you.
And the only argument you are putting is 'those images are all fake', without ANY actual sensible analysis - just 'trust me bro'.
And it's fine, if you believe that - maybe you're right, but I doubt it.
And even if they all are, it STILL doesn't prove she doesn't exist.
You have repeated all of this countless times.
Have you had some sort of breakdown and now you just can't think of anything else to say?
Being founded on the fallacious notion that a 33kg bomb exploded at the event, Dame Steyn's 'blueprint' is, in truth, a lawful and logical nullity. It needs to be rejected as the piece of excrement it is.
Whilst I'm not one to blow my own trumpet, here's the material evidence that I called out the Manchester Arena False Flag for the BS it was at an early stage. https://roguemale.org/2017/06/01/manchester-bombing-collection-anomalies/
Hi Michael.
I looked at your video where you suggested the judgment could be 'declared void'.
I had a quick look into that idea, and this is apparently only possible where a 'procedural irregularity' has occurred.
Maybe I'm mistaken about that, but I don't think so.
I am not aware of any such 'procedural irregularity' having occurred during the case.
The only thing that is blatantly 'irregular' is that Steyn's judgment basically ignores the evidence presented.
But they appeared to stick to 'procedures' in the actual conducting of the trial.
It's all corrupt, of course, but can you see a way a 'procedural irregularity' could be cited, in order to request a voiding of the judgment?
Just saying 'the judge ignored the evidence' just isn't going to do it.
Sorry.
So the appeal process to higher courts (if neccessary, all the way up to the ECHR, given that the likelihood would be that EVERY UK court would be just as corrupt as the High Court) would appear to be the only course of action open.
I would dearly love to be proven wrong though.
Prolie , you are proven wrong almost every time you affirm anything!
''I would dearly love to be proven wrong though.''
Another classic brain strain anal eruption from you !
Now, tell us all why 'vocabullaryless' is a word you use instead of inarticulate... & how did BRAT become this years new trendy word for the academics?
Back to your 'anal' obsession, I see!
It's so funny that you picked up the word I invented, to show your limited lexicon.
It's perfectly acceptable in English to add the suffix '-less' to a noun or many adjectives to create a new word to describe the absence of that thing.
I found the word 'vocabularyless' rolled off my tongue quite satisfyingly, so used it to describe how you repeat the same few insults endlessly.
That you've then obsessed about that very word just further demonstrates how thick you really are. :-)
And you've 'proven' NOTHING, EVER! (other than that you are clearly a sociopath).
Iain May I thank you for defending Richard in his attempts to expose the corruption and deceit which emanate not only from the Government but the Judiciary as well.
The most harrowing fact about all of this is not only are the Lamestream Media Outlets Aiding and Abetting the aforementioned so are Alternative Media Outlets.
Over to you UK Column, Unity News, The Light etc,etc.
A travesty...a show trial..
Richard should bring a counter plaint against the BBC and Mariana Spring for harassment...and we should crowd fund it.
This is one of many places where we should and can resist the establishment, resist the manipulation of the law for political purposes.
I feel we must do this before the door of opportunity closes on us all.
Democracy is not at all perfect. It simply doesn't exist without freedom of speech and journalism. 17% of the voting population established this government. This makes a mockery of democracy. Effectively a vote of no confidence from the vast majority.
If we don't succeed in the courts..... I have some excellent, reasonably priced pitch forks for sale if anyone's interested 😁
I'll bring the torches. ;-)
Prolie will bring the torches!
Any excuse for a witch hunt.. is that a key ring torch you'll bring,
...or did you actually mis-spell the word 'touches' , which is more likely with your molesting & stalking inclinations.
As somebody said on twitter the other night, I'm starting to think of Salem in a slightly more enlightened way these days!
So is this YOUR contribution here?
Trolling, attention seeking & time wasting?
You ARE the 'time vampire' you hate.
Richard D. Hall could have simply ignored this nonsensical claim and watched from afar as the legal process ground on to its inevitable conclusion. But, being the smart guy that he is, he probably hoped that any publicity the case received would alert the general public to the reality behind the so-called Manchester bombing. So he chose to defend himself in court and thereby, as Iain Davis rightly states, wrongfooted the Establishment.
Maybe a few people are asking the right questions as a result of learning about this case? Maybe something has started that will only grow and grow? Time will tell.
Personally I would love to see Richard D. Hall return to exposing the many other lies being perpetrated on the people. But he has done his bit - more than done his bit I would say. So who could blame him if he now decides to call it a day?
Thanks for your support, J.P.
Many seeds have been planted, many eyes have been opened and, in the light of Richard's solid defence, the kangaroo show trial judgment just further exposes the corruption of State organs, and highlighted that Fibbert was unable to produce evidence to back his story, which confirms what many thought - that he & Eve were not there that night.
This fight (and others) will continue, no matter what.
the Prolie rhetoric is excruciating & soooo cliched!
'This fight (and others) will continue, no matter what.'
Go & have a nap Prolapse, no one wants you on their team.
🙄🥱😴
Then why do you read it?
Masochist maybe?
Ole Dammegard on Staged Terror: Manchester, London & more
https://youtu.be/BqMJ8GhZQ7E?si=owo8IjO7ff83pOQn
Worth hearing Ole's take again now, thanks for the reminder!
It has occurred to me that the establishment is binding Richard D Hall in this labyrinth of lawfare for another reason, so far unstated.
The establishment intends further faked events which must be accepted as real by the public. Engaging Richard, yourself and other astute citizen journalists with this fiasco discourages or even prevents us from working on exposing them when they happen.
They are wearing us down because they cannot produce air-tight faked events because they have to use actors and amateurs who invariably slip up.
What we euphemistically call the 'establishment' is under orders from a global criminal syndicate and there is a timetable and an international plan underway. I think I know what that plan is:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/ww3-the-pentagon-brief
You could be right, Frances.
'They' have a transitional 'Reset' plan, and we know some of the major narratives that are likely to be played. The timings are more difficult to predict though.
That stuff you posted on your page about GAP/CORE division of the world is something I hadn't seen before, but I can see reasons why that could be the plan - it also fits with other known agendas like '30 by 30' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_by_30, which appears to be another depopulation / rewilding / landgrab process.
Among the narratives I expect to see played in the next 5 years or so are WW3, probably climaxing in a 'limited nuclear exchange' (which could be real or perhaps simulated in some way), the 'Cyberpandemic' that Schwab promised us (which, again, could well be a kind of 'fake flag' event, but blamed on Russia, Iran, China, or whatever bogeyman du jour), a widescale avian flu pandemic or possibly something like Marburg or a biowarfare attack (the exact truth of which could be as difficult to prove as covid has been - we're still arguing over whether there really was a pathogen, it was an aerial sprayed chemical toxin, it was just a nasty flu season, something else like microwave radiation, or any or all of the above - They do 'plausible deniability' so well when They want to!), and probably also a lot more unnatural/natural disasters (like earthquakes, tsunamis & weather events).
There's also the solar maximum coming up, and magnetic pole shift appears to be a real possibility too - it's all going on, innit!
We know They want to vastly reduce the human population ASAP.
We know They want to re-engineer what they keep of the herd into kind of 'borg slaves'.
And we know They will be utterly ruthless and devious in how They will go about all this.
I think you're right that we're fighting a kind of war of attrition where we're under attack from many, many different directions and types of warfare simultaneously, and that the intention is that we are being steadily ground down, divided, undermined & psychologically/spiritually degraded.
Much of what is being done is almost purely to try to invoke fear & despair, and events like Manchester, and now where Richard is being lawfared for daring to put his name to exposing it, are such an assault.
We must remain vigilant, and try to keep our focus on what's important as events occur.
Some, like the Trump 'assassination attempt' seem to be largely distractions - they really don't matter in the bigger scheme, but they are able to suck up a huge amount of our energy if we let them.
Sometimes it's difficult to know where to direct energy, and the 'truth & freedom movement' (for want of a better term) is frankly now a shambles.
It did some fairly strong work though in knocking down the covid narrative, and I would say we won that battle (in terms of preventing mandatory jabs & vax passports, if nothing else), although the damage from the shots that people took has been appalling, & will have caused millions of casualties.
But it's also opened many peoples eyes - far more, I think, than They planned for.
It's my own suspicion that the 'Cyberpandemic' will be the next major narrative, and I have a feeling about next Spring Equinox (the Ides on 15th is a big financial settlement date, then 20th is the Equinox, then 22nd is '322', the 'Skull & Bones Lodge date' when They seem to like to kill a load of people) - halfway to 2030, and the covid narrative was (according to the SPARS modelling exercise) supposed to continue full-on until 2025. Also there are many critical path deadlines, such as for the mass roll out of Digital ID, the infrastructure for CBDC systems, and multiple new legal statutes, to be in place 'BY 2025'.
So if They start switching bits of the old system off (and blaming the Russians or whoever), the new systems are there ready to switch people onto.
'Ordo ab chao' is one of Their mottos, of course.
I'm always hesitant to make solid predictions, so I'm not - I just see there being a load of pieces on the board in positions where that move could occur at that time.
And if/when that occurs, it will be a huge crisis for the Normies who are totally dependent on those systems for their daily bread & circuses.
It was only when They switched off the football that my neighbours here started to panic, in March 2020!
So They know exactly how to 'get their attention' (as Billy Goats might say).
It's difficult to know how to frontrun such an event, but the predictive priming has gone out in the form of the movie last year (co-produced by the Obamas) 'Leave the World Behind', and a 2022 Channel 4 dramamentary series called 'The Undeclared War' - both of which portray possible scenarios from a large scale cyberattack event.
So, many people will have been implanted with ideas which may lead to them falling for another 'pseudo-crisis' like covid was, in a similar way to how the movie 'Contagion' appeared to be used to freak out half the planet while 24/7 propaganda constructed the illusion that covid really was a 'killer plague'.
If this is the case, and such a cyber-event is massively overblown by clever psychological warfare techniques, those of us with some experience in dissecting these big events may be able to play a crucial part in derailing or negating some of the worst effects.
I would also be wary of 'snatch squads' rounding up potential 'troublemakers' during any period of chaos when communications systems may be down - much dark stuff may occur while the lights are off!
I know, from personal experience, that 'the Butterfly Effect' CAN be used consciously sometimes, when one identifies the right place and time to waft ones wings in just the right direction.
We just need to keep our wits about us, and our wings strong & ready to flap like hell when needed!
I know you understand. :-)
Wing wafting is an essential skill! Thanks a lot for taking the time to read my work and comment so comprehensively. I agree with every point you make and foresee a quickening pace of totalitarian brutality ahead. I certainly do not underestimate the determination of our enemy.
Francis you are my enemy, I genuinely hate you for your fear mongering & blind arrogance.. the naive or malicious promotion of Nuclear threat scenarios & evasion of taking the ideas of Freud seriously, resulting in a cowering & ignorant fanbase you've amassed.
So if it was a choice between the oppressive shits we have now, or YOU I wouldn't could chose either of you as allies.
So who are you really fighting for Francis..yourself, or a diverse population that will probably resent you & what you keep promoting?
EVERYONE is your enemy, Grotbags.
It's just what you are - a sociopath.
EDIT: I notice the term you use there 'diverse population' - are you making something about race again?
Funny cos you seem to HATE all Jews - are they just a bit TOO diverse for you?
Only virtual twats like you are my enemy Sarahahaha,
Real life is mostly joyful & empathic. Something you are so obviously devoid of from any angle of approach.
tROT ON gROT-BAG!
as you so gleefully do for me here.
It's YOU who are ROTTING ON for me here now, Grottybabes.
I'm sucking your juices again, aren't I, having summoned you here?
I'm off to my paradise tomorrow - a few days in the beautiful countryside.
And you will be anally obsessing and getting green goo all over your keyboard all weekend, I reckon!
But there is no proof NUKES exist except as a massive funding swindle.
Here your fear factory agenda is again revealed for the bogeyman & infantile fantasy that has crippled everything you affirm here Prolies.
I've seen those arguments, yes.
Did you not notice I said '(which could be real or perhaps simulated in some way)'
Do read properly, Grotbags!
You said ?
You wrote.
The confusion in your decomposing mind is a sight to behold here.
Have you been painting in both directions again Sarahahah?
Maybe like Francis , you are lost in a Labyrinth !
🙄😂🤣😂
I'm sat on top of a hill, watching you spinning around in circles on your broomstick, disappearing up your own anal obsession, Grottybabes!
Francis Leader is so dim witted & decrepit that she here perpetrates the idea that a Labyrinth is akin to a MAZE !!! You can't get lost in a labyrinth Francis , it is a type of psychic machinery /psychogeographical device, devised to stimulate internal senses with its windings .
''A labyrinth typically consists of a single, winding path that leads to a central point and then back out again, symbolizing a journey of self-discovery or spiritual enlightenment''.
No wonder she's so deluded & deranged about so much when basic forms have become confabulated in her bigoted imagination.
And nothing but ad hominem here - that's ALL you have Grotbags.
Why do you even bother?
You lose automatically EVERY time you post!
A Labyrinth is not a MAZE.
You yet again miss content & project your own uppity anality into the situation.
Now go & suck your dead dog dick keyfob Sarahahah, it's the only time you have a smile on your face these days.
Try not to explode with rage, Grotbags!
You'll get green goo all over your computer screen!
Excellent extrapolation of the motives of the Establishment that lie behind all of these false flag events. In Australia, Port Arthur and the poor patsy, Martin Bryant = tougher gun laws; Lindt Chocolate Factory = tougher anti-terrorism laws; Bourke Street Mall = heightened surveillance networks, and I could go on and on.
If only the general public had the ability to step out of their (engineered) state of fear for one moment and see how each of these ‘events’ has, over a long period of time, stripped them of more of their freedoms, leading right up to the massive hoax/false flag that was Convid.
"“Lawfare” is defined as “the use of legal action to cause problems for an opponent.” It is the illegitimate use of claimed legal authority to persecute and punish those who challenge power."
That is very correct Iain. Frédéric Bastiat called it Legal Plunder so we must always refer to Lawfare as an act of Legal Plunder
Iain May I thank you for defending Richard in his attempts to expose the corruption and deceit which emanate not only from the Government but the Judiciary as well.
The most harrowing fact about all of this is not only are the Lamestream Media Outlets Aiding and Abetting the aforementioned so are Alternative Media Outlets.
Over to you UK Column, Unity News, The Light etc,etc.
social engineering "active measures"
Another spot on article Iain. Having worked in housing I've been involved in a few Protection from Harassment cases. The thing that struck me about this case is that at the very worse there was one incident of harassment but zero evidence of sustained harassment. On that basis alone the decision is surely challengeable and unlikely to be upheld.
Your essay is poetic . We are taken to see a dank and vile intelligence that is relentlessly usurping the body politic . A ouroboros hopefully
Darkness equates to evil for you does it?
Are you aware of the sublimated linguistic racism such expressions expose?
Only petty fascist twats , such as Prolies here, would justify such lazy thinking & cliched jargon.. let's see if it wades in being a moron again about this?
Says the wannabe witch & admitted Satanist who spews anti-Semitic hate speech constantly.
Dear, dear, Grotbags - you are such a little green monster, aren't you?
(or is it racis to mention that you're green?)