36 Comments

King Charles and the Globalists set meeting for September at which they will plot how to accelerate goals of U.N. Agenda 2030 and the complete digitization of humanity

Last week the WEF released a post saying that “civic participation is key to meeting UN sustainability targets” to fulfill the goals of “Agenda 2030.”

The WEF wrote:

“Attacks on civil society and civic freedoms threaten to unravel achievements in meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They are weakening action to tackle economic inequality, gender imbalances, corruption and environmental degradation.”

So they have planned a special 2023 SDG Summit for September 18-19 in New York, where they will discuss the world’s shortcomings in meeting their 17 Sustainable Development Goals, calling the forum meeting “enormously significant,” as a select group of world leaders are expected to be in attendance.

According to the U.N. website:

“They will carry out a comprehensive review of the state of the SDGs, respond to the impact of multiple and interlocking crises facing the world, and provide high-level political guidance on transformative and accelerated actions leading up to the target year of 2030 for achieving the SDGs.”

The U.N. posting goes on to say that: “The special edition of the report of the Secretary-General entitled ‘Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards a Rescue Plan for People and Planet’, the Advance Unedited version has been released.”

https://leohohmann.com/2023/05/02/king-charles-and-the-globalists-set-meeting-for-september-at-which-they-will-plot-how-to-accelerate-goals-of-u-n-agenda-2030-and-the-complete-digitization-of-humanity/

Expand full comment

Funding Both Sides: How Jewish Money Controls British Politics . . . October 4, 2021/ by Tobias Langdon . . . https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/10/04/funding-both-sides-how-jewish-money-controls-british-politics/

Expand full comment

Jewish money has probably controlled British politics for centuries:).

Expand full comment

Excellent analysis, Iain! However, you omitted to mention yet another of our king's 'mentors' (by his own admission), Laurens van der Post, another vile paedophile. Got a girl of 14 pregnant on a sea voyage where she had been entrusted to his care, amongst other crimes.

It's probably just one of those 'coincidences' that our king has a predilection for older male paedophiles as his greatest influencers, no?

Expand full comment

I'm curious, when now King, Charles, dresses in drag does he still answer to the name Bonnie?

Expand full comment

Lest we forget, King Charles III is just the current shill for the British-Venetian goal of world domination and a One World British Empire.

The Council on Foreign Relations is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House), and the RIIA (Chatham House) originated as the Round Table Movement that was the “Secret Society” mandated by Cecil Rhodes’ Last Will when he died in 1902.

1877 Cecil Rhodes writes at the age of 22 in a Confession of Faith:

‘Why should we not form a secret society with but one object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule for the recovery of the United States for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.’

1888 In his third will, Rhodes leaves everything to ‘Lord Rothschild’, referring to ‘the matter discussed between us’. Several of Rhodes’ wills refer to secret societies, and to Lord Rothschild, but the final will sets out the terms for the Rhodes scholarships, administered by Rothschild. (The scholarships were intended to develop future leaders in the Rhodes mould)

1891 Cecil Rhodes, William Stead and Lords Esher, Rothschild, Salisbury, Rosebery and Milner drew up a plan for a secret society (the “Round Table”) that aims to bring all habitable portions of the world under their influence and control. (See New World Order: The Founding Fathers). The very next year,

Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table led to the founding in 1921 of both the US-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Chatham House in London, Bilderberg founded in 1954, the Club of Rome (1968) and the Trilateral Commission (1973). All of these organisations are dedicated to global governance, and there is extensive overlap in terms of the principle players. The same forces created the United Nations.

1921 The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA, now Chatham House) in London, and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in New York are founded with the financial backing of J. P. Morgan, Bernard Baruch, Otto Kahn, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, and John D. Rockefeller. (Schiff had links to Rothschild, Warburg and Morgan).

https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/

http://american_almanac.tripod.com/takeover.htm

https://lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-Life/AgainstOligarchy/AgainstOligarchy.pdf

https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2022/07/lillian-scott-troy-1882-1964-unsung.html

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/1967-Sir-Andrew-Carnegie-and-Cecil-J-Rhodes-Planners-of-Internationalism-The-George-Mason-School-of-Correspondence-by-CO-Garshwiler-ed-Education-Information-Inc-1967.pdf

https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/

Expand full comment

Informative and grin-inducing. Thank you for making me laugh, in the midst of reading more bad news.

Expand full comment

You're most welcome

Expand full comment

"The name Terra Carta (“Earth Charter”) derives from the Magna Carta, a charter of rights developed by King John and his barons 800 years ago that marked the first step in limiting monarchical power in England". How ironic...and galling!

Expand full comment

Come on everyone, sing along...

Thy choicest gifts in store,

For paedos and warmonger whores,

Long may he reign.

May he avoid our laws,

Income and inheritance fraud,

Plebs sing with heart and voice,

God save the King!

Expand full comment

So, Saturday May 6, 2023 is King Charles III’s coronation. I’m guessing that most citizens of the USA don’t even know the meaning of this line from our Declaration of Independence from England:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,….

When Thomas Jefferson and the Founders wrote “that all men are created equal” what they were arguing against were King George III’s supposed “Divine Rights” that supposedly superseded the “unalienable Rights” that all men are endowed with by their Creator. All men are created equal, not some created more equal than others by some phony Divine Right.

So, if you are some Anglophile who enjoys watching the spectacle of the Royals with all of their regal trappings of wealth and prestige, just remember that what you are watching and glorifying is nothing different than the glitterati traipsing down the red carpet to be crowned with whatever coveted golden idol is being bestowed that day.

Expand full comment

Well said that man. I argue that we do, in fact, have a codified constitution. I'm a big fan of Kenn D' Oudney's Democracy Defined.

https://iaindavis.com/the-british-constitution-deception-part-2/

Expand full comment

The “Glorious Revolution of 1688” was the inauguration of the Anglo-Venetian march towards a One World British Empire.

The Anglo-Venetians decided that they were fed up with the now-Catholic, pro-French and wholly useless Stuart dynasty. Representatives of some of the leading oligarchical families signed an invitation to the Dutch King, William of Orange, and his Queen Mary, a daughter of James II. John Churchill, the future Duke of Marlborough, was typical of James’ former supporters who now went over to support William and Mary. William landed and marched on London. This is called by the British the “Glorious Revolution” of 1688; in reality, it consolidated the powers and prerogatives of the oligarchy, which were expressed in the Bill of Rights of 1689. No taxes could be levied, no army raised, and no laws suspended without the consent of the oligarchy in Parliament. Members of Parliament were guaranteed immunity for their political actions and free speech. Soon, ministers could not stay in office for long without the support of a majority of Parliament. Parliament was supreme over the monarch and the state church. At the same time, seats in Parliament were now bought and sold in a de facto market. The greater the graft to be derived from a seat, the more a seat was worth. Within a few years after the Glorious Revolution there was a Bank of England and a national debt. When George I ascended the throne in 1714, he knew he was a Doge, the primus inter pares of an oligarchy.

The regime that took shape in England after 1688 was the most perfect copy of the Venetian oligarchy that was ever produced. There was a flare-up of resistance during the reign of Queen Anne because of the activity of the Tory Robert Harley and his ally Jonathan Swift; there was also the threat that the Hanoverian succession might bring Leibniz into England. Otherwise the Venetian Party was broadly hegemonic, and Britain was soon the dominant world power. The English masses had been so thoroughly crushed that little was heard from them for one and one half centuries, until the Chartist agitation of the 1840’s. The franchise was not substantially expanded until after the American Civil War, with industrial workers getting the vote in 1867 and farm laborers allowed to cast ballots in 1884.

The struggles of seventeenth- century England were thus decisive in parlaying the strong Venetian influence which had existed before 1603 into the long-term domination by the British Venetian Party observable after 1714. These developments are not phenomena of English history per se. They can only be understood as aspects of the infiltration into England of the metastatic Venetian oligarchy, which in its British Imperial guise has remained the menace of mankind.

http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/how-the-venetian-system-was-transplanted-into-england/

http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/

Expand full comment

And everyone rants over Andrew.

Expand full comment

Perhaps he is taking the heat whilst his older brother shields behind him?

Expand full comment

Who knows about the depths of the psychopathologies in these kinds of families? We are getting abundant evidence of it in these times.

Expand full comment

As a connoisseur of snark, I gotta give this whole piece a chef's kiss... Even though I don't know what a lot of the Brit slang means, somehow that makes it better!

Expand full comment

This is semi-snark mode I think. I could have been much more snarky about Charles da Turd but I'm keeping my powder dry for when he really screws things up. Because I am very confident that he will.

Expand full comment

In Canada, the Bastardling Charles (I can't bring myself to call him king so I call him Bastardling in reference to the illegitimacy of the "Windsor" royal line since Anne Boleyn) is widely seen as an inbred dolt. Do you think his intelligence is subnormal or do you think Canadians underestimate him?

Expand full comment

We will see some weird, occultic stuff performed doing the coronation of the true useless eaters.

Expand full comment

The British monarchy is sort of manufactured. In 1917, during World War I, King George V ordered the British royal family to dispense with the use of German titles and surnames, changing the surname of his own family, from the Germanic Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, to Windsor.

So the British monarchy is mostly from German heritage that's probably why in the early 1930's they found Hitler so appealing. That being said, the royal stock as come a long way from such a distasteful episode to the tragedy of Diana's dubious death and the remarriage of Charles to his mistress soon to be the Queen. And let's not forget, Andrew and his long relationship with Epstein and all those teen girls. There's no need to discuss the uncle of King Charles as that was already covered in detail. Is it inbreeding, or just lowlife depravity? Or perhaps, it's just a sense of entitlement which one feels if from birth they've had their arse wiped by the "official royal ass-wiper," in some circles a sought afer position. And this weekend the people of Britain are expected to assume a similar role--Royal ass-wipers to King Charles. If there is a benevolent rational God, would he bless such a King?

Btw I'm an agnostic.😁

Expand full comment

You might find this interesting and insightful:

https://www.corbettreport.com/charles/

Expand full comment

Yup, I’m also a fan of James Corbett.

Expand full comment

His videos on a host of topics are more professional than Hollywood documentaries and a lot more honest.

Expand full comment

I think that with the mixing of Diana’s DNA and Kate’s DNA, the future King George will have DNA that is predominantly of British lineage.

Expand full comment

We should all derive comfort from that genetic mix as we approach a future biosecurity technocracy organized via one world governance advocated by the "King Adulterer" and his coterie of pedophiles.

Expand full comment

The CORONA crisis ends the day before the CORONAtion. Keep enjoying your enslavement

Expand full comment

An alliance of the US, Russia, China, and India, to take down the modern globalist Anglo-Dutch system, known commonly as the British Empire, must now be taken up!

BEWARE The British East India Company! Toward an Alliance Between the USA, Russia, China, and India to Finally Defeat the British Empire, by William Wertz.

Will Wertz’s New Book: Four Nations, Aligned, Can Route the Globalists.

https://www.larouchepac.com/will_wertz_s_new_book_four_nations_aligned_can_route_the_globalists?fbclid=IwAR0Ps_eXh4taMAPFUh5cwBDk7v-58AlvrEI4YeGZtKkOyKFn7xpNOe_yx04&mibextid=Zxz2cZ

https://a.co/d/jgqf4Mn

Expand full comment

The British Lords’ First Priority: No Second Term for Donald Trump

Part I: The British Role in the Coup Against the President Is Now Exposed. Will You Act Now to Save the Nation?

https://larouchepac.com/20190110/part-i-british-role-coup-against-president-now-exposed-will-you-act-now-save-nation

Part II: The Integrity Initiative's Foreign Agents of Influence Invade the United States

https://larouchepac.com/20190110/part-ii-integrity-initiatives-foreign-agents-influence-invade-united-states

Part III: A British Intelligence Fraud Creates the Coup Against Donald Trump

https://larouchepac.com/20190112/part-iii-british-intelligence-fraud-creates-coup-against-donald-trump

Expand full comment