It will be interesting to see if the UKC team offer any further comment on the little spat between you and Brian Gerrish.
It doesn't look good, to these eyes, if any individual UKC staff member thinks they can blithely enter the arena (so to speak) of a particularly explosive(!) and controversial issue, only to walk away again when challenged to make their position clear in relation to certain crucial aspects of evidence.
For this reason, alone, I think Brian was misguided in deciding to publicly engage with you in the way he did. It came over as petty, defensive and more than just a little holier-than-thou.
He should've steered clear altogether, or gone all in and answered your questions directly and in full.
I have been an activist since the Viet Nam era and a activist/journalist since 1989: about 35 years. While I have seen many examples of controlled opposition there are also many examples where people simply have differing opinions. So I have always been careful before declaring some person or group to be part of astroturfing or controlled opposition. But it is a thing. My focus is, and remains, to stop the globalist agenda from moving forward. As far as I can recall no one has ever accused me of being part of any controlled opposition.
The Put People First Agenda (PPFA)
In my version of the Garden of Eden one should always be encouraged to eat from the tree of knowledge but should never meddle with the tree of life as that is above the pay grade of ANY human: past, present or future. Think of the sorcerers apprentice and all the unanticipated problems his meddling created. Those of us that understand the complexity of the global ecosystem tend to abide by the precautionary principle. The globalists have the audacity to think they can meddle with the Tree of Life with no consequence. They they seem to abide by the "Let's just do shit and see what happens" principle. I can't seem to find an antonym for the Precautionary Principle.
Our globalist corporations have obviously ignored this warning as GMO farming began/expanded in the early 1990's. Using CRISPR and other cutting edge technologies they have meddled with the tree of life: terminator seeds, plants that produce insecticides (which we eat), spraying plants with Glyphosate etc. Already it is clear these technologies are causing harm to human health. Then we have fluoride in the water supply, endocrine disruptors, PFAS chemicals etc., in or food and water. None of this makes sense and represents a willful refusal to consider what our collective knowledge (e.g., the tree of knowledge) should be telling us about the harm these substances unleash on the human population. But is goes on unabated because global corporations can profit in the short run.
Then came the Plandemic and the mRNA vaccines the did not prevent infection/transmission but did cause considerable harm and death. Worse yet there is growing evidence that these mRNA injections may actually be modifying our DNA and the consequences are just beginning to be understood. Of course this has all been ignored by globalist corporate media. And over the past year I have read numerous papers about self assembly nanobots within the vaccines and much more. I've yet to write about this subject as, at first, I was a skeptic. But perhaps it is time to cover the subject because there is plenty of evidence/papers etc. which suggest the globalists want to use mRNA concoctions in conjunction with 5G EMF radiation to control our moods and literally allow the government to get inside our heads. And thanks to the author for detailing the programs that are already underway.
It is now obvious that the WEF, UN, WHO etc. want full control of humanity. They aren't even shy about their plans: a Great Reset where you will own nothing (and really won't be happy at all). And it is all spelled out in Agenda21, Agenda2030, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's). They have very complex plans to exert control of every human on planet Earth. Their goal is a fully controlled global population -- which will relegate every human to the status of a slave on a globalist plantation.
WE THE PEOPLE, of planet Earth, need to immediately unite behind our own complex agenda in order to stop this globalist coup. To that end I've put together what I call the "Put People First" agenda, which has developed over the past 5 years. I'm encouraging everyone to endorse this agenda and cite your support at City Council, School Board meetings as well as during protests. As Benjamin Franklin once said at the signing of the Declaration of Independence: "We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately." Here is the PPF agenda as it currently exists:
* No Lockdowns EVER again
* No forced masking ANYWHERE
* No forced vaccinations under ANY circumstance whether that be from injection, food or chemtrails
* Absolutely no vaccine passports or digital currency
* Reinstate all of those that lost jobs for refusing to get the mRNA injection, including all of our Healthcare workers
* Universal non-coercive choice: Wearing a mask or getting a mRNA injection will be up to each individual and there will be ABSOLUTELY no penalty for not complying in or out of the workplace.
* No more censorship of ANYONE whether that be on social media, corporate media or at the workplace. No one should ever be censored or punished for exercising their First Amendment Right to Free Speech.
* Impeach Biden/Harris and reinstate Trump as our president.
* Stop the LGBTQ and CRT indoctrination in our schools and corporations
* Stop the Climate Agenda and make Energy Independence Priority Number One.
* Send every Illegal Alien, that Biden has brought in through Open Borders, back home.
* Stop the illegal mass imigration invasion worldwide
* Legalize the personal cultivation of Cannabis, Psilocybin.
* Legalize the right to take Ivermectin, Hydrochloriquine and other anti-viral herbs and drugs
* Legalize the right to choose when it comes to vaccines, abortion, drugs etc.
* Eliminate Genetically modified vaccines, plants, animals (fish, cattle etc.) and the use of Glyphosate.
* Eliminate the use of Geoengineering: Chemtrails, HAARP etc.* Eliminate the fluoridation of our water supply.
* Stop allowing Blackrock, and other financial institutions from buying up residential properties which will make it impossible for future families to own a home and build up equity.
* Demand your government defund and exit the UN, WHO and WEF
I go to Africa a lot in my youth & still occasionally.
Does anyone in Africa imagine all Africa can unite for common good ?
No. No one at all if honest. Yet , here in UK & US there is much time evaporated on uniting all 'Black peoples', all peoples etc. It is damages/pampered baby-think stupidness- peoples are too diverse & cultures are too incompatible to be realistic idea.
So, why is it promoted & by who?
By agenderist trouble makers who know it is impossible, & this schism with reality lead to more upset among the hopeful.
Here are you, effectively another impotent voice telling us what should be done, yet how is that going to happen? I come here to contribute & get constant abuse by masochists wanting payback, so how do you factor now epidemic SADO MASOCHISTIC DYNAMIC into all you dream ? We see all this virtue signalling game in Asia millennia ago, yet you in backwards western decay still haven't caught up with how the world really interacts & manoeuvres communities.
"Here are you, effectively another impotent voice telling us what should be done, yet how is that going to happen?"
I'll just overlook the label of "impotent." LOL
I am 70 but not yet impotent.
In 1989 I embarked on a project to legalize the adult cultivation of Cannabis with no tax, regulation or gov't oversight. Joining with thousands of activists, worldwide, that goal has largely been achieved.
And of course the Anti-Globalist Agenda is already happening as we push against the Net Zero and Mass Immigration agenda's of the globalists. You see it throughout the US and EU as "right wing" -- actually Anti-Globalists -- groups gain traction. We see it in the rise of the AfD in Germany, the election of Trump, and the rise of Anti-globalists throughout the EU. So basically the Anti-Globalist Group is happening and gains more support by the day.
Anyway . . . are there planks on the PPFA that you disagree? Are there planks you think need to be added? Try to be constructive. Thanks for writing.
Thank you Bruce, I do not mean offence to you specific with impotent, just all of us relative to policy enactments via media/gov/corps ! Apologies if it seem insult to your virile self of mature experience, potent orgone & healthy altitude.
Is anti globalist = Flat Earth ?
Well done with legalising cannabis as it is medicinal meditative plant entity of intrinsic cultural dynamic. It is small pity that control is from conservative MPs ownership, but still better than nothing at all, & much improved from previous demonised as tool of devil worship,& date rape substance for degenerates leading to heroin addiction. How ironic that penalisers of herbs were often pet feltching child abusers on coke & opioids!
I have much to say on this when in the mood, & I will one day write full post on it. As may I suggest you consider to do also? Long comments here tend to be evaded & lost, while a proper post has more focus & durability maybe?
BTW I do not see any right or left wings , I just see massive turkey of sacrifice gobbling rabbit droppings manufactured by espionage families, & eager media whores like worms of the Phoenix or Eagle all trying to consume each other like manic cannibals.
I'm not the least bit offended by your comments. I'm an Anti-globalist who thinks the "flat Earth" theory is possibly the dumbest idea I've encountered in my life. But I can only speak for myself. My occupation was that of a Health Care Systems Analyst so I tend to be quite critical of what I watch or read. As Firesign Theatre used to say "we are all just Bozo's on this bus." But at the end of the day we must try to make the world a little bit better. Trying is always better than doing nothing. At least that way you die without too many regrets.
I don't agree though to do as you say at the end of the day: after decades of doing much good deeds , it tends to generate envy, resentment, & ingratitude! I do not imply it should not be tried, just that Karma of such can be twisty, & indirect with result in far too many examples.
Sometimes it is best to do nothing & let tempest rage around you, instead of inside as well.
The other day I was kidding my wife that I was a descendent of Jesus as a number of artifacts seem to indicate he was of a rare bloodtype: ABRh-. I also share that rare bloodtype. LOL
My wife laughed because she knows I don't think Jesus ever existed though I do love the story. More than likely the story of Jesus finds parallels in many early cultures that were into Astrotheology: divining stories from the movement of the stars. Many of these cultures also found insights from doing entheogens of which I have done a few: Mescaline, LSD, Peyote, Psilocybin etc. At 70 I pretty much stick to a little occasional Cannabis. LOL
Personally I think we should all make efforts to make things better: whether that be you nation or your family. I think my father instilled those values when I was quite young. At the end of the day you just have to comport your life as you see best.
As someone that did a lot of entheogens, in my early years, I found this subject quite interesting. But I have no formed opinions and it is not something I'm likely to write about.
Astrotheology and Shamanism: Unveiling the Law of Duality in Christianity and other Religions
All good, thank you for sharing. One point though, I feel the tree of life is different from how you mention it. I feel it’s our own inner, higher consciousness that rests within the right hemisphere of our brain through which our heart and Mind align with and come to know the eternal Source. So, accessing it is actually imperative if we are to be “born in Spirit” and “saved”. We are saved from our own carnal nature, the lower mind, the tree of knowledge of hood and evil. Jesus spoke of the single eye, go within, find it and be set free. Just my two cents. ❤️
Good to see Sonia Poulton's interview with Dr. David Hughes, let's hope more independent media sources take up the gauntlet thrown down by Iain and commit to discussing and showing the compelling EVIDENCE proving that the Manchester Arena event was a hoax .
I’ve followed Richard D Hall for years since long before Covid. I’ve met him on one of his tours. His greatest cases have sometimes the smallest cases with no possibility of wider publicity or “grift” as his detractors might say. I’m thinking particularly of the Cumbria shootings and County Lines drug murders.
The UK state has long realised that Hall was a problem. I had a problem accessing Rich Planet and after many fruitless tech support calls I realised his site was being suppressed by state internet provider BT Internet. The stony silence of their support engineer when I suggested as such spoke volumes. I left BT Internet immediately after and the problem was resolved.
Hall was doing such work long before the likes of O’Loughlin realised that there might be a problem.
Excellent Iain. You are right, it's decision time for the Column and others - a crossroads has been reached. Quite uncomfortable to watch the excellent Ben and Brian rationalise their stance. Take on the establishment over this EVIDENCE or continue to self censor so as not to cross their line. The argument that you'll be around to fight other battles doesn't work - you will have lost the war, it will just take a while to notice.
I agree with your theory, so what is important is how people react to information they receive. I will scan articles that deal with many differing possibilities, and that's how I treat them. At that point I am aware but since it's a possibility I happily move on, after all it's possible I'm the greatest drummer on the planet; but it isn't probable.
I wait for possibilities to become probabilities before I give them a second thought. Thanks for highlighting your theory!
Viewing Iain’s excellent film on UKC’s reporting of the Richard D Hall issue I am struck by the ironic similarity between the judge’s ruling that Hall would not be allowed to present his detailed evidence of the Manchester bombing hoax to the court, & therefore to the public, & UKC’s refusal to also present this evidence to their audience.
The BBC took a similar stance in not presenting Hall’s evidence.
What are UKC afraid of?
I think I know.
UKC have become an established institution in the alternative media world . They have worked hard to get there. But now they are a victim of their success.
Like all established institutions UKC have a lot to lose if the state decided they had crossed the line. Presenting Halls evidence would be crossing that line.
In this way it can be said that UKC are controlled opposition.
The control may not be through a shadowy state agent issuing instructions. It may be a form of self-censoring. But it is nonetheless a form of control as I think Iain has highlighted.
The positive outcome of the Hall case - leaving aside the personal crisis for Hall & the wider serious implications for free speech - is that it has been like a canary in the coalmine.
It has shown how few in the so-called 'truth movement' / alternative media are truly independent & courageous enough to fully report Hall's case. Many - like UKC - have allowed the state to scare them off.
I was previously around the revolutionary left for numerous years but had become disillusioned by their refusal to seriously question official narratives around 'terrorism' like that around 9/11. My full ‘awakening’ to the dark hidden realities of the globalist cabal and those who seek to manipulate and control us developed only gradually and I continued to be sceptical of 'conspiracy theories'; but the Manchester Arena hoax as initially posited by UKcriticalthinker and later more comprehensively by RDH was the catalyst that finally cemented my convictions.
I only became a member of UKC in 2022 as I’d heard them mentioned on several other sites I’d visited and they seemed like a good source of news and analysis on a range of important topics. I was unconcerned about where they were coming from ideologically and politically as I was more interested in their research and analysis. Their ‘gradualist’ approach and apparent caution about not ‘going too far’ and potentially frightening their audience was immediately apparent, but didn’t concern me at that time. Quite quickly it became more obvious that they were reformists rather than revolutionists who rather than believing we had to tear down this corrupt and rotten system, were rather often defenders -in principle - of the constitution; monarchy and parliament, merely believing that those that currently held the commanding levers of power were the problem but believing implicitly that they could be replaced by decent people. I found the obvious Christian motivations of Gerrish, Robinson and in particular Alex Thompson relatively unobtrusive (although the tone of discussions does sometimes appear to assume that we all share their theological assumptions). Of course there is no formal requirement for members to agree with these views and so I was unconcerned.
Several people have claimed that the military and security backgrounds of certain key figures – Gerrish, Thompson and more recent Charles Mallet ‘proves’ they can’t be trusted as genuine ‘truth seekers’ engaged in independent journalism. I don’t share this view as I tend to think that the ‘controlled opposition’ thesis while valid should not be a substitute for developing the skill of critical judgement and remaining vigilant at all times as to the veracity of evidence and theories. We should judge evidence and theory by using this critical judgement and not merely accusing people by dint of past associations. It is surely possible that those who maybe naively as young people joined the forces or even security apparatus out of a genuine sense of duty could over the course of time and experience come to see that these institutions were corrupt and involved in controlling us rather than protecting our freedoms? Being at the ‘coal face’ and seeing first hand what the military and security services actually do could in principle make people involved more likely to see the light than less? However, the fact that so many key UKC team members have a background like this is worthy of consideration.
I just tend to think UKC's actions – in particular in relation to Manchester – derive from their gradualist strategy and survival instincts. This gradualist v revolutionist dualism in some respects mirrors that of the radical left in the 1970s and 80s. UKC are sometimes a good source of info and because of their size and resources are able to cover a range of topics others can’t. This is why with all their limitations I will continue to watch (although I find watching on demand and being able to fast forward through stuff I’m not interested in often is the best way to engage). My membership is up for renewal just after the New Year but I will not be renewing it if UKC continue to refuse to address the issue of RDH’s evidence. Instead I will probably donate the fee to Richard.
There is nothing DARK about agenda of oppressors - it is in big fuck off NEON signs & VDU screens ! & the use of DARKNESS to equate to evil is infantile , subliminal racist bum puke. You are not awake at all using such gob-toss phraseology.
1) Is your infantile woke comment some sort of joke/parody of an AOC/Kamala supporter?
2) 'bum puke' and 'gob toss' are you 11 years old?
3) In future please respond to me with the courtesy of standard English as used by adults - better still if this is the level of your intellect don't bother as I'm not a kindergarten teacher
Just like standard troll bitch you evade content & attempt to elevate yourself from sewers!
Bum Puke is something you eat after feltching pets ?
Gob toss is what you do here?
You do not have an adult brain, you have brittle tumour instead, so why you bitch like BBC presenter having to work in Shetland Islands ?
Now stick your 3 points into you sanctimonious, illiterate pompous pants & pretend it is your manhood, because only fragile humourless bores act like you about things like this.
You should be grateful I even notice your crying here like pouting little anus, swollen with anxiety.
Your prose is shit, your content is pretentious bore narcissism, your vocabulary is less than mediocre, yet you insult my phraseology ! I assume because of your notable lack of talent & originality, & due to terminal cognitive constipation?
Is it genetic, are your parents as devoid of humour & skills as yourself?
I have to assume they pampered you & this is why you have no social skills either.
I subscribed to UKC early in 2020 but, by the end of the year had moved on from what I consider their limitations. The fact that Brian Gerrish was a naval officer also spooked me a bit, but I’m eternally grateful for him waking me up to The Nudge unit and, as I subsequently discovered, their equivalent here in Australia. It’s unfortunate he won’t engage with you on Manchester but I figure there’s something going on behind the scenes that would explain why. And probably not a good something.
Maybe one point is to allow difference and debate as that will feed into the overall system.
Obviously, dividing and distracting us is useful in stopping any real resistance to the staus quo but also, if the new economic model is based on a society digitally linked together, then reactions and thoughts will all have to be recorded.
The system will want difference and choices as this will keep people happy in their own little worlds and will supply the data that the impact markets will require.
This is assuming that "Build Back Better" means a society run by data-driven, cybernetic governance protocols administered by AI.
I think for clear evidence of government malfeasance, in this case the U.S. government, to convince people to wake up and look at the tyranny, you can't beat the 5:00" to 15:00" portion of this video:
Well done Iain- I have found you and Hughes have done an excellent job on this topic. I found Hall's reporting on the Manchester bang compelling from the get go. I am surprized and disappointed by UK Column as a fairly regular viewer and listener. I think they need to reconsider and at least allow debate on the topic.
I've followed UK Column since finding Ian R Crane in about 2016. I watch it regularly and find it very useful for getting news and opinion that I don't get elsewhere. I have winessed, as have others, that since the Oct 7th incident happened we've seen the loss of two key members. How could any longterm viewer not feel a bit emotional seeing Patrick and David on the set again, in the clips you show above? The loss of these two great characters and then the move into a "new studio" has changed the UKC news , just as lineup changes do in bands. I think they feel like a "big gun" now and are fearful of losing what they have. I believe they feel that by showing the evidence , they could lose their positition and go the same way as Alex Jones. I think there were enough hints to go and check out Rich D Hall's work , in the clips you showed but as you rightly state ; that if they'd shown it , a whole load more people would be aware of it. As to why, I think it's about self preservation. They have certainly said many times that they do not know how much longer they can keep doing what they do.
I stopped watching U.K. column when I realised how narrow their remit was & how much what they cover is in reaction to the corporate news agenda. In short they are not alternative or radical enough.
Perhaps like so many in the wider media world they self-censor either knowingly or unknowingly.
While I used to listen to UK column and thought Brian Gerrish was reasonable. I respected him as a Naval Officer. I find Mike Robinson tends to be very suspicious of anyone and can be quite aggressive. I changed by mind however when they roped in Vanessa Beeley and chopped David Scott.
While Beeley has done remarkable work Exposing NATO and its evil and I commend her for that.
I was surprised though by her friends endorsing each others responses. Here I refer to four in particular being the Anti-Israel lobby, being Vanessa Beeley, Eva Karene Bartlett and Fiorella Isabel and Sam Husseini. All claim to be independent journalists which is fine with me and some have a huge reputations like Beeley and Husseni and appear to have good intentions. However when they start calling others names and supporters of Zionists and Israel and NATO & the West and then praise a convicted murderer now living in Turkey who goes under the name of Shahid Bolsen a converted Moslem as trustworthy, the alarm bells start to ring.
It’s great to sit in an ivory tower and cast aspersions, when their narrative is questioned some like Fiorella Isabel retreat into the nursery and block one. Why I say that is I have experienced exactly that was blocked when asking simple question on reports made and then labelled as troll or as I was called a state sponsored troll by another on a substack.
One thing Iain is you are strait down the line and explain when questioned. Even when one disagrees it is still done honestly.
Greetings Iain,
I'm glad you've persisted with this matter.
It will be interesting to see if the UKC team offer any further comment on the little spat between you and Brian Gerrish.
It doesn't look good, to these eyes, if any individual UKC staff member thinks they can blithely enter the arena (so to speak) of a particularly explosive(!) and controversial issue, only to walk away again when challenged to make their position clear in relation to certain crucial aspects of evidence.
For this reason, alone, I think Brian was misguided in deciding to publicly engage with you in the way he did. It came over as petty, defensive and more than just a little holier-than-thou.
He should've steered clear altogether, or gone all in and answered your questions directly and in full.
''It came over as petty, defensive and more than just a little holier-than-thou.''
Does that make an almost full house here then?
It look like typical nature of the place to me.🙄😆😂
I have been an activist since the Viet Nam era and a activist/journalist since 1989: about 35 years. While I have seen many examples of controlled opposition there are also many examples where people simply have differing opinions. So I have always been careful before declaring some person or group to be part of astroturfing or controlled opposition. But it is a thing. My focus is, and remains, to stop the globalist agenda from moving forward. As far as I can recall no one has ever accused me of being part of any controlled opposition.
The Put People First Agenda (PPFA)
In my version of the Garden of Eden one should always be encouraged to eat from the tree of knowledge but should never meddle with the tree of life as that is above the pay grade of ANY human: past, present or future. Think of the sorcerers apprentice and all the unanticipated problems his meddling created. Those of us that understand the complexity of the global ecosystem tend to abide by the precautionary principle. The globalists have the audacity to think they can meddle with the Tree of Life with no consequence. They they seem to abide by the "Let's just do shit and see what happens" principle. I can't seem to find an antonym for the Precautionary Principle.
Our globalist corporations have obviously ignored this warning as GMO farming began/expanded in the early 1990's. Using CRISPR and other cutting edge technologies they have meddled with the tree of life: terminator seeds, plants that produce insecticides (which we eat), spraying plants with Glyphosate etc. Already it is clear these technologies are causing harm to human health. Then we have fluoride in the water supply, endocrine disruptors, PFAS chemicals etc., in or food and water. None of this makes sense and represents a willful refusal to consider what our collective knowledge (e.g., the tree of knowledge) should be telling us about the harm these substances unleash on the human population. But is goes on unabated because global corporations can profit in the short run.
Then came the Plandemic and the mRNA vaccines the did not prevent infection/transmission but did cause considerable harm and death. Worse yet there is growing evidence that these mRNA injections may actually be modifying our DNA and the consequences are just beginning to be understood. Of course this has all been ignored by globalist corporate media. And over the past year I have read numerous papers about self assembly nanobots within the vaccines and much more. I've yet to write about this subject as, at first, I was a skeptic. But perhaps it is time to cover the subject because there is plenty of evidence/papers etc. which suggest the globalists want to use mRNA concoctions in conjunction with 5G EMF radiation to control our moods and literally allow the government to get inside our heads. And thanks to the author for detailing the programs that are already underway.
It is now obvious that the WEF, UN, WHO etc. want full control of humanity. They aren't even shy about their plans: a Great Reset where you will own nothing (and really won't be happy at all). And it is all spelled out in Agenda21, Agenda2030, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's). They have very complex plans to exert control of every human on planet Earth. Their goal is a fully controlled global population -- which will relegate every human to the status of a slave on a globalist plantation.
WE THE PEOPLE, of planet Earth, need to immediately unite behind our own complex agenda in order to stop this globalist coup. To that end I've put together what I call the "Put People First" agenda, which has developed over the past 5 years. I'm encouraging everyone to endorse this agenda and cite your support at City Council, School Board meetings as well as during protests. As Benjamin Franklin once said at the signing of the Declaration of Independence: "We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately." Here is the PPF agenda as it currently exists:
* No Lockdowns EVER again
* No forced masking ANYWHERE
* No forced vaccinations under ANY circumstance whether that be from injection, food or chemtrails
* Absolutely no vaccine passports or digital currency
* Reinstate all of those that lost jobs for refusing to get the mRNA injection, including all of our Healthcare workers
* Universal non-coercive choice: Wearing a mask or getting a mRNA injection will be up to each individual and there will be ABSOLUTELY no penalty for not complying in or out of the workplace.
* No more censorship of ANYONE whether that be on social media, corporate media or at the workplace. No one should ever be censored or punished for exercising their First Amendment Right to Free Speech.
* Impeach Biden/Harris and reinstate Trump as our president.
* Stop the LGBTQ and CRT indoctrination in our schools and corporations
* Stop the Climate Agenda and make Energy Independence Priority Number One.
* Send every Illegal Alien, that Biden has brought in through Open Borders, back home.
* Stop the illegal mass imigration invasion worldwide
* Legalize the personal cultivation of Cannabis, Psilocybin.
* Legalize the right to take Ivermectin, Hydrochloriquine and other anti-viral herbs and drugs
* Legalize the right to choose when it comes to vaccines, abortion, drugs etc.
* Eliminate Genetically modified vaccines, plants, animals (fish, cattle etc.) and the use of Glyphosate.
* Eliminate the use of Geoengineering: Chemtrails, HAARP etc.* Eliminate the fluoridation of our water supply.
* Stop allowing Blackrock, and other financial institutions from buying up residential properties which will make it impossible for future families to own a home and build up equity.
* Demand your government defund and exit the UN, WHO and WEF
https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/immediately-implement-put-people-first-agenda-ppfa
https://brucecain.substack.com/
I go to Africa a lot in my youth & still occasionally.
Does anyone in Africa imagine all Africa can unite for common good ?
No. No one at all if honest. Yet , here in UK & US there is much time evaporated on uniting all 'Black peoples', all peoples etc. It is damages/pampered baby-think stupidness- peoples are too diverse & cultures are too incompatible to be realistic idea.
So, why is it promoted & by who?
By agenderist trouble makers who know it is impossible, & this schism with reality lead to more upset among the hopeful.
Here are you, effectively another impotent voice telling us what should be done, yet how is that going to happen? I come here to contribute & get constant abuse by masochists wanting payback, so how do you factor now epidemic SADO MASOCHISTIC DYNAMIC into all you dream ? We see all this virtue signalling game in Asia millennia ago, yet you in backwards western decay still haven't caught up with how the world really interacts & manoeuvres communities.
The Blue Sky Maiden quote:
"Here are you, effectively another impotent voice telling us what should be done, yet how is that going to happen?"
I'll just overlook the label of "impotent." LOL
I am 70 but not yet impotent.
In 1989 I embarked on a project to legalize the adult cultivation of Cannabis with no tax, regulation or gov't oversight. Joining with thousands of activists, worldwide, that goal has largely been achieved.
And of course the Anti-Globalist Agenda is already happening as we push against the Net Zero and Mass Immigration agenda's of the globalists. You see it throughout the US and EU as "right wing" -- actually Anti-Globalists -- groups gain traction. We see it in the rise of the AfD in Germany, the election of Trump, and the rise of Anti-globalists throughout the EU. So basically the Anti-Globalist Group is happening and gains more support by the day.
Anyway . . . are there planks on the PPFA that you disagree? Are there planks you think need to be added? Try to be constructive. Thanks for writing.
Thank you Bruce, I do not mean offence to you specific with impotent, just all of us relative to policy enactments via media/gov/corps ! Apologies if it seem insult to your virile self of mature experience, potent orgone & healthy altitude.
Is anti globalist = Flat Earth ?
Well done with legalising cannabis as it is medicinal meditative plant entity of intrinsic cultural dynamic. It is small pity that control is from conservative MPs ownership, but still better than nothing at all, & much improved from previous demonised as tool of devil worship,& date rape substance for degenerates leading to heroin addiction. How ironic that penalisers of herbs were often pet feltching child abusers on coke & opioids!
I have much to say on this when in the mood, & I will one day write full post on it. As may I suggest you consider to do also? Long comments here tend to be evaded & lost, while a proper post has more focus & durability maybe?
BTW I do not see any right or left wings , I just see massive turkey of sacrifice gobbling rabbit droppings manufactured by espionage families, & eager media whores like worms of the Phoenix or Eagle all trying to consume each other like manic cannibals.
I'm not the least bit offended by your comments. I'm an Anti-globalist who thinks the "flat Earth" theory is possibly the dumbest idea I've encountered in my life. But I can only speak for myself. My occupation was that of a Health Care Systems Analyst so I tend to be quite critical of what I watch or read. As Firesign Theatre used to say "we are all just Bozo's on this bus." But at the end of the day we must try to make the world a little bit better. Trying is always better than doing nothing. At least that way you die without too many regrets.
I like your sentiment, it seems honest sincerity.
I don't agree though to do as you say at the end of the day: after decades of doing much good deeds , it tends to generate envy, resentment, & ingratitude! I do not imply it should not be tried, just that Karma of such can be twisty, & indirect with result in far too many examples.
Sometimes it is best to do nothing & let tempest rage around you, instead of inside as well.
The other day I was kidding my wife that I was a descendent of Jesus as a number of artifacts seem to indicate he was of a rare bloodtype: ABRh-. I also share that rare bloodtype. LOL
My wife laughed because she knows I don't think Jesus ever existed though I do love the story. More than likely the story of Jesus finds parallels in many early cultures that were into Astrotheology: divining stories from the movement of the stars. Many of these cultures also found insights from doing entheogens of which I have done a few: Mescaline, LSD, Peyote, Psilocybin etc. At 70 I pretty much stick to a little occasional Cannabis. LOL
Personally I think we should all make efforts to make things better: whether that be you nation or your family. I think my father instilled those values when I was quite young. At the end of the day you just have to comport your life as you see best.
As someone that did a lot of entheogens, in my early years, I found this subject quite interesting. But I have no formed opinions and it is not something I'm likely to write about.
Astrotheology and Shamanism: Unveiling the Law of Duality in Christianity and other Religions
https://www.amazon.com/Astrotheology-Shamanism-Unveiling-Christianity-Religions/dp/1585091073
All good, thank you for sharing. One point though, I feel the tree of life is different from how you mention it. I feel it’s our own inner, higher consciousness that rests within the right hemisphere of our brain through which our heart and Mind align with and come to know the eternal Source. So, accessing it is actually imperative if we are to be “born in Spirit” and “saved”. We are saved from our own carnal nature, the lower mind, the tree of knowledge of hood and evil. Jesus spoke of the single eye, go within, find it and be set free. Just my two cents. ❤️
Tree of Knowledge & /tree of Life are different, & neither are actual trees.
Why is western peoples so suckered by left right brain scam?
There is one brain with 3 main compartments, how nerves react is only artifact of FIELD of thoughts of bio electric modality (?).
It is like saying if I press remote control that is the actual TV, not an accessory of influence.
Good to see Sonia Poulton's interview with Dr. David Hughes, let's hope more independent media sources take up the gauntlet thrown down by Iain and commit to discussing and showing the compelling EVIDENCE proving that the Manchester Arena event was a hoax .
I’ve followed Richard D Hall for years since long before Covid. I’ve met him on one of his tours. His greatest cases have sometimes the smallest cases with no possibility of wider publicity or “grift” as his detractors might say. I’m thinking particularly of the Cumbria shootings and County Lines drug murders.
The UK state has long realised that Hall was a problem. I had a problem accessing Rich Planet and after many fruitless tech support calls I realised his site was being suppressed by state internet provider BT Internet. The stony silence of their support engineer when I suggested as such spoke volumes. I left BT Internet immediately after and the problem was resolved.
Hall was doing such work long before the likes of O’Loughlin realised that there might be a problem.
Excellent Iain. You are right, it's decision time for the Column and others - a crossroads has been reached. Quite uncomfortable to watch the excellent Ben and Brian rationalise their stance. Take on the establishment over this EVIDENCE or continue to self censor so as not to cross their line. The argument that you'll be around to fight other battles doesn't work - you will have lost the war, it will just take a while to notice.
I agree with your theory, so what is important is how people react to information they receive. I will scan articles that deal with many differing possibilities, and that's how I treat them. At that point I am aware but since it's a possibility I happily move on, after all it's possible I'm the greatest drummer on the planet; but it isn't probable.
I wait for possibilities to become probabilities before I give them a second thought. Thanks for highlighting your theory!
Viewing Iain’s excellent film on UKC’s reporting of the Richard D Hall issue I am struck by the ironic similarity between the judge’s ruling that Hall would not be allowed to present his detailed evidence of the Manchester bombing hoax to the court, & therefore to the public, & UKC’s refusal to also present this evidence to their audience.
The BBC took a similar stance in not presenting Hall’s evidence.
What are UKC afraid of?
I think I know.
UKC have become an established institution in the alternative media world . They have worked hard to get there. But now they are a victim of their success.
Like all established institutions UKC have a lot to lose if the state decided they had crossed the line. Presenting Halls evidence would be crossing that line.
Yeah that's what I was thinking - A "Nice news organization you've built there, be a shame if something happens to it" type scenario.
In this way it can be said that UKC are controlled opposition.
The control may not be through a shadowy state agent issuing instructions. It may be a form of self-censoring. But it is nonetheless a form of control as I think Iain has highlighted.
The positive outcome of the Hall case - leaving aside the personal crisis for Hall & the wider serious implications for free speech - is that it has been like a canary in the coalmine.
It has shown how few in the so-called 'truth movement' / alternative media are truly independent & courageous enough to fully report Hall's case. Many - like UKC - have allowed the state to scare them off.
Its been enlightening.
I was previously around the revolutionary left for numerous years but had become disillusioned by their refusal to seriously question official narratives around 'terrorism' like that around 9/11. My full ‘awakening’ to the dark hidden realities of the globalist cabal and those who seek to manipulate and control us developed only gradually and I continued to be sceptical of 'conspiracy theories'; but the Manchester Arena hoax as initially posited by UKcriticalthinker and later more comprehensively by RDH was the catalyst that finally cemented my convictions.
I only became a member of UKC in 2022 as I’d heard them mentioned on several other sites I’d visited and they seemed like a good source of news and analysis on a range of important topics. I was unconcerned about where they were coming from ideologically and politically as I was more interested in their research and analysis. Their ‘gradualist’ approach and apparent caution about not ‘going too far’ and potentially frightening their audience was immediately apparent, but didn’t concern me at that time. Quite quickly it became more obvious that they were reformists rather than revolutionists who rather than believing we had to tear down this corrupt and rotten system, were rather often defenders -in principle - of the constitution; monarchy and parliament, merely believing that those that currently held the commanding levers of power were the problem but believing implicitly that they could be replaced by decent people. I found the obvious Christian motivations of Gerrish, Robinson and in particular Alex Thompson relatively unobtrusive (although the tone of discussions does sometimes appear to assume that we all share their theological assumptions). Of course there is no formal requirement for members to agree with these views and so I was unconcerned.
Several people have claimed that the military and security backgrounds of certain key figures – Gerrish, Thompson and more recent Charles Mallet ‘proves’ they can’t be trusted as genuine ‘truth seekers’ engaged in independent journalism. I don’t share this view as I tend to think that the ‘controlled opposition’ thesis while valid should not be a substitute for developing the skill of critical judgement and remaining vigilant at all times as to the veracity of evidence and theories. We should judge evidence and theory by using this critical judgement and not merely accusing people by dint of past associations. It is surely possible that those who maybe naively as young people joined the forces or even security apparatus out of a genuine sense of duty could over the course of time and experience come to see that these institutions were corrupt and involved in controlling us rather than protecting our freedoms? Being at the ‘coal face’ and seeing first hand what the military and security services actually do could in principle make people involved more likely to see the light than less? However, the fact that so many key UKC team members have a background like this is worthy of consideration.
I just tend to think UKC's actions – in particular in relation to Manchester – derive from their gradualist strategy and survival instincts. This gradualist v revolutionist dualism in some respects mirrors that of the radical left in the 1970s and 80s. UKC are sometimes a good source of info and because of their size and resources are able to cover a range of topics others can’t. This is why with all their limitations I will continue to watch (although I find watching on demand and being able to fast forward through stuff I’m not interested in often is the best way to engage). My membership is up for renewal just after the New Year but I will not be renewing it if UKC continue to refuse to address the issue of RDH’s evidence. Instead I will probably donate the fee to Richard.
There is nothing DARK about agenda of oppressors - it is in big fuck off NEON signs & VDU screens ! & the use of DARKNESS to equate to evil is infantile , subliminal racist bum puke. You are not awake at all using such gob-toss phraseology.
Three points:
1) Is your infantile woke comment some sort of joke/parody of an AOC/Kamala supporter?
2) 'bum puke' and 'gob toss' are you 11 years old?
3) In future please respond to me with the courtesy of standard English as used by adults - better still if this is the level of your intellect don't bother as I'm not a kindergarten teacher
Hello Mark Watsup,
Just like standard troll bitch you evade content & attempt to elevate yourself from sewers!
Bum Puke is something you eat after feltching pets ?
Gob toss is what you do here?
You do not have an adult brain, you have brittle tumour instead, so why you bitch like BBC presenter having to work in Shetland Islands ?
Now stick your 3 points into you sanctimonious, illiterate pompous pants & pretend it is your manhood, because only fragile humourless bores act like you about things like this.
You should be grateful I even notice your crying here like pouting little anus, swollen with anxiety.
Your prose is shit, your content is pretentious bore narcissism, your vocabulary is less than mediocre, yet you insult my phraseology ! I assume because of your notable lack of talent & originality, & due to terminal cognitive constipation?
Is it genetic, are your parents as devoid of humour & skills as yourself?
I have to assume they pampered you & this is why you have no social skills either.
I subscribed to UKC early in 2020 but, by the end of the year had moved on from what I consider their limitations. The fact that Brian Gerrish was a naval officer also spooked me a bit, but I’m eternally grateful for him waking me up to The Nudge unit and, as I subsequently discovered, their equivalent here in Australia. It’s unfortunate he won’t engage with you on Manchester but I figure there’s something going on behind the scenes that would explain why. And probably not a good something.
Maybe one point is to allow difference and debate as that will feed into the overall system.
Obviously, dividing and distracting us is useful in stopping any real resistance to the staus quo but also, if the new economic model is based on a society digitally linked together, then reactions and thoughts will all have to be recorded.
The system will want difference and choices as this will keep people happy in their own little worlds and will supply the data that the impact markets will require.
This is assuming that "Build Back Better" means a society run by data-driven, cybernetic governance protocols administered by AI.
I think for clear evidence of government malfeasance, in this case the U.S. government, to convince people to wake up and look at the tyranny, you can't beat the 5:00" to 15:00" portion of this video:
https://www.jermwarfare.social/p/sasha-latypova-covid-military-operation
Well done Iain- I have found you and Hughes have done an excellent job on this topic. I found Hall's reporting on the Manchester bang compelling from the get go. I am surprized and disappointed by UK Column as a fairly regular viewer and listener. I think they need to reconsider and at least allow debate on the topic.
Great work Iain.
I've followed UK Column since finding Ian R Crane in about 2016. I watch it regularly and find it very useful for getting news and opinion that I don't get elsewhere. I have winessed, as have others, that since the Oct 7th incident happened we've seen the loss of two key members. How could any longterm viewer not feel a bit emotional seeing Patrick and David on the set again, in the clips you show above? The loss of these two great characters and then the move into a "new studio" has changed the UKC news , just as lineup changes do in bands. I think they feel like a "big gun" now and are fearful of losing what they have. I believe they feel that by showing the evidence , they could lose their positition and go the same way as Alex Jones. I think there were enough hints to go and check out Rich D Hall's work , in the clips you showed but as you rightly state ; that if they'd shown it , a whole load more people would be aware of it. As to why, I think it's about self preservation. They have certainly said many times that they do not know how much longer they can keep doing what they do.
Thanks so much for your tireless work on this, and for helping us see the importance of what is happening to Richard.
I stopped watching U.K. column when I realised how narrow their remit was & how much what they cover is in reaction to the corporate news agenda. In short they are not alternative or radical enough.
Perhaps like so many in the wider media world they self-censor either knowingly or unknowingly.
Good on you Iain.
While I used to listen to UK column and thought Brian Gerrish was reasonable. I respected him as a Naval Officer. I find Mike Robinson tends to be very suspicious of anyone and can be quite aggressive. I changed by mind however when they roped in Vanessa Beeley and chopped David Scott.
While Beeley has done remarkable work Exposing NATO and its evil and I commend her for that.
I was surprised though by her friends endorsing each others responses. Here I refer to four in particular being the Anti-Israel lobby, being Vanessa Beeley, Eva Karene Bartlett and Fiorella Isabel and Sam Husseini. All claim to be independent journalists which is fine with me and some have a huge reputations like Beeley and Husseni and appear to have good intentions. However when they start calling others names and supporters of Zionists and Israel and NATO & the West and then praise a convicted murderer now living in Turkey who goes under the name of Shahid Bolsen a converted Moslem as trustworthy, the alarm bells start to ring.
It’s great to sit in an ivory tower and cast aspersions, when their narrative is questioned some like Fiorella Isabel retreat into the nursery and block one. Why I say that is I have experienced exactly that was blocked when asking simple question on reports made and then labelled as troll or as I was called a state sponsored troll by another on a substack.
One thing Iain is you are strait down the line and explain when questioned. Even when one disagrees it is still done honestly.
All the best and keep up the good work.