Keir Starmer's job was to convert the Labour Party of Jeremy Corbyn into a centrist "nothing" similar to the US Democratic Party which is currently running a corpse.
The Dem "cadaver" is opposing an Orange obnoxious idiot who's supposedly a threat to democracy. 😁
The dominance of a corrupt political duopoly in both the US and Britain is an indication of how much control the powers that shouldn't be possess.
"If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.”
I went to a talk by Wole Soyinka in Kenya in the 1970s. He said: "When the phrase was written 'The pen is mightier than the sword', the machine-gun had not been invented".
Not by choice. The bank of England governor had her booted out. If she had been allowed to carry out her plan we would be OK now. As it is, we are screwed
Inverse world - up is down, black is white, right is wrong, good is evil. Demoralisation is a weapon in their arsenal but please remember, this too will soon pass, it is all psychological and transient. Once seen, cannot be unseen. Emperor's New Clothes.
Men are women... yeah upside down. They worked on this, notably the Stanford Experiments where blue could change to red if someone said so. But I'm trying to take the view it will eliminate the weak minded rather than a total doom scenario. Otherwise I would not get out of bed and that is getting harder.
Well put Iain and yes it amounts to jack shit as the criminocracy is in charge and we the ants trying to avoid the boots. The belief in what people call democracy, the system put in place by the clowns is the icing on the cockroach cake so loved by the semi-educated churchgoers for whom another pint is the payoff.
I think the CCP calls China the people's democratic dictatorship.
Pretty fancy footwork!
Pretending the overt dictator is not really a dictator does make more sense, than the massive cost of repeatedly changing the chairs via useless elections and political shenanigans, to try to cover up the fact that there is a constant covert dictator regardless.
And I laugh about it when some say its not a communist country but it's run by the Communist Chinese Party. It was said by the loon, Corbett of Corbett report that China is a technocracy.. Only because Patrick Wood said so.
If the country is run using Capitalist principals under a one party state, it is a Crony
- Capitalist state of fascism who share the profits of (means of production) among themselves, the "Communist Party" and the PPP's (Private Approved Partners). It is therefore still communistic as in a commune. No different, just because the Private partners use technocratic- techno-logic systems (computers) logic to drive profits upwards.
There are redefining it and relabelling it as a technocracy. The clothes are identical, just changed the make-up and lipstick.
Well there are now drones in the air over our little country town on the border of SA and Victoria (Australia) and my husband and I have now decided to keep our phones in Faraday bags and to start using techniques last seen behind the Iron Curtain. Music on when we talk, writing notes to each other. Sorry, but the Lebanese in me is highly suspicious and I can see this surveillance turning into incarceration for some or many. Meanwhile, I've had nosebleeds from the 5G towers.
My view on China was reinforced when I went there to Beijing on official business with a Danish company in 2000. As you may be aware the are mostly extremely liberal but believe in socialism and yet have a hate for their neighbours Germany and of course foreigners of all persuasions.
Being from a country where I live. I have seen first hand how the (Chinese) are invading north of where I live and witnessing, and by working with them on some infrastructure projects, have witnessed how they are terrorised by their own political officers. It showed me that they are still very a communist nation. Yep, maybe a new label now given, but no different to me. The root is the same as well as the progressive pathway of Marxism
Besides having some disgusting habits and behaviour when viewed from the western upbringing point of view, I don't particularly like them. So, yes I am biased against them as well as Russians and Cubans. The latter two is from military experience in the 1970's.
As far as you comments go on BRICS I fully agree. They China are with Russia fully behind the NWO SDG's and policies. The Western World is being fooled. I see it and witness it as I live in a BRICS country.
William, thought you would like this on technocracy. Gleaned from Nicholas Creeds substack. Modified in brackets by me.
Technocracy refers to a political system where decision-making power is concentrated in the hands of experts and technocrats , (partnered with state bureaucrats).
The rise of China to its position of economic, geopolitical and military prominence did not happen overnight and it did not happen as the result of a handful of bought-and-paid for politicians. Rather, China has been carefully and intentionally built up as a major player in the emerging multipolar New World Order by the same gaggle of globalists who have overseen the global financial and geopolitical for the past 50 years.
But why?
To get a handle on this question, it's fruitful to take a look at what it is that the globalists see in China. We can gain insight into the answer by looking at a curious, recurring theme in the controlled establishment media propaganda about China. I call it: "China Is Horrible! . . . But Wouldn't It Be Nice?"
This theme can be seen in just about every piece in the controlled corporate media about the evils of the Chinese government and its treatment of its citizens. In a nutshell, they expose the unbelievably Orwellian control that the ChiComs assert over every aspect of citizens' lives, decry it as tyrannical . . . and then point out how effective this autocratic system is in managing the Chinese economy and building Chinese military might and geopolitical clout. The effect of such propaganda is always to remind the reader that China is The Enemy and deserves our Two Minutes Hate—but that it would be nice if our loving, Western, "democratic" governments assumed some of those powers, too.
Trudeau's now infamous expression of "admiration" for the Chinese dictatorship is one example of this theme, but the propagandists over at The New York Times provided perhaps the quintessential expression of this idea in a recent article, "Living by the Code: In China, Covid-Era Controls May Outlast the Virus."
The piece opens by noting the plight of Xie Yang, a human rights lawyer who decided to travel to Shanghai to visit the mother of a dissident even after local authorities warned him against taking the trip. On his way to the airport, officials changed Xie's health status on his government-mandated health code app from "green," meaning that he was free to travel, to "red," prompting airport security to attempt to put him in quarantine.
The rest of the article walks a delicate line: it accurately documents the egregious abuses of human rights enabled by the biosecurity surveillance grid erected by the Chinese government, but it is peppered with constant reminders about how effective this grid is at "containing" the scamdemic. The Chinese government, it tells us, has become "emboldened by their successes in stamping out Covid." And, we are told, the government-mandated health code app is "key to China’s goal of stamping out the virus entirely within its borders." These controls "have really produced great results, because they can monitor down to every individual," the article quotes a Chinese dental worker as saying. The Times even asserts that the government's "success in limiting infections" has led to "widespread support" for the measures.
In other words: China's tyranny is horrible! . . . But wouldn't it be nice?
Once you notice this particular propaganda ploy, you will see it everywhere in mainstream discussions about the Chinese "menace" that is supposedly the greatest "threat" to the free world. And once you do notice this trick, you will begin to understand the real reason that the globalists have worked so closely with China for decades: not because they are adherents of communism, but because they see China as an experimental laboratory in which to perfect a new form of governance for the planet.
This is precisely what David Rockefeller meant when he wrote his infamous ode to Chairman Mao in an August 1973 New York Times op-ed, "From a China Traveler":
The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.
It is not that Rockefeller was a secret (or not-so-secret) communist. In fact, it turns out that the Chinese system of governance isn't really communism at all.
So if China isn't communist, what is it?
The answer is simple: China is a technocracy.
Technocracy is not the benevolent rule of an enlightened scientific class, but the use of that class by the ruling oligarchy to more effectively manage the human population.
The technocratic mindset is everywhere apparent in the Chinese system, where the citizenry is treated as unruly variables in an otherwise harmonious equation, variables that can only be tamed by rigorous logic and ruthless algorithmic strictures. Hence the laundry list of heartless, inhuman, but doubtless "efficient" techniques for managing the population. The techniques, spearheaded by the Chinese, range from the world's most pervasive facial recognition network to the vast social credit system, which regulates citizens' behaviour by barring them from public transit or by blocking their access to higher education or well-paying jobs if they do not comply with government dictates.
Is it any wonder, then, that China was the first country to roll out the QR code-driven, smartphone-hosted "health pass" that enables the government, if it chooses, to prevent any individual from passing any government checkpoint at any time? Or that the Western media—let alone (mis)leaders like Trudeau—would so openly lust after those powers?
First time here. Subscribed before finishing the first paragraph -- "chuffed" as I'm told you lot like to say. Hail originally from across the pond but presently in self-inflicted exile in Germany. If you Brits ever want to realize how good you have it, come and live here for awhile.
If people had turned out like they did to be "vaccinated" and had voted for an independent or one of the small freedom parties that sprang up during lockdown , would you consider parliament worthy of consideration then? Asking for a friend who wonders if destroying our current system would suit the "oligarchs" that you generically mentioned but didn't name, down to the ground.
No. I think the idea of electing someone else to make decisions for you, however noble their intentions may be, is a fundamentally flawed and ultimately self-destructive idea. I don't think we need to "destroy" anything. I think we need to build something better. We can end the current rule by ignoring it. I have written on how we can build a voluntary society in these articles.
Sounds attractive but we should consider whether maybe 'democracy' on the blockchain is the ultimate goal. It's what the Public/Private Partnerships want. Just like today, those who went to vote thought they had a choice (and you made a choice not to vote), in reality they were influenced by what they believed and then the choices afforded to them.
If the powerful "elites" get their way, all life will go on the blockchain and we will vote on issues (or let our AI buddy decide for us if we can't be bothered).
Influencers will attempt to convince the public that they’re the ones “in control,” but we will be voting with programmable money/tokens with conditions attached. I remember Zelensky made a holographic “appearance” at a European tech conference in which he proposed transforming “government” into a digital service delivered on a smartphone. I doubt he made that idea up himself.
Something is up with Kurten. I think he ran someone against Andrew Bridgen who also los t.I don't know why he doesn't park his Heritage Party and help somewhere else. He also needs to get in shape or I just don't trust a fat man.
Interesting. Maybe Kurten thought that Bridgen was controlled opposition. Overall, I don't know why the smaller parties haven't really got off the ground other than none of them get any media coverage and there has been some in-fighting.
As well as The Heritage Party, I am aware of The Freedom Alliance, The English Democrats, The Alliance for Democracy and Freedom and The Libertarian Party.
There are also of course indepedents and The Vote Freedom Project which encourages people to stand as independents. They want "to see parties and large scale funding removed from politics and towards Independent Democracy" which sounds fine as long as that isn't on the blockchain as that is walking into the trap awaiting those who want to tear down our current system!
You're not adding anything of value to this debate by your puerile, ad-hominem attack on David Kurten. David is perhaps the one of the few genuine, honest anti-establishment figures on the political scene alongside Robin Tilbrook, Graham Moore and others. David is open to do tactical deals with many of the genuine anti-establishment freedom parties and candidates in elections, but will NOT do deals with controlled opposition candidates (i.e. Bridgen, Farage, Tice, Fox etc.) and parties.
Ok, controlled opposition candidates... hmmm well at least Bridgen got up and said what he said in Parliament and told them how it is in the end. Nothing wrong with what he said and I'm sure you'd agree with that and perhaps his views on Ukraine. Given how few votes he got I really doubt he's controlled. Fox as well seems to be a man of himself given the legal action thrown at him and his losses there that illuminate just like with Hopkins how corrupt our country is now - how is this good for them and their narrative and there story? Do you know how stressful that is or is it all for show to have your name dragged through the mud for wanting freedom of speech? Hopkins went as far as changing the surname of her kids!
Whether they're controled opposition or not don't you understand the value of them changing the centre of the debate more in the direction we want? We've got to use everyone we've got and not be against everyone. My beef with Kurtan is I think he should of seen the value of Bridgen. I actually also agree with Bridgen's view of a Non-Party political system. Kurtan on the otherhand thinks otherwise.
Can't say I disagree with Kurten on much but think his high bar for only Christian candidates an incorrect and limiting approach. He closes himself off to too many options that could progress him and are arguments gainig better traction and reach. And he goes on GB News which is the king of controlled option so how can you marry that with his views? Or wait he's trying to get the narrative out there and change it and hold on isn't that what controlled opposition candidates are doing instead? Would it be better just not to have them including people like Russell Brand? But he can be used!
Farage and Reform are the closest chance so far to the UK getting PR and then people like your lovely Kurtan can then actually get into power. See my point on using what we do have? If Kirtan doesn't see these benefit of the points I'm making he's incredibly naive for someone so awake. That or there are other processes at play possibly a strange greed ego inverted arrogance or need for validation? Who knows?
And yes I think he should make a tactical deal with a PT to increase his appeal because the general public are shallow. So does he have a medical condition to make him that big - I'm asking seriously? Becasue if he doesn't then again for someone so awake he is naive. In order to fight this we've got to be healthy and save ourselves before we save anyone else. Otherwise how can we lead? Or is he actually part of the woke body positive movement?
I'm saying how it is, saying how the world actually works NOT how I think it should be. Kurten is an idealist and that unfortunately won't get him anywhere in my opinion. He should tweak and change as well as broaden his approach. Please forgive my sins and God bles you, but hang on again doesn't Kurtan agree with freedom of speech so why you getting personal with me and my argument when instead I'm just having a discussion softy?
An analogy I like is the people voted for a different coloured box (red) but once the contents are examined, they are the same as the blue box. I agree voting for “Change” is just an illusion. Politicians come and go but the deep state is a constant.
It fails the moment a brutish psychopath steals the property of others and distributes it to his weak sycophants. Immediately, there is the necessity for government amongst the victims to defend themselves against the brute and his army of plundering, raping, and murdering sycophants.
You ignore the key role the financial system plays in frustrating every impulse to give people effective freedom. This system has been diabolically designed and instituted by monopoly-pushers to maximize the accumulation of debt, which enhances their power. Engineer Clifford Hugh Douglas dissected its built-in defects and prescribed correctives for them a century ago. Today, after a 1984-style disappearing of Douglas’s analysis, the financial racket is forbidden territory for purported critics of the system that oppresses us.
Unlike Iain, I believe in the necessity of government.
The U.S. Constitution Preamble:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
''William Pritting, also known as Prince William of Wales, was born on June 21, 1982, at St Mary’s Hospital in London, England. He is the elder son of King Charles III and Diana, Princess of Wales''
BING surprises me more often than gives decent answers these days !
''I apologize for any confusion. William Pritting does not appear to be a widely known individual, and I couldn’t find specific information about his birthplace. However, Prince William, the heir apparent to the British throne, was born on 21 June 1982 at St Mary’s Hospital in London, England1. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask! 😊''
ALSO A BASIC QUERY GAVE THIS
''You
WHAT IS THE DATE OF BIRTH FOR William Pritting
Copilot
William, Prince of Wales, was born on 21 June 1982 at St Mary’s Hospital in London, England. He is the elder son of King Charles III and Diana, Princess of Wales. His full name is William Arthur Philip Louis1. If you need any more information, feel free to ask! 😊''
Norman Dodd tells how the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Guggenheim and Ford Foundations set out to control education and rewrite American history in order to merge America into the one-world government they could control.
Unfortunately, U.S. history has been a never ending battle against the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy. Our current and longest lasting battle began when the British assassinated our President McKinley in 1901 and installed their Anglophile puppet Teddy Roosevelt in the White House. TR’s treason was followed by another Anglophile traitor, Woodrow Wilson, whose betrayal resulted in the total submission of the USA back under the dominion of the British Commonwealth. Now the world is finally waking up and recognizing that the British Oligarchy are the true enemies of humanity with their evil machinations around the globe to instigate the undermining of Popular Nationalism and Republican Constitutionalism. My Substack page is dedicated to exposing the evil British Oligarchy and enlightening readers to the global war between Republicanism/Nationalism Vs. Oligarchism/Globalism.
Do you not think that these people think globally and are not just based in Britain? Eg Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Germany, Israel and Russia for instance? Oh and the USA...
No….it’s the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy that are the enemy of humanity:
Since so many people are now asking, “Who is really running the country?” Here’s the Deep State reality:
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
Always remember, the US State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the CFR is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House).
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
Today we are in the culmination of the British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on the USA that was plotted by Cecil Rhodes, activated by his death in 1902 and implementation of his Wills that resulted in the founding of the Rhodes Scholarship Program and Round Table Movement.
The Round Table Movement evolved into the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) founded in 1919-20 and its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations, founded in 1921. Hillary Clinton referred to the CFR as the “Mothership,” but that distinction more appropriately belongs to Chatham House.
The purpose for the creation of Chatham House and its subsidiary the CFR was, and is, to instigate the collapse of the USA and its reabsorption back under the British Commonwealth, and eventually under a future British One-World Global Empire.
(Click on a book pic and scroll down to the Table of Contents)
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
The British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America is not being fought with bullets and bayonets, but with filth and anarchy to instigate “The Great Collapse of US Society” so “We Their Serfs” will surrender our Liberty & Rights, abolish our Constitution, and allow them to “Build Back Better” a One-World NWO where the British Oligarchy own all of the land and natural resources, and we must obey the bureaucratic technocrats at the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS-NATO and their “Sustainable Development Goals” and “Environmental, Social, Governance” and “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion” dictates.
The following almost sounds like a script of every day’s evening news, and that’s because it is the playbook of the British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America, but this war is being fought with filth and anarchy, not bullets and bayonets:
How To Instigate "The Great Collapse of US Society" By Implementing the Frankfurt School's "Critical Theory."
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
Exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
THE SECRET PLOT IN 1909 BY THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
The evolution of the British quest for a One World Global Empire, from John Ruskin to Cecil Rhodes to Lord Milner’s Round Table Group to William Yandell Elliott to Henry Kissinger to Klaus Schwab.
The Kissinger Continuum: The Unauthorized History of the WEF’s Young Global Leaders Program
As the British Empire shifted from a colonial to a neocolonial system, it had to develop quieter, more discreet methods for removing rebellious vassals
Since after the Presidential Debate between Trump Vs. Biden, and the exposure of Biden’s dementia to the world, so many people are now asking, “Who is really running the country (USA)?
Here’s the Deep State reality:
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
Always remember, the US State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the CFR is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House).
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
Since after the Presidential Debate between Trump Vs. Biden, and the exposure of Biden’s dementia to the world, so many people are now asking, “Who is really running the country (USA)?
Here’s the Deep State reality:
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
Always remember, the US State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the CFR is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House).
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
Not voting is a perfectly legitimate choice, as is spoiling a ballot paper, or i deed voting in good faith with a belief that the vote you cast has a desired effect.
There has been a lot of discussion about Starmers "thin mandate". Public opinion does matter as of course does personal actions.
Personally I chose to vote, a protest vote in incidentally for Reform. 4 million others for their own reasons chose to do the same.
Steve Baker lost his seat in High Wycombe having failed in early coverage before he went to attend his count, to submit to the planned humiliation ritual, the Good morning Britain trio of Ed Balls, George Osbourne and Susahanna Reid had another go.
Heres my blog on my take away from what I felt was great blow from Steve to two Trilateral stooges.
The paper on how Andrew Bailey is the real shadow PM quoted in the blog.
On The Bond Market holding sway over the nominally executive legislative chamber this report from Southbank research and the — FLEET STREET LETTER SPECIAL REPORT
"By a bait and switch, central bankers are now the ones who can “intimidate everybody,” as Carville put it. If he is reincarnated as the bond market, he would be bitterly disappointed to discover these technocrats are now in charge. They can decide to support governments like Mario Draghi’s in Italy by buying Italian government debt. Or they can undermine governments like Liz Truss’ ... not always that blatant. ....discredited and then fired, like Liz Truss and Yanis Varoufakis."
I hold a different view to you Iain , but I do not claim to be anything else other than an active participant in the Establishment.
They. "The Heirarchy That enslave you"The Metaphysics of "THEY"
“When, in this century, did Labour get the largest number of votes in a general election?
The answer is, “Not this week, and not under Tony Blair. It was in 2017, when Labour was led by Jeremy Corbyn." His 2,877,918 votes were 3 million more than this week's winning 9,698,409 votes.
Of course Moore doesn't look at the fact that Corbyn was elected as Party Leader with 70% support of Members/Supporters, that the PLP and Labour party machine worked against him from day 1 ("Lord" Mandelson actually said "every day"). In 2016 Corbyn lost a PLP vote of no confidence 172-40 and in 2017 Labour MPs were horrified by the result. They then took full part in the campaign about left-wing anti-semitism. #ItWasAScam
No - his Lordship praises Starmer's "astonishing achievement: he understood his party’s predicament. He knew he had to rescue it from a hard-Left ghetto. He has done so with dignity and grit."
Keir Starmer's job was to convert the Labour Party of Jeremy Corbyn into a centrist "nothing" similar to the US Democratic Party which is currently running a corpse.
The Dem "cadaver" is opposing an Orange obnoxious idiot who's supposedly a threat to democracy. 😁
The dominance of a corrupt political duopoly in both the US and Britain is an indication of how much control the powers that shouldn't be possess.
"If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.”
Emma Goldma
Starmer, however, does do a very good impression of a retard. It's a toss-up between the addled and the retarded. How have we come to this?
We came to this when pens replaced swords and maces.
I went to a talk by Wole Soyinka in Kenya in the 1970s. He said: "When the phrase was written 'The pen is mightier than the sword', the machine-gun had not been invented".
Ooh I like a Mace. Check out Flowing Dutchman videos. That's the future. In the past.
Sometimes words are inadequate for winning an argument 🤣
Also check out Mark Wildman. Learn to protect yourself.
Aye! Will do. Thanks for the tips!
It's the inevitable result of gangsterism.
Maybe he’ll do a Liz Truss.
Why, what did she do?
She split the scene after 2 months.
Not by choice. The bank of England governor had her booted out. If she had been allowed to carry out her plan we would be OK now. As it is, we are screwed
I understood that. May I guess that you can think of no one who would give KS the boot?
You will be pleased to know that 'Keir Rodney Starmer', his full name, anagrams to:
er sir retard monkey
For some reason I did not include it n my post, but there are plenty of other good ones.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/keir-starmer-british-politician-and?utm_source=publication-search
Inverse world - up is down, black is white, right is wrong, good is evil. Demoralisation is a weapon in their arsenal but please remember, this too will soon pass, it is all psychological and transient. Once seen, cannot be unseen. Emperor's New Clothes.
Men are women... yeah upside down. They worked on this, notably the Stanford Experiments where blue could change to red if someone said so. But I'm trying to take the view it will eliminate the weak minded rather than a total doom scenario. Otherwise I would not get out of bed and that is getting harder.
Yuri Besmanov warned this is the demoralisation stage
I don't know how you did it, but you read my mind.
The next 12 months is now set to make the last four years look like a walk in the park (as planned).
Well put Iain and yes it amounts to jack shit as the criminocracy is in charge and we the ants trying to avoid the boots. The belief in what people call democracy, the system put in place by the clowns is the icing on the cockroach cake so loved by the semi-educated churchgoers for whom another pint is the payoff.
The political Parliamentary "Party" system is as was aptly described by former Conservative Law Lord Hailsham as “elective dictatorship”.
It doesn't matter who you vote for it is simply an exercise of rearranging the deck chairs. A new boss the same as the old boss.
I think the CCP calls China the people's democratic dictatorship.
Pretty fancy footwork!
Pretending the overt dictator is not really a dictator does make more sense, than the massive cost of repeatedly changing the chairs via useless elections and political shenanigans, to try to cover up the fact that there is a constant covert dictator regardless.
And I laugh about it when some say its not a communist country but it's run by the Communist Chinese Party. It was said by the loon, Corbett of Corbett report that China is a technocracy.. Only because Patrick Wood said so.
If the country is run using Capitalist principals under a one party state, it is a Crony
- Capitalist state of fascism who share the profits of (means of production) among themselves, the "Communist Party" and the PPP's (Private Approved Partners). It is therefore still communistic as in a commune. No different, just because the Private partners use technocratic- techno-logic systems (computers) logic to drive profits upwards.
There are redefining it and relabelling it as a technocracy. The clothes are identical, just changed the make-up and lipstick.
The concern is, we might all end up in a technocratic surveillance prison state regardless of who shares the spoils, unless we take action.
Well there are now drones in the air over our little country town on the border of SA and Victoria (Australia) and my husband and I have now decided to keep our phones in Faraday bags and to start using techniques last seen behind the Iron Curtain. Music on when we talk, writing notes to each other. Sorry, but the Lebanese in me is highly suspicious and I can see this surveillance turning into incarceration for some or many. Meanwhile, I've had nosebleeds from the 5G towers.
Technocracy is today’s label for modern fascism.
China is no longer a communist country, but a fascist country.
BRICS = UN Agenda 21/2030
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/brics-un-agenda-212030?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
China Is A Technocracy
https://www.technocracy.news/day-7-china-is-a-technocracy/
How The Trilateral Commission Converted China Into A Technocracy
https://www.technocracy.news/trilateral-commission-converted-china-technocracy/
Technocracy In China: The World’s First Technate – Part 1
https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy-in-china-the-worlds-first-technate-part-1/
China Is The World’s First Technate
https://www.technocracy.news/prelude-to-day-7-china-is-the-worlds-first-technate/
Technocracy Was Born In US, Grew Up In China, Now Conquering The World
https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy-was-born-in-us-grew-up-in-china-now-conquering-the-world/
Thanks for your comment.
My view on China was reinforced when I went there to Beijing on official business with a Danish company in 2000. As you may be aware the are mostly extremely liberal but believe in socialism and yet have a hate for their neighbours Germany and of course foreigners of all persuasions.
Being from a country where I live. I have seen first hand how the (Chinese) are invading north of where I live and witnessing, and by working with them on some infrastructure projects, have witnessed how they are terrorised by their own political officers. It showed me that they are still very a communist nation. Yep, maybe a new label now given, but no different to me. The root is the same as well as the progressive pathway of Marxism
Besides having some disgusting habits and behaviour when viewed from the western upbringing point of view, I don't particularly like them. So, yes I am biased against them as well as Russians and Cubans. The latter two is from military experience in the 1970's.
As far as you comments go on BRICS I fully agree. They China are with Russia fully behind the NWO SDG's and policies. The Western World is being fooled. I see it and witness it as I live in a BRICS country.
By design, William as you say: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/what-can-the-west-learn-from-china?r=hhrlz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
William, thought you would like this on technocracy. Gleaned from Nicholas Creeds substack. Modified in brackets by me.
Technocracy refers to a political system where decision-making power is concentrated in the hands of experts and technocrats , (partnered with state bureaucrats).
Yup….modern fascism.
David Hughes is good on this issue (and much else). New 2-part series:
Part 2
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Wall-Street-Nazis-Crimes-State-ebook/dp/B0CLL9233F/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=1-1
And Part1 https://dhughes.substack.com/t/full-book
He cites Iain Davis a lot.
China is the Laboratory for Globalism:
From: James Corbett
The rise of China to its position of economic, geopolitical and military prominence did not happen overnight and it did not happen as the result of a handful of bought-and-paid for politicians. Rather, China has been carefully and intentionally built up as a major player in the emerging multipolar New World Order by the same gaggle of globalists who have overseen the global financial and geopolitical for the past 50 years.
But why?
To get a handle on this question, it's fruitful to take a look at what it is that the globalists see in China. We can gain insight into the answer by looking at a curious, recurring theme in the controlled establishment media propaganda about China. I call it: "China Is Horrible! . . . But Wouldn't It Be Nice?"
This theme can be seen in just about every piece in the controlled corporate media about the evils of the Chinese government and its treatment of its citizens. In a nutshell, they expose the unbelievably Orwellian control that the ChiComs assert over every aspect of citizens' lives, decry it as tyrannical . . . and then point out how effective this autocratic system is in managing the Chinese economy and building Chinese military might and geopolitical clout. The effect of such propaganda is always to remind the reader that China is The Enemy and deserves our Two Minutes Hate—but that it would be nice if our loving, Western, "democratic" governments assumed some of those powers, too.
Trudeau's now infamous expression of "admiration" for the Chinese dictatorship is one example of this theme, but the propagandists over at The New York Times provided perhaps the quintessential expression of this idea in a recent article, "Living by the Code: In China, Covid-Era Controls May Outlast the Virus."
The piece opens by noting the plight of Xie Yang, a human rights lawyer who decided to travel to Shanghai to visit the mother of a dissident even after local authorities warned him against taking the trip. On his way to the airport, officials changed Xie's health status on his government-mandated health code app from "green," meaning that he was free to travel, to "red," prompting airport security to attempt to put him in quarantine.
The rest of the article walks a delicate line: it accurately documents the egregious abuses of human rights enabled by the biosecurity surveillance grid erected by the Chinese government, but it is peppered with constant reminders about how effective this grid is at "containing" the scamdemic. The Chinese government, it tells us, has become "emboldened by their successes in stamping out Covid." And, we are told, the government-mandated health code app is "key to China’s goal of stamping out the virus entirely within its borders." These controls "have really produced great results, because they can monitor down to every individual," the article quotes a Chinese dental worker as saying. The Times even asserts that the government's "success in limiting infections" has led to "widespread support" for the measures.
In other words: China's tyranny is horrible! . . . But wouldn't it be nice?
Once you notice this particular propaganda ploy, you will see it everywhere in mainstream discussions about the Chinese "menace" that is supposedly the greatest "threat" to the free world. And once you do notice this trick, you will begin to understand the real reason that the globalists have worked so closely with China for decades: not because they are adherents of communism, but because they see China as an experimental laboratory in which to perfect a new form of governance for the planet.
This is precisely what David Rockefeller meant when he wrote his infamous ode to Chairman Mao in an August 1973 New York Times op-ed, "From a China Traveler":
The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.
It is not that Rockefeller was a secret (or not-so-secret) communist. In fact, it turns out that the Chinese system of governance isn't really communism at all.
So if China isn't communist, what is it?
The answer is simple: China is a technocracy.
Technocracy is not the benevolent rule of an enlightened scientific class, but the use of that class by the ruling oligarchy to more effectively manage the human population.
The technocratic mindset is everywhere apparent in the Chinese system, where the citizenry is treated as unruly variables in an otherwise harmonious equation, variables that can only be tamed by rigorous logic and ruthless algorithmic strictures. Hence the laundry list of heartless, inhuman, but doubtless "efficient" techniques for managing the population. The techniques, spearheaded by the Chinese, range from the world's most pervasive facial recognition network to the vast social credit system, which regulates citizens' behaviour by barring them from public transit or by blocking their access to higher education or well-paying jobs if they do not comply with government dictates.
Is it any wonder, then, that China was the first country to roll out the QR code-driven, smartphone-hosted "health pass" that enables the government, if it chooses, to prevent any individual from passing any government checkpoint at any time? Or that the Western media—let alone (mis)leaders like Trudeau—would so openly lust after those powers?
https://www.corbettreport.com/its-confirmed-tyrants-love-china-but-why/?fbclid=IwAR2DZyFBjV3i73xKPvTHnyzVebMZIF5R2dLjojj_3KNd88aga18CDha6eRA_aem_AaTl6PWKH_fG7kdb-wEn77etNiq_OtSkJBLlkG6Zu19kjJT3Grn-aBy52vhCmXK6XtM&mibextid=Zxz2cZ
Corbett lives comfortably in Japan and has a prodigious output, so presumably he is sanctioned. What is he not telling us?
PS I doubt you'll find any criticism of him on Google if you look.
Got it….you’re NOT a fan of James Corbett.
"Coblette too fuking stupid to realise conspiracy exist before 911"
Documentaries on WW1 + WW2 + federal reserve + big oil + propaganda and many more conspiracies pre dating 911
First time here. Subscribed before finishing the first paragraph -- "chuffed" as I'm told you lot like to say. Hail originally from across the pond but presently in self-inflicted exile in Germany. If you Brits ever want to realize how good you have it, come and live here for awhile.
Oh they love the rules. The nation never left behind the Nazi mentality either it's crazy.
And it is full of Bad places too! :)
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/05/19/why-are-so-many-german-cities-bad/
C.J. Hopkins is excellent. https://cjhopkins.substack.com/
If people had turned out like they did to be "vaccinated" and had voted for an independent or one of the small freedom parties that sprang up during lockdown , would you consider parliament worthy of consideration then? Asking for a friend who wonders if destroying our current system would suit the "oligarchs" that you generically mentioned but didn't name, down to the ground.
No. I think the idea of electing someone else to make decisions for you, however noble their intentions may be, is a fundamentally flawed and ultimately self-destructive idea. I don't think we need to "destroy" anything. I think we need to build something better. We can end the current rule by ignoring it. I have written on how we can build a voluntary society in these articles.
https://iaindavis.com/inalienable-rights/
https://iaindavis.com/towards-freedom/
https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/
Sounds attractive but we should consider whether maybe 'democracy' on the blockchain is the ultimate goal. It's what the Public/Private Partnerships want. Just like today, those who went to vote thought they had a choice (and you made a choice not to vote), in reality they were influenced by what they believed and then the choices afforded to them.
If the powerful "elites" get their way, all life will go on the blockchain and we will vote on issues (or let our AI buddy decide for us if we can't be bothered).
Influencers will attempt to convince the public that they’re the ones “in control,” but we will be voting with programmable money/tokens with conditions attached. I remember Zelensky made a holographic “appearance” at a European tech conference in which he proposed transforming “government” into a digital service delivered on a smartphone. I doubt he made that idea up himself.
The blockchain is a digital version of the ball & chain, especially the necklace version
Something is up with Kurten. I think he ran someone against Andrew Bridgen who also los t.I don't know why he doesn't park his Heritage Party and help somewhere else. He also needs to get in shape or I just don't trust a fat man.
Interesting. Maybe Kurten thought that Bridgen was controlled opposition. Overall, I don't know why the smaller parties haven't really got off the ground other than none of them get any media coverage and there has been some in-fighting.
As well as The Heritage Party, I am aware of The Freedom Alliance, The English Democrats, The Alliance for Democracy and Freedom and The Libertarian Party.
There are also of course indepedents and The Vote Freedom Project which encourages people to stand as independents. They want "to see parties and large scale funding removed from politics and towards Independent Democracy" which sounds fine as long as that isn't on the blockchain as that is walking into the trap awaiting those who want to tear down our current system!
You're not adding anything of value to this debate by your puerile, ad-hominem attack on David Kurten. David is perhaps the one of the few genuine, honest anti-establishment figures on the political scene alongside Robin Tilbrook, Graham Moore and others. David is open to do tactical deals with many of the genuine anti-establishment freedom parties and candidates in elections, but will NOT do deals with controlled opposition candidates (i.e. Bridgen, Farage, Tice, Fox etc.) and parties.
Ok, controlled opposition candidates... hmmm well at least Bridgen got up and said what he said in Parliament and told them how it is in the end. Nothing wrong with what he said and I'm sure you'd agree with that and perhaps his views on Ukraine. Given how few votes he got I really doubt he's controlled. Fox as well seems to be a man of himself given the legal action thrown at him and his losses there that illuminate just like with Hopkins how corrupt our country is now - how is this good for them and their narrative and there story? Do you know how stressful that is or is it all for show to have your name dragged through the mud for wanting freedom of speech? Hopkins went as far as changing the surname of her kids!
Whether they're controled opposition or not don't you understand the value of them changing the centre of the debate more in the direction we want? We've got to use everyone we've got and not be against everyone. My beef with Kurtan is I think he should of seen the value of Bridgen. I actually also agree with Bridgen's view of a Non-Party political system. Kurtan on the otherhand thinks otherwise.
Can't say I disagree with Kurten on much but think his high bar for only Christian candidates an incorrect and limiting approach. He closes himself off to too many options that could progress him and are arguments gainig better traction and reach. And he goes on GB News which is the king of controlled option so how can you marry that with his views? Or wait he's trying to get the narrative out there and change it and hold on isn't that what controlled opposition candidates are doing instead? Would it be better just not to have them including people like Russell Brand? But he can be used!
Farage and Reform are the closest chance so far to the UK getting PR and then people like your lovely Kurtan can then actually get into power. See my point on using what we do have? If Kirtan doesn't see these benefit of the points I'm making he's incredibly naive for someone so awake. That or there are other processes at play possibly a strange greed ego inverted arrogance or need for validation? Who knows?
And yes I think he should make a tactical deal with a PT to increase his appeal because the general public are shallow. So does he have a medical condition to make him that big - I'm asking seriously? Becasue if he doesn't then again for someone so awake he is naive. In order to fight this we've got to be healthy and save ourselves before we save anyone else. Otherwise how can we lead? Or is he actually part of the woke body positive movement?
I'm saying how it is, saying how the world actually works NOT how I think it should be. Kurten is an idealist and that unfortunately won't get him anywhere in my opinion. He should tweak and change as well as broaden his approach. Please forgive my sins and God bles you, but hang on again doesn't Kurtan agree with freedom of speech so why you getting personal with me and my argument when instead I'm just having a discussion softy?
An analogy I like is the people voted for a different coloured box (red) but once the contents are examined, they are the same as the blue box. I agree voting for “Change” is just an illusion. Politicians come and go but the deep state is a constant.
Brilliant take, brilliantly and succinctly written. Just great! Thank you.
The Prince of Darkness pulling the strings.
Liked to holiday on Epstein Island.
Who did?
Peter Mandelson aka the Prince of Darkness. Also think he was mates with Seville.
Hear hear, 100% spot on Iain.
Buckle up, it's going to be a bumpy ride.
You should write a dissertation on how you believe people could survive and pursue a life of liberty and happiness without any form of government.
I have written on how we can build a voluntary society in these articles.
https://iaindavis.com/inalienable-rights/
https://iaindavis.com/towards-freedom/
https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/
A voluntary society is an impossible fantasy.
It fails the moment a brutish psychopath steals the property of others and distributes it to his weak sycophants. Immediately, there is the necessity for government amongst the victims to defend themselves against the brute and his army of plundering, raping, and murdering sycophants.
You ignore the key role the financial system plays in frustrating every impulse to give people effective freedom. This system has been diabolically designed and instituted by monopoly-pushers to maximize the accumulation of debt, which enhances their power. Engineer Clifford Hugh Douglas dissected its built-in defects and prescribed correctives for them a century ago. Today, after a 1984-style disappearing of Douglas’s analysis, the financial racket is forbidden territory for purported critics of the system that oppresses us.
A New Monetary System with A New National Bank
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/a-new-monetary-system-with-a-new?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Great Bankster Debt Scam!
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-great-bankster-debt-scam?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
It’s Time to Learn Real American Economics
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/its-time-to-learn-real-american-economics?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Why don't you do It and do a survival course? No one is coming to save us.
Unlike Iain, I believe in the necessity of government.
The U.S. Constitution Preamble:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
How's that going?
To whom do you imagine you are addressing here ?
''William Pritting, also known as Prince William of Wales, was born on June 21, 1982, at St Mary’s Hospital in London, England. He is the elder son of King Charles III and Diana, Princess of Wales''
BING surprises me more often than gives decent answers these days !
IT DOES LINK HIM !
BIZARRE !
Nope, not even close!
I was born in 1962 in New York.
Curious to know why you think I would be the Prince???
I GOT THIS FROM BING TODAY-
''I apologize for any confusion. William Pritting does not appear to be a widely known individual, and I couldn’t find specific information about his birthplace. However, Prince William, the heir apparent to the British throne, was born on 21 June 1982 at St Mary’s Hospital in London, England1. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask! 😊''
ALSO A BASIC QUERY GAVE THIS
''You
WHAT IS THE DATE OF BIRTH FOR William Pritting
Copilot
William, Prince of Wales, was born on 21 June 1982 at St Mary’s Hospital in London, England. He is the elder son of King Charles III and Diana, Princess of Wales. His full name is William Arthur Philip Louis1. If you need any more information, feel free to ask! 😊''
🙄😗
😁 Seriously that IS what BING replied with several times !
I have a screen shot.
Ask BING yourself and see what it says !
Aim4Truth: Truth History
https://aim4truth.org/truth-history-of-the-modern-world/
Americans for Innovation:
STUNNING REVELATIONS PROVE MSM IS MUCH MORE DANGEROUS THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-secret-plot-in-1909-by-anglo.html
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
Sir Andrew Carnegie & Cecil J. Rhodes
Planners of Internationalism
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/1967-Sir-Andrew-Carnegie-and-Cecil-J-Rhodes-Planners-of-Internationalism-The-George-Mason-School-of-Correspondence-by-CO-Garshwiler-ed-Education-Information-Inc-1967.pdf
Norman Dodd tells how the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Guggenheim and Ford Foundations set out to control education and rewrite American history in order to merge America into the one-world government they could control.
https://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/10.11/carnegie.html
Unfortunately, U.S. history has been a never ending battle against the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy. Our current and longest lasting battle began when the British assassinated our President McKinley in 1901 and installed their Anglophile puppet Teddy Roosevelt in the White House. TR’s treason was followed by another Anglophile traitor, Woodrow Wilson, whose betrayal resulted in the total submission of the USA back under the dominion of the British Commonwealth. Now the world is finally waking up and recognizing that the British Oligarchy are the true enemies of humanity with their evil machinations around the globe to instigate the undermining of Popular Nationalism and Republican Constitutionalism. My Substack page is dedicated to exposing the evil British Oligarchy and enlightening readers to the global war between Republicanism/Nationalism Vs. Oligarchism/Globalism.
https://substack.com/@william3n4z2
Why the British Kill American Presidents:
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2019/05/04/why-the-british-kill-american-presidents-2
Treason in America from Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman:
https://a.co/d/0iO1lyfy
John F. Kennedy vs. The Empire - The real reasons why JFK was assassinated, and how we defeat the perpetrators today.
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2013/eirv40n35-20130906/04-19_4035.pdf
The Coup, Then and Now--"The Enemies of Humanity Try to Give Trump the JFK Treatment"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sg9EveTA1yUvucA-LkTdIukvaoLsZLFa/view
The American Patriot History Project.
http://patriot-project.weebly.com/anton-chaitkin.html#.Y5ZZjeROklR
The American Almanac.
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/contents.htm
FDR vs. Churchill -- The American System Against the British Empire.
The Other War:
FDR's Battle Against Churchill and the British Empire
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/FDRlw95.htm
Roosevelt's `Grand Strategy' to Rid the World of British Colonialism: 1941-1945
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/lkffdr.htm
Do you not think that these people think globally and are not just based in Britain? Eg Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Germany, Israel and Russia for instance? Oh and the USA...
No….it’s the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy that are the enemy of humanity:
Since so many people are now asking, “Who is really running the country?” Here’s the Deep State reality:
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
Always remember, the US State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the CFR is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House).
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/new-revelations-shed-light-on-the?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Anglo-American Pilgrims Society (1902)
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-anglo-american-pilgrims-society?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Hillary Clinton describing the CFR as the “Mothership” from which the State Department gets its marching orders:
https://youtu.be/-6TXcQpgC9Q?si=F7EDstMIf8g_W3i4
Remember, Dick Cheney was a CFR executive and hid that fact from his Wyoming constituents:
https://youtu.be/XOAk-7F1EVU?si=zxBdiVsAlnOaT6IO
https://youtu.be/BbnpN07J_zg?si=a6mdz4RRxgCa9zgM
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/
The Origins of the Deep State in North America
Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
THE SECRET PLOT IN 1909 BY THE
ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
Two more…..
STUNNING REVELATIONS PROVE MSM IS MUCH MORE DANGEROUS THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-secret-plot-in-1909-by-anglo.html
Sir Andrew Carnegie & Cecil J. Rhodes:
Planners of Internationalism
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/1967-Sir-Andrew-Carnegie-and-Cecil-J-Rhodes-Planners-of-Internationalism-The-George-Mason-School-of-Correspondence-by-CO-Garshwiler-ed-Education-Information-Inc-1967.pdf
Today we are in the culmination of the British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on the USA that was plotted by Cecil Rhodes, activated by his death in 1902 and implementation of his Wills that resulted in the founding of the Rhodes Scholarship Program and Round Table Movement.
The Round Table Movement evolved into the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) founded in 1919-20 and its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations, founded in 1921. Hillary Clinton referred to the CFR as the “Mothership,” but that distinction more appropriately belongs to Chatham House.
The purpose for the creation of Chatham House and its subsidiary the CFR was, and is, to instigate the collapse of the USA and its reabsorption back under the British Commonwealth, and eventually under a future British One-World Global Empire.
Checkout this book by Matt Ehret:
Clash of the Two Americas, Volume 4:
The Anglo-Venetian Roots of the Deep State
https://a.co/d/4BTPcC5
Click on the “Read Sample” bar and read down through the Table of Contents and Introduction.
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/new-revelations-shed-light-on-the?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Sir Henry Kissinger: Midwife to New Babylon
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/sir-henry-kissinger-midwife-to-new?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Kissinger’s Adoration of the 1815 Congress of Vienna: A Master Key into Universal History
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/kissingers-adoration-of-the-1815-645?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Why the Anglo-American Special Relationship Must End
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/why-the-anglo-american-special-relationship?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
CSIS and the Round Table Origins of the Five Eyes
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/csis-and-the-round-table-origins?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Matt Ehret’s Insights:
https://matthewehret.substack.com/
The story of the Anglo-American Establishment was first revealed to the public by Prof. Carroll Quigley through his two books:
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=carroll+quigley&crid=D0QMHOVF5TT3&sprefix=Carroll%2Caps%2C142&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_5_7
Meet Carroll Quigley:
https://corbettreport.com/meet-carroll-quigley/
https://corbettreport.com/interview-1158-joe-plummer-teaches-tragedy-and-hope-101/
Tragedy & Hope 101
By Joe Plummer
https://www.joeplummer.com/
(Click on a book pic and scroll down to the Table of Contents)
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/
The Origins of the Deep State in North America
Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
The British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America is not being fought with bullets and bayonets, but with filth and anarchy to instigate “The Great Collapse of US Society” so “We Their Serfs” will surrender our Liberty & Rights, abolish our Constitution, and allow them to “Build Back Better” a One-World NWO where the British Oligarchy own all of the land and natural resources, and we must obey the bureaucratic technocrats at the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS-NATO and their “Sustainable Development Goals” and “Environmental, Social, Governance” and “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion” dictates.
The following almost sounds like a script of every day’s evening news, and that’s because it is the playbook of the British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America, but this war is being fought with filth and anarchy, not bullets and bayonets:
How To Instigate "The Great Collapse of US Society" By Implementing the Frankfurt School's "Critical Theory."
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
Exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
THE BRITISH OLIGARCHY’S FOURTH WAR ON AMERICA.
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-british-oligarchys-fourth-war?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
THE SECRET PLOT IN 1909 BY THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
The Anglo-American Pilgrims Society (1902).
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-anglo-american-pilgrims-society?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
https://william3n4z2.substack.com/archive?sort=new
The evolution of the British quest for a One World Global Empire, from John Ruskin to Cecil Rhodes to Lord Milner’s Round Table Group to William Yandell Elliott to Henry Kissinger to Klaus Schwab.
The Kissinger Continuum: The Unauthorized History of the WEF’s Young Global Leaders Program
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/08/investigative-reports/the-kissinger-continuum-the-unauthorized-history-of-the-wefs-young-global-leaders-program/
Sir Henry Kissinger: Midwife to New Babylon
https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/12/21/sir-henry-kissinger-midwife-to-new-babylon/
William Yandell Elliott
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2002/eirv29n03-20020125/eirv29n03-20020125_029-william_yandell_elliott.pdf
William Yandell Elliott: Confederate high priest
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1997/eirv24n49-19971205/eirv24n49-19971205_028-william_yandell_elliott_confeder.pdf
Kissinger and ‘Zbig’: Two Students of One Southern-Fried Fascist
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2001/eirv28n01-20010101/eirv28n01-20010101_039-kissinger_and_zbig_two_students.pdf
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/new-revelations-shed-light-on-the?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
William Pritting Substack:
https://william3n4z2.substack.com/?utm_medium=web
Richard Poe Substack:
https://richardpoe.substack.com/
I also highly recommend Richard Poe’s Substack page:
https://richardpoe.substack.com/
How the British Invented Globalism
Modern globalism was born in Victorian England. The plan was to merge the British Empire and the United States into a single superstate.
https://open.substack.com/pub/richardpoe/p/how-the-british-invented-globalism?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
How the British Invented Color Revolutions
As the British Empire shifted from a colonial to a neocolonial system, it had to develop quieter, more discreet methods for removing rebellious vassals
https://open.substack.com/pub/richardpoe/p/how-the-british-invented-color-revolutions?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews)
The Untold Story of Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, MI6, and the Russian Revolution
https://open.substack.com/pub/richardpoe/p/how-the-british-invented-communism?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Since after the Presidential Debate between Trump Vs. Biden, and the exposure of Biden’s dementia to the world, so many people are now asking, “Who is really running the country (USA)?
Here’s the Deep State reality:
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
Always remember, the US State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the CFR is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House).
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/new-revelations-shed-light-on-the?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Anglo-American Pilgrims Society (1902)
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-anglo-american-pilgrims-society?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Hillary Clinton describing the CFR as the “Mothership” from which the State Department gets its marching orders:
https://youtu.be/-6TXcQpgC9Q?si=F7EDstMIf8g_W3i4
Remember, Dick Cheney was a CFR executive and hid that fact from his Wyoming constituents:
https://youtu.be/XOAk-7F1EVU?si=zxBdiVsAlnOaT6IO
https://youtu.be/BbnpN07J_zg?si=a6mdz4RRxgCa9zgM
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/
The Origins of the Deep State in North America
Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
THE SECRET PLOT IN 1909 BY THE
ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
No CIA in this. Surely they have been the real US Govt all these years?
>>> READ ENTIRE REPLY <<<
Since after the Presidential Debate between Trump Vs. Biden, and the exposure of Biden’s dementia to the world, so many people are now asking, “Who is really running the country (USA)?
Here’s the Deep State reality:
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
Always remember, the US State Department is run by the Council on Foreign Relations, and the CFR is the US subsidiary of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House).
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/new-revelations-shed-light-on-the?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The Anglo-American Pilgrims Society (1902)
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-anglo-american-pilgrims-society?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Hillary Clinton describing the CFR as the “Mothership” from which the State Department gets its marching orders:
https://youtu.be/-6TXcQpgC9Q?si=F7EDstMIf8g_W3i4
Remember, Dick Cheney was a CFR executive and hid that fact from his Wyoming constituents:
https://youtu.be/XOAk-7F1EVU?si=zxBdiVsAlnOaT6IO
https://youtu.be/BbnpN07J_zg?si=a6mdz4RRxgCa9zgM
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/
The Origins of the Deep State in North America
Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
THE SECRET PLOT IN 1909 BY THE
ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
Jasun Horsley has dared to tread that path, to his credit. Honesty and good journalism are in short supply these days.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-146232505
Here's one option Chunky: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/the-financial-jigsaw-part-2-localisation?s=w
I could be mistaken but I thought I felt you channeling Larken Rose?
🎯
I often channel Larken Rose. Mainly because he is absolutely right.
Jack Shit wins again!
Not voting is a perfectly legitimate choice, as is spoiling a ballot paper, or i deed voting in good faith with a belief that the vote you cast has a desired effect.
There has been a lot of discussion about Starmers "thin mandate". Public opinion does matter as of course does personal actions.
Personally I chose to vote, a protest vote in incidentally for Reform. 4 million others for their own reasons chose to do the same.
Steve Baker lost his seat in High Wycombe having failed in early coverage before he went to attend his count, to submit to the planned humiliation ritual, the Good morning Britain trio of Ed Balls, George Osbourne and Susahanna Reid had another go.
Heres my blog on my take away from what I felt was great blow from Steve to two Trilateral stooges.
https://grubstreetinexile.substack.com/p/welcome-to-tony-world-kier-starmers
The paper on how Andrew Bailey is the real shadow PM quoted in the blog.
On The Bond Market holding sway over the nominally executive legislative chamber this report from Southbank research and the — FLEET STREET LETTER SPECIAL REPORT
"By a bait and switch, central bankers are now the ones who can “intimidate everybody,” as Carville put it. If he is reincarnated as the bond market, he would be bitterly disappointed to discover these technocrats are now in charge. They can decide to support governments like Mario Draghi’s in Italy by buying Italian government debt. Or they can undermine governments like Liz Truss’ ... not always that blatant. ....discredited and then fired, like Liz Truss and Yanis Varoufakis."
I hold a different view to you Iain , but I do not claim to be anything else other than an active participant in the Establishment.
They. "The Heirarchy That enslave you"The Metaphysics of "THEY"
https://open.substack.com/pub/grubstreetinexile/p/they-the-heirarchy-that-enslave-youthe?r=l1oox&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
"Gold? yellow, glittering, precious gold? No, gods",
― William Shakespeare, Timon of Athens
"Lord" Moore in the Daily Telegraph on Friday:
“When, in this century, did Labour get the largest number of votes in a general election?
The answer is, “Not this week, and not under Tony Blair. It was in 2017, when Labour was led by Jeremy Corbyn." His 2,877,918 votes were 3 million more than this week's winning 9,698,409 votes.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/05/starmer-triumph-three-million-fewer-votes-than-corbyn/
Of course Moore doesn't look at the fact that Corbyn was elected as Party Leader with 70% support of Members/Supporters, that the PLP and Labour party machine worked against him from day 1 ("Lord" Mandelson actually said "every day"). In 2016 Corbyn lost a PLP vote of no confidence 172-40 and in 2017 Labour MPs were horrified by the result. They then took full part in the campaign about left-wing anti-semitism. #ItWasAScam
No - his Lordship praises Starmer's "astonishing achievement: he understood his party’s predicament. He knew he had to rescue it from a hard-Left ghetto. He has done so with dignity and grit."
I think we need less of Moore.