Thanks for reporting on this case. Shocking revelations. Some of things brought out really are bizarre. A gum shield for a spinal x-ray? I can understand a thyroid shield for a mammogram or a groin shield for an abdominal x-ray but the claimants testimony here defies reason.
Also I'm wondering how the claimants can cross examine anything …
Thanks for reporting on this case. Shocking revelations. Some of things brought out really are bizarre. A gum shield for a spinal x-ray? I can understand a thyroid shield for a mammogram or a groin shield for an abdominal x-ray but the claimants testimony here defies reason.
Also I'm wondering how the claimants can cross examine anything related to the evidence they requested to be barred from the trial, surely they precluded themselves from doing so because it would be impossible for the defendant to rebut. These things work both ways.
Mr Oakley did an excellent job in his defence and countering. This whole charade will only make RDH a stronger character and better journalist which I'm sure was not the aim of the vexatious litigants.
Thanks for reporting on this case. Shocking revelations. Some of things brought out really are bizarre. A gum shield for a spinal x-ray? I can understand a thyroid shield for a mammogram or a groin shield for an abdominal x-ray but the claimants testimony here defies reason.
Also I'm wondering how the claimants can cross examine anything related to the evidence they requested to be barred from the trial, surely they precluded themselves from doing so because it would be impossible for the defendant to rebut. These things work both ways.
Mr Oakley did an excellent job in his defence and countering. This whole charade will only make RDH a stronger character and better journalist which I'm sure was not the aim of the vexatious litigants.