In Part 1 we examined the silly concept of the “armchair rioter” which has been offered to suggest people can start riots from the comfort of their favourite recliner.
Clearly the level of 'proof' needed for a conviction for 'encouraging' a crime is far lower than for incitement of a crime, because as stated in the article, a crime has to actually have been committed for a charge of incitement to stick, whereas 'encouraging' a crime really only comes down to interpretation of the circumstances of the event. It is a lot like the weird concept of victimless crime which is so much a part of the state's war against its population.
I entirely agree that the state is erecting a control system to ready the public to live under a dictatorship. It is a metaphorical cage that is being constructed around people, one which appears to have moveable bars according to how much a person complies with the state's diktats where the space between the bars will be wide for those complying or narrow for those refusing to comply.
In the several filmed judgments of the court cases the judges all said a more lenient sentence was given where the accused pleaded guilty. In other words, comply and play the game the way we like and we'll give you less jail time. Only a tiny percentage of people chose to have their cases heard in a crown court and before a jury. It will be very interesting to see what the jury's verdict will be in these cases.
I love how after you mention the CROOK & THE STAFF it is totally ignored & instead you get baited by the two latest chat bot troll gobshites, both sent here to be time vampire space invaders; & both of which write just like EverLyin' Bumsick the MPD MKULTRA blabber butt.
I don't think the filming of judges handing out sentences is a performance. They are real and serve as a warning to those watching that the same will happen to them if they exercise their rights. I think it would be too risky in terms of leaks to make it a performance. Even a small hint that the sentencing wasn't real would be enough to destroy the whole illusion.
I do not know if the control system was erected centuries ago, no doubt the desire was there to do so centuries ago, but it seems to me that they need secret organizations like Freemasons etc in order to help bring it about. Yes maritime rules (rules of commerce) have usurped the rule of law in courts and the vast majority of people do not know the difference.
How far up your own backside have you become lost in ?
The control system was undeniably in existence with the planning of almost all American cities, Washington is a classic example. While the Medici integration & consolidations are another overt signifier of it.
Nushi here has mentioned the NETWORKING of Freemasonry & Merchants, yet you still miss the point, acting like a dim, yet opinionated agent of misery.
Tempest is just another EverLyin' bumsick team drone, here to drone on with more TimeVampire Space Invader tactics. What a phucking boring crew of rancid twats- & I'm being polite because its Sunday!
I admire your tenacity Iain, unpicking that lot must have been a huge timesink.
I don't do social media so it was very difficult to get a handle on the finer details without knowing what was actually said by those swept up in this psyop. I appreciate you covering this, and look forward to the rest of the series.
I'm left wondering if those you've exampled who had been arrested, had exercised their right to silence, and had decent legal representation, whether they would have been convicted at all.
It will be interesting to see the outcomes of those who opted for a trial rather than those who fell for the 'plead guilty and get a lesser sentence' ploy, I'm pretty sure that if they thought they were going to do actual gaol time for words they posted on social media, they would have opted to take their chances with a jury. It's unlikely they can get even harsher with sentencing.
Thank you for a deeply considered and incisive analysis Iain, and for your novel interpretation of the collaborative and conspiratorial way (in the legal sense), in which the different arms of the Establishment are working together to create an environment in which increased coercion and control of Society is being fostered.
Sadly totalitarian censorship seems to be finding a natural home in the heart of one of the only successful democracies left without a written constitution, held together for a thousand years by the bonds of ‘Separation of Powers’, bonds which Government now wishes to break for its own ends.
In doing so they are sowing the seeds for a thousand years of chaos and misery.
While I agree with the gist of your argument, that the claims of inciting violence through "hate speech" are ginned up and lacking in proof of the existence of a causative link, I must say that I believe that much online speech is extremely harmful and toxic to the population, without necessarily "inciting" violence or obvious noxious behavior. Regrettably, this speech is almost exclusively, regularly and consistent coming from the government itself, which has seen fit to use the power of the media and censorship to foment hatred, divisiveness and social discord through its improper exercise of editorial power. As we have seen for some time now, it is those who hypocritically point the finger who are most likely to be guilty themselves of the crimes alleged to have been committed by others.
Complacency has allowed the rule of law to become so elastic that the blindfold of justice has slipped to the point of becoming a gag for those who seek to point it out.
On the rare occasions I have been in Cardiff when it is getting late and there is Rugby match between Wales and Scotland or whoever. You basically have far to many people in a area with a lot of pubs. Quite heavy police presence but fights breaking out some damage as a result. Plus pickpockets , drugs and criminals. But then you compare it to the Noting hill carnival crowds and stabbing. But non of this is the National Crisis that we are told these non riots represent.
As with all reporting it is just another message of fear and the self contradictory laws are just so they want people will self police themselves . So just another form of control and distraction.
Then you have the prime ministers meeting there great allies with lots of handshakes and big speeches. Few real journalist exist and none are allowed to ask Mr Prime minister how come your Great
Fellow prime minister in France is allowing the boat crossing that you say you want to stop.
The Barrage Balloons used over a hundred years ago could be used to monitor the beaches as well as satellites and drones .
Clearly the level of 'proof' needed for a conviction for 'encouraging' a crime is far lower than for incitement of a crime, because as stated in the article, a crime has to actually have been committed for a charge of incitement to stick, whereas 'encouraging' a crime really only comes down to interpretation of the circumstances of the event. It is a lot like the weird concept of victimless crime which is so much a part of the state's war against its population.
I entirely agree that the state is erecting a control system to ready the public to live under a dictatorship. It is a metaphorical cage that is being constructed around people, one which appears to have moveable bars according to how much a person complies with the state's diktats where the space between the bars will be wide for those complying or narrow for those refusing to comply.
In the several filmed judgments of the court cases the judges all said a more lenient sentence was given where the accused pleaded guilty. In other words, comply and play the game the way we like and we'll give you less jail time. Only a tiny percentage of people chose to have their cases heard in a crown court and before a jury. It will be very interesting to see what the jury's verdict will be in these cases.
I love how after you mention the CROOK & THE STAFF it is totally ignored & instead you get baited by the two latest chat bot troll gobshites, both sent here to be time vampire space invaders; & both of which write just like EverLyin' Bumsick the MPD MKULTRA blabber butt.
I don't think the filming of judges handing out sentences is a performance. They are real and serve as a warning to those watching that the same will happen to them if they exercise their rights. I think it would be too risky in terms of leaks to make it a performance. Even a small hint that the sentencing wasn't real would be enough to destroy the whole illusion.
I do not know if the control system was erected centuries ago, no doubt the desire was there to do so centuries ago, but it seems to me that they need secret organizations like Freemasons etc in order to help bring it about. Yes maritime rules (rules of commerce) have usurped the rule of law in courts and the vast majority of people do not know the difference.
You really need to wake the fuck up Tempest.
How far up your own backside have you become lost in ?
The control system was undeniably in existence with the planning of almost all American cities, Washington is a classic example. While the Medici integration & consolidations are another overt signifier of it.
Nushi here has mentioned the NETWORKING of Freemasonry & Merchants, yet you still miss the point, acting like a dim, yet opinionated agent of misery.
Why don't you phuk off you mindless nasty moron and get some help for your psycho problems?
Oh dear, complimenting your alter ego again?
How sad.
Tempest is just another EverLyin' bumsick team drone, here to drone on with more TimeVampire Space Invader tactics. What a phucking boring crew of rancid twats- & I'm being polite because its Sunday!
You got phuck all to say so why the phuck are you here you dimwit deranged dipstick?
You're like the demented Dub SurgeOn. You've also got nothing to say and need as much psycho help as him. You come across as schizoid.
Like I told you before, projecting your problems and psychoses on to others is not going to make it go away. Seek professional help asap.
In the meantime, help yourself by shutting your own yapping troll mouth so you don’t agitate even more your psycho problems.
I admire your tenacity Iain, unpicking that lot must have been a huge timesink.
I don't do social media so it was very difficult to get a handle on the finer details without knowing what was actually said by those swept up in this psyop. I appreciate you covering this, and look forward to the rest of the series.
I'm left wondering if those you've exampled who had been arrested, had exercised their right to silence, and had decent legal representation, whether they would have been convicted at all.
It will be interesting to see the outcomes of those who opted for a trial rather than those who fell for the 'plead guilty and get a lesser sentence' ploy, I'm pretty sure that if they thought they were going to do actual gaol time for words they posted on social media, they would have opted to take their chances with a jury. It's unlikely they can get even harsher with sentencing.
Thank you for a deeply considered and incisive analysis Iain, and for your novel interpretation of the collaborative and conspiratorial way (in the legal sense), in which the different arms of the Establishment are working together to create an environment in which increased coercion and control of Society is being fostered.
Sadly totalitarian censorship seems to be finding a natural home in the heart of one of the only successful democracies left without a written constitution, held together for a thousand years by the bonds of ‘Separation of Powers’, bonds which Government now wishes to break for its own ends.
In doing so they are sowing the seeds for a thousand years of chaos and misery.
While I agree with the gist of your argument, that the claims of inciting violence through "hate speech" are ginned up and lacking in proof of the existence of a causative link, I must say that I believe that much online speech is extremely harmful and toxic to the population, without necessarily "inciting" violence or obvious noxious behavior. Regrettably, this speech is almost exclusively, regularly and consistent coming from the government itself, which has seen fit to use the power of the media and censorship to foment hatred, divisiveness and social discord through its improper exercise of editorial power. As we have seen for some time now, it is those who hypocritically point the finger who are most likely to be guilty themselves of the crimes alleged to have been committed by others.
Bravo Iain. Look forward to 3 and 4.
Complacency has allowed the rule of law to become so elastic that the blindfold of justice has slipped to the point of becoming a gag for those who seek to point it out.
On the rare occasions I have been in Cardiff when it is getting late and there is Rugby match between Wales and Scotland or whoever. You basically have far to many people in a area with a lot of pubs. Quite heavy police presence but fights breaking out some damage as a result. Plus pickpockets , drugs and criminals. But then you compare it to the Noting hill carnival crowds and stabbing. But non of this is the National Crisis that we are told these non riots represent.
As with all reporting it is just another message of fear and the self contradictory laws are just so they want people will self police themselves . So just another form of control and distraction.
Then you have the prime ministers meeting there great allies with lots of handshakes and big speeches. Few real journalist exist and none are allowed to ask Mr Prime minister how come your Great
Fellow prime minister in France is allowing the boat crossing that you say you want to stop.
The Barrage Balloons used over a hundred years ago could be used to monitor the beaches as well as satellites and drones .