Building on my previous Substack post, where I discussed how the “Great Replacement conspiracy theory” is exploited, and the recent article on my website, where I discuss the real reasons for the civil unrest in the UK, over the next four posts, including this, I will continue to explore the febrile propaganda environment surrounding the UK’s so-called “far-right riots.” I hope all of these articles will collectively outline the evidence which poses some serious questions about what happened and who was really shaking the jar that led to the unrest.
I'm still stuck on the intial story. Lots of questions remain perplexing.
Why would a random 17yo get a taxi to a random quiet residential street in Southport, and then not pay for the taxi, ensuring likely police attention, or at least an altercation with the driver, if he was going to carry out a stabbing spree? Why call attention to yourself in this manner? Clearly no escape plan, so he was expecting to get caught.
Why then trot up the drive of a random biulding and go up the external stairs? Did he know there was a kids dance class there? and why would this trigger any nutter to go on a stabbing spree, and even more baffling, why do it while expecting to get caught?
Why was the building so usecured, not even a lock on the entry? Every building where activities take place, especially kids activities, seems to have unreasonable security thesedays, at least a buzzer entry, or knock and open by staff entry.
None of it makes any sense.
Either the whole establishment reaction was planned (and it's clear the state reaction and solution was planned) just waiting for an event to happen so they could trigger the reaction, or the event it's self was instigated (or staged) by those planning the reaction/solution.
How could things get so bad in our society I'm even contemplating this? "Think of the Children" yeah sorry Mariana/Aisling/Sanders et al, my bad, but I know what a severe leg wound does to legs, I know how much blood to expect from a severe leg wound, and I know for a fact nobody can walk across a foyer 4 mins after having a bolt followed by a blast wave travel 13cm though their thigh and still walk, let alone walk on high heels with only a small patch of blood, and zero physical symptoms, THAT is impossible Ms Murrell.
Yes very strange. As strange as the fact that two alleged jihadis stayed at the scene after allegedly hacking a soldier to death on the street and then try to attack police as they arrived at the scene, with one of the alleged perpetrators pointing a gun at police which was later found to be impossible to fire due to rust. A gun that dated back to the Austro-Hungarian army.
Strange too that ITV got to the scene an hour before anything happened to set up their equipment and were given exclusive rights to film the event. Why was it the police said the event happened at 2 pm but the soldier was photographed having just got off a tube train at the underground station 15 minutes after he was allegedly hacked to death on the street??? And why did no one officially inform the local police of the event and why did they later say they did not recognize any of the police officers who got to the scene before them apparently from a police station three mules away and that they did not recognize any of the bystanders as being local people?
I've not even looked at the recent one, so many staged events, so little time.
Gave me drummerboy redox there, I wish I'd downloaded Chris Spiveys posts on that before they got to him and made him take it all down, that was another obviously staged event.
Friends of Chris Spivey made copies of everything before he was forced to delete the info but for obvious reasons none of it can be posted in its entirety. There was an interesting video on Youtube, now long gone, which showed how software could be used, with no imperfections, to superimpose anything on to the image of a person before CGI or AI was commonly used. The poster superimposed the uniform of the soldier onto an image of Mr Bean and a couple of other well known characters as an example.
I think it was Chris Spivey who suggested the soldier never existed and was a creation based on a real British soldier called Carl Whittle who was killed in Afghanistan the previous year. The Hope for Heroes campaign was not doing too well at the time and after the soldier event the success of the campaign skyrocketed, I am not saying this was the motive for the event but the campaign certainly benefited from it. The sad fact is that such a campaign should not have to rely on such an event to get the recognition it deserves and if the government really cared as they claim, they would ensure veterans were at the top of the list for housing and health needs.
If I remember correctly there was also some 'teacher' who faced off these axe-wielding maniacs, as you do. That was so obviously 'MI5 in your face'.
See my comment above, however, about the mind control/hypnosis option. This the alternative explanation to the 'staged event' explanation. I'm sure some events are indeed 'staged' (or don't happen at all), but I'm equally sure that others are perpetrated by victims of MK-Ultra (or whatever cryptonym they call it these days).
I am sure mind control has been used in some of these events. It seems logical that the people behind such things would always be trying to perfect the technique so they could have programmed killers. A long held desire for those in convert work.
Another recent event was the 'corrosive liquid 'attacker' who traveled from the North East to London to throw 'corrosive liquid' in the face of a woman and accidentally got some on his face. He was pictured walking around London for 2+ days with a giant bulbous growth-like lump on his face and walking around on the London underground. The lump looked like a very badly photoshoped image. If true the man would have been in agony and not walking around London in a seemingly casual manner. A 'before' picture of him was shown which looked like a completely different person and taken around 25-30 years earlier. After more than a week the authorities claimed he was seen on CCTV on Chelsea Bridge and surmised he had jumped into the water to end his life. It was claimed his body had been found three weeks later. End of story.
A few months later there was the bizarre tale of the man seen on Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol carrying two suitcases of human remains. He apparently left them there and walked off the bridge. The story just petered out without any seeming resolution to it. It's like it was just placed there to test the public reaction. Very much like how governments leak policy proposals to test public reaction and if a negative one the proposal is quietly dropped.
Yep - that is just totally bizarre! There's so much cognitive dissonance going on there.
I think you're quite right though about testing public reactions. Which is possibly where part of the dissonance/bizarreness comes in.
At the same time, victims of mind control programs will often break down and do bizarre behaviour. Dave McGowan's book 'Programmed to Kill', for example, documents a lot of veterans of the CIA's Phoenix program in Vietnam who ended up being 'serial killers' when they returned to America.
McGowan also wrote and talked about the music idols of the 60s and how they were all related to people high up in the political-military-industrial complex, and how they all converged on Laurel Canyon, the epicentre of rock music, hippiedom, LSD and the so called counter-culture. Lookout Mountain close by had been a government covert centre for making atomic bomb films. Some said it was also manufacturing LSD and lots of celebrities of the time has visited it at its height. At the same time it was also the area where the worst of the Manson murders happened.
Indeed. If I remember correctly, one of the interesting aspects about the Manson murders which McGowan emphasised was the suggestion of mind control. That's to say Manson himself was said to exert some kind of almost-magical control over his acolytes. Of course he could just have been the cover/fall guy to distract from whoever else was doing the control.
It is definitely intriguing though to look at the connections between Laurel Canyon, the military-intelligence complex, and the MK-Ultra experiments which were going on around that time. This, to me, is the most important aspect of McGowan's work. I wouldn't be surprised at all if this lead to him being 'got to' as it were. The proverbial 'offer you can't refuse' kind of thing...
Except there was a picture of Murrells wound published, showing a 3cm dia entry and corresponding exit wound, also showing skin graft scarring.
I surmise she was wounded in action somewhere else, maybe in the sandpit, and it's an old picture of the wound, or the published scar picture they purported to be her scar, wasn't hers. She definately wasn't wounded in Manchester, no amount of gaslighting or emotional rhetoric is going to convince me she was wounded in the Manchester bang, some things you just can't unsee.
Given the anomalies you mention, I would imagine there are only the following explanations:
1/ completely staged event (i.e. it didn't happen at all, we're just told it did)
2/ partially staged event, meaning an event did happen, but only 'actors' were involved
or, the most sinister option, and one which, having thought about these things for quite some time now, I am becoming more and more to at least consider every time there is an 'event' like this, is
3/ mind-control. In this instance, as you suggested the patsy knew exactly where to go and was allowed to enter the building etc. etc. This is kind of a logical necessity if there's mind control at work. It has to be 'allowed' to happen.
Just think of, say, Sirhan, or the 'London Bridge terrorist attack' and the pattern becomes clear. Also notice that this theoretical option is virtually never discussed at all in the so-called alternative online community. If I were a CIA bad guy and I had a method that would work 100%, then I'd definitely do 'real' terrorist attacks, precisely because they are so obviously believable and provide all the evidence required. Especially to make 'conspiracy theorists' look stupid. Hence, also, the smokescreen/cover story/misdirection known as the 'false events' narrative (or 'staged' events). Beware those who spread such disinformation!
So now I am wondering how far back this method goes. As well as MK-Ultra going back to at least the 1950s, I mean, Sirhan/RFK was 1968, so that's a lot of false flag events...
This would also mean that the perpetrator of the Southport attack (if it happened) would have no memory of it - it would've been carried out by an alter, that is.
I try not to speculate too much, getting provable evidence for 'mind control' is going to be next to impossible, I read Sanders books, but since his apparent throwing RD Hall under the bus I'm less inclined to believe anything he wrote tbh.
It's a feasable hypothesis given what we know about various dark programs (MK Ultra for example) and there was Derren Browns "Assasin" series, tho that it's self could have been stagecraft to sow the idea of it into the public psyche, as could Sanders books.
If everyone goes round saying perps were mind controlled, it's easy for the state to nut them off, when they should be questioning the narrative it's self, with primary evidence, as R.D Hall, and our Iain have done so well.
They have a huge problem when it comes to "real" events, surviving victims, and family members of deceased victims tend not to let it drop if there are serious questions about the validity of the event narrative, Lockerbie, 9/11, and even some IRA events had problematic victim family groups asking awkward questions, they pose a bigger problem because they're not "conspiracy theorists" who can be sidelined and nutted off, plus they have legal standing. Fake victims etc. get well paid, often by donation, plus they have the state backing them, so they can afford to double down to the enth degree forever.
Given what we know about Gladio, and the IRA shinanigans interlinked with security services from whistleblowers e.g. "Lord Stevens told him that of 210 terrorist suspects he arrested, only three were not security force agents, and some worked for several agencies."
Plus the logic of terror attacks never adds up does it. It doesn't, and never has, benefitted the actual political aims of the group said to be responsible, the only thing that makes any logical sense about terror attacks is what one of the Gladio opperatives said in court...
Vincenzo Vinciguerra - Gladio opperative
"When you were on the Right you were not supposed to attack the State or its representatives. You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena. For one simple reason: To force the Italian public to turn to the State turn to the regime and ask for greater security. This was precisely the role of the right in Italy. It placed itself at the service of the State which created a strategy aptly called the "Strategy of Tension" in so far as they had to get ordinary people to accept that at any moment over a period of 30 years, from 1960 to the mid eighties a state of emergency could be declared. So, people would willingly trade part of their freedom for the security of being able to walk the streets, go on trains or enter a bank. This is the political logic behind all the bombings. They remain unpunished because the state cannot condemn itself.”
You can't unsee the evidence of Gladio, since I read about it I have a hard time believing any state narrative regarding "Terrorism", none of the state narratives make any logical sense, it only makes sense in the context of Opperation Gladio.
Cui Bono? Who benefits from all the "Muslim" terrorism? It's not Muslims that's for damn sure.
I can understand what you're getting at, for sure. But perhaps the problem lies in the use, or definition, of the word 'terrorism' - like 'one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter' - what I mean is, who is it, really, who defines who is a 'terrorist', rather than a 'resistance fighter'? Well, it's the regime against whom the terrorist/resistance fighter is fighting.
This is absolutely the case for the IRA. The IRA were a resistance organisation to occupation carried out by the British State. They would not have called themselves 'terrorists'. Same applies to, say, Hamas, or Hezbollah, or Ansar Allah. It is only their enemies who call them 'terrorists'.
With Gladio, of course, we're talking about something totally different. The quote you gave (I'm familiar with it - and it's always worth repeating now and again) sums it up - it was a series of 'false flag' events designed to create a strategy of tension so the people would give up a little liberty to gain a little security (or so they thought - I believe a Mr. Ben Franklin would've had something to say about that bargain).
So perhaps, when assessing an event, yes - you are right - we should always ask the 'qui bono' question...
The fundamental problem with "one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter" is that you'd have to accept violence is a justifiable tool for settling disagreements. Somewhere in that argument is a line to cross, everyone will draw a different line, often depending on which "side" they support.
The IRA, which mite well have started out as rightious idealogical resistance movement, soon devolved into a criminal cartel too willing to use violence in their activities, drug dealing and protection rackets etc, and as I've evidenced, they had surreptitious state collusion. Which, along with targetting innocents, delegitimized any idealogical foundation, while giving excuse, and tacit agreement by their involvement, to increasing the power of the state they were fighting.
“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.” (ML King)
The problem for would be freedom fighters, and revolutionaries, is human nature, there's a demographic bell curve to dark triad personality traits, you can't avoid allowing them into your movement, or government power structure for that matter, they tend to seek power, and have no qualms about switching sides, using whatever means they think will give themselves more power, or money/resources. Dark triad personality traits can't hide very easily in a pacifist movement.
Saying that, I don't really want to debate pacifism, I guess I'm a conditional pacifist, I'm fundamentally against war in all it's forms, but I will use reasonable force to defend myself, and others, but I don't consider that a licence to kill, the emphasis is on reasonable.
First point: the IRA got infiltrated and the bad guys did bad guy stuff and presented themselves as IRA. So that's not the resistance movement anymore.
Second point: My name is Boudicca. They raped me and my daughters after I exhausted all avenues of diplomacy.
The only way to deal with evil is to fucking exterminate it. Anything less allows the infection to continue.
Third point: this 'dark triad' bullshit is a deliberately manufactured lie by the cabal to make normal people think they are bad people and anyone can be a bad person. if this were true, humans would've become extinct a long time ago. This is a lie in order to disguise the cabal, to make the cabal seem like 'normal' people. it's a classic cabal tactic. Clearly it's worked.
Sorry, but 'normal people' do not do the things the cabal do. Normal people don't make war. Normal people would've closed all the borders if there was a deadly plague/covid on the way. Normal people are totally different. So don't give me this 'dark triad' bullshit. As soon as you do that, you cover for them...
The one on 29 November 2019. When I heard about it alarm bells went off extremely loudly and immediately. And this is leaving aside the fact that it happened during the election campaign (similar to the Manchester Arena incident 2 years earlier) and the MSM had already portrayed Corbyn as a 'terrorist sympathiser' etc. etc.
Anyhow, in that incident, the perp, Usman Khan, had been successfully complying with a 'rehab' scheme, and was in Fishmonger's Hall listening to a conference (about the rehab scheme), when suddenly, for no apparent reason, he draws a knife and starts attacking people. He is then pursued outside, including by someone with a narwhal (unicorn) tusk bizarrely enough, where eventually he gets shot and killed (conveniently).
For me, it's obvious that there must have been some kind of hypnotic trigger (usually a word or phrase). I say it's obvious because otherwise it makes zero psychological sense. Psychology, contrary to what the orthodox (i.e. Establishment/cabal) academics may say, is in fact a proper science with logical, exact, and definite 'laws' to it. One of the reasons most people don't understand this about psychology is because they have been denied understanding of neuroscience (deliberately, of course).
In other words, no one, so-called 'radicalised terrorist' or not, sits around quietly and then suddenly start stabbing people. The point is, there must be a 'reason' or 'motivation' or 'trigger' for a person to behave like that (I mean 'suddenly' behave like that, as opposed to a premeditated act - if it was premeditated in this instance then he would've acted very differently, and indeed more effectively). Or, in fact, behave in any way. Even on a basic level, like 'go to the fridge and get some food' doesn't 'just happen' - it requires a factual trigger, that trigger being 'stomach send brain hunger signal'. It's the same principle for higher functioning too. Just that most people don't notice. And we also need to understand that the bad guys have indeed been studying all this stuff for a long time, and are certainly decades ahead of what's publicly known in the science of psychology and neuroscience.
Anyhow, I am already forming an essay about all this in my head. Hopefully I'll get around to it soon.
Another thing about it was that a second prisoner convicted of murder was also due to be released early. He was taken by prison staff to the talk at Fishmonger's (Masonic) Hall to hear the lecture on the rehab of prisoners according to MSM. He was said to have been one of the people who gave chase to Khan onto London Bridge, thereby performing in the piece of theatre. It could have been partly motivated by wanting to discredit that particular early prisoner release scheme. If so, it worked.
That one was a definite false flag since he sat up after the 'police' had shot him dead twice! Not only that but Boris Johnson tweeted (or whoever ran his X account at the time) his condolences to the victims five and half hours before anything had happened !
Hmm - I have my doubts about that video. Could be faked. Mind you, I do admit I never actually saw anything because I was no longer watching TV by that time, just listening to the radio (no distracting visuals). Don't do that either now though. It does seem a bit psychologically unbelievable though to do staged event in broad daylight, in front of the general public and dozens of CCTV cameras - too much could go wrong.
The bit at the end especially doesn't make any sense to me. The guy who is supposedly dead is completely on his own before he gets up. This simply wouldn't happen, even in a staged event. Either there would still be people around him, or they'd have taken the body away by now. If he was just play acting dead then he'd have been told to wait until they put him in the back of the van before he wakes up. So all that makes me doubt the entire video.
If there is a mind control thing going on then in order to distract from or cover for it they would certainly come up with this 'faked events' narrative, which I've encountered more and more lately. So whenever I see things like this I'm always thinking 'is this a faked video/image', with the intention of promoting the 'it was faked/staged' meme within the 'conspiracy theory' movement. There is, after all, undoubtedly a lot of deep fakery about these days, which promotes some of the more outlandish theories.
It's certainly something I will need to look into a lot more though. But we should always bear psychology in mind, imho.
The guy who made the video has made other videos on and written about various false flags in the past. He believes 9/11 was an inside job for example, promotes the practice and spread of common law, has exposed the falsity of councils hiring court rooms to prosecute people for non payment of council tax and employing people who call themselves court bailiffs when they are no such thing, and how to deal with such people and with the police if they are called etc. On the whole he definitely seems sound considering his previous work.
I remember seeing the alleged attack on TV and wondered what language the alleged undercover cop was speaking at the time and how a non British person could be employed in the British police force. I don't think the time of day of a false flag matters and CCTV is often mysteriously not working conveniently for the authorities - 9/11, Princess Diana crash among others, or doctored CCTV as in the Lee Rigby event shown to the jury. The authorities story often changed, It was claimed he was shot twice. At the inquest it was claimed he was shot 17 times ! The footage showing him sitting up was taken by a woman from a building facing the bridge not CCTV. She probably used a camera phone.
We don't know how much time passed from him pretending to be dead and then sitting up. He was probably told to pretend and wait for the call to get up. The only sound we can hear in the footage is the conversation the woman is having with someone else. She seems to have taken it from the other side of a window so sound would have been muffled especially as it was taken from a building opposite. Of course the real proof of a false flag is Boris Johnson's tweet being made 5.5 hours before anything had happened. When I saw the video I checked out the tweet and sure enough it was there as described in the video. So this is not a fake. Others have pointed out the strange behavior of the 'police' in how they jump around and seem very agitated before firing the shots. This is not the behavior of professional police shooters but more like crisis actors told to make it look edgy, tense and dramatic.
Actually, it's the mainstream media news who inspires animosity between various segments of society by triggering tension over a variety of manufactured cultural wedge issues.
It's done through a campaign of relentless omissions, lies, and disinformation. In fact, tainting and shaping points of view which only follow the national security state's agenda is the primary objective.
That might explain, why mediocre ghoul commentators are paid millions by state-run mainstream media news channels.
What’s the solution to quell civil unrest and to restore social harmony and stability?
Answer: The taking away of personal Liberty & Rights by a strong arm Dictatorship!
But first, the wannabe Dictatorship must instigate the civil unrest.
The following was written to describe the anarchy being inflicted upon the citizens of the USA, but it can easily be extrapolated to the rest of Western Countries & Civilization.
I'm really confused now because I don't know if i'm a conspiracy theorist or an armchair rioter - there's no doubt this story is fishy - i know Southport well and i've never seen fish brought in by the tide - in fact, it's really difficult for the tide to come straight in if memory serves me right
The only source of the Southport murders was the media - how do we know that what is described really happened? This 'event' appears to have been memory-holed almost immediately.
From that day onwards for two weeks it appears that 'trouble' was going to happen - and it did, of sorts with the obvious Hope-Not-hate scam of 100 riots that followed (about which nothing has happened) and agent provocatuers
Then we get the 'mug shots' of all those naughty white people who have been locked up without due trial, no defence and no juries. Except, of course, the arrested labour councillor and the arrested Bernie Spofforth. About whom we have heard little more ... why weren't these two locked up as well??
Ricky Jones due to appear in court next January, Bernie Spofforth ... erm ... nothing that I can find??
To me this whole 'event' is one big psyop in order to bring about further limitations of freedom of speech and control as crazily announced and much desired by the WEF labour party.
The only lesson I can take away from this is don't get involved in their narrative.
The only people inciting violence and hatred is the british government and its accolytes.
I am not the first person to ask this question but why do so many events happen on recurring dates that involve the numbers 2, 7, 7/7, 11, 20, 22?
JFK assassination 22 November
9/11 - September 11
2004 Madrid train bombings 11 March
2005 London train bombings - 7 July - 7th day, 7th month
Soldier Lee Rigby event 22 May incorporating the number 2 in the form of 2 perpetrators, one of whom was 22 years old, official sources say it occurred at 2 pm.
Jo Cox disappearance 16 June 1+6=7
Westminster 'attack' 22 March
Manchester Arena bang 22 May
2019 London Bridge stabbing 29 November 2 pm - 9+2=11 1+1=2
In some of the cases that you mention, I think that the root number is number FOUR - think of amongst other things, golf terminology, societies with seccrets, etc.
Using some of your dates above:
2+2=4
7*7=49 (think "77 brigade"); 4+9=13; 1+3=4
7+6=13; 1+3=4
31; 3+1=4.
In other cases, the 11s and 29s for example, there may be a play on 9/11, which can be expressed in many ways:
11: 1+1=2; 4+7=11; so "29" is another way of expressing 9/11 (2.9; 11.9; 9.11), as well as adding up to 11.
The time of 9:47 on the ticker of 24-hour TV news clips on the day of the London underground events and what was said has also been discussed on the internet.
"18" is another one that sometimes comes up: 1+8=9, can be rotated to a "6". "18" is said to have "aces and eights" numerology. In the Desdemona typeface doubled over on a transparency, a number 4 variant "13" becomes "18" pictorially; so it might be said that on some systems 18 is even related to "4".
Other commentators on Iain's threads have mentioned the "Rule of Colel" applied to numerology too - worth looking up.
The problem is that Iain recently wrote an article entitled "The Occult Deception", so I doubt that he will be approving of the points that you make and this reply.
Have you written down the dates for events in the 1990s such as the London nail, Lawrence and Dunblane events?
No I haven't. Have you? I would be interested to know if you have the info on it. I have only just read Iain's article 'The Occult Deception'. I hadn't seen it before as I have just recently subscribed to his Substack and am kind of catching up with earlier stuff.
What I understand him to be saying in the article is that controlled opposition operatives are deliberately highlighting the occult signs in many false flags in order to direct attention to it and away from the actual evidence of the false flag and that this is the occult deception. In this way the evidence is never actually looked at because mention of the occult has been labelled 'weird', 'conspiracy minded', crazy etc and so no one wants to be tainted by such labels. As he points out, occult simply means something hidden from general knowledge. By complying with the labels attached to the occult, we are giving over our opportunity for knowledge to those who want to control us. Such knowledge is for everyone not just an elite part of society. These are some of the points I understand him to be making. He is not denying there might be an occult significance to the dates which keep recurring.
Regarding your point about the root number being 4, it feels a bit forced to conclude that, eg. 7x7 =49, 2+2=4, 1+1=2, because the numbers I mentioned often stand on their own without needing to be added. I know I have added some numbers together but it is because they come to either a 2, 7, 7/7, 11, 20, 22. I am not saying 4 has no significance but it is not one of the frequently recurring numbers in false flags or state murder cases.
I think your last paragraph is correct about the number 4. In numerology you have to keep things simple, with only 1 or perhaps 2 reductions (often to simply get to a single digit if one is using the 1 to 9 sequence). In other words I think it's a mistake to overcomplicate these things. 'Reading too much into it' one might also say.
I think Iain is partly correct about the 'occult deception'. Others talk about this as a kind of 'revelation of the method'. I think these people get it the wrong way round, though. Although there is certainly - at least sometimes - an element of the Satanic method involved (as there can also be with mind control programs), I am sometimes minded to think that the cabal are giving away clues in order to 'test the waters' - that's to say 'how much can we get away with, or how obvious can we be, how far can we push the general public before they erupt into outright revolution against us' - to put this differently, the more the cabal feel they can get away with without provoking the revolution, the safer they feel. And this is why they keep 'testing the waters' as it were. Of course they probably enjoy watching some 'conspiracy theorists' 'making themselves look silly in the eyes of the public and thus discrediting the conspiracy theory', and so on, but ultimately, in psychological terms, it's about the cabal's method to help themselves feel safe - they face overwhelming odds vs. humanity, after all.
But they certainly, at least now, know they can push things far further than they may have originally thought they could - this is especially true after 9-11, which was so in your face, but did not provoke the revolution. That must've made them feel incredibly empowered and secure.
Yes I agree about hem feeling safe after 9/11. Then they had it confirmed all over again with the world wide house arrest of billions of of people during the Covid scam. And still the revolution didn't happen!
Also strikes me that a similar thing is going on with regards to Israel-Gaza - it's a genocide which is also completely brazen and public, and yet the most reaction we see are 'protest marches'. At some point there really does need to be the establishment of a 'democratic deterrent' - if, say, a million people can march on London but instead of just standing around making pretty speeches and waving banners etc., they actually said 'either you stop it or we storm parliament', then sheer weight of numbers wins the day. That was what was so disappointing about that march ahead of the 2nd Iraq war - and that was 2 million people!
It does really make you wonder what it would take for people to cross that line. Because if they don't, then these events will continue.
I sometimes read wiki and BBC because they usually give the standard narritive. This is not a discussion of the narritive's accuracy. Merely observations on some numbers contained therein.
According to wiki, a grey Hyundai Tucson,...was driven at up to 76 miles per hour: 7+6=13; 1+3=4. They were keen to get the "76" in there, prefacing it with the weasel modifier "up to". Could a car really have done that on that bridge in the alleged circumstances?
Yes but like I said, most of the numbers I mentioned stand on their own e.g false flags happen on 2nd/11th/20th/22nd/29th. Things often happen at 2 pm, there are 2 perps, one could be 20 or 22 years old etc. They stand often independently as number on their own.
Yes - without any analysis - and without finding an answer to your intial question - like you say they must stand on their own - you've got it. Nice corresponding with you and keep up the good work!
Agent Slazenger playing her part very well again, and probably enjoying herself too I wouldn't wonder.
I do appreciate your calling out her errors, though. Whether they were unforced errors, or deliberate, or she just knows she doesn't need to care because her intended audience will not notice, is certainly an interesting, if academic point. She knows that most people don't have the time to go a questionin' the narrative or information she comes out with. And those wot do, well, they are dangerous conspiracy theorist spreaders of misinformation! Trolls, as she calls them.
On a serious note, though - just to point out what Slazenger's part is - she is simply the narrator. Telling the public what the story is supposed to be, and therefore what they are supposed to think (especially about the aforementioned 'conspiracy theorists' - so don't go there, public! Don't go there! Have a nice picnic instead! On Wimbledon Common! Don't litter! Strawberries and Robinson's Barley Water!).
Specifically, I'd say she concentrates on the drawing up of characters. Profiling and such like. It's quite a specific role actually, so I doubt she ever needed to go anywhere near Monckton. Unless they have a decent set of tennis courts there, that is. Perhaps a swimming pool. Resident's pub, curry nights on Thursdays...
"Channel3Now" in English Ordinal Gematria and Pythagorean Gematria are 112 and 49 respectively, when you value the "3" as 3, not 0, as some calculators unfortunately do.
Reduce 112 and 49:
1+1+2=4
4+9=13; 1+3=4.
Number FOUR again.
"Chanel3Now" thereFORE has a gematria of FOUR, despite "3" being mentioned in its name.
Separately, should Iain be locating the start of the events as eminating from the offending statement from "Channel3News"?
Only a weekend or two beFORE, asset Tommy Ten Names/Wasim Kempson held a London rally, which turned out to be relatively peaceful. I sure that the powers that be could have made it not to be peaceful, but they did not.
We all know this partly because Nick-Lowles-Hope-Not-Hate-Gerry-Gable-Seachlight-Magazine (also assets) told us about all the planning that Ten Names/Kempson put into the gathering, with photos of all the usual suspect asset and military types such as Katie Hokins, Gerrard Batten, Laurence Fox, Raving Reverend Calvin, etc sat at desks with him.
Was that networking of spook assets and actors several weekends before not relevant? A rather large number of all of these assets have been subsequently discussed in relation to Southport in a variety of left-ish reports quoted by Iain, including Lynn so-called-global-socalled-PR, Seachlight and HnH.
We have the same thing going on in the US. The older population believes that their preferred “trusted” newscaster tells them (because that’s what they’ve done all their lives) while bashing anyone that disagrees with what their trusted media representative tells them. My parents in their 70’s & 80’s in the midwest US fall into that category. There’s no changing of their minds. Their brains are atrophied
I'm still stuck on the intial story. Lots of questions remain perplexing.
Why would a random 17yo get a taxi to a random quiet residential street in Southport, and then not pay for the taxi, ensuring likely police attention, or at least an altercation with the driver, if he was going to carry out a stabbing spree? Why call attention to yourself in this manner? Clearly no escape plan, so he was expecting to get caught.
Why then trot up the drive of a random biulding and go up the external stairs? Did he know there was a kids dance class there? and why would this trigger any nutter to go on a stabbing spree, and even more baffling, why do it while expecting to get caught?
Why was the building so usecured, not even a lock on the entry? Every building where activities take place, especially kids activities, seems to have unreasonable security thesedays, at least a buzzer entry, or knock and open by staff entry.
None of it makes any sense.
Either the whole establishment reaction was planned (and it's clear the state reaction and solution was planned) just waiting for an event to happen so they could trigger the reaction, or the event it's self was instigated (or staged) by those planning the reaction/solution.
How could things get so bad in our society I'm even contemplating this? "Think of the Children" yeah sorry Mariana/Aisling/Sanders et al, my bad, but I know what a severe leg wound does to legs, I know how much blood to expect from a severe leg wound, and I know for a fact nobody can walk across a foyer 4 mins after having a bolt followed by a blast wave travel 13cm though their thigh and still walk, let alone walk on high heels with only a small patch of blood, and zero physical symptoms, THAT is impossible Ms Murrell.
Yes very strange. As strange as the fact that two alleged jihadis stayed at the scene after allegedly hacking a soldier to death on the street and then try to attack police as they arrived at the scene, with one of the alleged perpetrators pointing a gun at police which was later found to be impossible to fire due to rust. A gun that dated back to the Austro-Hungarian army.
Strange too that ITV got to the scene an hour before anything happened to set up their equipment and were given exclusive rights to film the event. Why was it the police said the event happened at 2 pm but the soldier was photographed having just got off a tube train at the underground station 15 minutes after he was allegedly hacked to death on the street??? And why did no one officially inform the local police of the event and why did they later say they did not recognize any of the police officers who got to the scene before them apparently from a police station three mules away and that they did not recognize any of the bystanders as being local people?
I've not even looked at the recent one, so many staged events, so little time.
Gave me drummerboy redox there, I wish I'd downloaded Chris Spiveys posts on that before they got to him and made him take it all down, that was another obviously staged event.
Friends of Chris Spivey made copies of everything before he was forced to delete the info but for obvious reasons none of it can be posted in its entirety. There was an interesting video on Youtube, now long gone, which showed how software could be used, with no imperfections, to superimpose anything on to the image of a person before CGI or AI was commonly used. The poster superimposed the uniform of the soldier onto an image of Mr Bean and a couple of other well known characters as an example.
I think it was Chris Spivey who suggested the soldier never existed and was a creation based on a real British soldier called Carl Whittle who was killed in Afghanistan the previous year. The Hope for Heroes campaign was not doing too well at the time and after the soldier event the success of the campaign skyrocketed, I am not saying this was the motive for the event but the campaign certainly benefited from it. The sad fact is that such a campaign should not have to rely on such an event to get the recognition it deserves and if the government really cared as they claim, they would ensure veterans were at the top of the list for housing and health needs.
If I remember correctly there was also some 'teacher' who faced off these axe-wielding maniacs, as you do. That was so obviously 'MI5 in your face'.
See my comment above, however, about the mind control/hypnosis option. This the alternative explanation to the 'staged event' explanation. I'm sure some events are indeed 'staged' (or don't happen at all), but I'm equally sure that others are perpetrated by victims of MK-Ultra (or whatever cryptonym they call it these days).
I am sure mind control has been used in some of these events. It seems logical that the people behind such things would always be trying to perfect the technique so they could have programmed killers. A long held desire for those in convert work.
Another recent event was the 'corrosive liquid 'attacker' who traveled from the North East to London to throw 'corrosive liquid' in the face of a woman and accidentally got some on his face. He was pictured walking around London for 2+ days with a giant bulbous growth-like lump on his face and walking around on the London underground. The lump looked like a very badly photoshoped image. If true the man would have been in agony and not walking around London in a seemingly casual manner. A 'before' picture of him was shown which looked like a completely different person and taken around 25-30 years earlier. After more than a week the authorities claimed he was seen on CCTV on Chelsea Bridge and surmised he had jumped into the water to end his life. It was claimed his body had been found three weeks later. End of story.
A few months later there was the bizarre tale of the man seen on Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol carrying two suitcases of human remains. He apparently left them there and walked off the bridge. The story just petered out without any seeming resolution to it. It's like it was just placed there to test the public reaction. Very much like how governments leak policy proposals to test public reaction and if a negative one the proposal is quietly dropped.
Yep - that is just totally bizarre! There's so much cognitive dissonance going on there.
I think you're quite right though about testing public reactions. Which is possibly where part of the dissonance/bizarreness comes in.
At the same time, victims of mind control programs will often break down and do bizarre behaviour. Dave McGowan's book 'Programmed to Kill', for example, documents a lot of veterans of the CIA's Phoenix program in Vietnam who ended up being 'serial killers' when they returned to America.
McGowan also wrote and talked about the music idols of the 60s and how they were all related to people high up in the political-military-industrial complex, and how they all converged on Laurel Canyon, the epicentre of rock music, hippiedom, LSD and the so called counter-culture. Lookout Mountain close by had been a government covert centre for making atomic bomb films. Some said it was also manufacturing LSD and lots of celebrities of the time has visited it at its height. At the same time it was also the area where the worst of the Manson murders happened.
Indeed. If I remember correctly, one of the interesting aspects about the Manson murders which McGowan emphasised was the suggestion of mind control. That's to say Manson himself was said to exert some kind of almost-magical control over his acolytes. Of course he could just have been the cover/fall guy to distract from whoever else was doing the control.
It is definitely intriguing though to look at the connections between Laurel Canyon, the military-intelligence complex, and the MK-Ultra experiments which were going on around that time. This, to me, is the most important aspect of McGowan's work. I wouldn't be surprised at all if this lead to him being 'got to' as it were. The proverbial 'offer you can't refuse' kind of thing...
Grazed like Donald's ear maybe?
Except there was a picture of Murrells wound published, showing a 3cm dia entry and corresponding exit wound, also showing skin graft scarring.
I surmise she was wounded in action somewhere else, maybe in the sandpit, and it's an old picture of the wound, or the published scar picture they purported to be her scar, wasn't hers. She definately wasn't wounded in Manchester, no amount of gaslighting or emotional rhetoric is going to convince me she was wounded in the Manchester bang, some things you just can't unsee.
Given the anomalies you mention, I would imagine there are only the following explanations:
1/ completely staged event (i.e. it didn't happen at all, we're just told it did)
2/ partially staged event, meaning an event did happen, but only 'actors' were involved
or, the most sinister option, and one which, having thought about these things for quite some time now, I am becoming more and more to at least consider every time there is an 'event' like this, is
3/ mind-control. In this instance, as you suggested the patsy knew exactly where to go and was allowed to enter the building etc. etc. This is kind of a logical necessity if there's mind control at work. It has to be 'allowed' to happen.
Just think of, say, Sirhan, or the 'London Bridge terrorist attack' and the pattern becomes clear. Also notice that this theoretical option is virtually never discussed at all in the so-called alternative online community. If I were a CIA bad guy and I had a method that would work 100%, then I'd definitely do 'real' terrorist attacks, precisely because they are so obviously believable and provide all the evidence required. Especially to make 'conspiracy theorists' look stupid. Hence, also, the smokescreen/cover story/misdirection known as the 'false events' narrative (or 'staged' events). Beware those who spread such disinformation!
So now I am wondering how far back this method goes. As well as MK-Ultra going back to at least the 1950s, I mean, Sirhan/RFK was 1968, so that's a lot of false flag events...
This would also mean that the perpetrator of the Southport attack (if it happened) would have no memory of it - it would've been carried out by an alter, that is.
I try not to speculate too much, getting provable evidence for 'mind control' is going to be next to impossible, I read Sanders books, but since his apparent throwing RD Hall under the bus I'm less inclined to believe anything he wrote tbh.
It's a feasable hypothesis given what we know about various dark programs (MK Ultra for example) and there was Derren Browns "Assasin" series, tho that it's self could have been stagecraft to sow the idea of it into the public psyche, as could Sanders books.
If everyone goes round saying perps were mind controlled, it's easy for the state to nut them off, when they should be questioning the narrative it's self, with primary evidence, as R.D Hall, and our Iain have done so well.
They have a huge problem when it comes to "real" events, surviving victims, and family members of deceased victims tend not to let it drop if there are serious questions about the validity of the event narrative, Lockerbie, 9/11, and even some IRA events had problematic victim family groups asking awkward questions, they pose a bigger problem because they're not "conspiracy theorists" who can be sidelined and nutted off, plus they have legal standing. Fake victims etc. get well paid, often by donation, plus they have the state backing them, so they can afford to double down to the enth degree forever.
Given what we know about Gladio, and the IRA shinanigans interlinked with security services from whistleblowers e.g. "Lord Stevens told him that of 210 terrorist suspects he arrested, only three were not security force agents, and some worked for several agencies."
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/half-of-all-top-ira-men-worked-for-security-services/28694353.html
Plus the logic of terror attacks never adds up does it. It doesn't, and never has, benefitted the actual political aims of the group said to be responsible, the only thing that makes any logical sense about terror attacks is what one of the Gladio opperatives said in court...
Vincenzo Vinciguerra - Gladio opperative
"When you were on the Right you were not supposed to attack the State or its representatives. You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena. For one simple reason: To force the Italian public to turn to the State turn to the regime and ask for greater security. This was precisely the role of the right in Italy. It placed itself at the service of the State which created a strategy aptly called the "Strategy of Tension" in so far as they had to get ordinary people to accept that at any moment over a period of 30 years, from 1960 to the mid eighties a state of emergency could be declared. So, people would willingly trade part of their freedom for the security of being able to walk the streets, go on trains or enter a bank. This is the political logic behind all the bombings. They remain unpunished because the state cannot condemn itself.”
You can't unsee the evidence of Gladio, since I read about it I have a hard time believing any state narrative regarding "Terrorism", none of the state narratives make any logical sense, it only makes sense in the context of Opperation Gladio.
Cui Bono? Who benefits from all the "Muslim" terrorism? It's not Muslims that's for damn sure.
I can understand what you're getting at, for sure. But perhaps the problem lies in the use, or definition, of the word 'terrorism' - like 'one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter' - what I mean is, who is it, really, who defines who is a 'terrorist', rather than a 'resistance fighter'? Well, it's the regime against whom the terrorist/resistance fighter is fighting.
This is absolutely the case for the IRA. The IRA were a resistance organisation to occupation carried out by the British State. They would not have called themselves 'terrorists'. Same applies to, say, Hamas, or Hezbollah, or Ansar Allah. It is only their enemies who call them 'terrorists'.
With Gladio, of course, we're talking about something totally different. The quote you gave (I'm familiar with it - and it's always worth repeating now and again) sums it up - it was a series of 'false flag' events designed to create a strategy of tension so the people would give up a little liberty to gain a little security (or so they thought - I believe a Mr. Ben Franklin would've had something to say about that bargain).
So perhaps, when assessing an event, yes - you are right - we should always ask the 'qui bono' question...
The fundamental problem with "one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter" is that you'd have to accept violence is a justifiable tool for settling disagreements. Somewhere in that argument is a line to cross, everyone will draw a different line, often depending on which "side" they support.
The IRA, which mite well have started out as rightious idealogical resistance movement, soon devolved into a criminal cartel too willing to use violence in their activities, drug dealing and protection rackets etc, and as I've evidenced, they had surreptitious state collusion. Which, along with targetting innocents, delegitimized any idealogical foundation, while giving excuse, and tacit agreement by their involvement, to increasing the power of the state they were fighting.
“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.” (ML King)
The problem for would be freedom fighters, and revolutionaries, is human nature, there's a demographic bell curve to dark triad personality traits, you can't avoid allowing them into your movement, or government power structure for that matter, they tend to seek power, and have no qualms about switching sides, using whatever means they think will give themselves more power, or money/resources. Dark triad personality traits can't hide very easily in a pacifist movement.
Saying that, I don't really want to debate pacifism, I guess I'm a conditional pacifist, I'm fundamentally against war in all it's forms, but I will use reasonable force to defend myself, and others, but I don't consider that a licence to kill, the emphasis is on reasonable.
First point: the IRA got infiltrated and the bad guys did bad guy stuff and presented themselves as IRA. So that's not the resistance movement anymore.
Second point: My name is Boudicca. They raped me and my daughters after I exhausted all avenues of diplomacy.
The only way to deal with evil is to fucking exterminate it. Anything less allows the infection to continue.
Third point: this 'dark triad' bullshit is a deliberately manufactured lie by the cabal to make normal people think they are bad people and anyone can be a bad person. if this were true, humans would've become extinct a long time ago. This is a lie in order to disguise the cabal, to make the cabal seem like 'normal' people. it's a classic cabal tactic. Clearly it's worked.
Sorry, but 'normal people' do not do the things the cabal do. Normal people don't make war. Normal people would've closed all the borders if there was a deadly plague/covid on the way. Normal people are totally different. So don't give me this 'dark triad' bullshit. As soon as you do that, you cover for them...
Which London Bridge 'attack' do you mean, the first or second?
I agree it's strange that mind control is rarely mentioned in the 'alternative' community.
The one on 29 November 2019. When I heard about it alarm bells went off extremely loudly and immediately. And this is leaving aside the fact that it happened during the election campaign (similar to the Manchester Arena incident 2 years earlier) and the MSM had already portrayed Corbyn as a 'terrorist sympathiser' etc. etc.
Anyhow, in that incident, the perp, Usman Khan, had been successfully complying with a 'rehab' scheme, and was in Fishmonger's Hall listening to a conference (about the rehab scheme), when suddenly, for no apparent reason, he draws a knife and starts attacking people. He is then pursued outside, including by someone with a narwhal (unicorn) tusk bizarrely enough, where eventually he gets shot and killed (conveniently).
For me, it's obvious that there must have been some kind of hypnotic trigger (usually a word or phrase). I say it's obvious because otherwise it makes zero psychological sense. Psychology, contrary to what the orthodox (i.e. Establishment/cabal) academics may say, is in fact a proper science with logical, exact, and definite 'laws' to it. One of the reasons most people don't understand this about psychology is because they have been denied understanding of neuroscience (deliberately, of course).
In other words, no one, so-called 'radicalised terrorist' or not, sits around quietly and then suddenly start stabbing people. The point is, there must be a 'reason' or 'motivation' or 'trigger' for a person to behave like that (I mean 'suddenly' behave like that, as opposed to a premeditated act - if it was premeditated in this instance then he would've acted very differently, and indeed more effectively). Or, in fact, behave in any way. Even on a basic level, like 'go to the fridge and get some food' doesn't 'just happen' - it requires a factual trigger, that trigger being 'stomach send brain hunger signal'. It's the same principle for higher functioning too. Just that most people don't notice. And we also need to understand that the bad guys have indeed been studying all this stuff for a long time, and are certainly decades ahead of what's publicly known in the science of psychology and neuroscience.
Anyhow, I am already forming an essay about all this in my head. Hopefully I'll get around to it soon.
Another thing about it was that a second prisoner convicted of murder was also due to be released early. He was taken by prison staff to the talk at Fishmonger's (Masonic) Hall to hear the lecture on the rehab of prisoners according to MSM. He was said to have been one of the people who gave chase to Khan onto London Bridge, thereby performing in the piece of theatre. It could have been partly motivated by wanting to discredit that particular early prisoner release scheme. If so, it worked.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50618744
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/video/2019/nov/30/london-bridge-attack-pm-says-automatic-early-prison-release-is-not-working-video
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/10/cambridge-university-scraps-prisoners-programme-2019-fishmonger-hall-terror-attack
Hmm. Looks like I'm going to have to do a lot more research on this one...
That one was a definite false flag since he sat up after the 'police' had shot him dead twice! Not only that but Boris Johnson tweeted (or whoever ran his X account at the time) his condolences to the victims five and half hours before anything had happened !
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dmvV6LPjnadN/
Hmm - I have my doubts about that video. Could be faked. Mind you, I do admit I never actually saw anything because I was no longer watching TV by that time, just listening to the radio (no distracting visuals). Don't do that either now though. It does seem a bit psychologically unbelievable though to do staged event in broad daylight, in front of the general public and dozens of CCTV cameras - too much could go wrong.
The bit at the end especially doesn't make any sense to me. The guy who is supposedly dead is completely on his own before he gets up. This simply wouldn't happen, even in a staged event. Either there would still be people around him, or they'd have taken the body away by now. If he was just play acting dead then he'd have been told to wait until they put him in the back of the van before he wakes up. So all that makes me doubt the entire video.
If there is a mind control thing going on then in order to distract from or cover for it they would certainly come up with this 'faked events' narrative, which I've encountered more and more lately. So whenever I see things like this I'm always thinking 'is this a faked video/image', with the intention of promoting the 'it was faked/staged' meme within the 'conspiracy theory' movement. There is, after all, undoubtedly a lot of deep fakery about these days, which promotes some of the more outlandish theories.
It's certainly something I will need to look into a lot more though. But we should always bear psychology in mind, imho.
The guy who made the video has made other videos on and written about various false flags in the past. He believes 9/11 was an inside job for example, promotes the practice and spread of common law, has exposed the falsity of councils hiring court rooms to prosecute people for non payment of council tax and employing people who call themselves court bailiffs when they are no such thing, and how to deal with such people and with the police if they are called etc. On the whole he definitely seems sound considering his previous work.
I remember seeing the alleged attack on TV and wondered what language the alleged undercover cop was speaking at the time and how a non British person could be employed in the British police force. I don't think the time of day of a false flag matters and CCTV is often mysteriously not working conveniently for the authorities - 9/11, Princess Diana crash among others, or doctored CCTV as in the Lee Rigby event shown to the jury. The authorities story often changed, It was claimed he was shot twice. At the inquest it was claimed he was shot 17 times ! The footage showing him sitting up was taken by a woman from a building facing the bridge not CCTV. She probably used a camera phone.
We don't know how much time passed from him pretending to be dead and then sitting up. He was probably told to pretend and wait for the call to get up. The only sound we can hear in the footage is the conversation the woman is having with someone else. She seems to have taken it from the other side of a window so sound would have been muffled especially as it was taken from a building opposite. Of course the real proof of a false flag is Boris Johnson's tweet being made 5.5 hours before anything had happened. When I saw the video I checked out the tweet and sure enough it was there as described in the video. So this is not a fake. Others have pointed out the strange behavior of the 'police' in how they jump around and seem very agitated before firing the shots. This is not the behavior of professional police shooters but more like crisis actors told to make it look edgy, tense and dramatic.
Actually, it's the mainstream media news who inspires animosity between various segments of society by triggering tension over a variety of manufactured cultural wedge issues.
It's done through a campaign of relentless omissions, lies, and disinformation. In fact, tainting and shaping points of view which only follow the national security state's agenda is the primary objective.
That might explain, why mediocre ghoul commentators are paid millions by state-run mainstream media news channels.
.
What’s the solution to quell civil unrest and to restore social harmony and stability?
Answer: The taking away of personal Liberty & Rights by a strong arm Dictatorship!
But first, the wannabe Dictatorship must instigate the civil unrest.
The following was written to describe the anarchy being inflicted upon the citizens of the USA, but it can easily be extrapolated to the rest of Western Countries & Civilization.
The British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-british-oligarchys-fourth-war?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
When did Western Civilization begin to Collapse?
Answer: 5 November 1688: The Glorious Revolution when the Venetians conquered England and set in motion the Oligarchy’s quest for a One-World Empire.
Venice’s War on Western Civilization
https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fid_91-96/952_venice.html
The Venetian Takeover of England:
A 200-Year Project
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1994/eirv21n16-19940415/eirv21n16-19940415_015-the_venetian_takeover_of_england.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution
https://william3n4z2.substack.com/
I'm really confused now because I don't know if i'm a conspiracy theorist or an armchair rioter - there's no doubt this story is fishy - i know Southport well and i've never seen fish brought in by the tide - in fact, it's really difficult for the tide to come straight in if memory serves me right
'Fact checking' doesn't mean what it used to mean, that's a fact.
The only source of the Southport murders was the media - how do we know that what is described really happened? This 'event' appears to have been memory-holed almost immediately.
From that day onwards for two weeks it appears that 'trouble' was going to happen - and it did, of sorts with the obvious Hope-Not-hate scam of 100 riots that followed (about which nothing has happened) and agent provocatuers
Then we get the 'mug shots' of all those naughty white people who have been locked up without due trial, no defence and no juries. Except, of course, the arrested labour councillor and the arrested Bernie Spofforth. About whom we have heard little more ... why weren't these two locked up as well??
Ricky Jones due to appear in court next January, Bernie Spofforth ... erm ... nothing that I can find??
To me this whole 'event' is one big psyop in order to bring about further limitations of freedom of speech and control as crazily announced and much desired by the WEF labour party.
The only lesson I can take away from this is don't get involved in their narrative.
The only people inciting violence and hatred is the british government and its accolytes.
I am not the first person to ask this question but why do so many events happen on recurring dates that involve the numbers 2, 7, 7/7, 11, 20, 22?
JFK assassination 22 November
9/11 - September 11
2004 Madrid train bombings 11 March
2005 London train bombings - 7 July - 7th day, 7th month
Soldier Lee Rigby event 22 May incorporating the number 2 in the form of 2 perpetrators, one of whom was 22 years old, official sources say it occurred at 2 pm.
Jo Cox disappearance 16 June 1+6=7
Westminster 'attack' 22 March
Manchester Arena bang 22 May
2019 London Bridge stabbing 29 November 2 pm - 9+2=11 1+1=2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dmvV6LPjnadN/
Brussels airport bombing 22 March
George Floyd event 25 May 2+5=7
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PQIE7kPlgR9B/
Hamas/Israel event 7 October
Crocus Music Hall, Moscow bombing 22 March
Southport incident 29 July 2+9=11 1+1=2
By no means an exhaustive list.
Here is another one English Ordinal Gematria combined with Roman numerals, combined with a pictoral substitution:
COVID
Pictoral substitution of "O" for "0":
C0VID
Roman numerals VI=6:
C06D
English ordinal gematria on what is left:
3064
3+0+6+4=13; 1+3 =4.
In some of the cases that you mention, I think that the root number is number FOUR - think of amongst other things, golf terminology, societies with seccrets, etc.
Using some of your dates above:
2+2=4
7*7=49 (think "77 brigade"); 4+9=13; 1+3=4
7+6=13; 1+3=4
31; 3+1=4.
In other cases, the 11s and 29s for example, there may be a play on 9/11, which can be expressed in many ways:
11: 1+1=2; 4+7=11; so "29" is another way of expressing 9/11 (2.9; 11.9; 9.11), as well as adding up to 11.
The time of 9:47 on the ticker of 24-hour TV news clips on the day of the London underground events and what was said has also been discussed on the internet.
"18" is another one that sometimes comes up: 1+8=9, can be rotated to a "6". "18" is said to have "aces and eights" numerology. In the Desdemona typeface doubled over on a transparency, a number 4 variant "13" becomes "18" pictorially; so it might be said that on some systems 18 is even related to "4".
Other commentators on Iain's threads have mentioned the "Rule of Colel" applied to numerology too - worth looking up.
The problem is that Iain recently wrote an article entitled "The Occult Deception", so I doubt that he will be approving of the points that you make and this reply.
Have you written down the dates for events in the 1990s such as the London nail, Lawrence and Dunblane events?
No I haven't. Have you? I would be interested to know if you have the info on it. I have only just read Iain's article 'The Occult Deception'. I hadn't seen it before as I have just recently subscribed to his Substack and am kind of catching up with earlier stuff.
What I understand him to be saying in the article is that controlled opposition operatives are deliberately highlighting the occult signs in many false flags in order to direct attention to it and away from the actual evidence of the false flag and that this is the occult deception. In this way the evidence is never actually looked at because mention of the occult has been labelled 'weird', 'conspiracy minded', crazy etc and so no one wants to be tainted by such labels. As he points out, occult simply means something hidden from general knowledge. By complying with the labels attached to the occult, we are giving over our opportunity for knowledge to those who want to control us. Such knowledge is for everyone not just an elite part of society. These are some of the points I understand him to be making. He is not denying there might be an occult significance to the dates which keep recurring.
Regarding your point about the root number being 4, it feels a bit forced to conclude that, eg. 7x7 =49, 2+2=4, 1+1=2, because the numbers I mentioned often stand on their own without needing to be added. I know I have added some numbers together but it is because they come to either a 2, 7, 7/7, 11, 20, 22. I am not saying 4 has no significance but it is not one of the frequently recurring numbers in false flags or state murder cases.
I think your last paragraph is correct about the number 4. In numerology you have to keep things simple, with only 1 or perhaps 2 reductions (often to simply get to a single digit if one is using the 1 to 9 sequence). In other words I think it's a mistake to overcomplicate these things. 'Reading too much into it' one might also say.
I think Iain is partly correct about the 'occult deception'. Others talk about this as a kind of 'revelation of the method'. I think these people get it the wrong way round, though. Although there is certainly - at least sometimes - an element of the Satanic method involved (as there can also be with mind control programs), I am sometimes minded to think that the cabal are giving away clues in order to 'test the waters' - that's to say 'how much can we get away with, or how obvious can we be, how far can we push the general public before they erupt into outright revolution against us' - to put this differently, the more the cabal feel they can get away with without provoking the revolution, the safer they feel. And this is why they keep 'testing the waters' as it were. Of course they probably enjoy watching some 'conspiracy theorists' 'making themselves look silly in the eyes of the public and thus discrediting the conspiracy theory', and so on, but ultimately, in psychological terms, it's about the cabal's method to help themselves feel safe - they face overwhelming odds vs. humanity, after all.
But they certainly, at least now, know they can push things far further than they may have originally thought they could - this is especially true after 9-11, which was so in your face, but did not provoke the revolution. That must've made them feel incredibly empowered and secure.
Yes I agree about hem feeling safe after 9/11. Then they had it confirmed all over again with the world wide house arrest of billions of of people during the Covid scam. And still the revolution didn't happen!
Agree completely re Covid.
Also strikes me that a similar thing is going on with regards to Israel-Gaza - it's a genocide which is also completely brazen and public, and yet the most reaction we see are 'protest marches'. At some point there really does need to be the establishment of a 'democratic deterrent' - if, say, a million people can march on London but instead of just standing around making pretty speeches and waving banners etc., they actually said 'either you stop it or we storm parliament', then sheer weight of numbers wins the day. That was what was so disappointing about that march ahead of the 2nd Iraq war - and that was 2 million people!
It does really make you wonder what it would take for people to cross that line. Because if they don't, then these events will continue.
And they will get far worse.
I sometimes read wiki and BBC because they usually give the standard narritive. This is not a discussion of the narritive's accuracy. Merely observations on some numbers contained therein.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
According to wiki, FOUR co-ordinated attacks. It mentions Pan Am flight 103 in passing. 1+0+3=4.
According to wiki, attacks eneded 9:47; add minutes side up 9:11 or 9/11.
According to wiki, the ages of two of the attackers were 18 and 22.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Westminster_attack
According to wiki, a grey Hyundai Tucson,...was driven at up to 76 miles per hour: 7+6=13; 1+3=4. They were keen to get the "76" in there, prefacing it with the weasel modifier "up to". Could a car really have done that on that bridge in the alleged circumstances?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_London_nail_bombings
According to wiki, the perpetrator's age was 22 (2+2=4). There were 4 deaths.
The BBC displayed a membership card which they say belonged to the perpetrator:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/archive/811720.stm
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/810000/images/_811720_1nsmcard_front300.jpg
A-640740
In English ordinal and pythagerean gematria this is 22. 2+2=4.
One has to do the work on numerology FOUR oneself at times...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Southport_stabbing
Check the first taxi arrival time and total harmed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Stephen_Lawrence
Yes but like I said, most of the numbers I mentioned stand on their own e.g false flags happen on 2nd/11th/20th/22nd/29th. Things often happen at 2 pm, there are 2 perps, one could be 20 or 22 years old etc. They stand often independently as number on their own.
Yes - without any analysis - and without finding an answer to your intial question - like you say they must stand on their own - you've got it. Nice corresponding with you and keep up the good work!
Thank you. And you too.
Classic government mal-information. Nothing more nothing less.
PROBLEM = Perceived threat from unrest
REACTION = Fear & horror
SOLUTION = Less freedom.
Agent Slazenger playing her part very well again, and probably enjoying herself too I wouldn't wonder.
I do appreciate your calling out her errors, though. Whether they were unforced errors, or deliberate, or she just knows she doesn't need to care because her intended audience will not notice, is certainly an interesting, if academic point. She knows that most people don't have the time to go a questionin' the narrative or information she comes out with. And those wot do, well, they are dangerous conspiracy theorist spreaders of misinformation! Trolls, as she calls them.
On a serious note, though - just to point out what Slazenger's part is - she is simply the narrator. Telling the public what the story is supposed to be, and therefore what they are supposed to think (especially about the aforementioned 'conspiracy theorists' - so don't go there, public! Don't go there! Have a nice picnic instead! On Wimbledon Common! Don't litter! Strawberries and Robinson's Barley Water!).
Specifically, I'd say she concentrates on the drawing up of characters. Profiling and such like. It's quite a specific role actually, so I doubt she ever needed to go anywhere near Monckton. Unless they have a decent set of tennis courts there, that is. Perhaps a swimming pool. Resident's pub, curry nights on Thursdays...
"Channel3Now" in English Ordinal Gematria and Pythagorean Gematria are 112 and 49 respectively, when you value the "3" as 3, not 0, as some calculators unfortunately do.
Reduce 112 and 49:
1+1+2=4
4+9=13; 1+3=4.
Number FOUR again.
"Chanel3Now" thereFORE has a gematria of FOUR, despite "3" being mentioned in its name.
Separately, should Iain be locating the start of the events as eminating from the offending statement from "Channel3News"?
Only a weekend or two beFORE, asset Tommy Ten Names/Wasim Kempson held a London rally, which turned out to be relatively peaceful. I sure that the powers that be could have made it not to be peaceful, but they did not.
We all know this partly because Nick-Lowles-Hope-Not-Hate-Gerry-Gable-Seachlight-Magazine (also assets) told us about all the planning that Ten Names/Kempson put into the gathering, with photos of all the usual suspect asset and military types such as Katie Hokins, Gerrard Batten, Laurence Fox, Raving Reverend Calvin, etc sat at desks with him.
Was that networking of spook assets and actors several weekends before not relevant? A rather large number of all of these assets have been subsequently discussed in relation to Southport in a variety of left-ish reports quoted by Iain, including Lynn so-called-global-socalled-PR, Seachlight and HnH.
For more on Lynn PR see:
https://jacothenorth.net/blog/lynn-global-pushes-globalist-agenda (best)
Intersting supplementary:
https://jacothenorth.net/blog/tag/shayoni-sarkar-lynn
We have the same thing going on in the US. The older population believes that their preferred “trusted” newscaster tells them (because that’s what they’ve done all their lives) while bashing anyone that disagrees with what their trusted media representative tells them. My parents in their 70’s & 80’s in the midwest US fall into that category. There’s no changing of their minds. Their brains are atrophied
Ahem. You don’t have to be old to be stupid.
True that! I’m 63 and not real smart myself