"If we think about it, the Great Replacement, as espoused by a tiny number of far-right voices, doesn’t make much sense. By all socio-economic and political measures, it is the the migrant populations in most countries that are the poorest and and least able to exercise either social or political power. If multiculturalism is the “planne…
"If we think about it, the Great Replacement, as espoused by a tiny number of far-right voices, doesn’t make much sense. By all socio-economic and political measures, it is the the migrant populations in most countries that are the poorest and and least able to exercise either social or political power. If multiculturalism is the “planned” replacement of the indigenous ethno-culture, as the fringe “far-right” claims, it has been a miserable failure."
Devil's advocate here!
Immigrant populations may exert significant overt and covert power regardless.
Indiscriminate immigration - numbers and values - can critically impact nations.
Too many and too poor can be drug sponges and crime factories.
Poor immigrants can drain welfare resources, to which they are arguably not entitled on an equal basis, especially if citizens are disadvantaged and taxpayers are forced to cover the extra costs.
Some immigrants make excessive demands on the basis of "non-discrimination" regardless, while
westerners would have absolutely no "equal rights" in the home nations of these immigrants.
For instance, trying to have western religious holidays banned on the basis of non-discrimination!
If westerners tried to have religious holidays banned in other nations, how would this go down?
Some immigrant groups presume, that they are entitled to pursue their political agendas in public in ways that are unacceptable to the majority, causing widespread offense, anger and unrest.
Rich immigrants can exert inordinate power in national economies and governments.
Rich mafia figure "immigrants" cause untold damage overt and covert.
The claim that immigrant populations are mostly poor and powerless, is questionable, as are the causes and intent of mass indiscriminate immigration worldwide
"If we think about it, the Great Replacement, as espoused by a tiny number of far-right voices, doesn’t make much sense. By all socio-economic and political measures, it is the the migrant populations in most countries that are the poorest and and least able to exercise either social or political power. If multiculturalism is the “planned” replacement of the indigenous ethno-culture, as the fringe “far-right” claims, it has been a miserable failure."
Devil's advocate here!
Immigrant populations may exert significant overt and covert power regardless.
Indiscriminate immigration - numbers and values - can critically impact nations.
Too many and too poor can be drug sponges and crime factories.
Poor immigrants can drain welfare resources, to which they are arguably not entitled on an equal basis, especially if citizens are disadvantaged and taxpayers are forced to cover the extra costs.
Some immigrants make excessive demands on the basis of "non-discrimination" regardless, while
westerners would have absolutely no "equal rights" in the home nations of these immigrants.
For instance, trying to have western religious holidays banned on the basis of non-discrimination!
If westerners tried to have religious holidays banned in other nations, how would this go down?
Some immigrant groups presume, that they are entitled to pursue their political agendas in public in ways that are unacceptable to the majority, causing widespread offense, anger and unrest.
Rich immigrants can exert inordinate power in national economies and governments.
Rich mafia figure "immigrants" cause untold damage overt and covert.
The claim that immigrant populations are mostly poor and powerless, is questionable, as are the causes and intent of mass indiscriminate immigration worldwide