Yes indeed, Francis: the monster has at last come out of the shadows and revealed itself in all its ghastliness.
Now, we can have no illusions about what we're really up against.
In all the mayhem that this case will entail, we must remember that people such as (Mis-)Judge Steyn are nothing more than mortal humans who've elected to serve the wrong god. They will need compassion and understanding - AFTER correction and true justice.
These are the days that signal the end of an epoch. What comes next is wholly unknowable, if we're perfectly honest with ourselves.
It all reminds me, in a somewhat perverse way, of Douglas Adams' "The restaurant at the end of the universe."
I should point out that all the money donated to Hall has gone to his defence team.
All future/further funds donated to Hall will go to the Hibberts & his defence team/
By donating to Hall you are GIVING TO HIBBERT, sadly and sickeningly.
I suggest personalities (!) like ELON MUSK etc who champion freedom of speech (yeah I know its most probably all spiel & PR!) should be approached, it is peanuts to a man like him (well, as claimed!) .
I see no creative thinking occurring in these comments (apart from ProLies fantasies) about a realistic resolution (with Ram, Nushi & Adrastieia being very notable expectations, as usual) .
If the case can not be turned with normal legal means then a bail out is required. Hall has interviewed/collaborated with some wealthy folk, why have they not funded this farce?
I dont think it is fair to expect the public to fund Hibbert via Hall due to Halls legal naivety & the states malicious intent to make this a spectacular example of their power to steam roll policies of oppression.
So any genuine supporter of reason & free speech should pester Elon (or the like, pop stars, film folk, charities like Amnesty ) until they respond.
What do you say Mr Davis , or are you too cowardly to respond to such common sense solutions here still ? Or will Hall get uppity and refuse to take anything from Musk even if he offered it !
lies, delusions, a damaged ego desperate for attention, misrepresentation & cognitive dissonance so vast that it is a cognitive void.
No one can believe a word you write Sarahahaha.
Last night , your behaviour put the matter to bed - You work for HIBBERTS interests.
In depth remedies for Hall were posted by Blue Sky Maiden here first, then my sister. The case was negated for keen minds by the work of Serge ages ago.
You contribution is to bury those comments in hate bait , time vampire tactics of anal vomit wallpapering, as can be seen & proven at a glance here.
Hibbert is only a heavyweight because he is sitting in a wheelchair Francis.
Take him out of that & he is a lightweight, with legs like spaghetti & an arse that can't cease prolapsing & talking away to itself. That is why his friends say he is a proper chatty arse.
When he & Mis Dis Info BBC Merde Anus Spring get together both their arses begin to chunter away like merry Gremlins in a karaoke competition.
Of course FREUD is the best authority on such anal antics, but bigoted minds & willful idiots tend to ignore what he had to say,because it would destabilize the strategies they devise for their more limited & stupid readership.
You are either blind, a hopeless idiot, or just another antagonistic troll Simon.
Hall is wearing brown shoes UK children used to call 'shit-kickers', a brown suit with elbow patches, and has the same style beard as Anton Le Vey and numerous TV villains.
Everyone familiar with his 'show' knows one of the few things that makes Hall laugh is his insults about Andrew Johnson's 'shitty fleece' , I think he may also market them as such?
Here I see a lot of shitty fleecers, the Protrue account being the worst offender, but also note on bitchute some anal, dribbling cretin called Simon supporting Hall in a sycophantic manner, so I imagine that may well be you also?
Why do you hate dark skinned people, the working class, Jamaicans, intelligent people, insightful comments, humorous insults & now people with learning problems or forgien expressions are RETARDS in your deluded ego Proturd Sarahahahahah?
Is it envy & insecurity or arrogance & conceit, maybe all of them & more ?
You hope the 'system', that you claim to hate, goes after Nushi because she makes you look like a moronic bigot lacking substance, subtly or a sense of humour? I hope a hungry rabid dog...or squirrel, wolf, bear, giant slug, or whatever... goes after you, & I will pray it occurs as soon as possible.
Keep tROTTING about for Nushi,
she's got you doing some amazing dressage feats so far, & Ian Davis let slip that you're part of his team of cenobite warriors!
Look out for the new conformity in the 'league of division' ! It's miserable, mediocre & mundane, just like 99% of your comments & the other overt plants here busy festering among the shrubbery & grubs.
Quite right Ben, here we see in these comments numerous attempts to silence the only people actually SERIOUSLY questioning official narratives,who are The Blue Sky Maiden, R(h)am & RAM. While the distraction work of Iain Davis, Fransis Leper, Protrue, Eve-i-lyn etc, is busy infecting peoples minds with endless misery, and desperate attempts at censorship! I wonder why so much effort is made by the later to ignore or abuse the most insightful and useful comments here?
Prolie , are you staring at your own mutilated genitalia when you write that ?!
😂🤣😂🤣😂
You really are in a rage today,
How is that flabby old whore you call 'mother', 'sister' & 'lover'-,are you still dressing up in her clothes & doing your own shower scenes like in PSYCHO ?
Maybe you & Norman from 911 ReVisionTwits should team up?
Or are you actually Siamese twins separated but functioning like Jackal & Hyde night stalkers?
Hall isn't silenced, he can say what the hell he likes, though he may have to do it anonymously. Yet it seems there is a conspiracy here , to silence opinions Iain O'Davis & his TEAM don't wish to be thought about?
I have removed this comment. "We" do not think Hall is a pervert or a masochist or whatever, I certainly don't. I think he had every legitimate right to conduct his on-the-ground investigation as he did. The High Court's insistence that this amounted to harassment was not born out by the evidence presented in the court and the High Court barred the evidence Hall could have presented in his own defence.
My first or second time here commenting and im not surprised.. Whenever there is a truth to be squashed these vermin parasites appear and overwhelm the arena/content.. Richard obviously has them worried/bang to rights, otherwise they would have allowed him to defend himself, but they can't afford to, speaks volumes... That's all we need to know...
I don't give these cockroaches the time of day, but they can't leave me alone, again speaks volumes...
The Establishment spend more money, time, manpower and effort controlling the narrative than they do on anything else, hence why The Media Are The Worlds Most Insidious, Pernicious, Prolific and Accomplished Serial Killers, being polite...
Why censor that comment though Iain, you could just respond to it.
the comment may have been foul but so is this situation & what the attack represents, and alleged to depict. Also it was a tactical comment that disproved a lot of fear mongering if you had the wits to comprehend how it was presented & written, by applying what Nushi wrote it actually taught people how to evade legal retribution , but not your god-like hand of censorship.
Also it did say genuine 'secret' facts about some risible famous people and exposed certain important psychodynamics intrinsic with how power affect those within its spell.
I suggest you resurrect the comment and give a commentary about it, disagreeing where you feel fit, and critiquing where you find it unreasonable, otherwise you may find your credibility and well being seriously compromised, as i imagine you are a man of genuine integrity & well meaning spirit, except for this transgression into emotive bigotry ?
Are you going to censor me for stating you blatantly ignored the REAL evidence of the time-stamp of the Pawley footage?
The doctored audio of the Pawley/Zach footage?
That you somehow overlooked the Jordan Kenney testimony which proves Bickerstaff is lying?
You let yourself be humiliated by Aisling O'Loughlin regarding the Bickerstaff footage, yet if you would have been prepared with REAL evidence you could have wiped her out? Very odd.
Let's go over some points of this farcical interview:
1:02:52 she points out the obvious flaw that RDH offered to all about the "LIVE" video footage shown in the Bickerstaff footage, HALL had ZERO evidence that this was "LIVE" - this rang alarm bells for me straight away, she was handed this along with others on a plate from Hall and she threw it at your face, instead of giving an honest reply that HALL should NEVER have included that as evidence, you stated she is missing out the "main tranche" of the Bickerstaff footage, well Mr. Davis so are YOU.
1:03:10 "The main tranche of the video (Bickerstaff) is the conduct of the people around him"
You had the opportunity to drown the evil witch, all you had to do was produce the Jordan Kenney testimony:
The problem with Stag Ring Hall, Gnome like Davis, Andrew Minger Johnson, Precious Pighooey etc is that they BELIEVE what they see.
None of them are what I would consider 'visually literate' or perceptive regarding illusions & trickery.
What is Halls great tag line ?
''Believe none of what you see & only half of what you hear'', or Believe none of what you hear & only half of what you see?
Either way it's shite isn;t it.... imagine Hall trying to cross the road with that in his mind...'' He didn't believe its a red light... He didn't believe that lorry is approaching & ignored the horn....... that isn;t a little blond haired girl, with a key hole iris, crossing the road in front of him...etc''
Hall & anyone taking on board his ludicrous 'advice' would be a danger on the roads with that philosophy!
How about BELIEVE NOTHING, you either know something or it is speculation.
After Proturds recent mania again, it revealed it 's racist nature & made me think, 'how many dark skinned interviewers have been involved with Hall, Davis, Dingleberry, Plumley, Johnny Watsit, Patrick Henderson, the UK Column etc?' Maybe NONE?
Just look at the desperate gaslighting Proturds get upto to dissuade you to continue this line of thinking about LAZY ARGUMENTS between 'the same team' of controlled op assets here. It;s the same cliched troll scrip we've all seen endlessly on social media controlled zones.
It seems to me that Proturd has effectively answered your questions to Iain.... these 'characters' are ALL sell outs in some way, playing with audience expectations & perception management. Hibbert is an evil shit, so Hall must be an angel of virtue... well,he never was, & made cutting insults about people he disliked on almost every one of his news round ups. Often that was the best bit of the show.
These substack operatives are clunky & overt i their behaviour because they are not as intelligent as they imagine , while the public are not as stupid as they would like to imagine either. They are also arrogant & shallow.
Maybe that is why so few people have sympathy for Hall if they are intuitive, or if they have seen a lot of his work (like me) remained unimpressed or unconvinced.
His Manchester Event book is very good in many ways, it proves beyond doubt that it was a staged event & not as 'publicised' , yet you raise many good ideas about what is evaded & why that may be so.
The answer to why is now obvious to some of us, & what we are seeing is a lesser evil (a probable controlled op fall guy) being steamrolled by the greater evil (probable 'staged' court theatre used to promote oppressive agendas ). There are no heroic characters in this 'game', none of them have the integrity required to be truly independent in their output or outlook.
The fact that Proturd Prolapse can stalk, blatantly lie & harass informed & insightful debate here without Davis intervening has proven to me the hypocrisy on display is terminal, & these controlled zones are primarily here to channel the narrative & reactions, raise the level of social fear , frustration & injustice, & employ a lot of malicious soul-less morons to call everyone they disagree with 'vermin'....
Which reminds me who was HALLs biggest sponsors for his 'TV Productions' ?!
FUCKING HELL- PROTURD has no interaction with 'dark skinned' people and is totally clueless!!!!
''Is it possible there aren't very many dark skinned 'awake' (for want of a better word) people in the UK, who ALSO actually WANT to be Internet personalities in the 'truther' field?''
What a cultural catastrophe this absolute brain dead rodent is.
What do almost ALL ROOTS REGGAE LYRICS talk about?
What do most UK rap tracks talk about?
Protrue here proves beyond any doubt it is an INVERSION FUCK UP PROGRAMME, what it writes here really deserves some serious retribution, let us hope there is some INSTANT KARMA for Protrue, I have never seen such overt antagonism without foundation.
That is a great outburst of lies & misrepresentation again their Proturd.
You would be ignored if you didnt stink the place out so much.
Still, it's great how you give away all sort of allegiances here among other controlled agents like yourself. It's in how you express yourself & what triggers you so readily... & you really are on fire today !
"Aisling O'loughlin appears to have outed HERSELF as some sort of op"
To whom! Not a casual observer, she made Davis look like a fool in many parts of that interview because he was not armed with any evidence, take the Bickerstaff footage for example, she wiped the floor with him.
Sorry Hew I disagree, Assling made a fool of herself & Davis was restrained and polite considering what a raving hysteric Assling proved to be.
I won't drone on about it with endless examples, however I do also agree with you that Davis didn't do as good a job as I hoped and missed opportunities.
What struck me most was that Assling was PERFORMING, this was an obvious mutual controlled ops performance as far as I see it at the moment.
No one claimed he wasn't within his rights Iain, you seem to have wandered off track. No one among us has claimed the charge against him isn't constructed lies.
You have become as disingenuous & malicious as ProLies account here, aa compulsive liar & hate bait division that YOU have encouraged & facilitated to STALK & Harass myself , friends & family.
This fiasco has shown what your sensibilities are & where they lie & you should really make amends or retire as very few informed folk will be able to take you seriously as an independent voice after this is highlighted.
It's so good to see and hear this. Well done to whoever filmed it - I have scanned many of the legacy media reports, and not a word in any of them on Richard's speech. He shows them up to be the craven establishment lackeys they truly are.
By the way, the first report I heard yesterday was BBC Radio 4 news headlines, and they made a point of saying that the claimants won damages of “over £22,000 each”… those two little ducks again!
I suspect the reason why no-one appeared at court to support Fibbert is because all were hired hands and they were done with their allotted roles once the Queen had dropped in to the hospital for a quick chat.
The Queen's visit was the official sanctification of the narrative in the public mind.
I wonder if she knew it was all baloney, or was she just another unwitting dupe?
This could be cheated up in 5 minutes by showing all the CCTV. if it's a case real people children were bombed then certain parties from both sides in a Skif. However that argument is not apparent when the State want to push an agenda they quite happily show bombings of people and Children when it suits them.
The Blue Sky Maiden account here mentions the hIXoss scum, which obviously alludes to histories hated Hyksos tribes of Egyptian corruption, & decline.
However you may have noted BSM is playful with words and highlights the IX , which is =9
In Egypt the 9 was the ruling gods the Ennead.
2.+2+.5= 9
with colel that is the perfect 10=1
or =8 the calling card of modern espionage
9 itself is possibly the most intriguing number, as all multiplications of 9 sum to 9 in gematria.
ie
2x9 -18 ... 1+8=9
3x9=27... 2+7 =9
4x 9= 36 ... 3+6=9
5x9= 45 ...4+5+9
9x9= 81 = 8+1=9
OSS = office of strategic services, forerunner to the CIA & also akin to the SS of infamy.
so what does the 'h' represent ? I asked her what it means to her and she replied 'it is a chair for emperors' , so a throne. She then told me that it would be capitalised 'but confuses the IX importance' as a capital it is still the 'throne chair' / Kings Throne, and ALSO the triple Tau in occluded form!
So, when she mentions the hIXoss scum she actually implies the corrupt remnants of Egyptian monotheistic mercenary 'foreigners' to the land (overly) but that via the Kingship and secret services their control and subjugation of the population.
This made me think a lot about what else it implies in this case and the royal families role or influence, married with the espionage networks we are aware of.
These ideas will probably be wasted here, as there is a lot of posturing venom instead of gratitude. So it may not great loss to Iain Davis, and Richard D Hall et al ,that I have no inclination to say anymore about the matter to such an hypocritical , mean natured gang of trivial compulsive bitches and sycophants.
Nushi (BSM) says her 'ideas grew from wat DubSurgeOn wrote & said to her', and she should thank him for 'credit where it is due, but not where it is jew- 😆😂😆 just joking, it is hard to resist!''.
I contacted TheDubSurgeOn, as he is one of the few people online who obviously knows what the hell he is talking about with Gematria, and had a great chat (as usual) , that made it clear as day to me what the symbolism here is all about, he sent me 2 more parts of the Mankey Event essays he wrote but is not going to publish. But said I can use bits if I 'give credit for a change'. So here goes, ripping the veil of maya from the event as concisely as possible. The whole thing is really fascinating, but deliberately sprawling & took time to digest (as it should I imagine!) , This is what is included-
H is the NEXT OCTAVE (A to F =1to 7) or COMPLETE CYCLE , as 8, it is also symbolic of infinity & HEAVEN/ABUNDANCE. With coloel it could be envisioned as '9' the manifest god head. SUDOKO is of course 9 units , as is the MASONIC CYPHER SQUARE similar to a PORTCULAS.
9 is the number of partitions in a magic square for SATURN - all lines = 15 (hence the modern demonization of 666 connected to Saturn/Time (3 rows of 15 = )1+5=6
so 666. 666 = THE LOWER NATURE =Hephren / Ἑφρην
Also phthora" (φθορά), which means decay or destruction has a gematria value of 666.
6+6+6=18 & reduces to 9 of course.
'Hephaestus, was the Greek god of fire, metalworking, craftsmanship, and blacksmiths. He is known for creating marvelous weapons and equipment for the gods and heroes, such as Achilles' armor and Hermes' winged helmet'.
Why is BLACKROCK given the name it has? Does the 'V' (allegedly for VICTORY) also symbolise VULCAN.
----end of extracts----
I will leave it there, if that goes unappreciated we know there is no hope here that Davis & co are up to any genuine good and their agenda is actually utterly despicable.
As a side note, I double checked what Serge had written and his mention with BSM of the EGYPTIAN SYMBOLISM INVOLVED and this leaped out at me
''Khafre[a] or Chephren[b] (died c. 2532 BC) was an ancient Egyptian monarch who was the fourth king of the Fourth Dynasty, during the earlier half of the Old Kingdom period (c. 2700–2200 BC). He was son of the king Khufu, and succeeded his brother Djedefre to the throne.''
----- WTMF !!!! -----
(C) HEPHREN !!!!! an incredible correspondence that confirms so much, ROSS you will love the numerology & symbolism here! It pretty much TIES IT ALL UP , , just fill in any gaps!
This should also be considered I think, bizarrely Sarah Plumley (a rapidly expanding, useless APE) who seems defiantly linked to the Prolie account here runs Guerrilla Education yet is a precocious idiot. Operation Chaos is Mile Mathis' (MM = Masonic STAMP/signifier) favourite tag for the oppressive process (code name) Espionage is using. Check this out!
''Apeiron is a Greek word meaning '(that which is) unlimited; boundless; infinite; indefinite' from ἀ- a- 'without' and πεῖραρ peirar 'end, limit; boundary', the Ionic Greek form of πέρας peras 'end, limit, boundary'.''
''As Greek mythology goes, the universe was once a big soup of nothingness. Then, two things happened: either Chaos or Gaia created the universe as we know it, or Ouranos and Tethys gave birth to the first beings.''
I also found this useful, but will cease now as i do not wish to overwhelm you or others interested in this 'facie-nating' yet boundless enterprise.😊
Thanks to all the authors who contributed to the above and the publication of it! It is very thorough and will take me some time to digest (on top of other correspondence that I am behind with)! I hope that others will also give sensible comments and contributions in response!
Thanks for that, Richard has them by the short and curlies, God Bless All fighting these Parasites...
It's a Masonic Control System, The Scottish Rite (Skull & Bones) and Swiss Octogon being top of that tree, one War (BlackRock/BlackWater/BlackStone/BlackWatch/MIC), one Financial (Vanguard/BIS/WHO/WEF/CERN) and both everything in-between.....
Even HUDGE-HELL solicitors can now gloat over the numerology.
"£22,500 to Mr Hibbert and £22,500 to his daughter Eve"
I never bothered with IAIN to be honest, another BOOK about the attacks, yet completely ignored THE EVIDENCE along with RDH....but my interest was suddenly invigorated with his interview with that useless witch and how she absolutely made a mockery of him, she was freely allowed to pelt him with rotten cabbages as though he had placed himself in the stocks voluntarily.
I have been reluctantly scrolling through the tripe being posted on here, I can see why you are leaving, it's nothing but a devoted fan-club of RDH with 'Gatekeeper' of the Substack PROLIES as it's drooling poodle guard dog to try and bark down any REAL input.
I just found over 12 RECENT mentions of Nushi on Google when I typed her birth name in. You have no idea who she really is do you Proturd ! No wonder you're still in such a confused mess & pounced on poor old Nick with accusations, making yourself look like a hysterical psycho in the process...
Nushi has one of the most perfect voluptuous yet contained arses I have ever seen Sarahhah, Unlike that slimy, leakage prone crusty old hole you swing behind you, like a rucksack with a haemorrhage.... or paddling pool nibbled by piranhas..
Prolies., you are getting 'literally' slaughtered here, & are obviously a virgin spinster- lost in lesbian fantasies & desperate for any attention, however derogatory it may be.
You have been called many relevant things , including a dog dicked arsehole, a pet feltching fuckwit, psycho stalker & maggot brained child molester, yet the best insult you can create is GROTBAGS.
You really are just some automated chat bot, programmed by rodents on crack. No human being could ever be as pathetic & feeble as your attempts at imaginative acts or expression.
WTF it's now showing signs of Schizophreniform disorder, I am now someone else? I believe 'Prolies' accused me of the same grave crime when I first posted about the CARLO photographs.
Anyone who now points out some truths that rattles 'ProSchizo' is now BlubSturgeon!
If a court judgement is obviously corrupt or neglegent what recourse is there?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
If you believe a court judgment is the result of corruption, negligence, or serious legal error, there are several potential recourses, depending on the specific circumstances and legal framework in your jurisdiction. Here are some of the options typically available:
1. Appeal the Judgment
Grounds for Appeal: You may be able to challenge the judgment by appealing to a higher court. In most cases, appeals are based on legal errors, such as misinterpretation of the law, improper procedures, or other substantial mistakes. If you believe the judgment was influenced by corruption or negligence, you would typically need to show this through evidence, often as part of the appeal argument.
Process: The process varies by jurisdiction, but typically you need to file a notice of appeal and then submit an appellate brief that outlines the legal errors you believe occurred. If the higher court agrees, the decision may be overturned or remanded for a new trial.
2. Motion for a New Trial
Legal Error or Fraud: If you can show that the judgment was obtained through fraudulent means, corruption, or significant legal error, you may be able to file a motion for a new trial. This is generally filed in the same court that issued the judgment.
Procedure: This motion must typically be filed within a specific time frame (e.g., within 30 days after the judgment). You would need to present new evidence, highlight procedural errors, or argue that there has been a significant injustice or miscarriage of justice.
3. Motion to Set Aside Judgment
Fraud, Mistake, or Misrepresentation: In some cases, if you believe the judgment was influenced by fraud or other unfair practices (e.g., corruption), you may file a motion to set aside the judgment. This is typically available in situations where one party can demonstrate that they were defrauded, misled, or subjected to an unjust legal process.
Procedure: This motion is often made to the same court that issued the judgment. If successful, the judgment may be vacated or revised.
4. Complaint or Petition for Judicial Misconduct
Corruption or Misconduct by Judges: If the judgment was affected by corruption, bias, or misconduct by the judge (e.g., accepting bribes, conflict of interest), you can file a complaint with the judicial conduct or ethics board in your jurisdiction. In many areas, there are bodies that oversee judicial conduct, such as:
State judicial commissions
Judicial conduct review boards
Bar associations
Investigation: If the board finds merit in your complaint, they may investigate the judge’s conduct. In extreme cases, this can result in disciplinary actions, including censure, suspension, or removal from the bench.
5. Civil Lawsuit for Malpractice or Misconduct
Attorney Misconduct or Negligence: If your lawyer acted negligently, incompetently, or in a corrupt manner (e.g., failing to properly represent you), you may have grounds for a civil malpractice lawsuit. This would be a separate action from the court case itself but could potentially lead to compensation or other remedies if the attorney's actions contributed to an unjust outcome.
Proceedings: You would need to prove that the attorney’s actions caused harm and that the judgment would have been different if not for the attorney’s misconduct.
6. Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (Criminal Cases)
If the judgment in question is in a criminal case and you believe it resulted from corruption or serious legal error, you might seek post-conviction relief. This process allows a convicted person to challenge their conviction after a final judgment, often based on newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations, or misconduct.
Innocence Claims: In some cases, you may also file for a "writ of habeas corpus," which challenges the legality of detention, arguing that the conviction was obtained through unconstitutional means.
7. Public Exposure and Political Pressure
Investigative Journalism: If you suspect that a judgment resulted from corruption, it can sometimes help to expose the issue through media outlets or investigative journalists who specialize in legal corruption. Public exposure can lead to increased scrutiny and potentially force a reexamination of the case, particularly if there is evidence of widespread corruption.
Government or NGO Advocacy: There are sometimes non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that advocate for judicial fairness and transparency. If corruption is involved, some of these organizations might be able to help bring attention to your case.
8. Criminal Charges Against the Judge or Other Officials
Corruption: If you have evidence that a judge, court official, or lawyer was involved in criminal activity (e.g., bribery, fraud, or abuse of office), you might be able to report the matter to law enforcement. This could lead to a criminal investigation into the individuals involved.
Whistleblower Protections: Some jurisdictions offer legal protections for individuals who report corruption or misconduct within the legal system.
Important Considerations:
Burden of Proof: In cases of alleged corruption or negligence, you would generally need to provide strong evidence to back your claims. Corruption or misconduct allegations are serious, and the burden of proving these claims often rests with the party making the allegations.
Statutes of Limitation: Many of the recourses mentioned above (like appeals or motions for a new trial) have strict deadlines. Make sure to consult with an attorney promptly to ensure you don’t miss important filing deadlines.
Next Steps:
Consult an Attorney: A lawyer who specializes in appellate law, civil litigation, or judicial ethics can help you understand the best course of action based on the specifics of your case.
Gather Evidence: Collect any documents, communications, or other evidence that support your claims of corruption, negligence, or misconduct.
Understand Local Laws: Legal processes vary greatly by jurisdiction, so understanding local rules and regulations is critical.
If you are considering challenging a judgment, it’s crucial to act swiftly and seek legal counsel to assess the best available options.
Yes, in some circumstances, a court judgment can be challenged as void, meaning that it is legally invalid and has no effect. A void judgment is one that is considered to have never legally existed, often due to serious legal defects. While it's a high bar to prove a judgment is void, there are specific grounds under which a judgment may be declared void.
Common Grounds to Claim a Judgment is Void:
Lack of Jurisdiction:
Personal Jurisdiction: A court lacks personal jurisdiction over the parties if it has no authority to compel them into court (e.g., the court doesn't have jurisdiction over the person, such as in the case of a party who resides in another state or country and wasn’t properly served).
Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A court may also lack jurisdiction over the type of case being heard (e.g., a probate court hearing a criminal case). A judgment issued by a court that has no jurisdiction over the matter is void.
Fraud or Lack of Proper Notice:
If a party was not properly notified of the legal proceedings (e.g., improper service of process or failure to inform someone about a hearing), the judgment may be void because due process was violated.
Fraud on the Court: If a judgment was obtained through fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation (such as falsifying evidence or tampering with court records), the judgment could be void.
Violation of Constitutional Rights:
A judgment may be considered void if it violates a party's constitutional rights, such as the right to a fair trial, right to due process, or other fundamental rights that were ignored or unlawfully denied during the proceedings.
Clerical or Administrative Errors:
Mistake in the Judgment: If there is a clerical mistake or a significant error in the judgment that misrepresents the actual decision of the court, it could potentially be challenged as void. This would typically apply to obvious and unintentional mistakes in the written judgment itself.
Lack of Proper Legal Authority: If a judgment is issued by a judge who lacked authority to issue the judgment, such as when a judge has been removed from office or if the case was decided after the judge was recused, the judgment could be void.
Depriving a Party of Due Process:
A judgment may also be considered void if it was issued after a party was deprived of the opportunity to be heard, or was denied a meaningful opportunity to present evidence or defend themselves.
Judgments Made Without Legal Standing:
Non-Party to the Case: If a judgment is entered against someone who was not a party to the case (i.e., they were not involved or properly joined in the lawsuit), it could be considered void because the court had no authority to issue a judgment against that person.
How to Challenge a Judgment as Void:
1. File a Motion to Vacate the Judgment
A motion to vacate (or set aside) the judgment is the most common way to challenge a judgment as void. This motion asks the court to recognize that the judgment was legally invalid for some reason (e.g., lack of jurisdiction, fraud, etc.).
The motion should be filed in the court where the judgment was entered. When filing a motion to vacate based on the judgment being void, you must explicitly state the legal reason why the judgment is void.
Note: If the judgment is void due to lack of jurisdiction, there is generally no time limit to challenge it because a void judgment is considered a legal nullity from the outset. In other words, it never existed legally.
2. Writ of Coram Nobis
In some jurisdictions, if you are seeking to invalidate a judgment because it was obtained by fraud or other extreme circumstances, you may file a writ of coram nobis. This is a rare remedy typically used to challenge judgments in criminal cases, where the judgment is shown to be the result of a fundamental error or a deprivation of constitutional rights.
A writ of coram nobis is an extraordinary legal remedy that asks the court to correct a fundamental error in the case. It is typically only granted when the error is of such a nature that it undermines the fairness of the legal process.
3. Appeal and Challenge Jurisdiction
If the judgment was made by a court that did not have proper jurisdiction (either personal or subject matter jurisdiction), you may challenge the judgment on appeal. On appeal, you can argue that the court did not have the authority to issue the judgment in the first place.
This could be done through the normal appeals process by filing an appeal to a higher court, where you argue that the trial court lacked jurisdiction or made a fundamental error.
4. Collateral Attack
In some situations, if an individual cannot directly challenge the judgment through motions or appeals (due to deadlines or procedural issues), they may try a collateral attack in another court proceeding. This could involve challenging the judgment in a separate, unrelated case (e.g., in a lawsuit or enforcement proceeding) by asserting that the original judgment was void.
A collateral attack is typically more difficult because it requires convincing a new court that the prior judgment should not be enforced due to its void nature.
Important Considerations:
Burden of Proof: To claim that a judgment is void, you must present convincing evidence that shows why the judgment does not meet legal standards. For example, you would need to demonstrate that the court lacked jurisdiction or that the judgment was obtained through fraud or other serious procedural errors.
Timeliness: While a void judgment can be attacked at any time, many other challenges to a judgment (such as motions for a new trial or appeals) have strict time limits. If the judgment is not void, but you're challenging it for other reasons (like fraud or mistake), you may need to file your challenge within a specific time frame.
Legal Complexity: The process of challenging a judgment as void can be complex, particularly when dealing with jurisdictional issues or claims of fraud. It is highly advisable to consult with an attorney who specializes in post-judgment motions or civil procedure.
Recourse Summary:
If you believe a court judgment is void, you can:
File a motion to vacate the judgment, arguing that it is void due to lack of jurisdiction, fraud, or other valid reasons.
File an appeal if the judgment was made by a court that did not have jurisdiction or if there were serious legal errors in the decision.
Seek a writ of coram nobis (in certain cases) to challenge the judgment based on fundamental legal errors.
Pursue a collateral attack in an unrelated case, if direct challenges are not possible.
A void judgment is treated as if it never existed legally, so it’s essential to move quickly and have strong evidence to support your claims. Consulting with a qualified attorney is highly recommended to ensure you have the best chance of success in challenging the judgment.
The matter of a VOID judgement, mentioned by Rhamasia elsewhere in the comments, is feasible with more effort than Michael the instigator of the idea implies.
for example as Eve's mum wasn't properly notified the use of Fraud or Lack of Proper Notice could be instigated.
''If a party was not properly notified of the legal proceedings (e.g., improper service of process or failure to inform someone about a hearing), the judgment may be void because due process was violated.''
Or on a wider view, notably allowing Hall to present evidence would be applicable with a Violation of Constitutional Rights:
''A judgment may be considered void if it violates a party's constitutional rights, such as the right to a fair trial, right to due process, or other fundamental rights that were ignored or unlawfully denied during the proceedings.''
Along with Depriving a Party of Due Process:
''A judgment may also be considered void if it was issued after a party was deprived of the opportunity to be heard, or was denied a meaningful opportunity to present evidence or defend themselves.''
I could go on, but if that doesn't help wake you up then nothing will.
It seems that no-one here is really serious about rectifying the judgement upon Hall apart from the people being called 'shit-heads, revolting creatures etc', or ignored & censored such as the Blue Sky Maiden who cleverly, and crudely, showed what to do to evade legal recourse, but was then censored by Iain and his hive mind sensibilities..
The whole attitude of Iains groupies is something he should be ashamed of , rather than encourage and facilitate.
He is a political prisoner. They were gunning for him and the court was corrupt. What a way to go to open up space for lazy journalism - if it can be called journalism - just write what you are told and stick your name on it at the end. True journalism is being squashed by the corrupt cabal.
I should point out that all the money donated to Hall has gone to his defence team.
All future/further funds donated to Hall will go to the Hibberts & his defence team/
By donating to Hall you are GIVING TO HIBBERT, sadly and sickeningly.
I suggest personalities (!) like ELON MUSK etc who champion freedom of speech (yeah I know its most probably all spiel & PR!) should be approached, it is peanuts to a man like him (well, as claimed!) .
I see no creative thinking occurring in these comments (apart from ProLies fantasies) about a realistic resolution (with Ram, Nushi & Adrastieia being very notable expectations, as usual) .
If the case can not be turned with normal legal means then a bail out is required. Hall has interviewed/collaborated with some wealthy folk, why have they not funded this farce?
I dont think it is fair to expect the public to fund Hibbert via Hall due to Halls legal naivety & the states malicious intent to make this a spectacular example of their power to steam roll policies of oppression.
So any genuine supporter of reason & free speech should pester Elon (or the like, pop stars, film folk, charities like Amnesty ) until they respond.
What do you say Mr Davis , or are you too cowardly to respond to such common sense solutions here still ? Or will Hall get uppity and refuse to take anything from Musk even if he offered it !
Lots of heated comments here though relatively small number of commentators .Should I wonder if any have ever attended one of of Richard `s tour shows? I admit, I haven't but will now try to do so.
I did , his hair smelled of soap, he was smug & unconvincing- relying on the fact those he criticized were obvious scum to gain sympathy with the audience (who some of which seemed far more informed than he) then angle his agenda accordingly.
3 of my friends can no longer log onto substack after his recent tantrum & censorship mania.
I can not 'like' friends comments unless 'I am a paid subscriber'. Iain Davis is acting like a very scared man with a guilty conscious.
Davis has ignored posts giving the means for HALL to remedy/overturn the court set-up he underwent.
Davis is too cowardly to respond to comments that provide means for Hall to not have to seek charity from his supporters. All financial support for Hall will end up in HIBBERTS HANDS, so would be counter productive.
All the while Davis is busy chit chatting with a proven compulsive liar & hate baiting stalker- the PROTRUE (sic) account, that is quite obviously actually 'ProLies', & crippled with self destructive petulance.
ProLies is an asset of The BBC/ Espionage tentacle of the state. It is a TEAM of arrogant yet inept 'righteous bigots' that have included contributions from (most probably) -
James Mark Court Delingpole, a pervy looking, creepy media personality & the sole personnel & DIRECTOR of WOLF FISH enterprises, that make about £50k a year- doing what exactly?
Sarah Plumley, another posh twerp with an exaggerated sense of her own importance & abilities.
As soon as the court case against Hall ended so did the baiting by ProLies AND Sarah's public appearances for 3 months.
Sarah still uses a picture of herself as a young woman for her profile image, but is now a flabby, scruffy blob of a thing, that looks as if it has been kissing horses arses for breakfast.
She occasionally teams up with homophobic, catholic; psycho bigot - Gemma O'Docherty, an overt agent provocateur based in Ireland. Sarah runs 'guerrilla Education' , a home learning set up that appears to have no clients, or genuine reviews!
Both giggle like neurotic school girls when confronted with 'non conformist haircuts' ! It would be amusing to see them react like that to a SAMURAI, maybe they'd quickly learn to respect other cultures & 'fashions'. It seems obvious to many that the pair of them are REACTIONARY, while in a pose of liberty. They are what used to be called band-wagon jumpers.
The other hand that dabbles in the ProLie account is the BBC's Mis Dis Info Bitch- Marianna Claire Spring, possibly the most hated girl in the media. She has become famous for hate mongering, gaslighting, bare faced lies, & having no sexual organs but two arseholes allegedly.
Much could be said about this repulsive girl, but now is not the time. She is a stereotype in so many ways that it would be no surprise to discover that she is more an actress than a journalist.
'Smirking Gnome' Iain Davis allowed this team to STALK, attempt to ridicule; dehumanize; stigmatize
& misrepresent myself, my family & friends for over 4 months in his comments section. He NEVER intervened even when approached directly about this. In effect he encouraged it. It did him no favors, & he lost a lot of subscribers with his 'cowardly' stance.
During that time Davis partly plagiarized & was inspired by several comments I wrote, he gave no credit, unsurprisingly. He then wrote a risible essay about the occult, When his 'occult' essay failings were pointed out he cowered as usual, he was unable to act like an adult & engage in debate about it.
He lost a lot of respect & subscribers from his shallow comprehension of such a fundamental & potent topic. After that I knew what he was, & the limitations he was crippled with on any resonant topic.
Davis is a good researcher for some things though, I am not claiming he is inept, or a waste of time for uninformed minds. He is just too bigoted & compromised to be much use to any well-experienced or knowledgeable folk in certain fields. In conspiratorial fields the ESOTERIC is of prime importance, and Davis is unable to look at the topic without childish prejudice or the seriousness it deserves.
Recently Davis referred to his views/himself as 'WE', as did ProLies. It transpires they aim to collaborate in teamwork , 'but are not a team' , !!! claimed ProLie.
Davis deleted a comment by the Blue Sky Maiden Account that very crudely & cleverly showed how anyone can evade legal recrimination for saying what they think, it also revealed a few 'secret truths' about various politicians, 'truths' known among some researchers/media folk (like the Phillip Scofield was well known to be gay, as is Robbie Williams bisexuality & boyfriend, etc) that should be better known about . Why would he do that, what a scoop for him if he'd handled it differently!
Davis is a boring writer, despite his research skills. He is repetitive to the point of exasperation. Tends to dwell on the obvious & steers his view away from some uncomfortable facts that change the dynamics of his arguments.
Why does Davis ignore pertinent work that complements his own, Is it envy or more likely a type of fear, and if so why would that be unless it is due to compromise & the likelihood he is working for an agenda & broad team of vested interests. Their currency is our misery, the perpetration of injustice & state sponsored threats to freedom. They REPORT IT, people comment, and that data is collated, quantified & partitioned as needed. In effect almost all the ALTERNATIVE VOICES ON PLATFORMS are working on behalf of these data mining oppressive agencies, sometime maybe unconsciously, other time quite deliberately.
Ask yourselves, why does Davis use the WATCHMEN LOGO adapted to be a schizophrenic split of Yellow & Black, the colour of a BEE & WASPS ?
How did he fund his 'SFX video intro, and why devise it to be as it is?
Why ignore comments from real people aiding his work, while engaging with obvious AI generated accounts, psychopathic proven STALKERS such as ProLies, the multiple personality disordered SPY FROM ANOTHER DIMENSION (sic) Everlyin' Brunswick, & make no effort to counter the Far-right wing white supremacist ravings of WILHELM SPANGLE when he lurked about here?
Does Iain Davis socialise with any 'dark skinned' people, has he ever been interviewed by one?
It now seems obvious that Davis is facilitating such time vampire agitators.. He is THE CHOSEN ONE to whine about Richard D Halls court case, making sure the indignation levels are high, yet channeling the debate away from obvious discrepancies, assumptions (ie Eve Hibbert actually exists as depicted in the media); esoteric concerns (the numerology is fascinating & revealing !); how 'benign' is
Halls work really,;& how independent of state influence is Hall; and most importantly for now-
Davis constantly evades any REMEDY too the court action.
If you have read Halls very convincing book &/or Davis' equally convincing take on the Manchester 'smoke without fire' event, then Hibbert is an obvious villain in this theater, yet I do not see Hall as a Hero at all either. The plan from our oppressors is that we side with one or the other. It may well be that Hall is just as risible a character as Hibbert in SOME WAY, maybe via a sexual transgression , and Hall & Hibbert may possibly be actually working together in effect ? We are free to imagine what we like, and speculate as we so wish on this MEDIA SPECTACLE, it has proven to be mostly a SERIES OF FICTIONS after all!
I will leave it there for now, later I may get around to expanding all the clues that give all these characters away as state actors/ controlled opposition agents.
Also, it should be mentioned that since interacting her, my keyboard malfunctions when I type ONLY ON SUBSTACK !
But after almost a year of intense trolling towards friends & myself, with the Trolls using almost exactly the same 'textbook insults' it is something we are now all expecting, & used to.
Excellent stuff! You even have Mis DisInfos middle name, that bing , Wikipediae etc can't supply!
It may be worth inquisitive readers checking out how SPRING talks & compare it to some of the ProLies account outbursts here, there are DIRECT CORRELATIONS that I'm surprised a Ms DisInfo Spring FANATIC like Iain Davis could miss!
This is a treasure trove of sycophantic horseshit from the radical lesbian interviewer, & sanctimonious posing from Ms sewer Spring herself !
Thank you again Iain. I am so glad Richard has you. I am beside myself with distress for the iniquity upon iniquity that has been piled upon Richard who has always acted openly and honestly. I am so glad you are speaking up so clearly for him and pointing out the many dreadful injustices against him. This case should never have even got as far as the court. It was begun when Mariana Spring put that evil seed of how he could gain money and fame by jumping on the 'I'm a victim of a conspiracy theorist' bandwagon. For he clearly thrives on these two things, as even without attacking Richard, this vicious little honey badger, had already clocked up vast appearances on TV and in the media, and had raised £thousands to travel to Australia (twice in all) for miracle treatment at an eyewatering price.
I don't want to talk about that. I just cannot bear how people are able to tell such lies and get away with it. How a judge can ignore evidence and decide to believe the opposite of the truth even when the truth is in the public domain.
Maybe today was my most upsetting time though. I have been a loyal member of UK Column. On the News Brian asked people to support Richard. I thanked him in the chat.
Then in the ‘Extra’ part of the News for Members, after the main News, Brian talked about first the Judge and her background, then he addressed Ben Rubin saying would this have come to a trial without the BBC. without Mariana Spring getting involved with the family. Brian went on to say, 'Whatever Richard D Hall did or did not do, and none of us are perfect ..... he could not form a proper defence in court because we have already been told what the government has told us what the truth is really. We are seeing the final nail in the coffin of so-called justice here in the UK.'
He handed over to Ben to comment. I expected him to respond to that last part, having clearly been told at the start, comments of judgement of Richard were not relevant (I wondered if Brian had already talked to Ben before going on air and was trying to prevent what next happened.)
Ben began, 'Yeh it's absolutely staggering umm I agree with that' then he seems to waffle a lot, his eyes moving all around as though trying to get ideas, and not speaking to the problem of how Richard had his defence evidence stitched up or whether the BBC had engineered this trial. His aim became obvious. He wanted to distance himself from Richard and show how he, a good guy, was not a bad guy like Richard. He obviously knew nothing about Richard, or the evets brought to the trial. But he spoke as though he were an authority on it and anyone disagreeing was demeaned and belittled.
(Around -18.40) 'Love him or loathe him and there are people who come down on both sides of that argument and err on err' (this dichotomy of course is false, it leaves no normal feelings for the man in between). He was waffling here and saying ‘people on both sides’ introduces the idea Richard is loathed. He was continuously waffling but filling gaps with ‘err um and an excess of unnecessary words. It went along the lines of 'if the Truther Movement.. people who have really actually really been and gone and done the work and looked at it … had really done the work and looked at it, have come down on either side of the argument regarding Richard Hall.’ I honestly have no idea who this ‘Truther Movement’ are and this idea that some people have ‘really looked at it’ they could not have seen any differently to the rest of us, That is to know that Richard keeps above and beyond the rules and ethics of his profession as an Investigative Journalist.
Rubin’s waffle continues and here is where I was completely shocked and utterly disgusted. Not just with him but with how the man in charge did nothing on behalf of UK Column. Listen,
‘Um and you know I would certainly say his methods were not methods I would employ like so actually you know like going and staking out people's houses and putting hidden cameras outside their houses strikes me you are begging for trouble if you behave like that.'
What?! Clearly Rubin neither knows Richard, nor has read his research, and clearly this message is exactly the kind we saw from Neil Sanders who, while pretending to be Richard’s friend, having taken so much help from Richard in his work, then stabs him in the back. Their motive is so plain! It is the speech of the weak minded, unprincipled coward who throws the decent and honest man to the wolves just to save his own skin. What makes it so much more contemptible is they try to boast their own glory while so doing.
Rubin continued like this throughout the rest of ‘Extra’, gibing at Richard’s supporters, using ‘forced choices’ or ‘either or’ descriptions, saying we either think Richard is a Saint or we agree with them he is ‘not perfect’ which is the ‘nice person’s’ way of saying he is wrong. Nothing else. Those who oppose Rubin are by implication soft in the head since Ben Rubin has… wait for it… met Richard! He says this as though to shut us up for he now has the superior ground. What is revealing of his character, is that he does not seem aware that among us all there could well be others who might have met Richard too!
I immediately wrote in the Chat which Brian reads as the broadcast goes out, that this is not what Richard did. Instead of withdrawing it, those of us pointing out this lie were scorned for making Richard a ‘Saint’.
Thanks for the link. You should read PROTRUE comments here and see why so many people distrust Hall now, as PROTRUE is Halls greatest fan, and a proven psychotic STALKER hell bend on a distraction game of overt lies & gaslighting.
As for BEN RUBIN look at the name & wake up to the fact of numerous consolidated PLANTS & controlled ops infesting these types of discussion/events. The UK Column treads water & digs ruts mostly, with a right wig Christian leaning, so I am not a fan of that either, but they are certainly preferable to the BBC for topical news.🙄😁
btw I can't stand Hall or his work, but with friends & family here made a massive effort to expose the court crime against him, (the case is obviously to set a 'new fashion' of oppression for any serious investigator, researcher, journalist & thinking person!) only to be insulted & ignored. If you care about Hall you should read the two posts before yours about how he can overturn the judgement against him, written by my sister.
Fighting a heavyweight opponent with hands tied behind his back, Richard shows us all what injustice looks like.
Yes indeed, Francis: the monster has at last come out of the shadows and revealed itself in all its ghastliness.
Now, we can have no illusions about what we're really up against.
In all the mayhem that this case will entail, we must remember that people such as (Mis-)Judge Steyn are nothing more than mortal humans who've elected to serve the wrong god. They will need compassion and understanding - AFTER correction and true justice.
These are the days that signal the end of an epoch. What comes next is wholly unknowable, if we're perfectly honest with ourselves.
It all reminds me, in a somewhat perverse way, of Douglas Adams' "The restaurant at the end of the universe."
At least we have a ringside seat.
Let's see the dish of the day!
Oops: FrancEs! Little bit of vowel trouble, there.
I should point out that all the money donated to Hall has gone to his defence team.
All future/further funds donated to Hall will go to the Hibberts & his defence team/
By donating to Hall you are GIVING TO HIBBERT, sadly and sickeningly.
I suggest personalities (!) like ELON MUSK etc who champion freedom of speech (yeah I know its most probably all spiel & PR!) should be approached, it is peanuts to a man like him (well, as claimed!) .
I see no creative thinking occurring in these comments (apart from ProLies fantasies) about a realistic resolution (with Ram, Nushi & Adrastieia being very notable expectations, as usual) .
If the case can not be turned with normal legal means then a bail out is required. Hall has interviewed/collaborated with some wealthy folk, why have they not funded this farce?
I dont think it is fair to expect the public to fund Hibbert via Hall due to Halls legal naivety & the states malicious intent to make this a spectacular example of their power to steam roll policies of oppression.
So any genuine supporter of reason & free speech should pester Elon (or the like, pop stars, film folk, charities like Amnesty ) until they respond.
What do you say Mr Davis , or are you too cowardly to respond to such common sense solutions here still ? Or will Hall get uppity and refuse to take anything from Musk even if he offered it !
lies, delusions, a damaged ego desperate for attention, misrepresentation & cognitive dissonance so vast that it is a cognitive void.
No one can believe a word you write Sarahahaha.
Last night , your behaviour put the matter to bed - You work for HIBBERTS interests.
In depth remedies for Hall were posted by Blue Sky Maiden here first, then my sister. The case was negated for keen minds by the work of Serge ages ago.
You contribution is to bury those comments in hate bait , time vampire tactics of anal vomit wallpapering, as can be seen & proven at a glance here.
Hibbert is only a heavyweight because he is sitting in a wheelchair Francis.
Take him out of that & he is a lightweight, with legs like spaghetti & an arse that can't cease prolapsing & talking away to itself. That is why his friends say he is a proper chatty arse.
When he & Mis Dis Info BBC Merde Anus Spring get together both their arses begin to chunter away like merry Gremlins in a karaoke competition.
Of course FREUD is the best authority on such anal antics, but bigoted minds & willful idiots tend to ignore what he had to say,because it would destabilize the strategies they devise for their more limited & stupid readership.
What the hell are you actually talking about?!
You are either blind, a hopeless idiot, or just another antagonistic troll Simon.
Hall is wearing brown shoes UK children used to call 'shit-kickers', a brown suit with elbow patches, and has the same style beard as Anton Le Vey and numerous TV villains.
Everyone familiar with his 'show' knows one of the few things that makes Hall laugh is his insults about Andrew Johnson's 'shitty fleece' , I think he may also market them as such?
Here I see a lot of shitty fleecers, the Protrue account being the worst offender, but also note on bitchute some anal, dribbling cretin called Simon supporting Hall in a sycophantic manner, so I imagine that may well be you also?
Why do you hate dark skinned people, the working class, Jamaicans, intelligent people, insightful comments, humorous insults & now people with learning problems or forgien expressions are RETARDS in your deluded ego Proturd Sarahahahahah?
Is it envy & insecurity or arrogance & conceit, maybe all of them & more ?
You hope the 'system', that you claim to hate, goes after Nushi because she makes you look like a moronic bigot lacking substance, subtly or a sense of humour? I hope a hungry rabid dog...or squirrel, wolf, bear, giant slug, or whatever... goes after you, & I will pray it occurs as soon as possible.
Keep tROTTING about for Nushi,
she's got you doing some amazing dressage feats so far, & Ian Davis let slip that you're part of his team of cenobite warriors!
Look out for the new conformity in the 'league of division' ! It's miserable, mediocre & mundane, just like 99% of your comments & the other overt plants here busy festering among the shrubbery & grubs.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
🥱😴
💩🤡👻
Nobody can pretend anymore that there is no conspiracy to silence people who question official narratives.
Quite right Ben, here we see in these comments numerous attempts to silence the only people actually SERIOUSLY questioning official narratives,who are The Blue Sky Maiden, R(h)am & RAM. While the distraction work of Iain Davis, Fransis Leper, Protrue, Eve-i-lyn etc, is busy infecting peoples minds with endless misery, and desperate attempts at censorship! I wonder why so much effort is made by the later to ignore or abuse the most insightful and useful comments here?
Ben liked that comment from Adrateia, Prolie,
is that what made you so furious?
Nick Kollestrom ignored you after you insulted him,
Iain had to correct you for being shifty & twisty in your comment,
& now Ben is choosing to act like you don't exist.
What an endearing character you are !
Prolie , are you staring at your own mutilated genitalia when you write that ?!
😂🤣😂🤣😂
You really are in a rage today,
How is that flabby old whore you call 'mother', 'sister' & 'lover'-,are you still dressing up in her clothes & doing your own shower scenes like in PSYCHO ?
Maybe you & Norman from 911 ReVisionTwits should team up?
Or are you actually Siamese twins separated but functioning like Jackal & Hyde night stalkers?
What a joy to behold Protwot in such a tantrum, as usual, but this time without any posing or veneer..
I imagine it really is starring at it own mutilated reproductive organs while screaming 'Fuck off parasite'!
Spot on, Ben. You know this as well as anyone!
Hall isn't silenced, he can say what the hell he likes, though he may have to do it anonymously. Yet it seems there is a conspiracy here , to silence opinions Iain O'Davis & his TEAM don't wish to be thought about?
''Fuck off, parasite.''
I have removed this comment. "We" do not think Hall is a pervert or a masochist or whatever, I certainly don't. I think he had every legitimate right to conduct his on-the-ground investigation as he did. The High Court's insistence that this amounted to harassment was not born out by the evidence presented in the court and the High Court barred the evidence Hall could have presented in his own defence.
My first or second time here commenting and im not surprised.. Whenever there is a truth to be squashed these vermin parasites appear and overwhelm the arena/content.. Richard obviously has them worried/bang to rights, otherwise they would have allowed him to defend himself, but they can't afford to, speaks volumes... That's all we need to know...
I don't give these cockroaches the time of day, but they can't leave me alone, again speaks volumes...
The Establishment spend more money, time, manpower and effort controlling the narrative than they do on anything else, hence why The Media Are The Worlds Most Insidious, Pernicious, Prolific and Accomplished Serial Killers, being polite...
Hilarious.
Death Cult symbolism for a Thanatos enslaved puppet James, you give yourself away before you even write a word!
Who is the vermin here?
Certainly not BSM, RAM or others aiding constructive though on this. It is Protrue and Davis himself acting like hysterical hypocrites!
Lost control again then Stalker troll ?
Keep squirming , soon it will be time to SNAP, CRACK-UP & POP, while you poop Prolie.
Why censor that comment though Iain, you could just respond to it.
the comment may have been foul but so is this situation & what the attack represents, and alleged to depict. Also it was a tactical comment that disproved a lot of fear mongering if you had the wits to comprehend how it was presented & written, by applying what Nushi wrote it actually taught people how to evade legal retribution , but not your god-like hand of censorship.
Also it did say genuine 'secret' facts about some risible famous people and exposed certain important psychodynamics intrinsic with how power affect those within its spell.
I suggest you resurrect the comment and give a commentary about it, disagreeing where you feel fit, and critiquing where you find it unreasonable, otherwise you may find your credibility and well being seriously compromised, as i imagine you are a man of genuine integrity & well meaning spirit, except for this transgression into emotive bigotry ?
Is that a confession from you Prolie,
You fuck off trolls ?
Is it with your ass ,or that excrement stench mouth you use on dogs & for feltching politicians?
Are you going to censor me for stating you blatantly ignored the REAL evidence of the time-stamp of the Pawley footage?
The doctored audio of the Pawley/Zach footage?
That you somehow overlooked the Jordan Kenney testimony which proves Bickerstaff is lying?
You let yourself be humiliated by Aisling O'Loughlin regarding the Bickerstaff footage, yet if you would have been prepared with REAL evidence you could have wiped her out? Very odd.
Let's go over some points of this farcical interview:
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/iain-davis-and-aisling-oloughlin
1:02:52 she points out the obvious flaw that RDH offered to all about the "LIVE" video footage shown in the Bickerstaff footage, HALL had ZERO evidence that this was "LIVE" - this rang alarm bells for me straight away, she was handed this along with others on a plate from Hall and she threw it at your face, instead of giving an honest reply that HALL should NEVER have included that as evidence, you stated she is missing out the "main tranche" of the Bickerstaff footage, well Mr. Davis so are YOU.
1:03:10 "The main tranche of the video (Bickerstaff) is the conduct of the people around him"
You had the opportunity to drown the evil witch, all you had to do was produce the Jordan Kenney testimony:
https://x.com/Richard63240134/status/1801041610664239577
Which clearly proves he was WITH his friend in the Bickerstaff footage, not panic stricken and separated as he testified.
You FAILED, miserably.
You state in regard to the Bickerstaff footage: 1:04:10
"we can absolutely categorically prove that he started filming that at least one minute and seven seconds before the purported time of the blast"
WEAK
If you had of presented the KENNEY testimony you could have proven that it was filmed LONG before the supposed blast.
"You can't maintain it" you holler!
Oh YES she can, because the evidence you offered was WEAK.
No. I will never censor or remove any criticism you make of ME. No matter how unhinged or vitriolic it is.
Why did you not use the Jordan Kenney testimony to strike down O'Loughlin?
''No matter how unhinged or vitriolic it is.''
= No matter how accurate or well reasoned it is
Shall we begin testing that claim then?
🙄😉😁😂
The problem with Stag Ring Hall, Gnome like Davis, Andrew Minger Johnson, Precious Pighooey etc is that they BELIEVE what they see.
None of them are what I would consider 'visually literate' or perceptive regarding illusions & trickery.
What is Halls great tag line ?
''Believe none of what you see & only half of what you hear'', or Believe none of what you hear & only half of what you see?
Either way it's shite isn;t it.... imagine Hall trying to cross the road with that in his mind...'' He didn't believe its a red light... He didn't believe that lorry is approaching & ignored the horn....... that isn;t a little blond haired girl, with a key hole iris, crossing the road in front of him...etc''
Hall & anyone taking on board his ludicrous 'advice' would be a danger on the roads with that philosophy!
How about BELIEVE NOTHING, you either know something or it is speculation.
After Proturds recent mania again, it revealed it 's racist nature & made me think, 'how many dark skinned interviewers have been involved with Hall, Davis, Dingleberry, Plumley, Johnny Watsit, Patrick Henderson, the UK Column etc?' Maybe NONE?
Just look at the desperate gaslighting Proturds get upto to dissuade you to continue this line of thinking about LAZY ARGUMENTS between 'the same team' of controlled op assets here. It;s the same cliched troll scrip we've all seen endlessly on social media controlled zones.
It seems to me that Proturd has effectively answered your questions to Iain.... these 'characters' are ALL sell outs in some way, playing with audience expectations & perception management. Hibbert is an evil shit, so Hall must be an angel of virtue... well,he never was, & made cutting insults about people he disliked on almost every one of his news round ups. Often that was the best bit of the show.
These substack operatives are clunky & overt i their behaviour because they are not as intelligent as they imagine , while the public are not as stupid as they would like to imagine either. They are also arrogant & shallow.
Maybe that is why so few people have sympathy for Hall if they are intuitive, or if they have seen a lot of his work (like me) remained unimpressed or unconvinced.
His Manchester Event book is very good in many ways, it proves beyond doubt that it was a staged event & not as 'publicised' , yet you raise many good ideas about what is evaded & why that may be so.
The answer to why is now obvious to some of us, & what we are seeing is a lesser evil (a probable controlled op fall guy) being steamrolled by the greater evil (probable 'staged' court theatre used to promote oppressive agendas ). There are no heroic characters in this 'game', none of them have the integrity required to be truly independent in their output or outlook.
The fact that Proturd Prolapse can stalk, blatantly lie & harass informed & insightful debate here without Davis intervening has proven to me the hypocrisy on display is terminal, & these controlled zones are primarily here to channel the narrative & reactions, raise the level of social fear , frustration & injustice, & employ a lot of malicious soul-less morons to call everyone they disagree with 'vermin'....
Which reminds me who was HALLs biggest sponsors for his 'TV Productions' ?!
FUCKING HELL- PROTURD has no interaction with 'dark skinned' people and is totally clueless!!!!
''Is it possible there aren't very many dark skinned 'awake' (for want of a better word) people in the UK, who ALSO actually WANT to be Internet personalities in the 'truther' field?''
What a cultural catastrophe this absolute brain dead rodent is.
What do almost ALL ROOTS REGGAE LYRICS talk about?
What do most UK rap tracks talk about?
Protrue here proves beyond any doubt it is an INVERSION FUCK UP PROGRAMME, what it writes here really deserves some serious retribution, let us hope there is some INSTANT KARMA for Protrue, I have never seen such overt antagonism without foundation.
That is a great outburst of lies & misrepresentation again their Proturd.
You would be ignored if you didnt stink the place out so much.
Still, it's great how you give away all sort of allegiances here among other controlled agents like yourself. It's in how you express yourself & what triggers you so readily... & you really are on fire today !
Apart from natural abuse , EVERYONE ignores you Protwot.
it looks like you are drowning in bitter envy here!
"Aisling O'loughlin appears to have outed HERSELF as some sort of op"
To whom! Not a casual observer, she made Davis look like a fool in many parts of that interview because he was not armed with any evidence, take the Bickerstaff footage for example, she wiped the floor with him.
Sorry Hew I disagree, Assling made a fool of herself & Davis was restrained and polite considering what a raving hysteric Assling proved to be.
I won't drone on about it with endless examples, however I do also agree with you that Davis didn't do as good a job as I hoped and missed opportunities.
What struck me most was that Assling was PERFORMING, this was an obvious mutual controlled ops performance as far as I see it at the moment.
No one claimed he wasn't within his rights Iain, you seem to have wandered off track. No one among us has claimed the charge against him isn't constructed lies.
You have become as disingenuous & malicious as ProLies account here, aa compulsive liar & hate bait division that YOU have encouraged & facilitated to STALK & Harass myself , friends & family.
This fiasco has shown what your sensibilities are & where they lie & you should really make amends or retire as very few informed folk will be able to take you seriously as an independent voice after this is highlighted.
It's so good to see and hear this. Well done to whoever filmed it - I have scanned many of the legacy media reports, and not a word in any of them on Richard's speech. He shows them up to be the craven establishment lackeys they truly are.
Complete absence of reporting on most '' truther '' sites too.
Yes, Pighooey: it's hard to imagine any more bitter gall than this.
The BBC and their co-conspiritors are attempting to leave us disenfranchised, destitute and hopeless.
What choice do we have, other than to resist?
Hilarious !
PIG-GOOEY , GROT OF GROOT & PROLAPSE PROTURD chatting away like a hybrid of 'Tales by the Riverbank' & 'One flew over the cuckoos nest'.
'Hammy Hamster and Once Upon a Hamster' ... or more like 'clammy Hamster & the feltchers'.
🙄😂🤣😂
Unlike you we like constructive or humorous interaction.
Keep squirming and sucking arse here Prolie, you really are a sight!
By the way, the first report I heard yesterday was BBC Radio 4 news headlines, and they made a point of saying that the claimants won damages of “over £22,000 each”… those two little ducks again!
You're kidding!? They must be laughing themselves sick.
I suspect the reason why no-one appeared at court to support Fibbert is because all were hired hands and they were done with their allotted roles once the Queen had dropped in to the hospital for a quick chat.
The Queen's visit was the official sanctification of the narrative in the public mind.
I wonder if she knew it was all baloney, or was she just another unwitting dupe?
Murrell? Morrell? The legacy media dinosaurs can't even agree on the spelling of her surname!
You'd think she might've tried to put them straight, but apparently not.
God, it stinks!
Why bother with TBSM? There's no edification in it and you waste valuable energy that would be much better allocated elsewhere, surely?
More blatant lies, projection, transference, gas lighting, strawman constructions & feltch breathed desperation from Prolies again.
At least she is consistent & predictable.
Prolapse Prolie, You claim I am celibate.
I've never said that, wrote that, or been that !
😂😂😂
What a desperate & compulsive liar your so obviously are!
If you can not provide a link & proof to that claim then may your nipples fester & rot off as rapidly as possible, while you go blind death & dumb.
This could be cheated up in 5 minutes by showing all the CCTV. if it's a case real people children were bombed then certain parties from both sides in a Skif. However that argument is not apparent when the State want to push an agenda they quite happily show bombings of people and Children when it suits them.
If it hasn't been made obvious enough by other posters:
Damages: £22,500 a piece.
Omit the sterling symbol:
22,500
Omit the zeros:
22,5
Change the comma symbol for the kind of symbol that is used in describing dates:
22/5
In english:
22nd of May.
I wonder what made the judge decide on that sum of money?
The Blue Sky Maiden account here mentions the hIXoss scum, which obviously alludes to histories hated Hyksos tribes of Egyptian corruption, & decline.
However you may have noted BSM is playful with words and highlights the IX , which is =9
In Egypt the 9 was the ruling gods the Ennead.
2.+2+.5= 9
with colel that is the perfect 10=1
or =8 the calling card of modern espionage
9 itself is possibly the most intriguing number, as all multiplications of 9 sum to 9 in gematria.
ie
2x9 -18 ... 1+8=9
3x9=27... 2+7 =9
4x 9= 36 ... 3+6=9
5x9= 45 ...4+5+9
9x9= 81 = 8+1=9
OSS = office of strategic services, forerunner to the CIA & also akin to the SS of infamy.
so what does the 'h' represent ? I asked her what it means to her and she replied 'it is a chair for emperors' , so a throne. She then told me that it would be capitalised 'but confuses the IX importance' as a capital it is still the 'throne chair' / Kings Throne, and ALSO the triple Tau in occluded form!
So, when she mentions the hIXoss scum she actually implies the corrupt remnants of Egyptian monotheistic mercenary 'foreigners' to the land (overly) but that via the Kingship and secret services their control and subjugation of the population.
This made me think a lot about what else it implies in this case and the royal families role or influence, married with the espionage networks we are aware of.
These ideas will probably be wasted here, as there is a lot of posturing venom instead of gratitude. So it may not great loss to Iain Davis, and Richard D Hall et al ,that I have no inclination to say anymore about the matter to such an hypocritical , mean natured gang of trivial compulsive bitches and sycophants.
Great analysis, which I need more time to consider.
H, of course, is 8 in English ordinal.
IX has sometimes been used with the "I" floating so that it can be IX or XI. i.e. 9/11.
During the 9/11 and Iraq saga who was the weapons inspector? Hans BLIX.
BLIX
The "No L" or "Noel" rule gives:
BIX
In English ordinal "B" is 2:
2IX
Covert the lot to roman numerals:
II/IX
Convert the right hand side to numerical figures:
II/9
Read from right to left as some cultures do, you get: 9/11 - the very event that prompted blIX to be called in by the UN in the first place!
Rather unfortunately, "OSS" is part of my name on these comments, but was not chosen because of the OSS!
Thanks,
Nushi (BSM) says her 'ideas grew from wat DubSurgeOn wrote & said to her', and she should thank him for 'credit where it is due, but not where it is jew- 😆😂😆 just joking, it is hard to resist!''.
I contacted TheDubSurgeOn, as he is one of the few people online who obviously knows what the hell he is talking about with Gematria, and had a great chat (as usual) , that made it clear as day to me what the symbolism here is all about, he sent me 2 more parts of the Mankey Event essays he wrote but is not going to publish. But said I can use bits if I 'give credit for a change'. So here goes, ripping the veil of maya from the event as concisely as possible. The whole thing is really fascinating, but deliberately sprawling & took time to digest (as it should I imagine!) , This is what is included-
H is the NEXT OCTAVE (A to F =1to 7) or COMPLETE CYCLE , as 8, it is also symbolic of infinity & HEAVEN/ABUNDANCE. With coloel it could be envisioned as '9' the manifest god head. SUDOKO is of course 9 units , as is the MASONIC CYPHER SQUARE similar to a PORTCULAS.
9 is the number of partitions in a magic square for SATURN - all lines = 15 (hence the modern demonization of 666 connected to Saturn/Time (3 rows of 15 = )1+5=6
so 666. 666 = THE LOWER NATURE =Hephren / Ἑφρην
Also phthora" (φθορά), which means decay or destruction has a gematria value of 666.
6+6+6=18 & reduces to 9 of course.
'Hephaestus, was the Greek god of fire, metalworking, craftsmanship, and blacksmiths. He is known for creating marvelous weapons and equipment for the gods and heroes, such as Achilles' armor and Hermes' winged helmet'.
Why is BLACKROCK given the name it has? Does the 'V' (allegedly for VICTORY) also symbolise VULCAN.
----end of extracts----
I will leave it there, if that goes unappreciated we know there is no hope here that Davis & co are up to any genuine good and their agenda is actually utterly despicable.
As a side note, I double checked what Serge had written and his mention with BSM of the EGYPTIAN SYMBOLISM INVOLVED and this leaped out at me
''Khafre[a] or Chephren[b] (died c. 2532 BC) was an ancient Egyptian monarch who was the fourth king of the Fourth Dynasty, during the earlier half of the Old Kingdom period (c. 2700–2200 BC). He was son of the king Khufu, and succeeded his brother Djedefre to the throne.''
----- WTMF !!!! -----
(C) HEPHREN !!!!! an incredible correspondence that confirms so much, ROSS you will love the numerology & symbolism here! It pretty much TIES IT ALL UP , , just fill in any gaps!
This should also be considered I think, bizarrely Sarah Plumley (a rapidly expanding, useless APE) who seems defiantly linked to the Prolie account here runs Guerrilla Education yet is a precocious idiot. Operation Chaos is Mile Mathis' (MM = Masonic STAMP/signifier) favourite tag for the oppressive process (code name) Espionage is using. Check this out!
''Apeiron is a Greek word meaning '(that which is) unlimited; boundless; infinite; indefinite' from ἀ- a- 'without' and πεῖραρ peirar 'end, limit; boundary', the Ionic Greek form of πέρας peras 'end, limit, boundary'.''
''As Greek mythology goes, the universe was once a big soup of nothingness. Then, two things happened: either Chaos or Gaia created the universe as we know it, or Ouranos and Tethys gave birth to the first beings.''
I also found this useful, but will cease now as i do not wish to overwhelm you or others interested in this 'facie-nating' yet boundless enterprise.😊
https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-famous-people/apeiron-source-all-things-and-philosophies-anaximenes-006747
Thanks to all the authors who contributed to the above and the publication of it! It is very thorough and will take me some time to digest (on top of other correspondence that I am behind with)! I hope that others will also give sensible comments and contributions in response!
Sadly very unlikely.
Still, we can always hope against the odds!
That is some garbled admission from you ProLie - you 'fuck off children!'
That would surprise no-one , if you were given the opportunity, you certainly have the inclination!
Look at ProLies Prolapse & loose control going on a hate frenzy after this outburst,
It is moments like this that make all the tedious work here worthwhile!
Check the MisDisInfo Interview linked in the latest comments, you will find the same quotes from Prolie about 'tackling trolls' as she uses!
WOOOOOOO !
Prolie really is over the edge now!
The veins in her temple are throbbing, her brain is pounding away filling up with blood,
her arse is going in & out like a piston while she prolapses herself & has a simultaneous embolism!
I bet Ross is really scared now! The power of your rage is enough to make anyone quiver in fear Prolie! Please , spare us your wrath!
🙄😂😃😂🤣😂
What a pathetic clown you are Prolie, with the big top falling down on you & empathetic humanity turning it's back on you.
where are all your supporters here? No-one cares do they, you are just an embarrassing laughing stock, a shameful wreck of a social pest.
Thanks for that, Richard has them by the short and curlies, God Bless All fighting these Parasites...
It's a Masonic Control System, The Scottish Rite (Skull & Bones) and Swiss Octogon being top of that tree, one War (BlackRock/BlackWater/BlackStone/BlackWatch/MIC), one Financial (Vanguard/BIS/WHO/WEF/CERN) and both everything in-between.....
"Richard has them by the short and curlies"
Pathetic.
Even HUDGE-HELL solicitors can now gloat over the numerology.
"£22,500 to Mr Hibbert and £22,500 to his daughter Eve"
I never bothered with IAIN to be honest, another BOOK about the attacks, yet completely ignored THE EVIDENCE along with RDH....but my interest was suddenly invigorated with his interview with that useless witch and how she absolutely made a mockery of him, she was freely allowed to pelt him with rotten cabbages as though he had placed himself in the stocks voluntarily.
I have been reluctantly scrolling through the tripe being posted on here, I can see why you are leaving, it's nothing but a devoted fan-club of RDH with 'Gatekeeper' of the Substack PROLIES as it's drooling poodle guard dog to try and bark down any REAL input.
No one who can breath or smell wants to engage with you .
You are a festering stink pit of decomposition Prolie.
tROT ON for Nushi though, she's making you do some great circus tricks & pratfalls for us!
It really does stink here!
I just found over 12 RECENT mentions of Nushi on Google when I typed her birth name in. You have no idea who she really is do you Proturd ! No wonder you're still in such a confused mess & pounced on poor old Nick with accusations, making yourself look like a hysterical psycho in the process...
🥳
Nushi has one of the most perfect voluptuous yet contained arses I have ever seen Sarahhah, Unlike that slimy, leakage prone crusty old hole you swing behind you, like a rucksack with a haemorrhage.... or paddling pool nibbled by piranhas..
She does, while Protwot here IS a great ass.
Synchronicity & diametric opposition simultaneously !
https://theblueskymaiden.substack.com/p/protrue-stalker-account-loses-its
We are currently living through preparations for the enthroning of the Antichrist. Trust in God and stay strong!
https://archive.org/details/lordofworld00bens
Yes Chap, Absolutely, and you...
Fuck me, even the cult religious fanatical zombies dwell here.
Prolies., you are getting 'literally' slaughtered here, & are obviously a virgin spinster- lost in lesbian fantasies & desperate for any attention, however derogatory it may be.
You have been called many relevant things , including a dog dicked arsehole, a pet feltching fuckwit, psycho stalker & maggot brained child molester, yet the best insult you can create is GROTBAGS.
You really are just some automated chat bot, programmed by rodents on crack. No human being could ever be as pathetic & feeble as your attempts at imaginative acts or expression.
Amen
WTF it's now showing signs of Schizophreniform disorder, I am now someone else? I believe 'Prolies' accused me of the same grave crime when I first posted about the CARLO photographs.
Anyone who now points out some truths that rattles 'ProSchizo' is now BlubSturgeon!
I knew you were fucking bonkers from the off!
''the same kind of poor comprehension''
that is more than ironic coming from a maggot brained stalker psycho who has lots of opinions yet no substance !
🙄😂😂😂😂
https://substack.com/home/post/p-145914900
I think we have more than enough evidence here :)
If a court judgement is obviously corrupt or neglegent what recourse is there?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
If you believe a court judgment is the result of corruption, negligence, or serious legal error, there are several potential recourses, depending on the specific circumstances and legal framework in your jurisdiction. Here are some of the options typically available:
1. Appeal the Judgment
Grounds for Appeal: You may be able to challenge the judgment by appealing to a higher court. In most cases, appeals are based on legal errors, such as misinterpretation of the law, improper procedures, or other substantial mistakes. If you believe the judgment was influenced by corruption or negligence, you would typically need to show this through evidence, often as part of the appeal argument.
Process: The process varies by jurisdiction, but typically you need to file a notice of appeal and then submit an appellate brief that outlines the legal errors you believe occurred. If the higher court agrees, the decision may be overturned or remanded for a new trial.
2. Motion for a New Trial
Legal Error or Fraud: If you can show that the judgment was obtained through fraudulent means, corruption, or significant legal error, you may be able to file a motion for a new trial. This is generally filed in the same court that issued the judgment.
Procedure: This motion must typically be filed within a specific time frame (e.g., within 30 days after the judgment). You would need to present new evidence, highlight procedural errors, or argue that there has been a significant injustice or miscarriage of justice.
3. Motion to Set Aside Judgment
Fraud, Mistake, or Misrepresentation: In some cases, if you believe the judgment was influenced by fraud or other unfair practices (e.g., corruption), you may file a motion to set aside the judgment. This is typically available in situations where one party can demonstrate that they were defrauded, misled, or subjected to an unjust legal process.
Procedure: This motion is often made to the same court that issued the judgment. If successful, the judgment may be vacated or revised.
4. Complaint or Petition for Judicial Misconduct
Corruption or Misconduct by Judges: If the judgment was affected by corruption, bias, or misconduct by the judge (e.g., accepting bribes, conflict of interest), you can file a complaint with the judicial conduct or ethics board in your jurisdiction. In many areas, there are bodies that oversee judicial conduct, such as:
State judicial commissions
Judicial conduct review boards
Bar associations
Investigation: If the board finds merit in your complaint, they may investigate the judge’s conduct. In extreme cases, this can result in disciplinary actions, including censure, suspension, or removal from the bench.
5. Civil Lawsuit for Malpractice or Misconduct
Attorney Misconduct or Negligence: If your lawyer acted negligently, incompetently, or in a corrupt manner (e.g., failing to properly represent you), you may have grounds for a civil malpractice lawsuit. This would be a separate action from the court case itself but could potentially lead to compensation or other remedies if the attorney's actions contributed to an unjust outcome.
Proceedings: You would need to prove that the attorney’s actions caused harm and that the judgment would have been different if not for the attorney’s misconduct.
6. Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (Criminal Cases)
If the judgment in question is in a criminal case and you believe it resulted from corruption or serious legal error, you might seek post-conviction relief. This process allows a convicted person to challenge their conviction after a final judgment, often based on newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations, or misconduct.
Innocence Claims: In some cases, you may also file for a "writ of habeas corpus," which challenges the legality of detention, arguing that the conviction was obtained through unconstitutional means.
7. Public Exposure and Political Pressure
Investigative Journalism: If you suspect that a judgment resulted from corruption, it can sometimes help to expose the issue through media outlets or investigative journalists who specialize in legal corruption. Public exposure can lead to increased scrutiny and potentially force a reexamination of the case, particularly if there is evidence of widespread corruption.
Government or NGO Advocacy: There are sometimes non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that advocate for judicial fairness and transparency. If corruption is involved, some of these organizations might be able to help bring attention to your case.
8. Criminal Charges Against the Judge or Other Officials
Corruption: If you have evidence that a judge, court official, or lawyer was involved in criminal activity (e.g., bribery, fraud, or abuse of office), you might be able to report the matter to law enforcement. This could lead to a criminal investigation into the individuals involved.
Whistleblower Protections: Some jurisdictions offer legal protections for individuals who report corruption or misconduct within the legal system.
Important Considerations:
Burden of Proof: In cases of alleged corruption or negligence, you would generally need to provide strong evidence to back your claims. Corruption or misconduct allegations are serious, and the burden of proving these claims often rests with the party making the allegations.
Statutes of Limitation: Many of the recourses mentioned above (like appeals or motions for a new trial) have strict deadlines. Make sure to consult with an attorney promptly to ensure you don’t miss important filing deadlines.
Next Steps:
Consult an Attorney: A lawyer who specializes in appellate law, civil litigation, or judicial ethics can help you understand the best course of action based on the specifics of your case.
Gather Evidence: Collect any documents, communications, or other evidence that support your claims of corruption, negligence, or misconduct.
Understand Local Laws: Legal processes vary greatly by jurisdiction, so understanding local rules and regulations is critical.
If you are considering challenging a judgment, it’s crucial to act swiftly and seek legal counsel to assess the best available options.
You said:
Is there a way to claim it is a VOID judgement ?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Yes, in some circumstances, a court judgment can be challenged as void, meaning that it is legally invalid and has no effect. A void judgment is one that is considered to have never legally existed, often due to serious legal defects. While it's a high bar to prove a judgment is void, there are specific grounds under which a judgment may be declared void.
Common Grounds to Claim a Judgment is Void:
Lack of Jurisdiction:
Personal Jurisdiction: A court lacks personal jurisdiction over the parties if it has no authority to compel them into court (e.g., the court doesn't have jurisdiction over the person, such as in the case of a party who resides in another state or country and wasn’t properly served).
Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A court may also lack jurisdiction over the type of case being heard (e.g., a probate court hearing a criminal case). A judgment issued by a court that has no jurisdiction over the matter is void.
Fraud or Lack of Proper Notice:
If a party was not properly notified of the legal proceedings (e.g., improper service of process or failure to inform someone about a hearing), the judgment may be void because due process was violated.
Fraud on the Court: If a judgment was obtained through fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation (such as falsifying evidence or tampering with court records), the judgment could be void.
Violation of Constitutional Rights:
A judgment may be considered void if it violates a party's constitutional rights, such as the right to a fair trial, right to due process, or other fundamental rights that were ignored or unlawfully denied during the proceedings.
Clerical or Administrative Errors:
Mistake in the Judgment: If there is a clerical mistake or a significant error in the judgment that misrepresents the actual decision of the court, it could potentially be challenged as void. This would typically apply to obvious and unintentional mistakes in the written judgment itself.
Lack of Proper Legal Authority: If a judgment is issued by a judge who lacked authority to issue the judgment, such as when a judge has been removed from office or if the case was decided after the judge was recused, the judgment could be void.
Depriving a Party of Due Process:
A judgment may also be considered void if it was issued after a party was deprived of the opportunity to be heard, or was denied a meaningful opportunity to present evidence or defend themselves.
Judgments Made Without Legal Standing:
Non-Party to the Case: If a judgment is entered against someone who was not a party to the case (i.e., they were not involved or properly joined in the lawsuit), it could be considered void because the court had no authority to issue a judgment against that person.
How to Challenge a Judgment as Void:
1. File a Motion to Vacate the Judgment
A motion to vacate (or set aside) the judgment is the most common way to challenge a judgment as void. This motion asks the court to recognize that the judgment was legally invalid for some reason (e.g., lack of jurisdiction, fraud, etc.).
The motion should be filed in the court where the judgment was entered. When filing a motion to vacate based on the judgment being void, you must explicitly state the legal reason why the judgment is void.
Note: If the judgment is void due to lack of jurisdiction, there is generally no time limit to challenge it because a void judgment is considered a legal nullity from the outset. In other words, it never existed legally.
2. Writ of Coram Nobis
In some jurisdictions, if you are seeking to invalidate a judgment because it was obtained by fraud or other extreme circumstances, you may file a writ of coram nobis. This is a rare remedy typically used to challenge judgments in criminal cases, where the judgment is shown to be the result of a fundamental error or a deprivation of constitutional rights.
A writ of coram nobis is an extraordinary legal remedy that asks the court to correct a fundamental error in the case. It is typically only granted when the error is of such a nature that it undermines the fairness of the legal process.
3. Appeal and Challenge Jurisdiction
If the judgment was made by a court that did not have proper jurisdiction (either personal or subject matter jurisdiction), you may challenge the judgment on appeal. On appeal, you can argue that the court did not have the authority to issue the judgment in the first place.
This could be done through the normal appeals process by filing an appeal to a higher court, where you argue that the trial court lacked jurisdiction or made a fundamental error.
4. Collateral Attack
In some situations, if an individual cannot directly challenge the judgment through motions or appeals (due to deadlines or procedural issues), they may try a collateral attack in another court proceeding. This could involve challenging the judgment in a separate, unrelated case (e.g., in a lawsuit or enforcement proceeding) by asserting that the original judgment was void.
A collateral attack is typically more difficult because it requires convincing a new court that the prior judgment should not be enforced due to its void nature.
Important Considerations:
Burden of Proof: To claim that a judgment is void, you must present convincing evidence that shows why the judgment does not meet legal standards. For example, you would need to demonstrate that the court lacked jurisdiction or that the judgment was obtained through fraud or other serious procedural errors.
Timeliness: While a void judgment can be attacked at any time, many other challenges to a judgment (such as motions for a new trial or appeals) have strict time limits. If the judgment is not void, but you're challenging it for other reasons (like fraud or mistake), you may need to file your challenge within a specific time frame.
Legal Complexity: The process of challenging a judgment as void can be complex, particularly when dealing with jurisdictional issues or claims of fraud. It is highly advisable to consult with an attorney who specializes in post-judgment motions or civil procedure.
Recourse Summary:
If you believe a court judgment is void, you can:
File a motion to vacate the judgment, arguing that it is void due to lack of jurisdiction, fraud, or other valid reasons.
File an appeal if the judgment was made by a court that did not have jurisdiction or if there were serious legal errors in the decision.
Seek a writ of coram nobis (in certain cases) to challenge the judgment based on fundamental legal errors.
Pursue a collateral attack in an unrelated case, if direct challenges are not possible.
A void judgment is treated as if it never existed legally, so it’s essential to move quickly and have strong evidence to support your claims. Consulting with a qualified attorney is highly recommended to ensure you have the best chance of success in challenging the judgment.
The matter of a VOID judgement, mentioned by Rhamasia elsewhere in the comments, is feasible with more effort than Michael the instigator of the idea implies.
for example as Eve's mum wasn't properly notified the use of Fraud or Lack of Proper Notice could be instigated.
''If a party was not properly notified of the legal proceedings (e.g., improper service of process or failure to inform someone about a hearing), the judgment may be void because due process was violated.''
Or on a wider view, notably allowing Hall to present evidence would be applicable with a Violation of Constitutional Rights:
''A judgment may be considered void if it violates a party's constitutional rights, such as the right to a fair trial, right to due process, or other fundamental rights that were ignored or unlawfully denied during the proceedings.''
Along with Depriving a Party of Due Process:
''A judgment may also be considered void if it was issued after a party was deprived of the opportunity to be heard, or was denied a meaningful opportunity to present evidence or defend themselves.''
I could go on, but if that doesn't help wake you up then nothing will.
It seems that no-one here is really serious about rectifying the judgement upon Hall apart from the people being called 'shit-heads, revolting creatures etc', or ignored & censored such as the Blue Sky Maiden who cleverly, and crudely, showed what to do to evade legal recourse, but was then censored by Iain and his hive mind sensibilities..
The whole attitude of Iains groupies is something he should be ashamed of , rather than encourage and facilitate.
That was one of 'our' insults to you that you are re-using now Proturd !
You've never had any creative dynamic, seem burnt out; bummed off; & busy loosing the plot.
Keep going, it's not often a horse can Gallop more than a few miles, never mind a maggot rotting carcass of a mule like you!
The Deep State at Work.
Yes, check out Protrue here and ask why she is busy trying to evade potential legal remedy while attacking those that offer suggestions.
That is my bait for you BBC Bitch... and you gobbled it up like a starving puppy eating fresh shit.
Now you have proven my claims beyond any doubt!
btw you have the same wonkey eye disability as Hall & other mind controlled sex slave victims BBC Bitch. It must be a family affair ?
He is a political prisoner. They were gunning for him and the court was corrupt. What a way to go to open up space for lazy journalism - if it can be called journalism - just write what you are told and stick your name on it at the end. True journalism is being squashed by the corrupt cabal.
I should point out that all the money donated to Hall has gone to his defence team.
All future/further funds donated to Hall will go to the Hibberts & his defence team/
By donating to Hall you are GIVING TO HIBBERT, sadly and sickeningly.
I suggest personalities (!) like ELON MUSK etc who champion freedom of speech (yeah I know its most probably all spiel & PR!) should be approached, it is peanuts to a man like him (well, as claimed!) .
I see no creative thinking occurring in these comments (apart from ProLies fantasies) about a realistic resolution (with Ram, Nushi & Adrastieia being very notable expectations, as usual) .
If the case can not be turned with normal legal means then a bail out is required. Hall has interviewed/collaborated with some wealthy folk, why have they not funded this farce?
I dont think it is fair to expect the public to fund Hibbert via Hall due to Halls legal naivety & the states malicious intent to make this a spectacular example of their power to steam roll policies of oppression.
So any genuine supporter of reason & free speech should pester Elon (or the like, pop stars, film folk, charities like Amnesty ) until they respond.
What do you say Mr Davis , or are you too cowardly to respond to such common sense solutions here still ? Or will Hall get uppity and refuse to take anything from Musk even if he offered it !
Lots of heated comments here though relatively small number of commentators .Should I wonder if any have ever attended one of of Richard `s tour shows? I admit, I haven't but will now try to do so.
I did , his hair smelled of soap, he was smug & unconvincing- relying on the fact those he criticized were obvious scum to gain sympathy with the audience (who some of which seemed far more informed than he) then angle his agenda accordingly.
Prolie calling the kettle BLACK again, not because it is, but because Prolie is a frustrated racist bigot & it lets off steam for herself.
Remember when you went Snap, cracked out & popped ?
https://theblueskymaiden.substack.com/p/protrue-stalker-account-loses-its
It is a commentary about your actions and words though Protwat,
the only analysis is your own anal cists smarting from the encounter by the look of it!
I attended one of Richard's talks about 7 years ago, in his home town of Merthyr Tydfil.
He's always seemed like the real deal to me, even if I don't subscribe to all his views.
Iain Davis must be getting ready to retire!
It looks as if his credibility is evaporating so rapidly he'll get scorch marks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 of my friends can no longer log onto substack after his recent tantrum & censorship mania.
I can not 'like' friends comments unless 'I am a paid subscriber'. Iain Davis is acting like a very scared man with a guilty conscious.
Davis has ignored posts giving the means for HALL to remedy/overturn the court set-up he underwent.
Davis is too cowardly to respond to comments that provide means for Hall to not have to seek charity from his supporters. All financial support for Hall will end up in HIBBERTS HANDS, so would be counter productive.
All the while Davis is busy chit chatting with a proven compulsive liar & hate baiting stalker- the PROTRUE (sic) account, that is quite obviously actually 'ProLies', & crippled with self destructive petulance.
ProLies is an asset of The BBC/ Espionage tentacle of the state. It is a TEAM of arrogant yet inept 'righteous bigots' that have included contributions from (most probably) -
James Mark Court Delingpole, a pervy looking, creepy media personality & the sole personnel & DIRECTOR of WOLF FISH enterprises, that make about £50k a year- doing what exactly?
Sarah Plumley, another posh twerp with an exaggerated sense of her own importance & abilities.
As soon as the court case against Hall ended so did the baiting by ProLies AND Sarah's public appearances for 3 months.
Sarah still uses a picture of herself as a young woman for her profile image, but is now a flabby, scruffy blob of a thing, that looks as if it has been kissing horses arses for breakfast.
She occasionally teams up with homophobic, catholic; psycho bigot - Gemma O'Docherty, an overt agent provocateur based in Ireland. Sarah runs 'guerrilla Education' , a home learning set up that appears to have no clients, or genuine reviews!
Both giggle like neurotic school girls when confronted with 'non conformist haircuts' ! It would be amusing to see them react like that to a SAMURAI, maybe they'd quickly learn to respect other cultures & 'fashions'. It seems obvious to many that the pair of them are REACTIONARY, while in a pose of liberty. They are what used to be called band-wagon jumpers.
The other hand that dabbles in the ProLie account is the BBC's Mis Dis Info Bitch- Marianna Claire Spring, possibly the most hated girl in the media. She has become famous for hate mongering, gaslighting, bare faced lies, & having no sexual organs but two arseholes allegedly.
Much could be said about this repulsive girl, but now is not the time. She is a stereotype in so many ways that it would be no surprise to discover that she is more an actress than a journalist.
'Smirking Gnome' Iain Davis allowed this team to STALK, attempt to ridicule; dehumanize; stigmatize
& misrepresent myself, my family & friends for over 4 months in his comments section. He NEVER intervened even when approached directly about this. In effect he encouraged it. It did him no favors, & he lost a lot of subscribers with his 'cowardly' stance.
During that time Davis partly plagiarized & was inspired by several comments I wrote, he gave no credit, unsurprisingly. He then wrote a risible essay about the occult, When his 'occult' essay failings were pointed out he cowered as usual, he was unable to act like an adult & engage in debate about it.
He lost a lot of respect & subscribers from his shallow comprehension of such a fundamental & potent topic. After that I knew what he was, & the limitations he was crippled with on any resonant topic.
Davis is a good researcher for some things though, I am not claiming he is inept, or a waste of time for uninformed minds. He is just too bigoted & compromised to be much use to any well-experienced or knowledgeable folk in certain fields. In conspiratorial fields the ESOTERIC is of prime importance, and Davis is unable to look at the topic without childish prejudice or the seriousness it deserves.
Recently Davis referred to his views/himself as 'WE', as did ProLies. It transpires they aim to collaborate in teamwork , 'but are not a team' , !!! claimed ProLie.
Davis deleted a comment by the Blue Sky Maiden Account that very crudely & cleverly showed how anyone can evade legal recrimination for saying what they think, it also revealed a few 'secret truths' about various politicians, 'truths' known among some researchers/media folk (like the Phillip Scofield was well known to be gay, as is Robbie Williams bisexuality & boyfriend, etc) that should be better known about . Why would he do that, what a scoop for him if he'd handled it differently!
Davis is a boring writer, despite his research skills. He is repetitive to the point of exasperation. Tends to dwell on the obvious & steers his view away from some uncomfortable facts that change the dynamics of his arguments.
Why does Davis ignore pertinent work that complements his own, Is it envy or more likely a type of fear, and if so why would that be unless it is due to compromise & the likelihood he is working for an agenda & broad team of vested interests. Their currency is our misery, the perpetration of injustice & state sponsored threats to freedom. They REPORT IT, people comment, and that data is collated, quantified & partitioned as needed. In effect almost all the ALTERNATIVE VOICES ON PLATFORMS are working on behalf of these data mining oppressive agencies, sometime maybe unconsciously, other time quite deliberately.
Ask yourselves, why does Davis use the WATCHMEN LOGO adapted to be a schizophrenic split of Yellow & Black, the colour of a BEE & WASPS ?
How did he fund his 'SFX video intro, and why devise it to be as it is?
Why ignore comments from real people aiding his work, while engaging with obvious AI generated accounts, psychopathic proven STALKERS such as ProLies, the multiple personality disordered SPY FROM ANOTHER DIMENSION (sic) Everlyin' Brunswick, & make no effort to counter the Far-right wing white supremacist ravings of WILHELM SPANGLE when he lurked about here?
Does Iain Davis socialise with any 'dark skinned' people, has he ever been interviewed by one?
It now seems obvious that Davis is facilitating such time vampire agitators.. He is THE CHOSEN ONE to whine about Richard D Halls court case, making sure the indignation levels are high, yet channeling the debate away from obvious discrepancies, assumptions (ie Eve Hibbert actually exists as depicted in the media); esoteric concerns (the numerology is fascinating & revealing !); how 'benign' is
Halls work really,;& how independent of state influence is Hall; and most importantly for now-
Davis constantly evades any REMEDY too the court action.
If you have read Halls very convincing book &/or Davis' equally convincing take on the Manchester 'smoke without fire' event, then Hibbert is an obvious villain in this theater, yet I do not see Hall as a Hero at all either. The plan from our oppressors is that we side with one or the other. It may well be that Hall is just as risible a character as Hibbert in SOME WAY, maybe via a sexual transgression , and Hall & Hibbert may possibly be actually working together in effect ? We are free to imagine what we like, and speculate as we so wish on this MEDIA SPECTACLE, it has proven to be mostly a SERIES OF FICTIONS after all!
I will leave it there for now, later I may get around to expanding all the clues that give all these characters away as state actors/ controlled opposition agents.
Also, it should be mentioned that since interacting her, my keyboard malfunctions when I type ONLY ON SUBSTACK !
But after almost a year of intense trolling towards friends & myself, with the Trolls using almost exactly the same 'textbook insults' it is something we are now all expecting, & used to.
Excellent stuff! You even have Mis DisInfos middle name, that bing , Wikipediae etc can't supply!
It may be worth inquisitive readers checking out how SPRING talks & compare it to some of the ProLies account outbursts here, there are DIRECT CORRELATIONS that I'm surprised a Ms DisInfo Spring FANATIC like Iain Davis could miss!
This is a treasure trove of sycophantic horseshit from the radical lesbian interviewer, & sanctimonious posing from Ms sewer Spring herself !
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/04/bbc-marianna-spring-violent-rhetoric-conspiracyland
Thank you again Iain. I am so glad Richard has you. I am beside myself with distress for the iniquity upon iniquity that has been piled upon Richard who has always acted openly and honestly. I am so glad you are speaking up so clearly for him and pointing out the many dreadful injustices against him. This case should never have even got as far as the court. It was begun when Mariana Spring put that evil seed of how he could gain money and fame by jumping on the 'I'm a victim of a conspiracy theorist' bandwagon. For he clearly thrives on these two things, as even without attacking Richard, this vicious little honey badger, had already clocked up vast appearances on TV and in the media, and had raised £thousands to travel to Australia (twice in all) for miracle treatment at an eyewatering price.
I don't want to talk about that. I just cannot bear how people are able to tell such lies and get away with it. How a judge can ignore evidence and decide to believe the opposite of the truth even when the truth is in the public domain.
Maybe today was my most upsetting time though. I have been a loyal member of UK Column. On the News Brian asked people to support Richard. I thanked him in the chat.
Then in the ‘Extra’ part of the News for Members, after the main News, Brian talked about first the Judge and her background, then he addressed Ben Rubin saying would this have come to a trial without the BBC. without Mariana Spring getting involved with the family. Brian went on to say, 'Whatever Richard D Hall did or did not do, and none of us are perfect ..... he could not form a proper defence in court because we have already been told what the government has told us what the truth is really. We are seeing the final nail in the coffin of so-called justice here in the UK.'
He handed over to Ben to comment. I expected him to respond to that last part, having clearly been told at the start, comments of judgement of Richard were not relevant (I wondered if Brian had already talked to Ben before going on air and was trying to prevent what next happened.)
Ben began, 'Yeh it's absolutely staggering umm I agree with that' then he seems to waffle a lot, his eyes moving all around as though trying to get ideas, and not speaking to the problem of how Richard had his defence evidence stitched up or whether the BBC had engineered this trial. His aim became obvious. He wanted to distance himself from Richard and show how he, a good guy, was not a bad guy like Richard. He obviously knew nothing about Richard, or the evets brought to the trial. But he spoke as though he were an authority on it and anyone disagreeing was demeaned and belittled.
(Around -18.40) 'Love him or loathe him and there are people who come down on both sides of that argument and err on err' (this dichotomy of course is false, it leaves no normal feelings for the man in between). He was waffling here and saying ‘people on both sides’ introduces the idea Richard is loathed. He was continuously waffling but filling gaps with ‘err um and an excess of unnecessary words. It went along the lines of 'if the Truther Movement.. people who have really actually really been and gone and done the work and looked at it … had really done the work and looked at it, have come down on either side of the argument regarding Richard Hall.’ I honestly have no idea who this ‘Truther Movement’ are and this idea that some people have ‘really looked at it’ they could not have seen any differently to the rest of us, That is to know that Richard keeps above and beyond the rules and ethics of his profession as an Investigative Journalist.
I can only surmise that Ben Rubin talked to Sanders and Lee. He ought in that case to read your, Iain Davies, work ‘Brent and Neil go to Manchester’ all of it beginning at https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/brent-and-neil-go-to-manchester-part1
Rubin’s waffle continues and here is where I was completely shocked and utterly disgusted. Not just with him but with how the man in charge did nothing on behalf of UK Column. Listen,
‘Um and you know I would certainly say his methods were not methods I would employ like so actually you know like going and staking out people's houses and putting hidden cameras outside their houses strikes me you are begging for trouble if you behave like that.'
What?! Clearly Rubin neither knows Richard, nor has read his research, and clearly this message is exactly the kind we saw from Neil Sanders who, while pretending to be Richard’s friend, having taken so much help from Richard in his work, then stabs him in the back. Their motive is so plain! It is the speech of the weak minded, unprincipled coward who throws the decent and honest man to the wolves just to save his own skin. What makes it so much more contemptible is they try to boast their own glory while so doing.
Rubin continued like this throughout the rest of ‘Extra’, gibing at Richard’s supporters, using ‘forced choices’ or ‘either or’ descriptions, saying we either think Richard is a Saint or we agree with them he is ‘not perfect’ which is the ‘nice person’s’ way of saying he is wrong. Nothing else. Those who oppose Rubin are by implication soft in the head since Ben Rubin has… wait for it… met Richard! He says this as though to shut us up for he now has the superior ground. What is revealing of his character, is that he does not seem aware that among us all there could well be others who might have met Richard too!
I immediately wrote in the Chat which Brian reads as the broadcast goes out, that this is not what Richard did. Instead of withdrawing it, those of us pointing out this lie were scorned for making Richard a ‘Saint’.
The ‘Chat’ section can be found on https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/uk-column-news-extra/uk-column-news-extra-11th-november-2024, beginning at approx. 23.38 or -19.44
Thanks for the link. You should read PROTRUE comments here and see why so many people distrust Hall now, as PROTRUE is Halls greatest fan, and a proven psychotic STALKER hell bend on a distraction game of overt lies & gaslighting.
As for BEN RUBIN look at the name & wake up to the fact of numerous consolidated PLANTS & controlled ops infesting these types of discussion/events. The UK Column treads water & digs ruts mostly, with a right wig Christian leaning, so I am not a fan of that either, but they are certainly preferable to the BBC for topical news.🙄😁
btw I can't stand Hall or his work, but with friends & family here made a massive effort to expose the court crime against him, (the case is obviously to set a 'new fashion' of oppression for any serious investigator, researcher, journalist & thinking person!) only to be insulted & ignored. If you care about Hall you should read the two posts before yours about how he can overturn the judgement against him, written by my sister.