Excellent summary. Each of us has some way, indeed probably many ways, to stand firmly against this threat. None of us stands alone despite the constant news cycle that says we are. Do what you can and live with your eyes open to evolving propaganda from those who want to rule. Speak up despite the lack of interest from others. Salespeople know it takes numerous messages to get a sale. Don't stop talking.
Succinct and incisive in a manner uncommon in the midst of inconclusive directives fed to us in a climate of never-ending verbal garbage loops instigated from the studio of fear.
Very well written Iain using language that is there to inform and not to obfuscate through contrived hieroglyphics a message that is as simple as the medium from whence it came.
Excellent work as usual Iain. The issue is that there are many facets to this multi pronged attack on us all. There are many that vehemently disagree with some facets while wholeheartedly agreeing with other e.g. climate scam.Truly divide and conquer. Although many are "waking up", media are captured and our propagandising elites too are all on the same page. Too many lemmings will throw themselves off the cliff and drag some of us with them. Let us pray the tipping point for us is not a bar set too high.
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem vetoes bill that would have paved the way for central digital bank currency in South Dakota
The South Dakota Freedom Caucus said they "profusely thank Gov. Noem for vetoing HB 1193, a bill that would have created a path towards a China-style Central Bank Digital Currency."
The co-opted independent media and social platforms relentlessly espouse "pie in the sky" praises about the new multipolar world order, while conveniently neglecting to mention that regional hegemonic gangsterism is just a more effective Empire. It guarantees as you say that billions "will
live under the yoke of a G3P global governance tyranny."
Thanks, Iain, it seems you are getting closer to the Voluntaryist position.
Democracy is the Free Range Chicken, still on the Farm, eggs/taxes stolen and meat served up on the platter when required. It is this simple, to see the Farm is to leave it.
“This is how the world will change. When the world becomes free it will not be by the creation of new laws, or the removal of old, or new political leaders, or any election result. It will not be because of a change in government, but because of a change in attitude toward government. Genuine change will come when the state is ignored, not reformed. It will not come when politicians are better, but when they are irrelevant. When state-made law is no longer deemed necessary or important it will not be respected. When it is not respected it will not be enforced because it will not be enforceable. The world can become free of the barbarous relic called the state. The state is a dangerous fiction whose power rests entirely on people’s belief in its necessity, or inevitability. It is not a given that a state must or will always exist. The state, like so many other superstitions [e.g., slavery once accepted as necessary] now thought to be outrageous, inhumane, and inefficient, can be left in the ash heap of history.”
I consider myself a voluntarist EVJ so I hope I am close to it. But I don't think it is enough just to venerate the principles of voluntarism. We need to consider how a voluntary society would function if we seriously hope the wider public will adopt it. There are issues that would need to be managed in a voluntary society. I couldn't agree more that we don't need government nor any of its institutions but we will still need hospitals, a system of exchange, a real justice system and, dare I say it, "roads." SEKIII's "counter economics" and Cleisthenes' demokratia, Spooner's Natural Law and Rose's rejection of "authority" can all be combined I suggest.
Quick reply, Iain, to your response which I appreciate.
I read your article more thoroughly having only scanned it when I gave the above comment; and I viewed some links--so yes, clearly you are a full-fledged Voluntaryist (V), my apologies.
Yes, I agree we need to “consider how a voluntary society would function”, and I have done that considerably and my two favorite books in that regard are “The Market for Liberty” by the Tannahills as well as “Precondition for Peace and Prosperity: Rational Anarchy” by the Perkins (hard to find, I have it in digital if you want a copy).
We will have substantial quibble points from what I can gather in terms of your basing your V on Natural Rights (what I term Natural Rites--or tribal, transcendental mind ghosts) and putting much hope on democracy (I spell in with an N:) as you define it.
But good to know you are truly a V--not many of us.
We are on Session 21.The Psychology of Authenticity. I think you know the YouTube “Academy of Ideas” which is two Canadian brothers who are Vs as we are which is why I find their videos insightfully and rightfully teachable.
Thanks EVJ a copy of Perkin's "Precondition for Peace and Prosperity: Rational Anarchy" would be appreciated. When I say "democracy" I mean "demokratia" as in the original concept defined by Cleisthenes, not the later adulteration by Aristotle. As for Natural Law I look forward to following your series. For me, Natural Law just is.
Iain, below is a quote from the Perkins’ book with link to it and the Market For Liberty and others.
Quick response to your belief in the kind of democracy framed by the Athenian Cleisthenes version: a Stirner rebuke (pun intended): A Spook! He and I recommend hosting no Ghosts, especially the God of Government, Democratic or Dictatorial. Democracy is still The Farm with Free Range Chickens. As Stefan suggested: “To see The Farm is to leave it.”
I read your Democracy Is Dead! Long Live Democracy https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/ I propose to you that no properly defined Voluntaryist can believe in and promote democracy as you seem to describe it. YOU CANNOT VOTE YOUR WAY TO FREEDOM (see below).
Do you agree with my moral basis for Voluntaryism? There is only one “Right” which is not “Natural” (or more would do it) or “Inalienable” (as history ruthlessly keeps repeatedly demonstrating) and it is a negative limitation on Freedom, what I term being Responsible for it. Here it is:
No one can MORALLY use first physical force against another human being or condone another to do so in his name.
THIS is the ONLY moral principle a genuinely peaceful, voluntary collective can be based upon—you need no other nor should any other be permitted.
This is I term a “WRONG” as the only “Right” that should be recognized and practiced by all who desire peaceful, voluntary exchange between humans as the way to mutually meet needs.
To initiate physical force is the essence of ANY government including your Greek version which by the way, very much depended on the use of first physical force to “make the world safe for democracy in the Agora”.
Do you actually believe that the act of voting makes something somehow moral, that is, respects responsible freedom? The famous quote mistakenly attributed to Franklin, actually anonymous, profiles the folly of voting democracy as: “Democracy is two wolves with a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”
I hope I can persuade you to change your mind and the title of your article to: Democracy is a Zombie! Let us starve it to complete death! If no one obeys or votes, no one rules!
Towards this outcome, I recommend you think through Robert Higgs’ “Participatory Fascism” that for me does one of the best autopsies on the dead corpse of Democracy, here
THE PRESCIENT QUOTE—REMEMBER THE BOOK PUBLISHED IN 1971
Precondition For Peace And Prosperity--Rational Anarchy by Richard and Earnestine Perkins, 1971
“In what form will the North American police state of the future appear, if not checked? It will take the form of total control of the individual by the government--but not necessarily in the open terror tactics of the German storm trooper. It will likely appear in the form of the computerized police state. It will, more and more resemble the society of George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. As each problem and crisis is met by governmental laws, the individuals rights and privacy are gradually and imperceptibly eroded. First a law legalizing telephone tapping in selective cases will appear. Then telephone tapping may be used by the government on any citizen, without their knowledge, in the name of the “public interest”. That our personal mail will become subject to arbitrary scrutiny. Then laws will creep in authorizing arbitrary search powers by police for the purpose of “maintaining law and order”. Fingerprinted identification cards will be issued to all individuals. The information which all will be compelled to supply will be automatically filed, control, and kept up up-to-date by computer. Used for such purposes, the computer offers the possibility of the most complete and most efficient enslavement of man, far surpassing in effectiveness the crude barbedwire of less sophisticated governmental aggression.
“These frightening possibilities, some of which are already in existence, cannot be stopped by violence intended to overthrow governments. Without the generally excepted ideas of rational anarchy, such violence will only urge most individuals to call for more and stronger police and stronger governments, which means more aggression. When the good ideas of racial anarchy are accepted, it will be recognized that violence is not necessary. This is why our appeal for racial anarchy Azim chiefly at the individuals of Western societies. We hope that there is still time enough before these governments gain complete control of every individual’s life; before individuals become totally dehumanized, psychological dependents; before our economy collapses; and in short, while it is still possible to spread rational ideas and foster the emergence of a moral society--one based on the three principles of non-sacrifice, non-aggression and justice.” From last two pages of the book.
Thank you Iain for another thought-provoking “rant” that provides ample fodder for your audience (Me) to contemplate and try to digest.
To summarize:
Globalists create Global Crises to justify Global Governance.
From the American Declaration of Independence:
“...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
The conundrum:
When citizen’s right to vote for elected representatives have been corrupted by the election process, when incumbent elected representatives and law enforcement and justices accept the results of a corrupted election, when citizen’s protests against a corrupted election are met with censorship and incarceration, then the newly “elected” government does not derive its powers from the “consent of the governed,” but by the “force paid for by the wealthy.”
Prior to retiring and enjoying a life of leisure, my job required me to have a Security Clearance. In the Security Office was a sign that read, “In God We Trust, All Others We Polygraph.”
The government of the USA was founded on the principle of “Checks and Balances” because our Founders understood that “Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.” Which means that our Founders had the great foresight not to trust elected representatives.
People in power who expect and demand that those not in power trust “Their” motives and actions and policies, rightly deserve the suspicions and resistance and non-compliance of the powerless.
If the powerless ever get control over the government, the very first action they need to enact is to take back ownership and control over “Their” money.
A New Monetary System with A New National Bank
A Nation’s Monetary System could be, and should be, this simple…..
A Nation’s money is owned by the citizens of the Nation.
The value of a Nation’s money is determined by the productivity (labor) of the Nation’s citizenry as expressed in the quantity and quality of the goods and services produced by the Nation’s citizenry.
Alexander Hamilton’s wise words should be fully grasped: “The intrinsic wealth of a nation is to be measured, not by the abundance of the precious metals contained in it, but by the quantity of the productions of its labor and industry.”
A Nation’s Treasury Department adds money to a Nation’s economy through a National Bank.
A Nation’s Treasury Department subtracts money from a Nation’s economy through tax collection, i.e. Internal Revenue Service.
A National Bank manages the Nation’s money supply.
Loans increase a Nation’s money supply.
Loan repayment and taxes decrease a Nation’s money supply.
Loan interest rates control how quickly a Nation’s money supply will increase.
Tax rates control how quickly a Nation’s money supply will decrease.
A National Bank is owned by a Nation’s citizens and therefore the interest received from loans will never be siphoned off as profits to any private owner.
Only independent sovereign nations can establish a National Bank to manage the Nation’s money.
The National Bank is subordinate to the Nation’s Treasury Department.
The National Bank does not sell ownership rights to the Bank to citizens using stocks or bonds.
The National Bank is forbidden from buying and owning and trading assets, including stocks, bonds, and mortgages, both domestic and foreign.
The National Bank of an independent sovereign Nation does not need investors to buy National Bank stock and/or bonds in order for the National Bank to then loan that money to borrowers.
Only the National Bank is authorized to create money by making loans to citizens and businesses, to Federal Government Agencies, and to State and Local Government Agencies.
National Bank Branches will be located in each Postal District throughout the nation.
National Bank Branches will manage loans:
Issuing, setting interest rates, evaluating applicant’s loan needs and applicant’s capability to repay their loan’s interest and principal.
Loan Types:
Monthly Revolving Credit Card:
The higher the monthly credit card limit, the higher the interest rate.
Transportation Vehicle Loan:
The more expensive the vehicle, the higher the interest rate.
Home Mortgage Loan:
The more expensive the home, the higher the interest rate.
Personal Loan:
The higher the loan amount, the higher the interest rate.
Business Loan for Business Expenses:
The higher the loan amount, the higher the interest rate.
New Business Start-Up Loan:
The higher the loan amount, the higher the interest rate. A maximum loan amount will be determined based upon risk of success or failure of the New Business. New Businesses can seek loans from non-Bank investment lenders.
Federal Government Agencies:
The National Bank will issue loans to Federal Government Agencies that will be repaid from Federal property and sales taxes, and tariffs.
State and Local Governments Agencies:
The National Bank will issue loans to State and Local Government Agencies that will be repaid from State and Local property and sales taxes.
Loans and taxes can only be paid in Bank money.
There shall be no Federal, State, and Local income taxes (personal and business). There shall only be Federal, State, and Local property and sales taxes.
Only the Federal Government can levy tariffs.
Loan interest rates and tax rates are modified to control the money supply, and thereby inflation.
Government agencies contract goods and services from citizens and businesses and other government agencies.
Federal, State and Local Government agencies submit budget requests to their governing elected representatives. Budget requests will either be approved, denied, or modified by the governing elected representatives. Approved budget requests are recorded in a national database that National Bank managers can search to confirm loan applications from Federal, State and Local Government agencies.
Welfare is a no-interest non-repayable loan (gift) to citizens based upon their poverty.
Welfare recipients have to agree to a contract with the National Bank requiring the welfare recipient to change their detrimental and self-destructive lifestyle behaviors and habits, fulfill training goals, and fulfill minimum employment requirements.
Only independent sovereign nations can control their own money supply by creating money out of “thin air” and then loaning their money to borrowers. Individual citizens can control their personal money supply (wealth) by loaning (investing) their personal accumulated money supply (wealth) to borrowers, domestic and foreign.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis announced comprehensive legislation to protect Floridians from the Biden administration’s weaponization of the financial sector through a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
The legislative proposal protects consumers and businesses from a federally controlled CBDC by:
Expressly prohibiting the use of a federally adopted Central Bank Digital Currency as money within Florida’s Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
Instituting protections against a central global currency by prohibiting any CBDC issued by a foreign reserve or foreign sanctioned central bank.
Calling on likeminded states to join Florida in adopting similar prohibitions within their respective Commercial Codes to fight back against this concept nationwide.
“The Biden administration’s efforts to inject a Centralized Bank Digital Currency is about surveillance and control,” said Governor Ron DeSantis.” Today’s announcement will protect Florida consumers and businesses from the reckless adoption of a ‘centralized digital dollar’ which will stifle innovation and promote government-sanctioned surveillance. Florida will not side with economic central planners; we will not adopt policies that threaten personal economic freedom and security.”
The UN and those that created it could not be trusted. Governments who have "partnered" with the UN and the WEF are the same ilk. So, their partners in crime the WEF can only be the lowest scum of the scum IMO.
Russian and China are willing players sharing the deck. As untrustworthy as the rest of the scum.
"Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed." Only, Organized Crime will burn down your "freed" house. It requires something more like communities without a diversity, equity or inclusiveness willing to defend itself.
Polycrisis is merely what the military calls Full Spectrum Dominance.
What, the organised crime gangs that currently run rampant in every country on Earth you mean? How about the organised criminal gangs of financial fraudsters that are called bankers? Of course to "burn down" and entire country you need the biggest criminal gang of them all, namely government. And why, if we lived in a voluntary society, wouldn't you be willing to pay for a security service to protect your community if necessary? You pay for it now and get virtually no protection at all in return.
I agree completely, Iain. Productive people would be willing to pay for what they want, including protection. Those not willing to pay are parasites and desire collectivism which is why it has failed repeatedly and requires force. The system set up in the US which I am only experienced in has been devised to remove the payers from the service directly which is provided by the controllers through their intermediaries. (The school system and its boards are a great example of this.) That is why you do not get what you pay for with the added benefit that you are impoverished and become unable to pay additionally for what you want.
I do not believe that "they" wish to burn down the country but, rather, to have it all and have less of us by whatever means that takes.
I forgot to point out in your discussion of Jewish oligarchs that what should be addressed is the actions and beliefs of the people involved, whether Jewish, other faiths, atheists or aliens and not a name or, as someone was said to say, hate the sin and not the sinner. After all, there are conversos and assumed identities. In fact, the great majority of people today are lifetime actors.
Appreciate the good work you've been doing Iain since I found you during Covid1984. Purchased a hard copy of your book, though I haven't finished it yet. Your work is more factual and devoid of the speculative and sensationalist hyperbole and overt religious framing I see from too many in this sphere. That does put me off certain folks. That and them be willingly subservient to Institutions of Authority (The State/Religion/Government/Governance, Monarchy etc).
Do not comply. "Democracy" has always been a cog in the mechanism of the tyranny that is Governance. All governance is tyrannical.
Democracy only means one thing. Governance by trial by jury. That is true demokratia, where legislation is genuinely subservient to the decisions made by the people, whose only criteria for making any judgement is justice. What we call "democracy" is not democracy.
Yes, the right to jury trial is vital. Juries are accountable to nobody. They simply return a verdict of guilty or not guilty without explanation. This is not always benign, but ‘perverse verdicts’ can provide an important safety valve against perceived injustice or an over-reaching government.
Trial by Jury and Legislation all come under Governance...
Subservience to decisions made by people is also known as mob justice/rule. Groups routinely decide it is Just to remove the rights of the individual for "the greater good". That's not pro liberty, nor voluntary.
Probably the vast majority of Laws are unjust, if not tyrannical, many Trials are illegitimate or corrupt and the same applies to a Jury.
Agree to disagree regarding "Democracy". The definition you've focused on is one thing, the reality is another.
This is an excellent article. Thank you. Some of us are looking at all solutions and attempting to improve them. We would appreciate help. It is free of economic cost. Please take a look and consider inviting others who might want to participate as equals in this process of discovery. Thanks again.
Thanks for drawing my attention to your project Larry.
May I suggest a voluntary model based upon the true democracy which means "governance by trial by jury." This is what "demokratia" (people power) originally meant.
So, seeing as government will never allow the real rule of law (Natural Law) to abide, personally, I do not think we can ever ask "government" or expect it to ever deliver the only "law" that really matters - justice.
Consequently, it is up to us to construct a voluntary society based upon these principles. We have no choice but to do this in the face of government oppression. But we can do it, as alluded to in the article above, if we firstly understand what our inalienable rights actually mean:
Armed with this knowledge, an understanding of demokratia, annulment and the true intention of our constitutions (the US constitution embodies many of the principles of Magna Carta, for example) we can then set about creating this better world. We can do this by consciously focusing upon the actions we take every day.
Yes excellent , I I have been promoting the reviving of the RIGHT WE USED TO HAVE IN AMERICA of THE FULLY INFORMED JURY provision , whereby we the people had the RIGHT to give NOT GUILTY VERDICT based upon an unlawful process , undesirable or UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW or UNFAIRLY APP,LIED or ADJUDICATED or APPLIED LAW. In America this has been called the FIJA movement , Judges detest it , it strips their usurped power .
This is an excellent solution. I have studied this for a long time and, upon first glance at your comment, what you have shared is excellent. This all takes time, but I can think of no more important way to spend time. Thank you. I will link Solution Seekers to this comment trail so they can look at it here.
At Solution Seeking we attempt to consider the pros and cons of all solutions. In the process we have discovered something... The question of HOW to achieve the solution is as important as the solution itself. Specifically, we have framed this as: "HOW can we eliminate the enemy's ability to harm humanity and the planet?" There are two URLs where this HOW is investigated. We have gained insights and knowledge so far as we investigate the complexities and challenges of HOW. I suggest here that nothing Einstein ever did compares to the importance, urgency and challenges of this HOW we seek. Please offer your criticisms, corrections, interpretations, etc. of what I write here. Please consider taking a look at these two URLs and possibly adding your version(s) of HOW. Please consider participating in the discussion of HOW in the comments, which are the most important part of Substack Solution Seeking.
IE. First we must stop the ability of the enemy to harm humanity and the planet? After this is done, we can implement a better society? Our predatory and parasitic power hungry enemy does not intend to allow us to implement solutions like what you suggest voluntarily?
An Open Invitation For Readers To Use Their Visualization And Creative Writing Skills To Solve The World's Problems - The article and the pinned comment
We also attempted to define our enemy. One of many suggestions is Warren Buffet's class and higher, along with the puppet minions it installs at most or all power institutions world wide. That definition was discussed in several of the earlier publications listed here. https://solutionseeking.substack.com/archive
Thanks again. This is not easy and it is not tidy. For others and me, it is still in the preliminary brainstorming session, and there are challenges to doing that online. It takes time and many are not ready, willing, and able to devote the time.
I like all this have promoted it all for years , yes takes time but SOME can be working on this while others are doing your more elusive and less openly talked about ideas
It might take the totality of many different kinds of actions, including those that are not appropriate for discussion on the internet the enemy controls and monitors. From the ultimate goals discussed here, the enemy knows that some of us have no place for it on this planet. We have work to do. Onward!!
The image makes a very misleading statement; the shoal of minnows could easily envelope the shark, however, it can never consume it. Once inside the shoal the shark does what it always does and thrashes about wildly eating what it pleases, hollowing out those who thought they were safest, which is effectively what the 'vaxxines' are doing now.
Sharks are killed with a spear to the brain. We must destroy those destroying us, simply saying no is not enough; a humane rat trap does not eliminate the problem, even though it salves the conscience.
Brilliant analysis of how we imprison ourselves by taking the bait of comfort and convenience offered to us disingenously by the globalists. If one voluntarily accepts a life in prison, is one really a prisoner, or is one free, by dint of having chosen one's prison cell? The entire program the globalists wish to foist on humanity flushes out the essential question raised by Dostoevsky in The Brothers Karamozov's Grand Inquisitor chapter -- are humans capable of handling freedom, or do they need a "Savior" whether in the form of a Christ figure or the State to absolve them of the right and burden of exercising free choice? The pseudo-anemic has clarified the answer to this: some will be capable, some will be incapable. Some will submit to authority, and others will not. one will see through the lies and propaganda; others will not. Dostoevsky seems to be arguing (through Ivan) that submission is the best solution for humanity. Those who submit will be right for themselves at least. But for those who can handle the burdens of freedom, they will be wrong, and submission will be a disaster for them.
We freedom lovers may like to believe that civilization has evolved to the point that freedom is generally accepted as a virtue. How many of those who submit by supporting the prevailing regime are quick to fight against oppression of others, even as they accept being oppressed themselves?
The pseudopandemic has revealed that we as a society are not as evolved as we may have wanted to believe. Under the pressure of fear, way to many of us tend to revert back to a state of passive submissiveness. On the other hand, the freedom movement is very strong, and while the success of the outcome the globalists aspire to is still unsettles, it is clear that the globalists have quite a challenge in trying to stifle us. They are really trying to fight against themselves, insofar as the human spirit has the capacity for both freedom and submission, and neither one can be banished entirely from our souls.
much of the current global situation can be traced to the use of genetics to set an elitely funded and guided 'backstory' as authority from which to set risk modelling into hyped media into movements demanding protections for artificial or contrived crisis.
The most fundamental level is that of ideas given acceptance by acting from them, and so teaching them. Ideas are extended to narratives that frame life in terms that set a closed system in which to be incentivised to choose seemingly different options that effect the same outcome.
I read that the Fabian society gave almost unbridled scope to its intelligentsia within the stricture of life as a closed sytem, of limited and depleting resources in which competition and war is then inherent or inevitable, hence the subversion of all else to the war by which another's loss is 'our' gain. A sort of musical chairs in which the jiggery of financial and other controls can set timings for 'stopping the music' such that the sacrifice is distributed or dumped on 'others'.
The weaponising of the mind, of language, culture, science, medicine all represents a technologising of human being to human tools. so the biotech runs the logical extension of a 'Luciferian' agenda - at war with (and despising of) life as a violation of unworthiness, limitation and loss relative to fantasy ideals that are invoked to impose upon life, or sacrifice life to - as a kind of cargo cult for a perfection that has no expression or support in life embodied.
Spiritual pride is elitist self-specialness set over against 'others' who are easily manipulated or tooled by their own sympathies, by framing grievance as basis and authority for power over others - for such is the signature of their 'manipulators'.
Regardless our part in the world , we have a part in the mind that runs under a blind eye.
Aligning in integrity of being - rather than moral guilting claiming power - is to uncover true authority - which lords it over none, nor need justify or apologise for being - that I am.
"It is time to think positively and act positively. A people armed with the will to want to get better, armed with the will to win, and armed with knowledge of the past and present, can move forward and take action, succeed, and reclaim their dignity". Bill Cosby. Actions speak louder than words but I guess words help as they may lead to actions when you mull it over.
I know that planning in Plato, founded the religious and political systems of western society long ago. Thus western society is based on deception, through narrative/authorship to this day. So, control of all forms of media, traditions, laws gives control through belief in those susceptible because of conditioning from childhood.
A vital foundation, from Plato to our time, is indoctrination from a very young age. They are susceptible to believe whatever they are taught because they are not yet sensibly rational. Those that are, can't easily be taken in by irrational nonsense. Thus rulers access to young minds is foundational.
Today control of national/state schooling, ensures irrationality conditioning, which makes a population susceptible to the many forms of 'authorship'.
MUCH OF THE CURRENT GLOBAL SITUATION CAN BE TRACED TO THE USE OF GENETICS TO SET AN ELITELY FUNDED AND GUIDED 'BACKSTORY' AS AUTHORITY FROM WHICH TO SET RISK MODELLING INTO HYPED MEDIA INTO MOVEMENTS DEMANDING PROTECTIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL OR CONTRIVED CRISIS.
I get all that except for it being traced to the use of genetics. Note: Everything you've written so far seems quite aware and likely true but readers will find it hard to see it unless they already know what you are talking about.
THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL IS THAT OF IDEAS GIVEN ACCEPTANCE BY ACTING FROM THEM, AND SO TEACHING THEM. IDEAS ARE EXTENDED TO NARRATIVES THAT FRAME LIFE IN TERMS THAT SET A CLOSED SYSTEM IN WHICH TO BE INCENTIVISED TO CHOOSE SEEMINGLY DIFFERENT OPTIONS THAT EFFECT THE SAME OUTCOME.
Again, very good.
The telling of a false story and acting as if it is real and of utmost importance is core to the deceptions of ages. From kings, rulers and churches enshrining in religious memorials of all kinds, especially those that the population takes part in. ACTING TO MAKE THE IDEAS IN THE STORY, SEEM REAL AND IMPORTANT. The Christmas death and resurrection, followed by the Easter Pentecost Christian rituals/holydays are an old example. Many elite saying they came down with Covid and seeming to take global warming seriously in legislation etc, are more recent ones.
I READ THAT THE FABIAN SOCIETY GAVE ALMOST UNBRIDLED SCOPE TO ITS INTELLIGENTSIA WITHIN THE STRICTURE OF LIFE AS A CLOSED SYTEM, OF LIMITED AND DEPLETING RESOURCES IN WHICH COMPETITION AND WAR IS THEN INHERENT OR INEVITABLE, HENCE THE SUBVERSION OF ALL ELSE TO THE WAR BY WHICH ANOTHER'S LOSS IS 'OUR' GAIN. A SORT OF MUSICAL CHAIRS IN WHICH THE JIGGERY OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER CONTROLS CAN SET TIMINGS FOR 'STOPPING THE MUSIC' SUCH THAT THE SACRIFICE IS DISTRIBUTED OR DUMPED ON 'OTHERS'.
Excellent. If you remember the Fabian source would you tell me.
This is an example of philosophical planning, like that in Plato and it is building using principles in Plato. A thing about such narrative building is once people BELIEVE the story, the objective reality to dispel it can't be seen by BELIEVERS. You can tell them it's a story but they see it as rock solid reality. And denial of it to them is: heresy, blasphemy, insanity, denialism etc.
THE WEAPONISING OF THE MIND, OF LANGUAGE, CULTURE, SCIENCE, MEDICINE ALL REPRESENTS A TECHNOLOGISING OF HUMAN BEING TO HUMAN TOOLS.
Yep, service to the Lord i.e. boss, master, owner has been a core goal and part of western society for a very long time. Automatons have been made since ancient times. The sacrifice of self for the common good has been a core indoctrination value for ages.
SO THE BIOTECH RUNS THE LOGICAL EXTENSION OF A 'LUCIFERIAN' AGENDA - AT WAR WITH (AND DESPISING OF) LIFE AS A VIOLATION OF UNWORTHINESS, LIMITATION AND LOSS RELATIVE TO FANTASY IDEALS THAT ARE INVOKED TO IMPOSE UPON LIFE, OR SACRIFICE LIFE TO - AS A KIND OF CARGO CULT FOR A PERFECTION THAT HAS NO EXPRESSION OR SUPPORT IN LIFE EMBODIED.
I'm losing you here
I probably know what your talking about in real terms though?
SPIRITUAL PRIDE IS ELITIST SELF-SPECIALNESS SET OVER AGAINST 'OTHERS' WHO ARE EASILY MANIPULATED OR TOOLED BY THEIR OWN SYMPATHIES, BY FRAMING GRIEVANCE AS BASIS AND AUTHORITY FOR POWER OVER OTHERS - FOR SUCH IS THE SIGNATURE OF THEIR 'MANIPULATORS'.
Seems like you're referring to some recent conditioning/indoctrination fed out through education systems in many places. The grievance studies hoax papers and their authors give some good insight into that. Joe R's discussion with them opens it out well.
THE FULL VID, JUST UNDER 2 HOURS, IS NO LONGER ON YOUTUBE. Search for "Joe Rogan Experience #1191 - Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay" to get it somewhere else. Found this link: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4H5SKpubfylmMroqgDnM0X (Don't forget to save the vid!)
REGARDLESS OUR PART IN THE WORLD , WE HAVE A PART IN THE MIND THAT RUNS UNDER A BLIND EYE.
I assume you're just saying we're all indoctrinated and have some blind spots. i.e. Those in an age/philosophical narrative are blind to it's influence upon them. Sometimes given as "we can't see the water we swim in."
ALIGNING IN INTEGRITY OF BEING - RATHER THAN MORAL GUILTING CLAIMING POWER - IS TO UNCOVER TRUE AUTHORITY - WHICH LORDS IT OVER NONE, NOR NEED JUSTIFY OR APOLOGISE FOR BEING - THAT I AM.
I'm not sure what you're saying here, or what it's in response to. It seems a personal statement of integrity to truth refuting current narrative claiming original sin type status and the need to live a life of continuous shame/repentance etc.?
I think I like a lot of what you write but I'm not sure because a lot of it is in general/abstract terms. Regarding the planning in Plato, here is a link to some info on it.
Nor am I the result of template Ideals in a world that must forever fail them and by their light be considered unworthy.
The physical expression or embodiment of life has thus been associated with a fallen, demonised or gross aspect to be subdued, or ruled out and over from 'ideals' that interject between our nature and true living will - as a mind of control.
This may seem abstract unless we observe our ideas, most of which we act out from as if 'reality'.
Everyone learns to make a mask for personal survival in a world of a split mind. This begins before we have any conscious reflection or articulation, so again it runs beneath the self and world-view we learned, made and adapted to. In this sense we made a self. But it runs as a self-protective mind - to make you safe - relative to its original conditioning.
But we are as we are created - regardless what we make of ourselves, and so can question our masking defences or beliefs to uncover truth that we did not make. Ask and you shall be answered does apply, but the ego's questions are really statements of self-reinforcement in the form of a question.
The paragraph on use of Genetics is the current version of seeking domination (or control) via the setting up of a backstory that is then distorted to cut off from our natural authority of being. A specific thread can be traced from Edward calabrese's documentation of errors ommissions, bias and outright fraud regarding the philanthropic use of geneticists to set both a false model of genetic determination as a limited, weak and defenceless biological insecurity to threats of toxic exposure, starting with radiations, but expanding from there as the false principle of a linear no (dose) threshold model of risk in place of a hormetic effect.
To translate - the belief in a piggy bank of acquired 'damage' that is set by modelling as debits for disease and death with zero tolerance for dosage. This is hyped by Media to generate movements seeking protections such as to enable tyranny via regulatory capture with significant public support. Life or living biology is not only resilient and adaptive, but can thrive or gain from exposures to challenge or stressors. And even by its own revisions DNA is now known to self repair - though we can go deeper into what runs beneath the protein-code level.
As for understanding me - There are many levels. I would prompt a living resonance of curiosity that becomes the readers own journey of desire seeking fulfilment - but no one questions what they assume self-evidently real. So it would be natural for me to seem ununderstandable in many respectsto any who are still seeking to mentally understand from a sense of mind-control - rather than understanding in the heart - which is a relational integration rather than attempts to define lif in terms of predictive control.
My comments on Platonic Ideal relates to the 'Luciferian agenda'.
the symbol of Lucifer is of despising the embodiment of god in Man.
Elitism looks down on what it judges unworthy. Call it gaslighting but when masked as science and applied as technology we get humans managed as lab rats or tools to a controller caste.
Yes we have blind spots to be vigilant against - you could also call them back doors by which we are manipulated or deceived.
Integrity of being is nothing you can make or unmake, edit or distort. Moral guilting runs a mask of control, if you give this authority you will lose awareness or mask over your true nature. Be still and know - means release the invested attention of internal chatter or dissociated imaginative thinking to be no more nor less that wholly present. you cannot DO this - you can only LET what Is, be. The I Am, is therefore already an integrity of being - before a thought. Your being is not coercive over you. (But mind can split to controller and controlled).
Now I may not have become any clearer than before, but I felt to meet your responses or at least some of them. I feel you are picking up meanings that are of course resonant with and part of your own life.
The Calabrese info 'string' is a nice addition to other 'strings' that have the same characteristics of philosophical narrative subservient to Idea while paying no respect whatever to empirical reality. i.e. the base nature of these 'strings' and the running of western society, is philosophical.
Do you know how the Calibrese info 'string' ties into nuke bombs as false ideological narrative? Later,* I will give you a very brief skeletal outline for your consideration. You can flesh it out as you will?
Please note well: I consider a science based investigation into what is fundamentally a philosophical matter to be using inferior investigative tools to best see and understand it.
Society is created and managed according to philosophical principles and methods which generate false narrative as foundations for world view and thinking.
So, my information is not framed like Calibrese' detailed investigation. I start with my framing, my world view, (which I know to be fact/experience informed) that western society is based upon deceptions fabricated by rulers, that use philosophical planning knowledge and institutions. CALIBRESE GIVES MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF STICKING TO AN IDEA WHILE PAYING NO RESPECT TO REALITY. THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF A PHILOSOPHERS IDEA BASED HISTORY/SCIENCE. The Lewis example at about 2hr 17 mins, inferring likely connections here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCRiw6Lg0i8 typifies philosophical rule of the world through false narrative creation and propagation. BUT Calibrese doesn't know the dots he's 'connecting', show 101 philosophical basics for making and shaping western society, and that such has been going on for thousands of years.
I consider Calibrese to have more facts and knowledge in this area than probably anyone, but his overall understanding and expression of it is inferior to the philosophically aware that hear his facts, because he doesn't objectively know the ultimate foundations and nature of western society, is philosophical. Without a major prime base fact, fundamental understanding is incomplete. More complete and accurate fundamental facts/knowledge makes for a more objective framing and hence understanding of a matter.
* Some skeleton points, on the nuclear narrative 'string'.
POINT 1:
Crawford F Sams 'blows the whistle', that he was instructed via presidential order through a letter as part of the Manhattan Project to PLAY UP THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF 'THE BOMB' IN JAPAN. He says he followed the order and for 6 months all that died in effected areas were rerecord as dying from nuclear bomb effects. He basically states, that if someone was run over by a bicycle and died, he made sure cause of death was attributed to nuke effects. This may be valid historical evidence directly from one involved. Voice recording and transcript are still accessible online.
POINT 2:
It doesn't take much investigation to find out that there is a story of very tight media control by the military concerning Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and that John Hersey's 'triumph over military censorship', played up the effects of nukes/radiation like Crawford F Sams was ordered to fabricate. i.e. the idea of nukes having very serious radiation effects is consistent and that's what was fed out to the public as the 'Reality'.
POINT 3:
My reading of Hersey's 'book' sees it to be a work of fiction to elicit emotional attachment by western, and especially American readers and it 'plays up the effects of the Bomb' in what is basically a Horror/Action genre story to be seen and believed in as a part of objective reality.
POINT 4:
Additionally, the years of US/Alliance control of Japan after 'the bomb', made talking about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki illegal for years.
POINT 5:
And other aspects of the narrative. I'm being brief here, as a lot of detail takes a lot of time etc. And you might already know, not care or dismiss it out of hand.
MOST LIKELY CONCLUSION (In my view)
When I look at the above 4 points (and more), it is an artificially fabricated narrative, like a biblical story to build and establish beliefs in Ideas of vulnerability to nuclear threat and end of the world. It combines ideas like those in Sodom and Gomorrah's destruction by a God/'super power' raining it from above. And a new type of Armageddon or terrifying apocalypse – cataclysmic event, end of the world scenario. It's part of a gradual genre transition to nature/science and non-religious history i.e. natural real history as the backdrop, to the upgrade, of much in Plato's original plan.
Thanks again for your reply I really appreciate it but the abstract nature in much of it means I don't know what you mean in those parts. I have often written that sensible reality is my prime dictionary, encyclopedia and library though when using sensible reality as one's prime definer of meaning, those literary sources are, in a sense, no longer adequate as prime sources. Dictionaries don't really define anything. Words that don't elicit a specific sense of the reality one wants to communicate, are words that don't communicate.
I simply see the ego in myself and thus in my world.
I use the term for a believed indeed beloved self image - given priority over relational integrity.
This does develop as the philosophical basis - except philosophy developed within a self-justifiction of rationalisations of a developed world view or over underlying mythic or symbolic representations of Separation, or Fall into fragmented limitation.
As for Calabrese - he speaks to scientific peers from a sense of integrity within its disciplines.
But what he reveals is part of how wealth leveraged control used 'new science' to gain the god position that is now running with a lot of support because it defines as weak, helpless and dangerous to a centrally collectivised control.
I am aware of that and other shaping of the mind and world by the post war banking cartel complex, and of course re-enacting mythic representation of species trauma. That's what drama is an does as an interplay of good and evil set into mythic projections around its central character and personae.
The ego of the world is a 'Script' through which to open explore experience & develop consciousness through a glass darkly - that is through a lens of conflicted limitation.
However there is another Script of undoing, correcting and redeeming to the distortions of the lie and the backstory of it. In this, a willingness to release invested lie opens a discernment of a truth that was discarded, blindsided, denied or masked over by lies - and is no less true than ever is. I see this as the healing back to our false foundation - where it no longer find cover of darkness in which to pass off as real, true, meaningful or useful.
My primary sense is intuitively guided. Including an awareness of the body-senses.
A world made or based on lies is used to frame 'truth' in terms of judgements - that is in terms of selections that exclude or reject.
There is seat of awareness prior to thinking and the projected meaning & reflection of perceived reality, but while the script is running there is no interfering with another's gift of experience. The belief that we can, have been and are being subjected against our will is the ego or the 'script' of a mind split so as to not know the word it gave, but take the reflected reality as both self-existing and threatening to a sense of self set in conflict with and within it.
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king’s horses and all the king’s men
Couldn’t put Humpty together again.
But the futile search, war or quest is the ego's hiding place.
thus we see a world of reversal.
Continuity of masking ego-mind or world is assumed to be a physical determinant, but without the 'Men in Black' the true nature of Humpty as the first false flag - would be evident and the willingness or capacity to hold the focus of this world would require a very heavy process of forgetting.
Lies believed substitute for truth.
Truth is not IN a world of lies, but bringing self-illusion to truth is to be undone to a truly shared source and nature.
Unfortunately the globalists will succeed because most people can't even see a problem, and of those who do virtually nobody is willing to make the sacrifices necessary to stop them.
Excellent summary. Each of us has some way, indeed probably many ways, to stand firmly against this threat. None of us stands alone despite the constant news cycle that says we are. Do what you can and live with your eyes open to evolving propaganda from those who want to rule. Speak up despite the lack of interest from others. Salespeople know it takes numerous messages to get a sale. Don't stop talking.
Succinct and incisive in a manner uncommon in the midst of inconclusive directives fed to us in a climate of never-ending verbal garbage loops instigated from the studio of fear.
Very well written Iain using language that is there to inform and not to obfuscate through contrived hieroglyphics a message that is as simple as the medium from whence it came.
Excellent work as usual Iain. The issue is that there are many facets to this multi pronged attack on us all. There are many that vehemently disagree with some facets while wholeheartedly agreeing with other e.g. climate scam.Truly divide and conquer. Although many are "waking up", media are captured and our propagandising elites too are all on the same page. Too many lemmings will throw themselves off the cliff and drag some of us with them. Let us pray the tipping point for us is not a bar set too high.
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem vetoes bill that would have paved the way for central digital bank currency in South Dakota
The South Dakota Freedom Caucus said they "profusely thank Gov. Noem for vetoing HB 1193, a bill that would have created a path towards a China-style Central Bank Digital Currency."
https://thepostmillennial.com/kristi-noem-vetoes-bill-that-would-have-paved-the-way-for-central-digital-bank-currency-in-south-dakota
The co-opted independent media and social platforms relentlessly espouse "pie in the sky" praises about the new multipolar world order, while conveniently neglecting to mention that regional hegemonic gangsterism is just a more effective Empire. It guarantees as you say that billions "will
live under the yoke of a G3P global governance tyranny."
Yep
Thanks, Iain, it seems you are getting closer to the Voluntaryist position.
Democracy is the Free Range Chicken, still on the Farm, eggs/taxes stolen and meat served up on the platter when required. It is this simple, to see the Farm is to leave it.
No one rules if no one obeys. www.voluntaryist.com
I think Isaac Morehouse puts it the most clearly.
“This is how the world will change. When the world becomes free it will not be by the creation of new laws, or the removal of old, or new political leaders, or any election result. It will not be because of a change in government, but because of a change in attitude toward government. Genuine change will come when the state is ignored, not reformed. It will not come when politicians are better, but when they are irrelevant. When state-made law is no longer deemed necessary or important it will not be respected. When it is not respected it will not be enforced because it will not be enforceable. The world can become free of the barbarous relic called the state. The state is a dangerous fiction whose power rests entirely on people’s belief in its necessity, or inevitability. It is not a given that a state must or will always exist. The state, like so many other superstitions [e.g., slavery once accepted as necessary] now thought to be outrageous, inhumane, and inefficient, can be left in the ash heap of history.”
I consider myself a voluntarist EVJ so I hope I am close to it. But I don't think it is enough just to venerate the principles of voluntarism. We need to consider how a voluntary society would function if we seriously hope the wider public will adopt it. There are issues that would need to be managed in a voluntary society. I couldn't agree more that we don't need government nor any of its institutions but we will still need hospitals, a system of exchange, a real justice system and, dare I say it, "roads." SEKIII's "counter economics" and Cleisthenes' demokratia, Spooner's Natural Law and Rose's rejection of "authority" can all be combined I suggest.
Quick reply, Iain, to your response which I appreciate.
I read your article more thoroughly having only scanned it when I gave the above comment; and I viewed some links--so yes, clearly you are a full-fledged Voluntaryist (V), my apologies.
Yes, I agree we need to “consider how a voluntary society would function”, and I have done that considerably and my two favorite books in that regard are “The Market for Liberty” by the Tannahills as well as “Precondition for Peace and Prosperity: Rational Anarchy” by the Perkins (hard to find, I have it in digital if you want a copy).
We will have substantial quibble points from what I can gather in terms of your basing your V on Natural Rights (what I term Natural Rites--or tribal, transcendental mind ghosts) and putting much hope on democracy (I spell in with an N:) as you define it.
But good to know you are truly a V--not many of us.
Join our ongoing, online tutorial "The Philosophy of Responsible Freedom", I would enjoy having your fecundly free mind, here for details https://responsiblyfree.substack.com/p/the-philosophy-of-responsible-freedom
We are on Session 21.The Psychology of Authenticity. I think you know the YouTube “Academy of Ideas” which is two Canadian brothers who are Vs as we are which is why I find their videos insightfully and rightfully teachable.
Stay safe and free.
Thanks EVJ a copy of Perkin's "Precondition for Peace and Prosperity: Rational Anarchy" would be appreciated. When I say "democracy" I mean "demokratia" as in the original concept defined by Cleisthenes, not the later adulteration by Aristotle. As for Natural Law I look forward to following your series. For me, Natural Law just is.
Iain, below is a quote from the Perkins’ book with link to it and the Market For Liberty and others.
Quick response to your belief in the kind of democracy framed by the Athenian Cleisthenes version: a Stirner rebuke (pun intended): A Spook! He and I recommend hosting no Ghosts, especially the God of Government, Democratic or Dictatorial. Democracy is still The Farm with Free Range Chickens. As Stefan suggested: “To see The Farm is to leave it.”
I read your Democracy Is Dead! Long Live Democracy https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/ I propose to you that no properly defined Voluntaryist can believe in and promote democracy as you seem to describe it. YOU CANNOT VOTE YOUR WAY TO FREEDOM (see below).
Do you agree with my moral basis for Voluntaryism? There is only one “Right” which is not “Natural” (or more would do it) or “Inalienable” (as history ruthlessly keeps repeatedly demonstrating) and it is a negative limitation on Freedom, what I term being Responsible for it. Here it is:
No one can MORALLY use first physical force against another human being or condone another to do so in his name.
THIS is the ONLY moral principle a genuinely peaceful, voluntary collective can be based upon—you need no other nor should any other be permitted.
This is I term a “WRONG” as the only “Right” that should be recognized and practiced by all who desire peaceful, voluntary exchange between humans as the way to mutually meet needs.
To initiate physical force is the essence of ANY government including your Greek version which by the way, very much depended on the use of first physical force to “make the world safe for democracy in the Agora”.
Do you actually believe that the act of voting makes something somehow moral, that is, respects responsible freedom? The famous quote mistakenly attributed to Franklin, actually anonymous, profiles the folly of voting democracy as: “Democracy is two wolves with a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”
https://media.allauthor.com/images/quotes/gif/benjamin-franklin-quote-democracy-is-two-wolves-and-a-lamb.gif
Perhaps attend our session 44 by the Academy of Ideas’ Voluntaryist brothers, puts it pithily: 44.Why We Can’t Vote Our Way to Freedom
https://academyofideas.com/2018/05/why-we-cant-vote-our-way-to-freedom/
I hope I can persuade you to change your mind and the title of your article to: Democracy is a Zombie! Let us starve it to complete death! If no one obeys or votes, no one rules!
Towards this outcome, I recommend you think through Robert Higgs’ “Participatory Fascism” that for me does one of the best autopsies on the dead corpse of Democracy, here
https://blog.independent.org/2018/08/27/on-the-participatory-part-of-participatory-fascism/
THE PRESCIENT QUOTE—REMEMBER THE BOOK PUBLISHED IN 1971
Precondition For Peace And Prosperity--Rational Anarchy by Richard and Earnestine Perkins, 1971
“In what form will the North American police state of the future appear, if not checked? It will take the form of total control of the individual by the government--but not necessarily in the open terror tactics of the German storm trooper. It will likely appear in the form of the computerized police state. It will, more and more resemble the society of George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. As each problem and crisis is met by governmental laws, the individuals rights and privacy are gradually and imperceptibly eroded. First a law legalizing telephone tapping in selective cases will appear. Then telephone tapping may be used by the government on any citizen, without their knowledge, in the name of the “public interest”. That our personal mail will become subject to arbitrary scrutiny. Then laws will creep in authorizing arbitrary search powers by police for the purpose of “maintaining law and order”. Fingerprinted identification cards will be issued to all individuals. The information which all will be compelled to supply will be automatically filed, control, and kept up up-to-date by computer. Used for such purposes, the computer offers the possibility of the most complete and most efficient enslavement of man, far surpassing in effectiveness the crude barbedwire of less sophisticated governmental aggression.
“These frightening possibilities, some of which are already in existence, cannot be stopped by violence intended to overthrow governments. Without the generally excepted ideas of rational anarchy, such violence will only urge most individuals to call for more and stronger police and stronger governments, which means more aggression. When the good ideas of racial anarchy are accepted, it will be recognized that violence is not necessary. This is why our appeal for racial anarchy Azim chiefly at the individuals of Western societies. We hope that there is still time enough before these governments gain complete control of every individual’s life; before individuals become totally dehumanized, psychological dependents; before our economy collapses; and in short, while it is still possible to spread rational ideas and foster the emergence of a moral society--one based on the three principles of non-sacrifice, non-aggression and justice.” From last two pages of the book.
Link to a copy https://tinyurl.com/4w5f7zht as well as The Market For Liberty and others.
Thank you Iain for another thought-provoking “rant” that provides ample fodder for your audience (Me) to contemplate and try to digest.
To summarize:
Globalists create Global Crises to justify Global Governance.
From the American Declaration of Independence:
“...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
The conundrum:
When citizen’s right to vote for elected representatives have been corrupted by the election process, when incumbent elected representatives and law enforcement and justices accept the results of a corrupted election, when citizen’s protests against a corrupted election are met with censorship and incarceration, then the newly “elected” government does not derive its powers from the “consent of the governed,” but by the “force paid for by the wealthy.”
Prior to retiring and enjoying a life of leisure, my job required me to have a Security Clearance. In the Security Office was a sign that read, “In God We Trust, All Others We Polygraph.”
The government of the USA was founded on the principle of “Checks and Balances” because our Founders understood that “Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.” Which means that our Founders had the great foresight not to trust elected representatives.
People in power who expect and demand that those not in power trust “Their” motives and actions and policies, rightly deserve the suspicions and resistance and non-compliance of the powerless.
If the powerless ever get control over the government, the very first action they need to enact is to take back ownership and control over “Their” money.
A New Monetary System with A New National Bank
A Nation’s Monetary System could be, and should be, this simple…..
A Nation’s money is owned by the citizens of the Nation.
The value of a Nation’s money is determined by the productivity (labor) of the Nation’s citizenry as expressed in the quantity and quality of the goods and services produced by the Nation’s citizenry.
Alexander Hamilton’s wise words should be fully grasped: “The intrinsic wealth of a nation is to be measured, not by the abundance of the precious metals contained in it, but by the quantity of the productions of its labor and industry.”
https://americansystemnow.com/nations-must-study-alexander-hamiltons-principles-of-political-economy/
A Nation’s Treasury Department adds money to a Nation’s economy through a National Bank.
A Nation’s Treasury Department subtracts money from a Nation’s economy through tax collection, i.e. Internal Revenue Service.
A National Bank manages the Nation’s money supply.
Loans increase a Nation’s money supply.
Loan repayment and taxes decrease a Nation’s money supply.
Loan interest rates control how quickly a Nation’s money supply will increase.
Tax rates control how quickly a Nation’s money supply will decrease.
A National Bank is owned by a Nation’s citizens and therefore the interest received from loans will never be siphoned off as profits to any private owner.
Only independent sovereign nations can establish a National Bank to manage the Nation’s money.
The National Bank is subordinate to the Nation’s Treasury Department.
The National Bank does not sell ownership rights to the Bank to citizens using stocks or bonds.
The National Bank is forbidden from buying and owning and trading assets, including stocks, bonds, and mortgages, both domestic and foreign.
The National Bank of an independent sovereign Nation does not need investors to buy National Bank stock and/or bonds in order for the National Bank to then loan that money to borrowers.
Only the National Bank is authorized to create money by making loans to citizens and businesses, to Federal Government Agencies, and to State and Local Government Agencies.
National Bank Branches will be located in each Postal District throughout the nation.
National Bank Branches will manage loans:
Issuing, setting interest rates, evaluating applicant’s loan needs and applicant’s capability to repay their loan’s interest and principal.
Loan Types:
Monthly Revolving Credit Card:
The higher the monthly credit card limit, the higher the interest rate.
Transportation Vehicle Loan:
The more expensive the vehicle, the higher the interest rate.
Home Mortgage Loan:
The more expensive the home, the higher the interest rate.
Personal Loan:
The higher the loan amount, the higher the interest rate.
Business Loan for Business Expenses:
The higher the loan amount, the higher the interest rate.
New Business Start-Up Loan:
The higher the loan amount, the higher the interest rate. A maximum loan amount will be determined based upon risk of success or failure of the New Business. New Businesses can seek loans from non-Bank investment lenders.
Federal Government Agencies:
The National Bank will issue loans to Federal Government Agencies that will be repaid from Federal property and sales taxes, and tariffs.
State and Local Governments Agencies:
The National Bank will issue loans to State and Local Government Agencies that will be repaid from State and Local property and sales taxes.
Loans and taxes can only be paid in Bank money.
There shall be no Federal, State, and Local income taxes (personal and business). There shall only be Federal, State, and Local property and sales taxes.
Only the Federal Government can levy tariffs.
Loan interest rates and tax rates are modified to control the money supply, and thereby inflation.
Government agencies contract goods and services from citizens and businesses and other government agencies.
Federal, State and Local Government agencies submit budget requests to their governing elected representatives. Budget requests will either be approved, denied, or modified by the governing elected representatives. Approved budget requests are recorded in a national database that National Bank managers can search to confirm loan applications from Federal, State and Local Government agencies.
Welfare is a no-interest non-repayable loan (gift) to citizens based upon their poverty.
Welfare recipients have to agree to a contract with the National Bank requiring the welfare recipient to change their detrimental and self-destructive lifestyle behaviors and habits, fulfill training goals, and fulfill minimum employment requirements.
Only independent sovereign nations can control their own money supply by creating money out of “thin air” and then loaning their money to borrowers. Individual citizens can control their personal money supply (wealth) by loaning (investing) their personal accumulated money supply (wealth) to borrowers, domestic and foreign.
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2?r=1kb28q&utm_medium=ios
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis announced comprehensive legislation to protect Floridians from the Biden administration’s weaponization of the financial sector through a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
The legislative proposal protects consumers and businesses from a federally controlled CBDC by:
Expressly prohibiting the use of a federally adopted Central Bank Digital Currency as money within Florida’s Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
Instituting protections against a central global currency by prohibiting any CBDC issued by a foreign reserve or foreign sanctioned central bank.
Calling on likeminded states to join Florida in adopting similar prohibitions within their respective Commercial Codes to fight back against this concept nationwide.
“The Biden administration’s efforts to inject a Centralized Bank Digital Currency is about surveillance and control,” said Governor Ron DeSantis.” Today’s announcement will protect Florida consumers and businesses from the reckless adoption of a ‘centralized digital dollar’ which will stifle innovation and promote government-sanctioned surveillance. Florida will not side with economic central planners; we will not adopt policies that threaten personal economic freedom and security.”
https://www.flgov.com/2023/03/20/governor-ron-desantis-announces-legislation-to-protect-floridians-from-a-federally-controlled-central-bank-digital-currency-and-surveillance-state/
Fantastic Iain.
The UN and those that created it could not be trusted. Governments who have "partnered" with the UN and the WEF are the same ilk. So, their partners in crime the WEF can only be the lowest scum of the scum IMO.
Russian and China are willing players sharing the deck. As untrustworthy as the rest of the scum.
"Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed." Only, Organized Crime will burn down your "freed" house. It requires something more like communities without a diversity, equity or inclusiveness willing to defend itself.
Polycrisis is merely what the military calls Full Spectrum Dominance.
What, the organised crime gangs that currently run rampant in every country on Earth you mean? How about the organised criminal gangs of financial fraudsters that are called bankers? Of course to "burn down" and entire country you need the biggest criminal gang of them all, namely government. And why, if we lived in a voluntary society, wouldn't you be willing to pay for a security service to protect your community if necessary? You pay for it now and get virtually no protection at all in return.
I agree completely, Iain. Productive people would be willing to pay for what they want, including protection. Those not willing to pay are parasites and desire collectivism which is why it has failed repeatedly and requires force. The system set up in the US which I am only experienced in has been devised to remove the payers from the service directly which is provided by the controllers through their intermediaries. (The school system and its boards are a great example of this.) That is why you do not get what you pay for with the added benefit that you are impoverished and become unable to pay additionally for what you want.
I do not believe that "they" wish to burn down the country but, rather, to have it all and have less of us by whatever means that takes.
I forgot to point out in your discussion of Jewish oligarchs that what should be addressed is the actions and beliefs of the people involved, whether Jewish, other faiths, atheists or aliens and not a name or, as someone was said to say, hate the sin and not the sinner. After all, there are conversos and assumed identities. In fact, the great majority of people today are lifetime actors.
My previous comment seems to have disappeared...
Appreciate the good work you've been doing Iain since I found you during Covid1984. Purchased a hard copy of your book, though I haven't finished it yet. Your work is more factual and devoid of the speculative and sensationalist hyperbole and overt religious framing I see from too many in this sphere. That does put me off certain folks. That and them be willingly subservient to Institutions of Authority (The State/Religion/Government/Governance, Monarchy etc).
Do not comply. "Democracy" has always been a cog in the mechanism of the tyranny that is Governance. All governance is tyrannical.
Democracy only means one thing. Governance by trial by jury. That is true demokratia, where legislation is genuinely subservient to the decisions made by the people, whose only criteria for making any judgement is justice. What we call "democracy" is not democracy.
https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/
Yes, the right to jury trial is vital. Juries are accountable to nobody. They simply return a verdict of guilty or not guilty without explanation. This is not always benign, but ‘perverse verdicts’ can provide an important safety valve against perceived injustice or an over-reaching government.
Trial by Jury and Legislation all come under Governance...
Subservience to decisions made by people is also known as mob justice/rule. Groups routinely decide it is Just to remove the rights of the individual for "the greater good". That's not pro liberty, nor voluntary.
Probably the vast majority of Laws are unjust, if not tyrannical, many Trials are illegitimate or corrupt and the same applies to a Jury.
Agree to disagree regarding "Democracy". The definition you've focused on is one thing, the reality is another.
This is an excellent article. Thank you. Some of us are looking at all solutions and attempting to improve them. We would appreciate help. It is free of economic cost. Please take a look and consider inviting others who might want to participate as equals in this process of discovery. Thanks again.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/about
Thanks for drawing my attention to your project Larry.
May I suggest a voluntary model based upon the true democracy which means "governance by trial by jury." This is what "demokratia" (people power) originally meant.
https://iaindavis.com/long-live-democracy/
This jury power to "annul" any and all legislation is enshrined in the British Constitution which is the one and only, original Magna Carta: -
https://iaindavis.com/the-british-constitution-deception-part-2/
Government has usurped this power of jury annulment (demokratia) and true rule of the people through genuine sortition.
https://iaindavis.com/the-british-constitution-deception-part-1/
So, seeing as government will never allow the real rule of law (Natural Law) to abide, personally, I do not think we can ever ask "government" or expect it to ever deliver the only "law" that really matters - justice.
Consequently, it is up to us to construct a voluntary society based upon these principles. We have no choice but to do this in the face of government oppression. But we can do it, as alluded to in the article above, if we firstly understand what our inalienable rights actually mean:
https://iaindavis.com/inalienable-rights/
Armed with this knowledge, an understanding of demokratia, annulment and the true intention of our constitutions (the US constitution embodies many of the principles of Magna Carta, for example) we can then set about creating this better world. We can do this by consciously focusing upon the actions we take every day.
https://iaindavis.com/towards-freedom/
That's my suggested solution, for what it is worth.
Yes excellent , I I have been promoting the reviving of the RIGHT WE USED TO HAVE IN AMERICA of THE FULLY INFORMED JURY provision , whereby we the people had the RIGHT to give NOT GUILTY VERDICT based upon an unlawful process , undesirable or UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW or UNFAIRLY APP,LIED or ADJUDICATED or APPLIED LAW. In America this has been called the FIJA movement , Judges detest it , it strips their usurped power .
This is an excellent solution. I have studied this for a long time and, upon first glance at your comment, what you have shared is excellent. This all takes time, but I can think of no more important way to spend time. Thank you. I will link Solution Seekers to this comment trail so they can look at it here.
At Solution Seeking we attempt to consider the pros and cons of all solutions. In the process we have discovered something... The question of HOW to achieve the solution is as important as the solution itself. Specifically, we have framed this as: "HOW can we eliminate the enemy's ability to harm humanity and the planet?" There are two URLs where this HOW is investigated. We have gained insights and knowledge so far as we investigate the complexities and challenges of HOW. I suggest here that nothing Einstein ever did compares to the importance, urgency and challenges of this HOW we seek. Please offer your criticisms, corrections, interpretations, etc. of what I write here. Please consider taking a look at these two URLs and possibly adding your version(s) of HOW. Please consider participating in the discussion of HOW in the comments, which are the most important part of Substack Solution Seeking.
IE. First we must stop the ability of the enemy to harm humanity and the planet? After this is done, we can implement a better society? Our predatory and parasitic power hungry enemy does not intend to allow us to implement solutions like what you suggest voluntarily?
An Open Invitation For Readers To Use Their Visualization And Creative Writing Skills To Solve The World's Problems - The article and the pinned comment
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/an-open-invitation-for-readers-to
My Current Best Guess At The Best Way To Solve The World's Major Problems
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/my-current-best-guess-at-the-best
We also attempted to define our enemy. One of many suggestions is Warren Buffet's class and higher, along with the puppet minions it installs at most or all power institutions world wide. That definition was discussed in several of the earlier publications listed here. https://solutionseeking.substack.com/archive
Thanks again. This is not easy and it is not tidy. For others and me, it is still in the preliminary brainstorming session, and there are challenges to doing that online. It takes time and many are not ready, willing, and able to devote the time.
I like all this have promoted it all for years , yes takes time but SOME can be working on this while others are doing your more elusive and less openly talked about ideas
It might take the totality of many different kinds of actions, including those that are not appropriate for discussion on the internet the enemy controls and monitors. From the ultimate goals discussed here, the enemy knows that some of us have no place for it on this planet. We have work to do. Onward!!
Another URL for simple grass roots actions that may be enacted
https://globalwalkout.com/
Thank you. for providing this. It looks promising. It has been shared with Solution Seeking readers. Thanks again.
The image makes a very misleading statement; the shoal of minnows could easily envelope the shark, however, it can never consume it. Once inside the shoal the shark does what it always does and thrashes about wildly eating what it pleases, hollowing out those who thought they were safest, which is effectively what the 'vaxxines' are doing now.
Sharks are killed with a spear to the brain. We must destroy those destroying us, simply saying no is not enough; a humane rat trap does not eliminate the problem, even though it salves the conscience.
Brilliant analysis of how we imprison ourselves by taking the bait of comfort and convenience offered to us disingenously by the globalists. If one voluntarily accepts a life in prison, is one really a prisoner, or is one free, by dint of having chosen one's prison cell? The entire program the globalists wish to foist on humanity flushes out the essential question raised by Dostoevsky in The Brothers Karamozov's Grand Inquisitor chapter -- are humans capable of handling freedom, or do they need a "Savior" whether in the form of a Christ figure or the State to absolve them of the right and burden of exercising free choice? The pseudo-anemic has clarified the answer to this: some will be capable, some will be incapable. Some will submit to authority, and others will not. one will see through the lies and propaganda; others will not. Dostoevsky seems to be arguing (through Ivan) that submission is the best solution for humanity. Those who submit will be right for themselves at least. But for those who can handle the burdens of freedom, they will be wrong, and submission will be a disaster for them.
We freedom lovers may like to believe that civilization has evolved to the point that freedom is generally accepted as a virtue. How many of those who submit by supporting the prevailing regime are quick to fight against oppression of others, even as they accept being oppressed themselves?
The pseudopandemic has revealed that we as a society are not as evolved as we may have wanted to believe. Under the pressure of fear, way to many of us tend to revert back to a state of passive submissiveness. On the other hand, the freedom movement is very strong, and while the success of the outcome the globalists aspire to is still unsettles, it is clear that the globalists have quite a challenge in trying to stifle us. They are really trying to fight against themselves, insofar as the human spirit has the capacity for both freedom and submission, and neither one can be banished entirely from our souls.
Maybe that is why they are going to allow AI to make decisions. The computer says "No".
Authorship is the root of authority.
much of the current global situation can be traced to the use of genetics to set an elitely funded and guided 'backstory' as authority from which to set risk modelling into hyped media into movements demanding protections for artificial or contrived crisis.
The most fundamental level is that of ideas given acceptance by acting from them, and so teaching them. Ideas are extended to narratives that frame life in terms that set a closed system in which to be incentivised to choose seemingly different options that effect the same outcome.
I read that the Fabian society gave almost unbridled scope to its intelligentsia within the stricture of life as a closed sytem, of limited and depleting resources in which competition and war is then inherent or inevitable, hence the subversion of all else to the war by which another's loss is 'our' gain. A sort of musical chairs in which the jiggery of financial and other controls can set timings for 'stopping the music' such that the sacrifice is distributed or dumped on 'others'.
The weaponising of the mind, of language, culture, science, medicine all represents a technologising of human being to human tools. so the biotech runs the logical extension of a 'Luciferian' agenda - at war with (and despising of) life as a violation of unworthiness, limitation and loss relative to fantasy ideals that are invoked to impose upon life, or sacrifice life to - as a kind of cargo cult for a perfection that has no expression or support in life embodied.
Spiritual pride is elitist self-specialness set over against 'others' who are easily manipulated or tooled by their own sympathies, by framing grievance as basis and authority for power over others - for such is the signature of their 'manipulators'.
Regardless our part in the world , we have a part in the mind that runs under a blind eye.
Aligning in integrity of being - rather than moral guilting claiming power - is to uncover true authority - which lords it over none, nor need justify or apologise for being - that I am.
"It is time to think positively and act positively. A people armed with the will to want to get better, armed with the will to win, and armed with knowledge of the past and present, can move forward and take action, succeed, and reclaim their dignity". Bill Cosby. Actions speak louder than words but I guess words help as they may lead to actions when you mull it over.
Hello BINRA
AUTHORSHIP IS THE ROOT OF AUTHORITY.
Excellent point.
Too short for me to know just what you mean.
I know that planning in Plato, founded the religious and political systems of western society long ago. Thus western society is based on deception, through narrative/authorship to this day. So, control of all forms of media, traditions, laws gives control through belief in those susceptible because of conditioning from childhood.
A vital foundation, from Plato to our time, is indoctrination from a very young age. They are susceptible to believe whatever they are taught because they are not yet sensibly rational. Those that are, can't easily be taken in by irrational nonsense. Thus rulers access to young minds is foundational.
Today control of national/state schooling, ensures irrationality conditioning, which makes a population susceptible to the many forms of 'authorship'.
MUCH OF THE CURRENT GLOBAL SITUATION CAN BE TRACED TO THE USE OF GENETICS TO SET AN ELITELY FUNDED AND GUIDED 'BACKSTORY' AS AUTHORITY FROM WHICH TO SET RISK MODELLING INTO HYPED MEDIA INTO MOVEMENTS DEMANDING PROTECTIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL OR CONTRIVED CRISIS.
I get all that except for it being traced to the use of genetics. Note: Everything you've written so far seems quite aware and likely true but readers will find it hard to see it unless they already know what you are talking about.
THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL IS THAT OF IDEAS GIVEN ACCEPTANCE BY ACTING FROM THEM, AND SO TEACHING THEM. IDEAS ARE EXTENDED TO NARRATIVES THAT FRAME LIFE IN TERMS THAT SET A CLOSED SYSTEM IN WHICH TO BE INCENTIVISED TO CHOOSE SEEMINGLY DIFFERENT OPTIONS THAT EFFECT THE SAME OUTCOME.
Again, very good.
The telling of a false story and acting as if it is real and of utmost importance is core to the deceptions of ages. From kings, rulers and churches enshrining in religious memorials of all kinds, especially those that the population takes part in. ACTING TO MAKE THE IDEAS IN THE STORY, SEEM REAL AND IMPORTANT. The Christmas death and resurrection, followed by the Easter Pentecost Christian rituals/holydays are an old example. Many elite saying they came down with Covid and seeming to take global warming seriously in legislation etc, are more recent ones.
I READ THAT THE FABIAN SOCIETY GAVE ALMOST UNBRIDLED SCOPE TO ITS INTELLIGENTSIA WITHIN THE STRICTURE OF LIFE AS A CLOSED SYTEM, OF LIMITED AND DEPLETING RESOURCES IN WHICH COMPETITION AND WAR IS THEN INHERENT OR INEVITABLE, HENCE THE SUBVERSION OF ALL ELSE TO THE WAR BY WHICH ANOTHER'S LOSS IS 'OUR' GAIN. A SORT OF MUSICAL CHAIRS IN WHICH THE JIGGERY OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER CONTROLS CAN SET TIMINGS FOR 'STOPPING THE MUSIC' SUCH THAT THE SACRIFICE IS DISTRIBUTED OR DUMPED ON 'OTHERS'.
Excellent. If you remember the Fabian source would you tell me.
This is an example of philosophical planning, like that in Plato and it is building using principles in Plato. A thing about such narrative building is once people BELIEVE the story, the objective reality to dispel it can't be seen by BELIEVERS. You can tell them it's a story but they see it as rock solid reality. And denial of it to them is: heresy, blasphemy, insanity, denialism etc.
THE WEAPONISING OF THE MIND, OF LANGUAGE, CULTURE, SCIENCE, MEDICINE ALL REPRESENTS A TECHNOLOGISING OF HUMAN BEING TO HUMAN TOOLS.
Yep, service to the Lord i.e. boss, master, owner has been a core goal and part of western society for a very long time. Automatons have been made since ancient times. The sacrifice of self for the common good has been a core indoctrination value for ages.
SO THE BIOTECH RUNS THE LOGICAL EXTENSION OF A 'LUCIFERIAN' AGENDA - AT WAR WITH (AND DESPISING OF) LIFE AS A VIOLATION OF UNWORTHINESS, LIMITATION AND LOSS RELATIVE TO FANTASY IDEALS THAT ARE INVOKED TO IMPOSE UPON LIFE, OR SACRIFICE LIFE TO - AS A KIND OF CARGO CULT FOR A PERFECTION THAT HAS NO EXPRESSION OR SUPPORT IN LIFE EMBODIED.
I'm losing you here
I probably know what your talking about in real terms though?
SPIRITUAL PRIDE IS ELITIST SELF-SPECIALNESS SET OVER AGAINST 'OTHERS' WHO ARE EASILY MANIPULATED OR TOOLED BY THEIR OWN SYMPATHIES, BY FRAMING GRIEVANCE AS BASIS AND AUTHORITY FOR POWER OVER OTHERS - FOR SUCH IS THE SIGNATURE OF THEIR 'MANIPULATORS'.
Seems like you're referring to some recent conditioning/indoctrination fed out through education systems in many places. The grievance studies hoax papers and their authors give some good insight into that. Joe R's discussion with them opens it out well.
THE FULL VID, JUST UNDER 2 HOURS, IS NO LONGER ON YOUTUBE. Search for "Joe Rogan Experience #1191 - Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay" to get it somewhere else. Found this link: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4H5SKpubfylmMroqgDnM0X (Don't forget to save the vid!)
REGARDLESS OUR PART IN THE WORLD , WE HAVE A PART IN THE MIND THAT RUNS UNDER A BLIND EYE.
I assume you're just saying we're all indoctrinated and have some blind spots. i.e. Those in an age/philosophical narrative are blind to it's influence upon them. Sometimes given as "we can't see the water we swim in."
ALIGNING IN INTEGRITY OF BEING - RATHER THAN MORAL GUILTING CLAIMING POWER - IS TO UNCOVER TRUE AUTHORITY - WHICH LORDS IT OVER NONE, NOR NEED JUSTIFY OR APOLOGISE FOR BEING - THAT I AM.
I'm not sure what you're saying here, or what it's in response to. It seems a personal statement of integrity to truth refuting current narrative claiming original sin type status and the need to live a life of continuous shame/repentance etc.?
I think I like a lot of what you write but I'm not sure because a lot of it is in general/abstract terms. Regarding the planning in Plato, here is a link to some info on it.
http://sensible-reason.org/plato-and-the-hebrew-bible-1/
Have a GREAT day Binra!
sincerely
david
I do not author myself.
Nor am I the result of template Ideals in a world that must forever fail them and by their light be considered unworthy.
The physical expression or embodiment of life has thus been associated with a fallen, demonised or gross aspect to be subdued, or ruled out and over from 'ideals' that interject between our nature and true living will - as a mind of control.
This may seem abstract unless we observe our ideas, most of which we act out from as if 'reality'.
Everyone learns to make a mask for personal survival in a world of a split mind. This begins before we have any conscious reflection or articulation, so again it runs beneath the self and world-view we learned, made and adapted to. In this sense we made a self. But it runs as a self-protective mind - to make you safe - relative to its original conditioning.
But we are as we are created - regardless what we make of ourselves, and so can question our masking defences or beliefs to uncover truth that we did not make. Ask and you shall be answered does apply, but the ego's questions are really statements of self-reinforcement in the form of a question.
The paragraph on use of Genetics is the current version of seeking domination (or control) via the setting up of a backstory that is then distorted to cut off from our natural authority of being. A specific thread can be traced from Edward calabrese's documentation of errors ommissions, bias and outright fraud regarding the philanthropic use of geneticists to set both a false model of genetic determination as a limited, weak and defenceless biological insecurity to threats of toxic exposure, starting with radiations, but expanding from there as the false principle of a linear no (dose) threshold model of risk in place of a hormetic effect.
To translate - the belief in a piggy bank of acquired 'damage' that is set by modelling as debits for disease and death with zero tolerance for dosage. This is hyped by Media to generate movements seeking protections such as to enable tyranny via regulatory capture with significant public support. Life or living biology is not only resilient and adaptive, but can thrive or gain from exposures to challenge or stressors. And even by its own revisions DNA is now known to self repair - though we can go deeper into what runs beneath the protein-code level.
As for understanding me - There are many levels. I would prompt a living resonance of curiosity that becomes the readers own journey of desire seeking fulfilment - but no one questions what they assume self-evidently real. So it would be natural for me to seem ununderstandable in many respectsto any who are still seeking to mentally understand from a sense of mind-control - rather than understanding in the heart - which is a relational integration rather than attempts to define lif in terms of predictive control.
My comments on Platonic Ideal relates to the 'Luciferian agenda'.
the symbol of Lucifer is of despising the embodiment of god in Man.
Elitism looks down on what it judges unworthy. Call it gaslighting but when masked as science and applied as technology we get humans managed as lab rats or tools to a controller caste.
Yes we have blind spots to be vigilant against - you could also call them back doors by which we are manipulated or deceived.
Integrity of being is nothing you can make or unmake, edit or distort. Moral guilting runs a mask of control, if you give this authority you will lose awareness or mask over your true nature. Be still and know - means release the invested attention of internal chatter or dissociated imaginative thinking to be no more nor less that wholly present. you cannot DO this - you can only LET what Is, be. The I Am, is therefore already an integrity of being - before a thought. Your being is not coercive over you. (But mind can split to controller and controlled).
Now I may not have become any clearer than before, but I felt to meet your responses or at least some of them. I feel you are picking up meanings that are of course resonant with and part of your own life.
Hi Binra
Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it.
The Calabrese info 'string' is a nice addition to other 'strings' that have the same characteristics of philosophical narrative subservient to Idea while paying no respect whatever to empirical reality. i.e. the base nature of these 'strings' and the running of western society, is philosophical.
Do you know how the Calibrese info 'string' ties into nuke bombs as false ideological narrative? Later,* I will give you a very brief skeletal outline for your consideration. You can flesh it out as you will?
Please note well: I consider a science based investigation into what is fundamentally a philosophical matter to be using inferior investigative tools to best see and understand it.
Society is created and managed according to philosophical principles and methods which generate false narrative as foundations for world view and thinking.
So, my information is not framed like Calibrese' detailed investigation. I start with my framing, my world view, (which I know to be fact/experience informed) that western society is based upon deceptions fabricated by rulers, that use philosophical planning knowledge and institutions. CALIBRESE GIVES MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF STICKING TO AN IDEA WHILE PAYING NO RESPECT TO REALITY. THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF A PHILOSOPHERS IDEA BASED HISTORY/SCIENCE. The Lewis example at about 2hr 17 mins, inferring likely connections here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCRiw6Lg0i8 typifies philosophical rule of the world through false narrative creation and propagation. BUT Calibrese doesn't know the dots he's 'connecting', show 101 philosophical basics for making and shaping western society, and that such has been going on for thousands of years.
I consider Calibrese to have more facts and knowledge in this area than probably anyone, but his overall understanding and expression of it is inferior to the philosophically aware that hear his facts, because he doesn't objectively know the ultimate foundations and nature of western society, is philosophical. Without a major prime base fact, fundamental understanding is incomplete. More complete and accurate fundamental facts/knowledge makes for a more objective framing and hence understanding of a matter.
* Some skeleton points, on the nuclear narrative 'string'.
POINT 1:
Crawford F Sams 'blows the whistle', that he was instructed via presidential order through a letter as part of the Manhattan Project to PLAY UP THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF 'THE BOMB' IN JAPAN. He says he followed the order and for 6 months all that died in effected areas were rerecord as dying from nuclear bomb effects. He basically states, that if someone was run over by a bicycle and died, he made sure cause of death was attributed to nuke effects. This may be valid historical evidence directly from one involved. Voice recording and transcript are still accessible online.
POINT 2:
It doesn't take much investigation to find out that there is a story of very tight media control by the military concerning Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and that John Hersey's 'triumph over military censorship', played up the effects of nukes/radiation like Crawford F Sams was ordered to fabricate. i.e. the idea of nukes having very serious radiation effects is consistent and that's what was fed out to the public as the 'Reality'.
POINT 3:
My reading of Hersey's 'book' sees it to be a work of fiction to elicit emotional attachment by western, and especially American readers and it 'plays up the effects of the Bomb' in what is basically a Horror/Action genre story to be seen and believed in as a part of objective reality.
POINT 4:
Additionally, the years of US/Alliance control of Japan after 'the bomb', made talking about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki illegal for years.
POINT 5:
And other aspects of the narrative. I'm being brief here, as a lot of detail takes a lot of time etc. And you might already know, not care or dismiss it out of hand.
MOST LIKELY CONCLUSION (In my view)
When I look at the above 4 points (and more), it is an artificially fabricated narrative, like a biblical story to build and establish beliefs in Ideas of vulnerability to nuclear threat and end of the world. It combines ideas like those in Sodom and Gomorrah's destruction by a God/'super power' raining it from above. And a new type of Armageddon or terrifying apocalypse – cataclysmic event, end of the world scenario. It's part of a gradual genre transition to nature/science and non-religious history i.e. natural real history as the backdrop, to the upgrade, of much in Plato's original plan.
Thanks again for your reply I really appreciate it but the abstract nature in much of it means I don't know what you mean in those parts. I have often written that sensible reality is my prime dictionary, encyclopedia and library though when using sensible reality as one's prime definer of meaning, those literary sources are, in a sense, no longer adequate as prime sources. Dictionaries don't really define anything. Words that don't elicit a specific sense of the reality one wants to communicate, are words that don't communicate.
Cheers
sincerely
david.
I simply see the ego in myself and thus in my world.
I use the term for a believed indeed beloved self image - given priority over relational integrity.
This does develop as the philosophical basis - except philosophy developed within a self-justifiction of rationalisations of a developed world view or over underlying mythic or symbolic representations of Separation, or Fall into fragmented limitation.
As for Calabrese - he speaks to scientific peers from a sense of integrity within its disciplines.
But what he reveals is part of how wealth leveraged control used 'new science' to gain the god position that is now running with a lot of support because it defines as weak, helpless and dangerous to a centrally collectivised control.
I am aware of that and other shaping of the mind and world by the post war banking cartel complex, and of course re-enacting mythic representation of species trauma. That's what drama is an does as an interplay of good and evil set into mythic projections around its central character and personae.
The ego of the world is a 'Script' through which to open explore experience & develop consciousness through a glass darkly - that is through a lens of conflicted limitation.
However there is another Script of undoing, correcting and redeeming to the distortions of the lie and the backstory of it. In this, a willingness to release invested lie opens a discernment of a truth that was discarded, blindsided, denied or masked over by lies - and is no less true than ever is. I see this as the healing back to our false foundation - where it no longer find cover of darkness in which to pass off as real, true, meaningful or useful.
My primary sense is intuitively guided. Including an awareness of the body-senses.
A world made or based on lies is used to frame 'truth' in terms of judgements - that is in terms of selections that exclude or reject.
There is seat of awareness prior to thinking and the projected meaning & reflection of perceived reality, but while the script is running there is no interfering with another's gift of experience. The belief that we can, have been and are being subjected against our will is the ego or the 'script' of a mind split so as to not know the word it gave, but take the reflected reality as both self-existing and threatening to a sense of self set in conflict with and within it.
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king’s horses and all the king’s men
Couldn’t put Humpty together again.
But the futile search, war or quest is the ego's hiding place.
thus we see a world of reversal.
Continuity of masking ego-mind or world is assumed to be a physical determinant, but without the 'Men in Black' the true nature of Humpty as the first false flag - would be evident and the willingness or capacity to hold the focus of this world would require a very heavy process of forgetting.
Lies believed substitute for truth.
Truth is not IN a world of lies, but bringing self-illusion to truth is to be undone to a truly shared source and nature.
and all the best to you!
Binra
Unfortunately the globalists will succeed because most people can't even see a problem, and of those who do virtually nobody is willing to make the sacrifices necessary to stop them.