As soon as social media posts were blamed for instigating alleged “far-right riots” in the UK, I immediately became suspicious. Leaving aside the many questions I have about the Southport murders that reportedly led to the unrest, the fact that the entire UK establishment and its legacy media was scrupulously “on message” compelled me to look into what happened and what we were being told about it.
Over the next two months I looked at the evidence and contrasted that with the official narrative. This culminated in me practically writing another book I hadn’t expected to write. A number of articles resulted, and this post brings that work together in one place for those of you who might be interested in seeing it as a whole.
I looked at the reasons why the unrest happened. The resultant article can be found on my website titled “The Real Reason for the Civil Unrest In The UK.” As my regular readers will know, I don’t claim to be right but I am personally satisfied that the explanations given for the unrest by “official sources” are a steaming pile of doggy doo-doo.
The central piece is the deep-dive published on Unlimited Hangout titled “Manufacturing the Far-Right: Who Is shaking The Jar?”
I examined how the modern far-right myth was manufactured. I also looked at the history and agent provocateur activities of the so-called charity Hope not hate (HNH). I considered where it sits within the global intelligence and propaganda operation it represents and the network’s broader objectives.
As I waded through HNH sludge, I was struck by its enthusiasm to promote—alongside the far-right threat it has fabricated—the claimed “Great Replacement conspiracy theory.” This led me to have a look at the ideas behind said theory, which I wrote about in the article “Sutherland, Kalergi, Camus, Replacism and Technocracy.”
This was very kindly republished by the OffGuardian where I received a right bashing from some OG readers who were most vexed by my article. Reading the comment section over at OffGuardian may be of interest, if you have the time and quite fancy seeing me taken down a peg or two.
I found one propagandist term that cropped up during the state’s “disinformation” onslaught particularly ridiculous: the suggested notion of the “armchair rioter.” This spawned four articles here on Substack
In “The Armchair Rioters - Part 1” I analysed the claim that purported “far-right influencers” had caused riots by spreading unverified rumours, predominantly on Musk’s ‘X’ platform. Those claims also turned out to be total rubbish in my opinion.
In Part 2 I looked at some of the subsequent convictions for various “communications offences” and realised these too were part of a broader “disinformation” front. The objective seemed to me to be to convince people to be fearful of what they say on social media while, simultaneously, the state has virtually no power to stop anyone saying whatever they like—providing it doesn’t constitute what we used to call “incitement.”
Part 3 was concerned with the legislative moves the state has made to try and rectify its relative powerlessness. I looked at the Online Safety Act (OSA) and discussed the form of information control and dictatorship it is designed to establish.
And, in the concluding Part 4, I looked at the frankly bizarre “test cases” the state has tentatively embarked upon to try to see if it can both use the OSA to censor whoever it wants while claiming it is “democratic.” Evidently it can’t. Well, not legitimately anyway.
I hope you will take the time to read these articles and essays if you haven’t already. This self-promotional post has been a bit weird to write—I hope you don’t mind—but I just wanted to provide a reference to, what is effectively, a single body of work.
Right, I’m cream-crackered and off out with the dog. He doesn’t want to go and I can tell he’s going to be hard work but he’ll cheer up when he sees a squirrel.
not far rightjust right just rightly pissedof people at many things cost of living and how many have lost others to the new neverused beforejabs, girl upstairs foe me. 4 heart atacks in 4 mths this year
The British Oligarchy have a long history of trying to control the content and dissemination of news and information beginning with telegraph technology and newspapers and radio and television, but they lost control of the narrative with the advent of the internet and social media.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH is THE existential threat to the Globalist Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy in the war between Nationalism Vs. Globalism.
A Long History of British Machinations to Control the Content and Dissemination of News and Information:
Before Google, everyone got their facts from the Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-secret-plot-in-1909-by-anglo.html
Leader Technologies Vs. Facebook
THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CONSPIRED TO STEAL LEADER TECHNOLOGIES' SOCIAL NETWORKING INVENTION AS A TOOL FOR ROGUE C.I.A. MIND CONTROL.
TRILLION DOLLAR RIP-OFF: SOCIAL NETWORKING IS A STOLEN TRADE SECRET.
One of the largest government sponsored industrial espionage thefts of copyrights, trade secrets, and patents in modern times was the theft of scalable social networking inventions. The technology and programming code that underlie Facebook, Gmail, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and most the other large-scale social networking companies runs on Leader Technologies' intellectual property.
It was stolen by a group of criminal lawyers, judges, spies and bankers working with complete impunity and in total disregard for the law. Under the guise of the IBM Eclipse Foundation, James P. Chandler III (who was a national security advisor and top White House attorney) led the group of criminals who, interestingly enough, are also appearing in the news currently due to their most recently discovered crimes, along with John Podesta, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, John Breyer, James Breyer, Larry Summers, Yuri Milner, Alisher Usmanov, Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and a host of others who are not so well known.
Usually, we see them stealing oil, gold, uranium and other resources, but this time they stole the very software code that is utilized by the largest tech companies in America, Europe, Russia, China, South America, and anywhere else they could market it—making trillions of dollars in the process.
They carved up the globe and the markets in each region, giving each criminal a piece of the market using Leader Technologies' stolen trade secrets.
Eric Schmidt took America and Europe, Chandler got South America, Summers and his side-kick, Sheryl Sandberg, joined Schmidt in taking America. Yuri Milner, Alisher Usmanov and Summers got Russia; the Breyers got China, and a host of fake tech-lords became the front-men for all of the various social networks we see cropping up everywhere—the richest companies in the world - Google, Facebook, Amazon. The criminals got filthy rich off the back of a hard-working, creative American entrepreneur—Michael McKibben.
What did Leader Technologies get? Seventeen years of lies, deceit, legal maneuvering, patent tricks, industrial espionage, betrayal, governmental manipulation, frauds on the courts, and a $10 million dollar legal bill—as well as seven lawsuits brought against Leader Technologies itself as an attempt to bankrupt them.
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/leader-technologies-vs-facebook?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web