The BBC's "Marianna in Conspiracyland" podcast series is presented by Marianna Spring, the BBC's specialist disinformation and social media correspondent.
It would make a good exam question, Rob! She's not a moron in the old sense of having learning difficulties. She is entirely a scum bag in the sense of being wicked, evil, cruel, causing the worst kind of harm in encouraging children to have an injection that will kill them and in many will maim them in a horrible way. In this I would say she is satanic. The moron meaning could be the kind where she twists the truth in a way that confuses the minds of the young and the impressionable. The things she says are moronic because they are palpably wrong. But she is saying them with the darkest of motives. I think she is intelligent enough to know she is telling heinous lies.
I think also the fame and public recognition matter to her. Being able to manipulate others matters to her. Telling lies comes easily to her. Getting a big salary is enticing to her.
It all began in 1909 with the Anglo-American Pilgrims Society’s “Imperialist Press Conference” that resulted in the creation of the Empire Press Union.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today
AIM Cats are definitely deeeeep divers and collect the receipts. The Crown are the villains, ably assisted by Jesuits Masons, Rhodes Scholars, Fabians, Common Purpose and a plethora of others....
Yes. It's good to remember that beginning of the Pilgrims' Society.
I always remind people to read "The Committee of 300" by Dr John Coleman. here's a quotation:
"In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled "new" society only it isn't new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: "THE OPEN CONSPIRACY-- PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION. [to quote from which:] 'A One World Government and one-unit monetary system under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.'"
Coleman, John. Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 (p. 186). UNKNOWN. Kindle Edition. "
If I didn't have 24 mouths to feed, seriously, I would be happy to pay for a subscription. I say that to let you know I appreciate your work as well as your willingness to make it available to all. Thanks!
Thanks, Iain, for your steadfast commitment to freedom there in the U.K. and trying to hold the would be authorities and their lap-police-dogs accountable.
You perhaps have already written about the below, but you might want to ask Ms Spring to check with her BBC about the news it seems they were forced to let leak out—a CONSPIRACY FACT. Perhaps ask her to “VERIFY” this as part of her “CONSPIRACYLAND”.
Stay free, then safe.
MATT HANCOCK: LEAKED MESSAGES SUGGEST PLAN TO FRIGHTEN PUBLIC March 5, 2023
Is there any difference if the news is brought to you by Pfizer, or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?
So what difference does it make if the news channel is corporately owned, or philanthropically financed by Gates or other techno/billionares if all the critical information is scripted by the national security state?🤔
I am not a paid subscriber and just wanted to explain why because there are probably a lot of people like me.
First off, I think Iain is a great researcher / writer and well worth a subscription fee. I bought his book Pseudopandemic with Bitcoin when it first came out and consider it a treasure. I believe that book will still be read, studied and discussed a 100 years from now as an invaluable historical record on the horrific global coronavirus scam of the early 2020s.
But I'm not currently a paid subscriber as I'm simply tapped out and not sure how I'm even going to manage covering my council tax bill this month.
But in many respects I'm wealthy. I own my home (no mortgage) and own an off-grid smallholding nearby where I'm currently digging wells and growing food. And I have big plans. But next to no money.
I'll have to devote more of my precious time to the filthy money-making economy soon enough, although it does feel like selling one's soul sometimes. And then I will happily be a subscriber to Iain's substack. So there's that.
It is a sad fact that writing comments as briefly as possible frequently causes misunderstandings.
If you imagine that I am not aware of the Black Nobility and all their servants (you listed a few of them) you clearly have never come across anything I have written before.
Thankfully Iain has. He knows my writing. He won't have misunderstood my comment quite as much as you have.
I have NO IDEA where you get this idea from: "At the moment you imagine that the Vatican and Jesuits were at logger heads"..... sorry? Where have I ever said that?
Then you continue to 'enlighten' me that my work is 'tarnished' in some way.
THEN you seem to claim that I am plagiarising your FB work!
I wrote the original of Who Rules The World ten years ago on FB. I have had to re-publish on other platforms, several times due to being banned.
I don't think you have read very much from me. Otherwise you would not be insulting me, even unwittingly.
I do feel slightly emotional when Marianna Spring is mentioned as the day after I came to her attention on Twitter, I was permanently suspended. My crime was mentioning free speech, so of course I deserve to be put in Twitter prison for life. Thanks Iain, for putting her and her like under the micro scope. Hopefully it will hasten the day when she has no power over anybody but herself.
Good to hear the episodes will become publicly available! I hope I'll get an email notice.
I do wonder what wisdom can be gained from the false binaries the name Verify implies. Their statements will be designed for both agreeing and disagreeing listeners.
Dear Iain, As always, a deep and heart-felt thank you.
I have trouble reading about this woman. I get too emotional.
As far as "Spring's personal complicity" and whether she has thought about "the appalling ramifications of what she is promoting", I doubt she will tell us truthfully. However, having taught many young Students at University, I have come across those who are so sure they are right, so set in their beliefs, which some claim come from parental influence, nothing budges them. These young people. show no respect for any of the Professors in the Uni who are daily researching the subjects they claim to own.
I would relate their attitude to a psychiatric condition rather than their ideas of Epistemology and certainly not to any ethical thinking. That is, they are not bothered about studying the content of their views, or any knowledge that supports them, or the consequences of them, but are far more assured of their own importance being greater than that of others and their right to hold opinions also being greater than that of others. It follows that they firmly believe they are right in whatever they believe. Their essays often end with a sentence such as "I say that this is right." I know you will know the name of this condition Iain.
I also believe that the BBC seek such people deliberately for the roles such as that which Ms Spring holds. It crosses my mind that she, like Matt Hancock, are puppets which are expendable and if the edifice falls - I should say when the edifice tumbles down - these are the people they will push under the bus.
In the introduction to Verify it is stated that they have just set up this unit.
Then the fake social media accounts they have set up were identified.
This would to a great extent make these fake accounts useless as the fact that they were fake wold soon circulate.
This suggests that they have already been used and all future reference will be to there past use.
This conflicts with the just set up verify claim. So when were they set up and for how long and how extensive.
I expect this will not be made clear , but I suspect they were used for a short time among a few people. But a much wider set of assumptions and speculations plus aspersions and conclusions will be drawn and presented as if they represent some sort of facts or scientific analysis.
I'm sure you're very close to the truth, regarding "one massive data harvesting and analysis system".
I'm quite sure Spring is a willing dupe, as well. If you're pulling down 70-84k/annum, that's quite an incentive to leave at home any critical thinking capabilities you might possess.
Who was it that said, it's hard to get a person to understand something when their salary depends on them not understanding it?
I can't tell if she's a moron or a scumbag....
Perhaps half and half 😂
Must be half and half to tick the diversity box.
It would make a good exam question, Rob! She's not a moron in the old sense of having learning difficulties. She is entirely a scum bag in the sense of being wicked, evil, cruel, causing the worst kind of harm in encouraging children to have an injection that will kill them and in many will maim them in a horrible way. In this I would say she is satanic. The moron meaning could be the kind where she twists the truth in a way that confuses the minds of the young and the impressionable. The things she says are moronic because they are palpably wrong. But she is saying them with the darkest of motives. I think she is intelligent enough to know she is telling heinous lies.
I think also the fame and public recognition matter to her. Being able to manipulate others matters to her. Telling lies comes easily to her. Getting a big salary is enticing to her.
It all began in 1909 with the Anglo-American Pilgrims Society’s “Imperialist Press Conference” that resulted in the creation of the Empire Press Union.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2022/07/lillian-scott-troy-1882-1964-unsung.html
https://aim4truth.org/2019/08/07/the-pilgrims-society-enemy-of-humanity/
AIM Cats are definitely deeeeep divers and collect the receipts. The Crown are the villains, ably assisted by Jesuits Masons, Rhodes Scholars, Fabians, Common Purpose and a plethora of others....
Yes. It's good to remember that beginning of the Pilgrims' Society.
I always remind people to read "The Committee of 300" by Dr John Coleman. here's a quotation:
"In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled "new" society only it isn't new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: "THE OPEN CONSPIRACY-- PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION. [to quote from which:] 'A One World Government and one-unit monetary system under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.'"
Coleman, John. Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 (p. 186). UNKNOWN. Kindle Edition. "
If I didn't have 24 mouths to feed, seriously, I would be happy to pay for a subscription. I say that to let you know I appreciate your work as well as your willingness to make it available to all. Thanks!
Thanks, Iain, for your steadfast commitment to freedom there in the U.K. and trying to hold the would be authorities and their lap-police-dogs accountable.
You perhaps have already written about the below, but you might want to ask Ms Spring to check with her BBC about the news it seems they were forced to let leak out—a CONSPIRACY FACT. Perhaps ask her to “VERIFY” this as part of her “CONSPIRACYLAND”.
Stay free, then safe.
MATT HANCOCK: LEAKED MESSAGES SUGGEST PLAN TO FRIGHTEN PUBLIC March 5, 2023
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-64848106
UK GOVT DISCUSSED USING ‘FEAR’ AND ‘GUILT’ TO MAKE PUBLIC FOLLOW COVID-19 RULES March 6, 2023
https://english.alarabiya.net/coronavirus/2023/03/06/UK-govt-discussed-using-fear-and-guilt-to-make-public-follow-COVID-19-rules
GOVERNMENT ‘USED GROSSLY UNETHICAL TACTICS TO SCARE PUBLIC INTO COVID COMPLIANCE’ Jan 28, 2022
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/01/28/grossly-unethical-downing-street-nudge-unit-accused-scaring/
Hey Iain, this is brilliant....
https://expose-news.com/2023/06/14/marianna-spring-boasted-about-investigating/
Yes it is. Very useful. Thank you very much.
Is there any difference if the news is brought to you by Pfizer, or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?
So what difference does it make if the news channel is corporately owned, or philanthropically financed by Gates or other techno/billionares if all the critical information is scripted by the national security state?🤔
I am not a paid subscriber and just wanted to explain why because there are probably a lot of people like me.
First off, I think Iain is a great researcher / writer and well worth a subscription fee. I bought his book Pseudopandemic with Bitcoin when it first came out and consider it a treasure. I believe that book will still be read, studied and discussed a 100 years from now as an invaluable historical record on the horrific global coronavirus scam of the early 2020s.
But I'm not currently a paid subscriber as I'm simply tapped out and not sure how I'm even going to manage covering my council tax bill this month.
But in many respects I'm wealthy. I own my home (no mortgage) and own an off-grid smallholding nearby where I'm currently digging wells and growing food. And I have big plans. But next to no money.
I'll have to devote more of my precious time to the filthy money-making economy soon enough, although it does feel like selling one's soul sometimes. And then I will happily be a subscriber to Iain's substack. So there's that.
Try not paying it and let us know how you got on.
Every second wasted listening to, discussing and countering the relentless BBC propaganda is useless in the fight for truth. We are being distracted.
The BBC keeps us angry and focused on their atrocious narratives and deceptions. It keeps us concerned about the millions who are being deceived.
Meanwhile, the Military Industrial Complex has teamed up with Big Tech and Big pHarma to deploy weapons of mass destruction that the BBC denies exist.
The video in this post is appropriate here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/i-do-not-have-a-tell-lie-vision
It is a sad fact that writing comments as briefly as possible frequently causes misunderstandings.
If you imagine that I am not aware of the Black Nobility and all their servants (you listed a few of them) you clearly have never come across anything I have written before.
Thankfully Iain has. He knows my writing. He won't have misunderstood my comment quite as much as you have.
Allow me to introduce myself:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/who-rules-the-world
Wow. You really DID misunderstand me, didn't you?
I have NO IDEA where you get this idea from: "At the moment you imagine that the Vatican and Jesuits were at logger heads"..... sorry? Where have I ever said that?
Then you continue to 'enlighten' me that my work is 'tarnished' in some way.
THEN you seem to claim that I am plagiarising your FB work!
I wrote the original of Who Rules The World ten years ago on FB. I have had to re-publish on other platforms, several times due to being banned.
I don't think you have read very much from me. Otherwise you would not be insulting me, even unwittingly.
🤣😂 who is triggered?????? 🤣😂
I do feel slightly emotional when Marianna Spring is mentioned as the day after I came to her attention on Twitter, I was permanently suspended. My crime was mentioning free speech, so of course I deserve to be put in Twitter prison for life. Thanks Iain, for putting her and her like under the micro scope. Hopefully it will hasten the day when she has no power over anybody but herself.
Good to hear the episodes will become publicly available! I hope I'll get an email notice.
I do wonder what wisdom can be gained from the false binaries the name Verify implies. Their statements will be designed for both agreeing and disagreeing listeners.
"Marianna earns somewhere in the region of £70K - £84K per annum as a BBC correspondent."
I do wish people would stop using the term "earns" in this way. Marianna IS PAID that amount per annum. The only thing she earns is my loathing.
Dear Iain, As always, a deep and heart-felt thank you.
I have trouble reading about this woman. I get too emotional.
As far as "Spring's personal complicity" and whether she has thought about "the appalling ramifications of what she is promoting", I doubt she will tell us truthfully. However, having taught many young Students at University, I have come across those who are so sure they are right, so set in their beliefs, which some claim come from parental influence, nothing budges them. These young people. show no respect for any of the Professors in the Uni who are daily researching the subjects they claim to own.
I would relate their attitude to a psychiatric condition rather than their ideas of Epistemology and certainly not to any ethical thinking. That is, they are not bothered about studying the content of their views, or any knowledge that supports them, or the consequences of them, but are far more assured of their own importance being greater than that of others and their right to hold opinions also being greater than that of others. It follows that they firmly believe they are right in whatever they believe. Their essays often end with a sentence such as "I say that this is right." I know you will know the name of this condition Iain.
I also believe that the BBC seek such people deliberately for the roles such as that which Ms Spring holds. It crosses my mind that she, like Matt Hancock, are puppets which are expendable and if the edifice falls - I should say when the edifice tumbles down - these are the people they will push under the bus.
In the introduction to Verify it is stated that they have just set up this unit.
Then the fake social media accounts they have set up were identified.
This would to a great extent make these fake accounts useless as the fact that they were fake wold soon circulate.
This suggests that they have already been used and all future reference will be to there past use.
This conflicts with the just set up verify claim. So when were they set up and for how long and how extensive.
I expect this will not be made clear , but I suspect they were used for a short time among a few people. But a much wider set of assumptions and speculations plus aspersions and conclusions will be drawn and presented as if they represent some sort of facts or scientific analysis.
Very interesting insights.
I'm sure you're very close to the truth, regarding "one massive data harvesting and analysis system".
I'm quite sure Spring is a willing dupe, as well. If you're pulling down 70-84k/annum, that's quite an incentive to leave at home any critical thinking capabilities you might possess.
Who was it that said, it's hard to get a person to understand something when their salary depends on them not understanding it?
Many thanks for supporting comments.
Many thanks
The writer of that article, Kit Klarenberg, was detained at a Brit airport in May this year, by counter terrorism police.
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2023/06/13/705182/Kit-Klarenberg-British-police