The Unacknowledged False Flag Substack series explores the evidence that indicates reported terrorist attacks were actually false flags orchestrated by elements within governments or those aligned to state interests.
This a Substack comment thread freely open to all. It is intended to provide a space for productive dialogue.
Everyone is free to comment. Please be civil and courteous to each other. Have a laugh, use irony, whit, sarcasm, whatever you like. Argue your point, show your evidence. But please do not be personal, abusive, or accusatory just because someone disagrees with or questions you.
Personal abuse will result in one warning. If abuse persists, after the warning, the abusive account will be blocked and permanently barred from commenting on my Substack posts.
Please, only reply to this message if you wish to alert me to abusive behaviour.
To an otherwise excellent introduction I have two issues.
1/ You wrote: "The ease with which some of us applaud indiscriminate slaughter is not a religious or cultural problem, it is a human problem."
You are utterly psychologically wrong here. And it's something which really gets my goat. Partly because it's always the people who make these blatant generalisations about 'human nature having a dark side' who would say 'oh but I don't mean myself, obviously'. It's always 'others'.
The truth is that it IS a 'religious or cultural' problem - specifically, it's a CULT problem. We do humanity a massive disservice if we allow these ideologies to be given the get out clause of 'religion'.
Furthermore, it's almost bordering on the awful Pinker-esque calumny that humans were murderous barbarians in their natural form before 'civilisation' (law and order etc.) came along. As an sort-of anarchist, Iain, I would've thought you'd find that view insulting. Law and order hasn't been used, historically, to 'contain human nature's natural tendency to barbarism', but quite the opposite - it has been used for social control, and to ironically provide an excuse for barbarism practiced by the minority ruling classes (who call themselves a State).
If you want to understand what might make otherwise normal human beings support evil things, then you MUST understand it in terms of the subversive effect of CULT-like ideologies. Human nature, in its natural setting, is beautiful, peaceful, harmonious, cooperative and so on.
Martin Luther said, Man is sinner and saint! We should always admit to our faults or sins with change OR repentance and that keeps the piety and virtuous at bay. When man is not accountable or feels no remorse, humanity leaves, evil moves in. IMHO
"Human nature, in its natural setting, is beautiful, peaceful, harmonious, cooperative and so on."
I seriously doubt this.
Even if one discounts the Cain and Abel story as fable, there are two kinds of people.
Moral responsible people, who respect the rights of others, and immoral and irresponsible people who do not.
The latter group may justify their actions via "cult-like religious or cultural ideologies."
However, if all "cult-like religions and cultural ideologies" could be eliminated, there will still be individuals and groups who will violate the rights of others.
This IS HUMAN NATURE!
Not human nature as it could be perhaps, but human nature as it is.
Sweeping generalisations are not sustainable historically or otherwise.
I assume the detailed analysis of vehicular damage at the Nova Festival will be covered in part 2, so I am refraining from comment, but if it isn't, may I respectfully suggest that you include some analysis of this as it might go a long way to support your claim of the Hannibal protocol being invoked.
Unfortunately I don't really have time to give you a full lecture on neuroscience, evolution, psychology, human brain development, or the anthropological history of the human species stretching back 300k years. It would take too long and besides, this comment section is the absolute wrong place for it.
I'm not the one making sweeping generalisations here - seems more likely that you are. But if human nature was inherently violent and confrontational then the species would've gone extinct some time in the last 300k years, or at least it would never have made it to sentience in the first place. Also, we would be living in a permanent almost rage zombie-esque chaotic world, in which everyone was focussed only on sheer survival, and there would be no time whatsoever for culture, or poetry or love or music or compassion.
History alone proves beyond reasonable doubt that human beings are not inherently violent or racist or aggressive. Otherwise there would be a load of archaeological evidence attesting to conflict stretching back for those 300k years. Also, the need for ever more powerful war machines would've driven technological advancement much, much earlier than the recent holocene...
Humans' natures are diverse, aren't they? My sense is that most are prosocial and compassionate, but many are sociopathic—antisocial, callous if not sadistic, and/or megalomaniacal. A majority of humans are susceptible to delusion by the sociopathic minority, a minority within which are masters of deception, dissimulation, and sophistry and have surreptitiously seized the bulk of power in the world, taking advantage of the majority's too trusting, too credulous nature. Humans' natures are, like everything else, only discernible by observation. The are empirical phenomena. Reality's necessary particularity is ultimately inexplicable, necessarily. Isn't it? Generalisations are ALWAYS open to disconfirmation.
I very much agree. And we can only understand history by acknowledging this. You might like my social psychology & the cabal series, part 1 of which is linked below in my comment at the end of this thread.
The species hasn't gone extinct only for the fact that Christianity came into being and for over 2000 years, its believer's have civilized barbarians, brought people out of the darkness of doing that which is evil, and spread a message of redemption, forgiveness, and love unknown in all of human history before it existed.
I was very tempted to make the exact same point. But then I thought, no, it might provoke a tirade and I don't have time for that. Then we could list all the horrors perpetrated by monotheism, except we'd be here till doomsday.
We live in the paradigm of the inverted Pentagram or the Cult paradigm. The pentagram Righted is not Cult. It is pledging allegiance to Truth and Right Action. While most people think they are moral human beings they have been unwittingly mind controlled into a diluted Satanic way of being in the world. The 4 tenets of Satanism. 1 Ego is God( Do not love your neighbour as yourself) 2 Moral relativism ( Man gets to choose Right and Wrong. There is no such thing as Natural Law)3. Social Darwinism ( extruding the Law of the jungle into Human behaviour) 4. Eugenics .
The Fall from Eden has been likened to Moral relativism ( belief in man’s law). Natural Law does exist. It is taught in Freemasonry. There is a Left Hand Path in Freemasonry . The path of Manifestation ( which is Truth and since we co create reality we can be activated in Natural Law through care and focus on manifestation and by giving an alignment of Truth. Manifestation is a becoming and Satanism uses group focus and care. They don’t have a wholistic care for humanity as a whole. They call them ‘the dead’. The Centre Path in Freemasonry is the Path of Moral Manifestation. Satanism ( which is an ancient Occult religion) have Dark Care amongst themselves which is better than No care. The Centre Path beats the Left Hand Path. If only Humanity knew. It is the Righted Pentagram.
Ah it bugs me when people call Satanism ancient. It isn’t. It’s of the last century and it’s usually mostly losers who follow it. I don’t think there are many in power who would say they were actual Satanists. I think they worship older gods, pre-Christian.
I agree with the goodness of the righted pentagram. It’s means mind and spirit (Akasha) over body.
"Law and order hasn't been used, historically, to 'contain human nature's natural tendency to barbarism', but quite the opposite - it has been used for social control, and to ironically provide an excuse for barbarism practiced by the minority ruling classes (who call themselves a State)."
WOOWH!
This sweeping generalisation is not sustainable in my opinion.
Most regimes use law and order, to protect all from the violation of their basic human rights by some.
This is a benevolent form of social control, not evil.
Without this, the law of the jungle reigns supreme!
Not all regimes are oppressive states, set up by barbaric rulers to rob the people of their human rights.
Most regimes, even if corrupt to some degree, provide basic protections.
Few regimes are totally corrupt and violate human rights without any accountability.
There may be a barbaric minority ruling class.
There are also inevitably barbaric minority groups, who will violate the rights of others if not prevented by force of law.
‘The law of the jungle.’ Eh? If you seriously think we need lawyers and politicians to protect us you are thinking like a Baboon. Or at best a mainstream normie.
‘Basic human rights’ as you put it are inalienable, god given, not for politicians and their lawyers to play with.
I was explaining the tenets of Satanism. I agree with you. We vote ( I don’t vote) and we give our personal sovereignty away when we vote. I think we are on the same page. Thank you.
Thanks for the feedback. Sometimes I fall short of my Correspondence gaols by trying to condense an essay into a couple of paragraphs. There are essays that can be. Natural Law has a nexus to the Holy Spirit in Christianity, but it is derived from the 7 Ancient Hermetic Principles of Consciousness. Control Consciousness and you will control humanity. Satanist do not like that Natural Law exists and their MO is basically to Acknowledge God through Truth because we co create reality. God is Truth. God is also Love which is reflected in the 3rd and 4th Hermetic Principles.The Law of Vibration and the Law of Polarity. We have a Vibrational Polarity of Love and Fear. Satanists keep us in the Fear vibration and they think of Natural Law as a prison. They think of God as a prison.
Our basic human rights are inalienable and inherent, not given and hence able to be taken away, by governments, organisations, lawyers, military or police.
How are we going to protect our human rights without some form of effective "law and order" though?
In my opinion, expecting everyone to play together happily in some utopian heaven on earth is completely unrealistic.
Life experience, contemporary reality and history negate this possibility.
Only because we are trying to live in a system which is already utterly corrupt and corrupting that works against our better nature. For instance all money is based on debt and is issued by Central Banks. Jesus threw the money lenders out of the temple. In contemporary society we now hold the money lenders in high esteem. ‘Governments, organisations, lawyers, military or police’ keep that system in place to protect the hierarchy. We don’t need them.
It's precisely BECAUSE normal people are good that they don't do that. The problem is they are TOO good to 'do what must be done' - and that is precisely how this minority group (cabal) maintain their social control.
I always suspected this was a false flag event/LIHOP and your explanation of what happened confirms that for me. It can be very difficult to get to the truth unless the time is spent to do a deep dive into it as you have done. I look forward to reading the next one. Thank you Iain.
2/ you wrote: "The Hamas attack was a despicable act of horrific violence. Nothing justifies it and I do not defend, sympathise nor identify with Hamas or its Islamist extremist partners."
Why? That's like saying you condemn Boudicca, or Robin Hood, or the French resistance, or any other resistance in history. That siding with the bad guys' propaganda. Are you supporting the fucking Romans now, after they raped and tortured? I hope not. There is a very long list of these resistances against evil.
Furthermore, you're ignoring international law, which states that there are no 'innocents' in an illegal occupying force. Doesn't matter if it's a six day old baby - the responsibility is on the occupying forces not to use them as human shields. They are all classed as legitimate military targets. Therefore, Hamas is justified according to international law. Not to mention natural law. In fact, there can be no 'crimes' committed by a resistance force in this context. This is vitally important to remember and cannot be overstated. I despise every one who prefaces their interview or statement with 'do you condemn Hamas' (Piers Morgan for example).
This is of course leaving aside the obvious LIHOP. It doesn't matter what did or didn't happen. I'm really talking about the principle here. I will absolutely always refuse to condemn any justified resistance force. Especially one that is fighting against possibly the most evil cult regime ever to have existed on this planet.
We must always remember who the bad guys are. Especially in this case. It is entirely one-sided.
Yeah, we'll have to disagree on that one. I don't see how killing civilians in their homes or machine gunning them at dance parties serves any cause at all, ever. Sure, strike military targets or occupying forces but this attack wasn't just that and I am fed up with people defending Hamas' right to act while ignoring just how barbaric those acts sometimes are. Not least of all for the fact that Hamas is a creation of the Israeli state. I do not think Hamas killed anywhere near as many people as alleged, nor do I think all Hamas fighters are homicidal loonies, but some of them evidently are and they certainly murdered a lot. So I don't think the "principle" you write of holds up here. As for the French resistance, they had a lot to answer for as well.
Hmm. I do see your point, for sure. But part of my point is that in terms of international law there are no 'innocent civilians' in an occupied territory. That's important to remember.
On the other paw I do certainly take your point about nasty people getting involved. That seems to always happen because any kind of conflict will attract all the psychopaths (in the same way that professions involving children will attract pedos). Also true for some elements within the French resistance of course.
Obviously we should also take any Israeli anecdotes about atrocities with the scepticism they deserve. I don't know if you'll be addressing the point in more detail but I have read here and there how most of the deaths were in fact caused by the IOF, not by Hamas. You do acknowledge that bit though of course. Maybe we'll never know the exact number or details.
One thing is for sure, though, which is that Hamas gave Israel the golden opportunity it had been wanting for decades to do what it has been doing since. Whether that was collusion or the LIHOP is perhaps the crucial question for the analysis of it being a false flag, as you are doing. Might even be a bit of both of course.
Then again, given the fact the so-called international community wasn't ever going to stop Israel, the only option left for the Palestinians is what happened on 7 October. If you put 2.3 million people in a concentration/death camp, with no possibility of ever getting out alive, then don't be surprised if they exhibit a fight or flight response...
I thought about this international law stating that the oppressed have the right to armed resistance, over and over again. And I couldn't help but wonder if there may have been some type of hidden agenda behind it. Did this law solve anything? Did it actually support the oppressed or did it open pandora's box for never ending conflict. I discuss my thoughts here.
DON'T ARM THE RESISTANCE, STOP THE COLONIZERS!!!!!!
People keep saying that the Palestinians have the right to armed struggle, but wouldn't that open the box for the continuation of the tag-line "terrorism"? The colonizers who are being resisted could quickly imply and/or openly state that the “resistance” groups are terrorists, as we have seen thus far. And then wouldn't the armed struggle of ‘resistance” groups apply to every colonized country? So when they put that into International Law, didn't they know it would mean continuous war? Instead, shouldn’t they have placed into International law, that “nobody should be colonizing anyone, anywhere”? How disingenuous and counterintuitive to make a law supporting armed struggle knowing full well, it would not bring peace but more chaos.
That's an exceptionally good point actually. By acknowledging 'armed resistance' they are implying a kind of acceptance of colonialism and aggression.
By not labelling colonialism and aggression itself acts of terrorism, they allow the the coloniser to call the resistance terrorists, when it should be the other way round.
Then again, international law is supposed to recognise acts of aggression as 'illegal'. Hence their (false/double standards) application of that to Russia's SMO - which, ironically, was in fact a legitimate act of resistance in the form of 'collective self-defence'.
So the real problem is that international law is an ass, and is applied arbitrarily by those with the mightiest armies. Namely the American/Zionist Empire (plus all the other blackmail threats they use).
I guess this sort of goes without saying. But you are spot on here, for sure. Great comment.
Thank you for your response to my comment, Evelyn. It struck me as I kept hearing folks saying that the Palestinians had the right to armed resistance. It felt like a set-up. Instead focusing on preventing the colonizers from colonizing, they gave the colonized the right to armed resistance. I looked up the law and it even states in
"Right of peoples to self-determination/Struggle by all available means – GA resolution Reaffirming its faith in the importance of the implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples contained in its resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960,
2. Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;"
It just seemed to me that this would keep the wars going. Then if you add the fact that the colonizers typically arm both sides, it appears to be a recipe for disaster. Then you throw in the "supporters" on both sides and it becomes a quagmire.
You said: So the real problem is that international law is an ass, and is applied arbitrarily by those with the mightiest armies. Namely the American/Zionist Empire (plus all the other blackmail threats they use).
To me, frankly that is the crux of the matter. And it explains why nothing really can be changed because the actual institution itself is fatally flawed.
Someone said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, will leave the world blind and toothless."
I know that folks want to get "revenge" for aggressions made against them.. but using this law, without holding to account the initiators of the aggression doesn't seem to work. Yes, they will state that "apartheid is illegal" and granted that's in the codes of International Law, but seldom is that the focus. Is it any wonder that they "don't focus on it. As I've stated in some of my other posts, they cannot bring Israel to heel until they themselves acknowledge their own role as colonizers, make atonement for their crimes against humanity and then make reparations. Fat chance that will ever happen. So Israel's impunity continues to be ignored at best and supported at worst.
While I agree that Hamas are resistance or freedom fighters, I certainly do NOT agree that a baby isn’t an innocent if its part of the occupying population. I don’t care if that’s international law, that’s ridiculous. Not saying there won’t be unfortunate accidental collateral damage from time to time, but I think babies in particular should be avoided as a kill target by everyone - even freedom fighters!
I don’t think we would have felt so sympathetic towards Robin Hood if he murdered noble babies in their sleep, in addition to stealing their parents money. There needs to be some standards. Can’t stoop to the lows of your enemy in everything.
Yes, I think you've sort of captured the nuance I should've added myself. I wouldn't necessarily advocate deliberate targeting of let's call them 'non-threatening' members of an occupying force (partly out of military strategy, partly because it plays into the enemy's propaganda hands). And of course I detest the term 'collateral damage', as if a human being is just an object (part of the dehumanisation process). But any focus on 'the resistance' as 'possibly immoral' is a misdirection from what should be the continuous focus, which is the unacceptability of an occupation. It's that thing where the occupying forces, following an attack, try to gain people's sympathy, by essentially starting each sentence with 'secondly...'. We should always start with 'first there was an occupation...' So we are always mindful of who the bad guys are.
And yes it does say a lot about international law. Of course international law isn't worth shit anymore anyway.
I for one do not condemn Hamas, but by the same token neither do I condemn Israel. Hamas in their arrogance, decided to wage TOTAL WAR against a better armed and dispassionately ruthless enemy as exemplified by the Hannibal Directive. Having done that, they are in no position to whine and cry about the "genocidal" Israelis who have responded to Hamas' De Facto declaration of total war in like fashion. The delusional arrogance of Hamas is the same as that of the Japanese high command who fondly imagined that they could go to war with a country with twice as many people and 5 times the gdp and 60% of the world's oil production. By doing so Hamas condemned its people to the same fate as Japan. Fortunately for the Gazans their traitorous leadership and much admired Hamas fighters are trapped like rats in their expensive tunnels and will be ruthlessly rooted out by a vengeful IDF within the next few months, so they won't have to suffer the kind of genocidal fire bombing that the USAAF unleashed on millions of Japanese civilians.
I wonder if you have seen this Iain? This is analysis by a CGI expert who is saying advanced AI video generating technology was used - we would have to assume by the Israeli deep state to produce propaganda footage which was broadcast on major media channels to show and claim events which were faked. His analysis is quite impressive in my view. I saw this quite a while ago and immediately thought ‘false flag’ and I guess both sides are probably creating their own propaganda in dirty conflicts like this which makes it almost impossible to know what really went on. Thanks for tackling and shedding some light on this difficult topic. I must say that I feel that most people are never going to know the truth about what occurred.
Yep I've seen it. Not sure I am overly convinced and I don't think it is necessary to reference it to demonstrate that, in all likelihood, it was a LIHOP operation. I hope you find the next post, maybe two, interesting.
Great article Iain, I'll be reading the series with interest. With regard to Matt Guertin's videos - he isn't the best at explaining the anomalies and it's a bit of a chore getting to grips with what he's trying to show us, but it's worth persevering because if he's right the implications are enormous. I intend to make some time (and it be quite a commitment time-wise) learning more about AI film fakery and how it might be used to fool us in this way.
Here's the link to Matt's Substack - this is the one that made the most sense to me. I don't know enough about AI generated video to say one way or the other about it, but it's worth watching... https://matt1up.substack.com/p/synthetic-ai-news-visual-glitches
Q. Because the crater extended into the seat area, didn’t it, between 30 and 27? [NB, this area between 30 and 27 is where they are trying to put ‘Khan’]
A. There was two craters, wasn’t there?
Q. We’ve heard some evidence there were two holes.
A. Yes.
Q. There was a huge crater caused by the bomb.
A. Yes, and another one further up.
Q. Possibly, and was that towards the rear, that’s to say carriage 3, so between —
A. Yes.
Q. — seats 7 and 23?
A. Yes, between 26 and 23, yes.
Q. Right. Might that have been a manhole cover that had come up from the floor of the carriage?
A. It could have been, but it was — no, because the seats were missing, so it was definitely not a manhole cover
"I acknowledge the reported estimate of 1,195 Hamas attack fatalities, around 800 of whom were civilians, including infants and children." Even in the Israel press there is dispute about the number killed and the number that were civilians. There are regular reports of many civilians being killed in Palestine But Israel naturally disputes these numbers.
But I contrast the number of good documentaries that were made about 7/7 and the lack of good documentaries made about the 7th of October and other recent false flags.
In 2005 you could post such material on YouTube and search and discover it on google.
Now unless you now certain web sites you can not find the material . I do not know of any documentaries that have been made about October the 7th and any in-depth investigation that compares to the 7/7 investigations. They may exist but I am unlikely to find them. That is not to say it has been ignored Corbett Report and others have covered it. The state are good at keeping information secret and banning free speech with hate laws and prescribed terrorist laws.
I'd avoid ripple effect and Tom Secker if I were you - these two are cognitive infiltrators. The best person to consult on the 7/7 event is Keelan Balderson, aka eyes wide shut.
You may be interested in this video which proves CONCLUSIVELY that the order to execute the Hannibal Directive WAS indeed given...and then executed by attack drone operators of the Israeli Air Force.
This was aired on Israel's public broadcaster Kan and I added English subtitles to it (manually, not through AI. I am a native Hebrew speaker).
Secondly, there's claims that Hamas provided training, fighters, and weapons to Syrian rebel groups. Other reports suggest Hamas operatives assisted Sunni jihadists in Qusayr and fought against the Syrian regime at the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp.
My gut feeling is that some groups within the IDF and CIA knew the 10/7 attack was imminent. There's probably more nefarious twists and turns regarding this grisly event.
Nonetheless, 10/7 gave the justification for the Palestinian genocide and the demolition of Gaza. It's another example, of how the Empire ties up loose ends.
It should also be stressed that populations are always cavalierly used and discarded as victims are created with every new imperialist bloodbath. Victims of sadistic wars are trained by the Empire to brutalize new targets as the slaughter must perpetuate to solidify fascist hegemony.
Enough Americans and Israelis know or suspect, that their governments were involved in 9/11 and 10/7, to act decisively and demand accountability but they do not.
Why?
Cognitive dissonance?
The head processes the facts but the heart cannot.
The result is paralysis.
Why?
We are adults, not infants suffering from infantile paralysis!
Or are we adults?
The welfare state is our trusted parental provider and protector.
Perhaps we cannot cope with facing the reality, that Mama and Papa may not be the parents we thought they were!
Perhaps we are not the adults we thought we were!
Perhaps trauma has paralysed us, making mature, responsible adult action impossible.
If this is the case, we need a reality adjustment fast!
There is definitely a lot of trauma-based control involved, for sure. And coercive control. They're very good at using psychology against normal people (cf. MK-U).
Looking forward to Part 2 and your always erudite insights & observations. Your comment about the deeds of governments versus people is really a key point and hopefully it helps those who haven't considered it thoroughly as it helps shed light on the misdeeds of ALL governments who have acted in ways that do not reflect nor assume the approval of the citizenry they claim to represent. ANd God knows these are manifold & date back centuries!
Thank you for this Iain. Looking forward to part 2. In relation to this, i wrote a long note that shows how the zionist ruling class attacks not only the local palestinians but how it also attacks ordinary (non ruling-class) jews. And it also shows that - contrary to what the rulers' media constantly claims - this is NOT a conflict between ordinary israeli jews and ordinary palestinjan muslims and christians, but this is a war waged by the billionaore ruling class (both jewish and arab) on the 99% (both jewish and arab), and I brought four key facts (that not many people seem to know about) which clearly illustrates this.
I am mentioning this here because the october 7th LIHOP operation was an integral part of this long war by the ruling class against us, and i show the big picture of exactly WHY they engage in such FALSE FLAG operations against the people, and what are the benefits they derive from that, as well as from their many other tactics to keep ordinary people divided fearful, hateful and at each others' throats, and looking to them - the billionaire mafia rulers and their bought politicians - to be our "protection" from "the evil monstrous scary antisemite enemy who irrationally hate jews for being jews")
I did look into the background of Matt Guertain (I think that’s his surname) and he seems genuine to me. Because, I’ve worked quite a bit with video editing I can see that his analysis of the imagery appears believable. However, it is quite technical and when I’ve shown it to some friends who do not understand how still movie frames work to generate a moving image they don’t see it.
It struck me that the footage was probably manipulated but the question is by whom, when and for what reason. As I don't know and don't need that evidence to ake the point I will make I think I'll exclude it at this juncture.
Sure, Iain, I only provided it for possible interest. It showed me that video like this can be entirely synthetically generated and passed off to the general public on mainstream media as an event which in reality did not occur. And nobody watching this will ever think to question it. I suppose it is not accidental that much of the mainstream media is said to be owned by Israeli interests but I have not checked this. I recall there was something about an important image from 9/11 quickly shown in the media after the event which was discovered to have originated from a source in Israel but I cannot recall the exact details.
While you make some very interesting points of argument, it must be said that a deeper look into HAMAS's funders and the onslaught against Israel that goes back before the British involvement in the region as far back as Roman times when they destroyed Jerusalem. It is clear that the Hebrews and the Jews have been hounded by hostile enemies for thousands of years. They are now scapegoated for everything people don't like. Israel is called an Apartheid state (a Marxist relabelling). However it cannot be called that for a simple exposure of facts. There was no “occupation” of Gaza after 2005 when Israel extracted itself and all Jewish settlements from the area. There is no “apartheid” in Israel, where Jewish and Arab citizens have exactly the same political, social, and economic rights. The only difference in their treatment is this: Jewish Israelis must, while Arab Israelis may, serve in the military.
For Item 1) I read your claim and I was not convinced. Hamas was a creation of the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt) and that is where Arafat, who was an Egyptian emerged from. Arafat was helped by the British Empire as a tool to prevent Israel becoming a sovereign country with a parliament and ensure they followed the same Westminster Political Party system which is what they currently do. It can be simply seen what happened after the 2005 Israeli withdrawal form Gaza after they won the election. Tensions between Fatah and Hamas have dominated Palestinian politics since 2006, when Hamas was victorious in the Palestinian Authority’s last parliamentary elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council, ending the era of Fatah’s dominance. They chased all Fatah supporters out of Gaza.
Regarding Item 2) The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement was issued on August 18, 1988. The Islamic Resistance Movement, also known as the HAMAS, is an extremist fundamentalist Islamic organization operating in the territories under Israeli control. Its Covenant is a comprehensive manifesto comprised of 36 separate articles, all of which promote the basic HAMAS goal of destroying the State of Israel through Jihad (Islamic Holy War). Don't try the BS argument that it has changed over time. It hasn't and it is clear when one looks at its actions over the last 20 Years. So we are in disagreement.
So much bullpoop and yet people will suck it all in as the Gospel truth! Ugh! The more we think about things the more obvious it all is. Did learn some new things to confirm my "yeah right - it's hinky" impression, cheers Iain.
My message to the Gazans who have died and those are still suffering: 1. To those who have passed on: you are now happy and at peace. 2. To those who are suffering: all bad experiences will end. It is better to suffer than to make others suffer. Turn to God for comfort and peace. 3. Please, have not bitter hearts. Leave all to God.
Trolls and bots are not welcome!
********************************
This a Substack comment thread freely open to all. It is intended to provide a space for productive dialogue.
Everyone is free to comment. Please be civil and courteous to each other. Have a laugh, use irony, whit, sarcasm, whatever you like. Argue your point, show your evidence. But please do not be personal, abusive, or accusatory just because someone disagrees with or questions you.
Personal abuse will result in one warning. If abuse persists, after the warning, the abusive account will be blocked and permanently barred from commenting on my Substack posts.
Please, only reply to this message if you wish to alert me to abusive behaviour.
Thank you.
To an otherwise excellent introduction I have two issues.
1/ You wrote: "The ease with which some of us applaud indiscriminate slaughter is not a religious or cultural problem, it is a human problem."
You are utterly psychologically wrong here. And it's something which really gets my goat. Partly because it's always the people who make these blatant generalisations about 'human nature having a dark side' who would say 'oh but I don't mean myself, obviously'. It's always 'others'.
The truth is that it IS a 'religious or cultural' problem - specifically, it's a CULT problem. We do humanity a massive disservice if we allow these ideologies to be given the get out clause of 'religion'.
Furthermore, it's almost bordering on the awful Pinker-esque calumny that humans were murderous barbarians in their natural form before 'civilisation' (law and order etc.) came along. As an sort-of anarchist, Iain, I would've thought you'd find that view insulting. Law and order hasn't been used, historically, to 'contain human nature's natural tendency to barbarism', but quite the opposite - it has been used for social control, and to ironically provide an excuse for barbarism practiced by the minority ruling classes (who call themselves a State).
If you want to understand what might make otherwise normal human beings support evil things, then you MUST understand it in terms of the subversive effect of CULT-like ideologies. Human nature, in its natural setting, is beautiful, peaceful, harmonious, cooperative and so on.
I'll do a 2/ as separate.
Good point. I shall update the article accordingly.
Wow! Thank you! I wasn't expecting that. Maybe I should've though, as you are a highly intelligent and good-natured person.
Now I feel guilty!
No worries. Thanks for reminding me of the obvious. Sometimes it is easy to forget.
Martin Luther said, Man is sinner and saint! We should always admit to our faults or sins with change OR repentance and that keeps the piety and virtuous at bay. When man is not accountable or feels no remorse, humanity leaves, evil moves in. IMHO
"Human nature, in its natural setting, is beautiful, peaceful, harmonious, cooperative and so on."
I seriously doubt this.
Even if one discounts the Cain and Abel story as fable, there are two kinds of people.
Moral responsible people, who respect the rights of others, and immoral and irresponsible people who do not.
The latter group may justify their actions via "cult-like religious or cultural ideologies."
However, if all "cult-like religions and cultural ideologies" could be eliminated, there will still be individuals and groups who will violate the rights of others.
This IS HUMAN NATURE!
Not human nature as it could be perhaps, but human nature as it is.
Sweeping generalisations are not sustainable historically or otherwise.
I assume the detailed analysis of vehicular damage at the Nova Festival will be covered in part 2, so I am refraining from comment, but if it isn't, may I respectfully suggest that you include some analysis of this as it might go a long way to support your claim of the Hannibal protocol being invoked.
Unfortunately I don't really have time to give you a full lecture on neuroscience, evolution, psychology, human brain development, or the anthropological history of the human species stretching back 300k years. It would take too long and besides, this comment section is the absolute wrong place for it.
If you are interested in such a thing, then I can point you towards a series of essays I've done (more like the beginning of a dissertation, or even a thesis, actually), which starts here: https://evieinconspiracyland.substack.com/p/circe-1-social-psychology-and-the?r=2s9hod
I'm not the one making sweeping generalisations here - seems more likely that you are. But if human nature was inherently violent and confrontational then the species would've gone extinct some time in the last 300k years, or at least it would never have made it to sentience in the first place. Also, we would be living in a permanent almost rage zombie-esque chaotic world, in which everyone was focussed only on sheer survival, and there would be no time whatsoever for culture, or poetry or love or music or compassion.
History alone proves beyond reasonable doubt that human beings are not inherently violent or racist or aggressive. Otherwise there would be a load of archaeological evidence attesting to conflict stretching back for those 300k years. Also, the need for ever more powerful war machines would've driven technological advancement much, much earlier than the recent holocene...
Humans' natures are diverse, aren't they? My sense is that most are prosocial and compassionate, but many are sociopathic—antisocial, callous if not sadistic, and/or megalomaniacal. A majority of humans are susceptible to delusion by the sociopathic minority, a minority within which are masters of deception, dissimulation, and sophistry and have surreptitiously seized the bulk of power in the world, taking advantage of the majority's too trusting, too credulous nature. Humans' natures are, like everything else, only discernible by observation. The are empirical phenomena. Reality's necessary particularity is ultimately inexplicable, necessarily. Isn't it? Generalisations are ALWAYS open to disconfirmation.
I very much agree. And we can only understand history by acknowledging this. You might like my social psychology & the cabal series, part 1 of which is linked below in my comment at the end of this thread.
I just corrected the last word, which I suspect was auto-uncorrected. It now reads “disconfirmation” instead of “disinformation”.
Put downs are not appreciated - overt or covert.
We are all entitled to have our input respected regardless.
If I made a sweeping generalisation point it out please.
I did not say that human nature was "inherently violent and confrontational".
Please read what is written not what you want to see to fly your kite!
I said that some individuals and groups inevitably exist, that will violate the rights of others, unless restrained.
History, contemporary reality and personal experience affirm this to me.
I am not the master of history, so I cannot generalise and make sweeping statements about human nature or anything else with certainty.
Most human beings may not be "inherently violent or racist or aggressive" in their own space in their own cultural context.
However, mixing races and cultures leads to explosions.
That is why we have forced, indiscriminate immigration, complements of the UN & CO!
They have this grand plan for world peace and prosperity, enabled by an endless supply of human rights regardless!
Good luck with that!
Multi-cultural utopia is a myth, a lie, a deception!
America is a failed experiment in multi-cultural utopia.
There are many others.
That is why "multi-cultural utopia" is being forced upon the world!
All you have to do is stand by and watch your dream come true!
I withdraw.
The species hasn't gone extinct only for the fact that Christianity came into being and for over 2000 years, its believer's have civilized barbarians, brought people out of the darkness of doing that which is evil, and spread a message of redemption, forgiveness, and love unknown in all of human history before it existed.
The species could have gone extinct in the 298,000 years (or more) before Christianity though.
I was very tempted to make the exact same point. But then I thought, no, it might provoke a tirade and I don't have time for that. Then we could list all the horrors perpetrated by monotheism, except we'd be here till doomsday.
We live in the paradigm of the inverted Pentagram or the Cult paradigm. The pentagram Righted is not Cult. It is pledging allegiance to Truth and Right Action. While most people think they are moral human beings they have been unwittingly mind controlled into a diluted Satanic way of being in the world. The 4 tenets of Satanism. 1 Ego is God( Do not love your neighbour as yourself) 2 Moral relativism ( Man gets to choose Right and Wrong. There is no such thing as Natural Law)3. Social Darwinism ( extruding the Law of the jungle into Human behaviour) 4. Eugenics .
The Fall from Eden has been likened to Moral relativism ( belief in man’s law). Natural Law does exist. It is taught in Freemasonry. There is a Left Hand Path in Freemasonry . The path of Manifestation ( which is Truth and since we co create reality we can be activated in Natural Law through care and focus on manifestation and by giving an alignment of Truth. Manifestation is a becoming and Satanism uses group focus and care. They don’t have a wholistic care for humanity as a whole. They call them ‘the dead’. The Centre Path in Freemasonry is the Path of Moral Manifestation. Satanism ( which is an ancient Occult religion) have Dark Care amongst themselves which is better than No care. The Centre Path beats the Left Hand Path. If only Humanity knew. It is the Righted Pentagram.
Thank you for this input Andrew.
The first paragraph I understand.
The second ... I got lost in the forest.
The trees seem to be shrouded in webs.
Not unlike the trees where I live, seen in the right light.
Those who seek the light of right will find the Truth, if they persevere.
Ah it bugs me when people call Satanism ancient. It isn’t. It’s of the last century and it’s usually mostly losers who follow it. I don’t think there are many in power who would say they were actual Satanists. I think they worship older gods, pre-Christian.
I agree with the goodness of the righted pentagram. It’s means mind and spirit (Akasha) over body.
For those who are interested, I've done a series on this sort of thing, which starts here: https://evieinconspiracyland.substack.com/p/circe-1-social-psychology-and-the?r=2s9hod
"Law and order hasn't been used, historically, to 'contain human nature's natural tendency to barbarism', but quite the opposite - it has been used for social control, and to ironically provide an excuse for barbarism practiced by the minority ruling classes (who call themselves a State)."
WOOWH!
This sweeping generalisation is not sustainable in my opinion.
Most regimes use law and order, to protect all from the violation of their basic human rights by some.
This is a benevolent form of social control, not evil.
Without this, the law of the jungle reigns supreme!
Not all regimes are oppressive states, set up by barbaric rulers to rob the people of their human rights.
Most regimes, even if corrupt to some degree, provide basic protections.
Few regimes are totally corrupt and violate human rights without any accountability.
There may be a barbaric minority ruling class.
There are also inevitably barbaric minority groups, who will violate the rights of others if not prevented by force of law.
Our legal systems are faulty.
The law of the jungle is ruthlessly violent.
‘The law of the jungle.’ Eh? If you seriously think we need lawyers and politicians to protect us you are thinking like a Baboon. Or at best a mainstream normie.
‘Basic human rights’ as you put it are inalienable, god given, not for politicians and their lawyers to play with.
I was explaining the tenets of Satanism. I agree with you. We vote ( I don’t vote) and we give our personal sovereignty away when we vote. I think we are on the same page. Thank you.
Thanks for the feedback. Sometimes I fall short of my Correspondence gaols by trying to condense an essay into a couple of paragraphs. There are essays that can be. Natural Law has a nexus to the Holy Spirit in Christianity, but it is derived from the 7 Ancient Hermetic Principles of Consciousness. Control Consciousness and you will control humanity. Satanist do not like that Natural Law exists and their MO is basically to Acknowledge God through Truth because we co create reality. God is Truth. God is also Love which is reflected in the 3rd and 4th Hermetic Principles.The Law of Vibration and the Law of Polarity. We have a Vibrational Polarity of Love and Fear. Satanists keep us in the Fear vibration and they think of Natural Law as a prison. They think of God as a prison.
Put downs are not appreciated Iain.
Our basic human rights are inalienable and inherent, not given and hence able to be taken away, by governments, organisations, lawyers, military or police.
How are we going to protect our human rights without some form of effective "law and order" though?
In my opinion, expecting everyone to play together happily in some utopian heaven on earth is completely unrealistic.
Life experience, contemporary reality and history negate this possibility.
Only because we are trying to live in a system which is already utterly corrupt and corrupting that works against our better nature. For instance all money is based on debt and is issued by Central Banks. Jesus threw the money lenders out of the temple. In contemporary society we now hold the money lenders in high esteem. ‘Governments, organisations, lawyers, military or police’ keep that system in place to protect the hierarchy. We don’t need them.
I take your points Iain>
I am not a stateist.
I am a realist.
If we were all basically good people as some claim we are, then we would throw off the shackles of our oppressors, and all be free!
We outnumber the baddies by millions.
If we do not need them, then why don't we get rid of them?
I rest my case.
It's precisely BECAUSE normal people are good that they don't do that. The problem is they are TOO good to 'do what must be done' - and that is precisely how this minority group (cabal) maintain their social control.
I always suspected this was a false flag event/LIHOP and your explanation of what happened confirms that for me. It can be very difficult to get to the truth unless the time is spent to do a deep dive into it as you have done. I look forward to reading the next one. Thank you Iain.
2/ you wrote: "The Hamas attack was a despicable act of horrific violence. Nothing justifies it and I do not defend, sympathise nor identify with Hamas or its Islamist extremist partners."
Why? That's like saying you condemn Boudicca, or Robin Hood, or the French resistance, or any other resistance in history. That siding with the bad guys' propaganda. Are you supporting the fucking Romans now, after they raped and tortured? I hope not. There is a very long list of these resistances against evil.
Furthermore, you're ignoring international law, which states that there are no 'innocents' in an illegal occupying force. Doesn't matter if it's a six day old baby - the responsibility is on the occupying forces not to use them as human shields. They are all classed as legitimate military targets. Therefore, Hamas is justified according to international law. Not to mention natural law. In fact, there can be no 'crimes' committed by a resistance force in this context. This is vitally important to remember and cannot be overstated. I despise every one who prefaces their interview or statement with 'do you condemn Hamas' (Piers Morgan for example).
This is of course leaving aside the obvious LIHOP. It doesn't matter what did or didn't happen. I'm really talking about the principle here. I will absolutely always refuse to condemn any justified resistance force. Especially one that is fighting against possibly the most evil cult regime ever to have existed on this planet.
We must always remember who the bad guys are. Especially in this case. It is entirely one-sided.
Yeah, we'll have to disagree on that one. I don't see how killing civilians in their homes or machine gunning them at dance parties serves any cause at all, ever. Sure, strike military targets or occupying forces but this attack wasn't just that and I am fed up with people defending Hamas' right to act while ignoring just how barbaric those acts sometimes are. Not least of all for the fact that Hamas is a creation of the Israeli state. I do not think Hamas killed anywhere near as many people as alleged, nor do I think all Hamas fighters are homicidal loonies, but some of them evidently are and they certainly murdered a lot. So I don't think the "principle" you write of holds up here. As for the French resistance, they had a lot to answer for as well.
Hmm. I do see your point, for sure. But part of my point is that in terms of international law there are no 'innocent civilians' in an occupied territory. That's important to remember.
On the other paw I do certainly take your point about nasty people getting involved. That seems to always happen because any kind of conflict will attract all the psychopaths (in the same way that professions involving children will attract pedos). Also true for some elements within the French resistance of course.
Obviously we should also take any Israeli anecdotes about atrocities with the scepticism they deserve. I don't know if you'll be addressing the point in more detail but I have read here and there how most of the deaths were in fact caused by the IOF, not by Hamas. You do acknowledge that bit though of course. Maybe we'll never know the exact number or details.
One thing is for sure, though, which is that Hamas gave Israel the golden opportunity it had been wanting for decades to do what it has been doing since. Whether that was collusion or the LIHOP is perhaps the crucial question for the analysis of it being a false flag, as you are doing. Might even be a bit of both of course.
Then again, given the fact the so-called international community wasn't ever going to stop Israel, the only option left for the Palestinians is what happened on 7 October. If you put 2.3 million people in a concentration/death camp, with no possibility of ever getting out alive, then don't be surprised if they exhibit a fight or flight response...
I thought about this international law stating that the oppressed have the right to armed resistance, over and over again. And I couldn't help but wonder if there may have been some type of hidden agenda behind it. Did this law solve anything? Did it actually support the oppressed or did it open pandora's box for never ending conflict. I discuss my thoughts here.
DON'T ARM THE RESISTANCE, STOP THE COLONIZERS!!!!!!
People keep saying that the Palestinians have the right to armed struggle, but wouldn't that open the box for the continuation of the tag-line "terrorism"? The colonizers who are being resisted could quickly imply and/or openly state that the “resistance” groups are terrorists, as we have seen thus far. And then wouldn't the armed struggle of ‘resistance” groups apply to every colonized country? So when they put that into International Law, didn't they know it would mean continuous war? Instead, shouldn’t they have placed into International law, that “nobody should be colonizing anyone, anywhere”? How disingenuous and counterintuitive to make a law supporting armed struggle knowing full well, it would not bring peace but more chaos.
https://topicsfromatoz.substack.com/p/dont-arm-the-resistance-stop-the
That's an exceptionally good point actually. By acknowledging 'armed resistance' they are implying a kind of acceptance of colonialism and aggression.
By not labelling colonialism and aggression itself acts of terrorism, they allow the the coloniser to call the resistance terrorists, when it should be the other way round.
Then again, international law is supposed to recognise acts of aggression as 'illegal'. Hence their (false/double standards) application of that to Russia's SMO - which, ironically, was in fact a legitimate act of resistance in the form of 'collective self-defence'.
So the real problem is that international law is an ass, and is applied arbitrarily by those with the mightiest armies. Namely the American/Zionist Empire (plus all the other blackmail threats they use).
I guess this sort of goes without saying. But you are spot on here, for sure. Great comment.
Thank you for your response to my comment, Evelyn. It struck me as I kept hearing folks saying that the Palestinians had the right to armed resistance. It felt like a set-up. Instead focusing on preventing the colonizers from colonizing, they gave the colonized the right to armed resistance. I looked up the law and it even states in
"Right of peoples to self-determination/Struggle by all available means – GA resolution Reaffirming its faith in the importance of the implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples contained in its resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960,
2. Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;"
It just seemed to me that this would keep the wars going. Then if you add the fact that the colonizers typically arm both sides, it appears to be a recipe for disaster. Then you throw in the "supporters" on both sides and it becomes a quagmire.
You said: So the real problem is that international law is an ass, and is applied arbitrarily by those with the mightiest armies. Namely the American/Zionist Empire (plus all the other blackmail threats they use).
To me, frankly that is the crux of the matter. And it explains why nothing really can be changed because the actual institution itself is fatally flawed.
Someone said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, will leave the world blind and toothless."
I know that folks want to get "revenge" for aggressions made against them.. but using this law, without holding to account the initiators of the aggression doesn't seem to work. Yes, they will state that "apartheid is illegal" and granted that's in the codes of International Law, but seldom is that the focus. Is it any wonder that they "don't focus on it. As I've stated in some of my other posts, they cannot bring Israel to heel until they themselves acknowledge their own role as colonizers, make atonement for their crimes against humanity and then make reparations. Fat chance that will ever happen. So Israel's impunity continues to be ignored at best and supported at worst.
All Empires Are Just As Complicit As Israel https://topicsfromatoz.substack.com/p/all-empires-are-just-as-complicit
While I agree that Hamas are resistance or freedom fighters, I certainly do NOT agree that a baby isn’t an innocent if its part of the occupying population. I don’t care if that’s international law, that’s ridiculous. Not saying there won’t be unfortunate accidental collateral damage from time to time, but I think babies in particular should be avoided as a kill target by everyone - even freedom fighters!
I don’t think we would have felt so sympathetic towards Robin Hood if he murdered noble babies in their sleep, in addition to stealing their parents money. There needs to be some standards. Can’t stoop to the lows of your enemy in everything.
Yes, I think you've sort of captured the nuance I should've added myself. I wouldn't necessarily advocate deliberate targeting of let's call them 'non-threatening' members of an occupying force (partly out of military strategy, partly because it plays into the enemy's propaganda hands). And of course I detest the term 'collateral damage', as if a human being is just an object (part of the dehumanisation process). But any focus on 'the resistance' as 'possibly immoral' is a misdirection from what should be the continuous focus, which is the unacceptability of an occupation. It's that thing where the occupying forces, following an attack, try to gain people's sympathy, by essentially starting each sentence with 'secondly...'. We should always start with 'first there was an occupation...' So we are always mindful of who the bad guys are.
And yes it does say a lot about international law. Of course international law isn't worth shit anymore anyway.
I for one do not condemn Hamas, but by the same token neither do I condemn Israel. Hamas in their arrogance, decided to wage TOTAL WAR against a better armed and dispassionately ruthless enemy as exemplified by the Hannibal Directive. Having done that, they are in no position to whine and cry about the "genocidal" Israelis who have responded to Hamas' De Facto declaration of total war in like fashion. The delusional arrogance of Hamas is the same as that of the Japanese high command who fondly imagined that they could go to war with a country with twice as many people and 5 times the gdp and 60% of the world's oil production. By doing so Hamas condemned its people to the same fate as Japan. Fortunately for the Gazans their traitorous leadership and much admired Hamas fighters are trapped like rats in their expensive tunnels and will be ruthlessly rooted out by a vengeful IDF within the next few months, so they won't have to suffer the kind of genocidal fire bombing that the USAAF unleashed on millions of Japanese civilians.
I wonder if you have seen this Iain? This is analysis by a CGI expert who is saying advanced AI video generating technology was used - we would have to assume by the Israeli deep state to produce propaganda footage which was broadcast on major media channels to show and claim events which were faked. His analysis is quite impressive in my view. I saw this quite a while ago and immediately thought ‘false flag’ and I guess both sides are probably creating their own propaganda in dirty conflicts like this which makes it almost impossible to know what really went on. Thanks for tackling and shedding some light on this difficult topic. I must say that I feel that most people are never going to know the truth about what occurred.
Yep I've seen it. Not sure I am overly convinced and I don't think it is necessary to reference it to demonstrate that, in all likelihood, it was a LIHOP operation. I hope you find the next post, maybe two, interesting.
Great article Iain, I'll be reading the series with interest. With regard to Matt Guertin's videos - he isn't the best at explaining the anomalies and it's a bit of a chore getting to grips with what he's trying to show us, but it's worth persevering because if he's right the implications are enormous. I intend to make some time (and it be quite a commitment time-wise) learning more about AI film fakery and how it might be used to fool us in this way.
Yep, Given yours and Howard's points I might consider referencing it. I'll see how it goes.
Here's the link to Matt's Substack - this is the one that made the most sense to me. I don't know enough about AI generated video to say one way or the other about it, but it's worth watching... https://matt1up.substack.com/p/synthetic-ai-news-visual-glitches
thanks
As part of the war on Terror we have just past the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 London Bombings
The best archive and time line is https://www.julyseventh.co.uk/
also https://terroronthetube.co.uk/
also https://www.richplanet.net/
Many good documentaries were made about 7/7
Mind the Gap
Ludicrous diversions
Ripple effect
7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction
Tom Secker, 7/7: Crime and Prejudice
The main/lame steam media are putting out the usual mainstream narrative
conveniently ignoring all the information that questions the narrative
like multiple holes in the floor of the train carriages
https://terroronthetube.co.uk/2010/11/18/two-holes-in-floor-of-edgware-road-coach/
From the inquest
Q. Because the crater extended into the seat area, didn’t it, between 30 and 27? [NB, this area between 30 and 27 is where they are trying to put ‘Khan’]
A. There was two craters, wasn’t there?
Q. We’ve heard some evidence there were two holes.
A. Yes.
Q. There was a huge crater caused by the bomb.
A. Yes, and another one further up.
Q. Possibly, and was that towards the rear, that’s to say carriage 3, so between —
A. Yes.
Q. — seats 7 and 23?
A. Yes, between 26 and 23, yes.
Q. Right. Might that have been a manhole cover that had come up from the floor of the carriage?
A. It could have been, but it was — no, because the seats were missing, so it was definitely not a manhole cover
"I acknowledge the reported estimate of 1,195 Hamas attack fatalities, around 800 of whom were civilians, including infants and children." Even in the Israel press there is dispute about the number killed and the number that were civilians. There are regular reports of many civilians being killed in Palestine But Israel naturally disputes these numbers.
But I contrast the number of good documentaries that were made about 7/7 and the lack of good documentaries made about the 7th of October and other recent false flags.
In 2005 you could post such material on YouTube and search and discover it on google.
Now unless you now certain web sites you can not find the material . I do not know of any documentaries that have been made about October the 7th and any in-depth investigation that compares to the 7/7 investigations. They may exist but I am unlikely to find them. That is not to say it has been ignored Corbett Report and others have covered it. The state are good at keeping information secret and banning free speech with hate laws and prescribed terrorist laws.
I'd avoid ripple effect and Tom Secker if I were you - these two are cognitive infiltrators. The best person to consult on the 7/7 event is Keelan Balderson, aka eyes wide shut.
Here is a link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrJIZyLJv4Y
to Keelan Balderson 7/7 documentary 7/7 what did they know.
It is very good surprising still on YouTube.
But ware are the 7th of October in depth documentaries LIHOP or MIHOP but the mainstream and history will record as a surprise attack
Outstanding piece Iain, as always.
You may be interested in this video which proves CONCLUSIVELY that the order to execute the Hannibal Directive WAS indeed given...and then executed by attack drone operators of the Israeli Air Force.
This was aired on Israel's public broadcaster Kan and I added English subtitles to it (manually, not through AI. I am a native Hebrew speaker).
https://rumble.com/v5l3gh8-proof-the-israeli-air-force-did-carry-out-the-hannibal-directive-on-its-own.html
There's two interesting facts related to Hamas:
Firstly, Netanyahu divided power between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank by propping up Hamas.
Check out this video Hamas funded by netanyahu: https://g.co/kgs/mXzXDr8
Secondly, there's claims that Hamas provided training, fighters, and weapons to Syrian rebel groups. Other reports suggest Hamas operatives assisted Sunni jihadists in Qusayr and fought against the Syrian regime at the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp.
My gut feeling is that some groups within the IDF and CIA knew the 10/7 attack was imminent. There's probably more nefarious twists and turns regarding this grisly event.
Nonetheless, 10/7 gave the justification for the Palestinian genocide and the demolition of Gaza. It's another example, of how the Empire ties up loose ends.
It should also be stressed that populations are always cavalierly used and discarded as victims are created with every new imperialist bloodbath. Victims of sadistic wars are trained by the Empire to brutalize new targets as the slaughter must perpetuate to solidify fascist hegemony.
Enough Americans and Israelis know or suspect, that their governments were involved in 9/11 and 10/7, to act decisively and demand accountability but they do not.
Why?
Cognitive dissonance?
The head processes the facts but the heart cannot.
The result is paralysis.
Why?
We are adults, not infants suffering from infantile paralysis!
Or are we adults?
The welfare state is our trusted parental provider and protector.
Perhaps we cannot cope with facing the reality, that Mama and Papa may not be the parents we thought they were!
Perhaps we are not the adults we thought we were!
Perhaps trauma has paralysed us, making mature, responsible adult action impossible.
If this is the case, we need a reality adjustment fast!
There is definitely a lot of trauma-based control involved, for sure. And coercive control. They're very good at using psychology against normal people (cf. MK-U).
Looking forward to Part 2 and your always erudite insights & observations. Your comment about the deeds of governments versus people is really a key point and hopefully it helps those who haven't considered it thoroughly as it helps shed light on the misdeeds of ALL governments who have acted in ways that do not reflect nor assume the approval of the citizenry they claim to represent. ANd God knows these are manifold & date back centuries!
Thank you for this Iain. Looking forward to part 2. In relation to this, i wrote a long note that shows how the zionist ruling class attacks not only the local palestinians but how it also attacks ordinary (non ruling-class) jews. And it also shows that - contrary to what the rulers' media constantly claims - this is NOT a conflict between ordinary israeli jews and ordinary palestinjan muslims and christians, but this is a war waged by the billionaore ruling class (both jewish and arab) on the 99% (both jewish and arab), and I brought four key facts (that not many people seem to know about) which clearly illustrates this.
I am mentioning this here because the october 7th LIHOP operation was an integral part of this long war by the ruling class against us, and i show the big picture of exactly WHY they engage in such FALSE FLAG operations against the people, and what are the benefits they derive from that, as well as from their many other tactics to keep ordinary people divided fearful, hateful and at each others' throats, and looking to them - the billionaire mafia rulers and their bought politicians - to be our "protection" from "the evil monstrous scary antisemite enemy who irrationally hate jews for being jews")
https://substack.com/@headandheart1/note/c-109156403
I just followed your link and read your note, and I must say this is the explanation that has made the most sense to me that I’ve seen. Thank you.
Yes, I will keep reading this series, thanks.
I did look into the background of Matt Guertain (I think that’s his surname) and he seems genuine to me. Because, I’ve worked quite a bit with video editing I can see that his analysis of the imagery appears believable. However, it is quite technical and when I’ve shown it to some friends who do not understand how still movie frames work to generate a moving image they don’t see it.
It struck me that the footage was probably manipulated but the question is by whom, when and for what reason. As I don't know and don't need that evidence to ake the point I will make I think I'll exclude it at this juncture.
Sure, Iain, I only provided it for possible interest. It showed me that video like this can be entirely synthetically generated and passed off to the general public on mainstream media as an event which in reality did not occur. And nobody watching this will ever think to question it. I suppose it is not accidental that much of the mainstream media is said to be owned by Israeli interests but I have not checked this. I recall there was something about an important image from 9/11 quickly shown in the media after the event which was discovered to have originated from a source in Israel but I cannot recall the exact details.
While you make some very interesting points of argument, it must be said that a deeper look into HAMAS's funders and the onslaught against Israel that goes back before the British involvement in the region as far back as Roman times when they destroyed Jerusalem. It is clear that the Hebrews and the Jews have been hounded by hostile enemies for thousands of years. They are now scapegoated for everything people don't like. Israel is called an Apartheid state (a Marxist relabelling). However it cannot be called that for a simple exposure of facts. There was no “occupation” of Gaza after 2005 when Israel extracted itself and all Jewish settlements from the area. There is no “apartheid” in Israel, where Jewish and Arab citizens have exactly the same political, social, and economic rights. The only difference in their treatment is this: Jewish Israelis must, while Arab Israelis may, serve in the military.
You once made a statement that Hamas was founded and funded by Israel which is laughable considering that was a media assertion by a hostile left wing media entity called Haaretz. It is noteworthy that according to EIR, it was the Muslim Brotherhood who was a creation of the British Empire. The Muslim Brotherhood was recently (23.04.2025) banned by Jordan. https://apnews.com/article/jordan-politics-muslim-brotherhood-parliament-unrest-02d78750d626506f3b989f9a241e6782. The eirv40n31-20130809 is the source here https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2013/eirv40n31-20130809/15-22_4031.pdf . The Catholic Press too haven't covered themselves in glory either. The UN is not worth mentioning as a source of good. Just look who infests it.
1. - Yes, The Israeli Government Created Hamas: - https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/yes-the-israeli-government-created
2. - No, Hamas is not committed to the obliteration of Israel: - https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/no-hamas-is-not-committed-to-the
For Item 1) I read your claim and I was not convinced. Hamas was a creation of the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt) and that is where Arafat, who was an Egyptian emerged from. Arafat was helped by the British Empire as a tool to prevent Israel becoming a sovereign country with a parliament and ensure they followed the same Westminster Political Party system which is what they currently do. It can be simply seen what happened after the 2005 Israeli withdrawal form Gaza after they won the election. Tensions between Fatah and Hamas have dominated Palestinian politics since 2006, when Hamas was victorious in the Palestinian Authority’s last parliamentary elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council, ending the era of Fatah’s dominance. They chased all Fatah supporters out of Gaza.
Regarding Item 2) The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement was issued on August 18, 1988. The Islamic Resistance Movement, also known as the HAMAS, is an extremist fundamentalist Islamic organization operating in the territories under Israeli control. Its Covenant is a comprehensive manifesto comprised of 36 separate articles, all of which promote the basic HAMAS goal of destroying the State of Israel through Jihad (Islamic Holy War). Don't try the BS argument that it has changed over time. It hasn't and it is clear when one looks at its actions over the last 20 Years. So we are in disagreement.
Nothing wrong with disagreement. Yes, we do disagree,
So much bullpoop and yet people will suck it all in as the Gospel truth! Ugh! The more we think about things the more obvious it all is. Did learn some new things to confirm my "yeah right - it's hinky" impression, cheers Iain.
Looking forward to read part 2!
My message to the Gazans who have died and those are still suffering: 1. To those who have passed on: you are now happy and at peace. 2. To those who are suffering: all bad experiences will end. It is better to suffer than to make others suffer. Turn to God for comfort and peace. 3. Please, have not bitter hearts. Leave all to God.