The feudalists or faux libertarians concept of decentralization is "privatized fiefdoms." Corporatized smart cities that's ultimately very centralized, but on a micro level.
Plebs won't even be able to choose their "feudal lord," as they'll be assigned purely based on usefulness. That's as long as they don't become useless eaters. Those types aren't profitable and will be discarded without any social safety nets, as the above-mentioned expenditures were long ago decried as being Ponzi schemes.
Enter, social Darwinism where eugenicists determine whether euthanasia is required. 🤑
Another thought - this 'mimesis' thing. Isn't that just a fancy intellectual term for 'coveting your neighbour's ox'?
See that's their projection tendency again. But here's the interesting psychohistorical/anthropological observation: ancient human beings were never like that at all. Their brains did not evolve to be like that. Remember we're talking several hundred thousand years of brain evolution before the very notion of 'economics' and 'capitalism' and all that even existed. Yes, it's true that human brains may have 'adapted' to several thousand years of this dystopian evil ('it's not healthy to be well-adjusted to a sick society' etc.), but one can't analyse 'normal human beings' by examining 'well-adjusted' modern people (this is the flaw of that modern psyop known as 'psychology').
Further - it all reveals their attitude towards human beings not even as 'subhuman' but 'other' - they view humans as 'units of economic productivity' - and that view is absolutely expressed in all of these ideologies/methods you described, like 'technate' and technocracy and so on. It's revealing that there's zero psychology in any of it. Zero emotion. Zero love. Zero culture. Zero art. Zero spirituality. And so on. All of the things that are at the higher levels of the 'hierarchy of needs' are conspicuously absent from any of these philosophies. It is entirely mechanistic and centred around 'productivity' and 'resources' and 'economy' and 'social mechanism' and so on. Again, it reveals their view of humans as themselves 'resources'.
in other words, as nothing more nor less than 'slaves'.
So if we want to truly understand all of this we simply need to go back in history and ask ourselves where did this view of 'the rest of humanity' come from? I know the answer to that one, of course. It's not natural, it's not normal. It's certainly not ancient/pagan/spiritual - as normal human beings evolved to be. I think that monster group is intended as a kind of vaccination - to look at, rather than from, and by understanding them, develop an immunity. On a species level. That which does not kill us makes us stronger, etc.
This monster group has been conducting a war against the spirit since its inception. It is evil, quite frankly. That's what I shall be doing a series on, I think, rather than get bogged down in all this 'conspiracy' stuff. I think, by virtue of all these cognitive infiltrators, that whole thing is a grand misdirection. Ha, yes, a 'carceral intellectual paradigm'. When the truth is really blindingly simple.
Ramble over. I shall be making blackberry crumble tomorrow, from blackberries picked lovingly from our own garden. I wonder how these technocratic fuckers are going to stop people picking blackberries? Hah - bet they didn't factor that into their dark enlightenment shit, eh! Nature always wins. Love nature, and you win too...
I haven't watched your video yet because I wanted to read your article first. It's very long, of course, but well worth the cognitive effort - it's an amazing piece of research quite frankly, and I've archived it for reference. Thank you for all your effort there. It is very much appreciated.
I was right, though - you did learn me stuff I hadn't encountered before! Like, I'd never heard of this 'dark enlightenment' or 'neoreactionary' or any of these other monstrous concepts, nor the monstrous ideologues espousing them. And it's probably a good thing for my mental health that I hadn't heard about them.
Obviously I've heard of Thiel and I do love your takedown of his pseudo-Christian hypocrisy. Nicely done, Sir. Nicely done.
Personally, I think one could sum up all these people in just one word 'insane'. Actually we should definitely prefix the word 'fucking' to that.
I am now wondering, however, whether all these convoluted theories they are vomiting out at us are 'genuine' (on an intellectual level, I mean - in the sense that they actually believe in them) or whether they are simply misdirecting intellectual types. Getting them to argue over what is ultimately irrelevant, thus wasting their time, doing their heads in ('fucking with them'), and generally constraining them in some carceral intellectual paradigm (that's a good phrase, 'carceral intellectual paradigm' - must use it more often).
What I mean is, like we were discussing a while ago, if we distinguish, or differentiate, between the 'ideology' and 'the method' then it becomes clear that all of these so-called ideologies, or even 'intellectual disputes' are nothing but bickering about the best method or pathway towards totalitarianism. Hence the misdirection and 'keeping people intellectually occupied'. Because what it all boils down to is the same old small minority group of evil monsters pursuing their objective of total domination. They are simply adapting to all this new technology, which, one presumes, the likes of Adam Weishaupt, Amschel Rothe's Child et al. simply couldn't have envisaged. It must excite them, for sure, and probably in an onanistic way, one imagines.
I think you sort of hinted at this fact, though, by suggesting it's all just different sides of the same totalitarian coin. It leads to the same monsters being 'the Cathedral'.
Anyway, what it simply reinforces is that which is revealed by their attitude towards normal human beings. It's that they really do view normal humans as a different species. They may ascribe their own amoral motivations to humans (projection), but ultimately, it kind of reinforces what I myself have definitely come to believe, which is that we truly are dealing with a fundamentally different species here, because they simply do not think like normal human beings. And seeing as thinking is governed by the brain, that means their brains are differently wired. No normal human, after all, would ever come up with the sorts of philosophies you described in your essay. You can of course catch glimpses of it in some of the more Establishment-oriented thinkers in the Enlightenment, but they didn't get anywhere near these new monstrosities, and I strongly suspect even they would be horrified.
So it's back to that word 'insane' again. Not forgetting that all-important prefix...
I thought Tony Gosling made a very good point when he mentioned Rand's objectivism. While I personally agree that reality is not subjective, Tony's inferred observation that it was only the laissez-fairre capitalism aspect that appealed to the oligarchs is a good one. Yarvin has obviously been encouraged by Thiel. Is that because Thiel really thinks Yarvin is on to something or is it because Yarvin is simply saying what Thiel wants to hear? I suspect it is the latter.
I don't think these people have any kind of moral compass at all. I think their philosophy is always self-serving. Look at how Thiel chooses to interpret Christianity! For me philosophy and theology are at their best when they challenge you to honestly reflect and possibly consider your own failings, or at least explore the possibility that you could be more "moral."
These guys consistently select, favour, support (whatever) theology and philosophy that either already justifies or could be engineered to justify their own moral insanity. This happens too frequently for me to accept that they are approaching this with any intellectual, emotional or spiritual honesty. Of course, if they are psychopaths that would be impossible for them to understand anyway.
I think, as you suggest, much of it is simply an attempt to legitimise their own depravity. But, in doing so, as Gosling inferred, they are also creating a rationale other lunatics can adopt to legitimise their own.
Totally excellent points! I agree completely - their use of ideologies is simply a kind of pragmatism and, yes, a form of psychological self-deception used to justify their depravity. In a similar way in which ideas like the theory of evolution were appropriated to justify the British Empire (racism, might is right, a ruling class etc.).
Similarly, 'what Thiel wants to hear' - precisely.
I really don't think these creatures genuinely believe in any ideology except self-gratification and domination. The further one goes down that psychological rabbit hole the more one encounters the evil depravity of the child abuse network, which is in perfect keeping with their psychological profile. Anneke Lucas makes this point, if in slightly different words.
So I do think it's important for us more intellectually minded dissidents to really focus a lot more on the psychology, even if it's pretty obvious. Except it might seem obvious, but it's far more nuanced. And people need to be educated about that. One of the great successes of the bad guys (including the cognitive infiltrators) is the corruption of the science of psychology and the preventing of people in the conspiracy theory subculture from understanding psychology. And thus history too, for that matter. Sorry, I'm in danger of rambling again. My blackberry crumble awaits.
Anyway, hold your other thoughts, though, as I didn't have time to watch the video yet, as I was intently devouring your essay. Hopefully I'll have time to watch it this evening, then I'll do another reply.
There’s a few other choice snippets too, like Trump saying at an election rally ‘four more years, it’ll be fixed… after this you won’t need to vote anymore’.
Then the revocation of security clearance for an attorney called Mark Zaid who was representing people claiming Havana Syndrome damage. Then indications of the need for a false flag back in 1994, i.e. several years earlier than PNAC.
Just when you thought the rabbit hole didn’t get any deeper, it does. And the deeper, the more disturbing. One aspect I find interesting is that a lot of what’s out in the open about the technocracy is the ‘organisational’ aspects of its method (cf. WEF etc.). The deeper ‘mind control’ aspects are necessarily hidden. And I also get the equally sinister impression that a lot of the cognitive infiltrators are misdirecting people away from the real version of mind control, by getting people to focus on ‘anti-woke’ talking points, and ‘psyops’ - i.e. stuff that really only affects ‘the masses’, not intelligent thinkers. These aspects aren’t unimportant, of course, but they are not the most important. A true technate, after all, does require a serious level of mind control, at all levels of society. Manipulating the masses is relatively easy (call them gammas or lower). Manipulating individuals is a different matter, especially when those individuals are alphas and betas (and it’s alphas and betas who are the real threat to the Cathedral).
I finally got around to your discussion with Tony. Obviously having read the essay I was familiar with all the content. You're right though about that point about Rand - as I said, it seems a lot like pragmatism, I mean without any genuine belief in a particular ideology. It's the utility or otherwise of it which they find important. And, yes, they will create these pragmatic ideologies which suit their underlying purpose (social control etc.). And naturally it's always important for them to dress them up in the kind of language which makes them sound positive and attractive - I think you both made that point, which is an important one.
I liked the reference to Land being a bit of an acid head (and in Brighton too - which is where I first did acid ironically (late 80s/early 90s) - there was a great scene there, for sure.). If only Land had done pills instead of acid then he'd never have come up with a 'dark' enlightenment. It would've been a much brighter one. Lol.
I do have a funny story about doing acid in Brighton actually, just wandering around and ending up meeting these skinheads who claimed to be 'SHARPS' - skinheads against racial prejudice. I mean, FFS! If that's not postmodernism to the extreme I don't know what is.
So yeah, there's a lot of fucking weirdos out there, for sure. Unfortunately, the lunatics are running the asylum now. With high tech shit. I hate to say we're doomed, but it's not looking great right now.
Most creatures love darkness & without it life wouldn't be possible.
There seems to be a lot of fear about the lack of light these days & that is typically the influence & urge of LUCIFER, the light bringer.
Reading so many 'cowards of darkness' expressing their fear makes me wonder if this is either overt or sublimated Lucifer propaganda or just childish terms we tend not to think about when used. It's strange that often the the 'cowards of darkness' are also busy saying Lucifer is the Devil. Can you explain why we should fear the darkness, especially DEEP DARKNESS which seems very Freudian ?
Maybe I'm getting too old to take much of the conspiracy 'market' seriously anymore, it just seems that talking of darkness as a 'tangible demonic entity' is so corny ,& childish, it makes me inclined to think its a joke comment, or artefact of psychosis.
You are one of the few people who seems to understand that the people orchestrating current developments are not just motivated by mundane concerns of money and power but that there are deeper currents of thought that are now pushing us in terrifying directions.
The secularisation of the Western mind was a deliberate strategy to rob people of any vestiges of the capacity for metaphysical and philosophical thought or religious feeling. Before the eighteenth century, all thought in the West took place in a Christian context or with reference to Christianity. So, this begs the question what is Christianity? It certainly is not a set of values surrounding being nice. This notwithstanding, the obligation to care for the weak and the emphasis on forgiveness and the negation of the idea of an eye for an eye did inject a particular positive tension into human social and political relations that pretty much shaped the development of Western Europe.
But Jesus did not leave any written documents and the biblical compilation arose out of early debates, arguments and reasoning about what it all meant. Early Christian thinkers drew on many sources to help their thinking, and this is still the cause of a lot of bitter disagreement to this day. So, there have been, and are, many different strands of thought within Christianity battling each other for supremacy. This finally descended into the gross indignity of the barking insanity of the charismatic movement, American televangelism and the crass theatricality and sugary cliches of the megachurch movement which have served to render Christianity a circus, pandered to the lowest type of emotionality and obscured all of the profound reasoning that forms the basis of the religion. This has allowed the rise of people like Brand, Peterson, Robinson and the messianism that we first saw in Tony Blair. They can get away with pretty much anything and call it ‘Christian’. But they are using it as a smokescreen for a much darker current of metaphysical thought.
Thiel’s apocalypticism seems to me to be based on the sixteenth century collaboration between Jews and Christians instigated by Pico della Mirandola. This astonishing set of ideas was then infused into the entity that was to become the British Empire. It is encoded in John Dee’s Monas Hieroglyphica and was transported to America by the Puritan alchemists in the seventeenth century. Coincidentally, in the opening of his Monas Dee includes a Y. It is his tree of rarity that demands that the global ruler take the spiritual path if he is to avoid becoming a tyrant. This is the path that Thiel et al seem to believe that they are taking to save humanity from Antichrist and establish the kingdom of God on Earth. As Dee insisted, this would be a world controlled and shaped by those who understood that everything is based on the mystical and practical powers of numbers.
Dee’s programme involved the development of ‘an invincible war machine’ to fight Antichrist. Even more worrying, he appropriated the idea of the ‘mystical vocation of the Jew’ in which God relies upon the actions of his devotees to bring harmony into his own processes. Following Pico this involved a process of divine becoming in which mankind is obliged to metamorphosise into a new creature. Unfortunately, so the argument (based on Plato) goes, most people are incapable of the spiritual focus to bring about their own transformation. The journey from Alpha to Omega is then one in which these self-appointed directors of our spiritual advancement will direct the Second Coming of Christ now interpreted as some kind of collective energetic expression. They will bring about the kingdom of God and our collective absorption into the higher level of angelic intelligence or nous. Whether they actually believe in ‘Christ’ or a God, as we would understand it, is open to question, but they certainly seem to have some kind of ‘religiosity’ that takes their ideas out of the normal pulses and rhythms of purely secular, political thought.
It is futile to argue about ‘Communism’ or ‘Fascism’ when we are facing a phalanx of metaphysicians who believe that anything they do is justified because the very future of humanity depends upon them. And anyone who thinks that the physical and spiritual metamorphosis of humanity is not the endpoint is not taking enough notice of the profound interventions in human biology now being implemented and planned.
I'd say the secularisation of the human mind began with the monotheistic ideology - that's the evil objective it was designed for. It's fundamentally anti-nature, anti-spiritual, anti-human and so on. The 'atheistic' enlightenment is an inevitable outcome of it, because by then it had destroyed all true spirituality as existed pre-Christianity. This is one of the older historical reasons for anti-Judaism of course - contemporary thinkers would've been able to psychologically understand how anti-spiritual and infantilising their ideology was, and an insult to all the gods and assorted other supernatural entities with which humanity had always existed on a daily basis.
That ideology posits the existence of an authoritarian tyrant at the top of the pyramid, with an 'elect' (chosen) to manage the world, and everyone else is a slave. If that doesn't sound exactly like the kind of 'new world order' we're all talking about here then I don't know what does.
The greatest irony is that so many people think 'Christianity' is any different. The original philosophy of Jesus, in terms of the mystery schools, may well have been a warning about all this, but that will understandably have been utterly memory holed. So now we have a Christianity that is indistinguishable from the original monotheistic ideology/cult. Equally ironic how they talk about 'the antichrist' whilst perfectly embodying it themselves. The 'devil' in Judaeo-Christianity is a misdirection, designed to decoy people away from realising that it's the Judaeo-Christian 'god' itself which is the demon. A demon pretending to be a god, as the snake so wisely would've said.
I think if we are to wake people up, these historical and psychological facts are what needs to be discussed, and without fear of being branded with the obvious, predictable smears.
I can see why you say that and I absolutely agree with your last sentence. But do we know what ancient Judaism was or even what monotheism is? Rabbinic Judaism didn’t become the predominant form of the religion until after the destruction of the Second Temple in AD70. People seem to think that monotheism means that there is only one God and one controlling spiritual intelligence. Judaism doesn’t say this. It says there is one creator God and a very elaborate metaphysics involving spiritual intelligences that are called angels and sometimes ‘gods’ in the Old Testament. For me, secularisation is when belief in all of these entities and the hidden forces of nature by which they direct human affairs are consigned to the bin of superstition or greetings cards complete with fat, infantilised cherubs.
In the Old Testament, God rules with a council of intelligences who are given free will which some use to rebel. We are entangled in this war and in fact our fate is the issue being fought over. Secularists just laugh at such an idea. But in the last instance, I am less interested in what any of us think and more interested in the true beliefs of Thiel and those to whom he reports. They are the ones who, almost unhindered, are introducing a cybernetic system with a particular view of humanity at its heart which seems to involve taking human experimentation out of the shadowy laboratories of Operation Paperclip and placing it into pharmacies like Boots where willing subjects line up right next to the Lemsip aisle.
I, rightly or wrongly, think that there is a good chance that they are the heirs of a sixteenth century group of thinkers who took these intelligences very seriously, and, using a complex mix of hermeticism, Kabbalah, mystic Christianity, medieval science, Solomonic magic and alchemy, developed the idea that whilst humanity cannot create matter (only the creator God can do this) we can work with the spiritual intelligences and divorce created matter from its forming forces (based on Plato) to develop our own forms and build a new creation. According to ancient Judaism (books of Jasher and Jubilees), this had happened before in one of the first spiritual rebellions that led to the Flood. Our intrepid explorers ignored this and took very seriously passages from books like Isaiah that argued that nature was ailing and dying. They combined this with the idea that humanity itself had deteriorated from the strength and longevity of the Patriarchs and the vision of the bodily ascension of Enoch into the angelic realms to place the metamorphosis of humanity and the creation of a new ‘nature’ at the heart of its project.
Biologists like Michael Levin are now taking the electromagnetic forces that direct physical growth to make heads grow where tails should be and so on. The implications of such manipulation combined with genetic engineering, the mRNA interventions in protein folding and the forced increase in cancers demanding mutation-inducing radiation are beyond contemplation.
Many people seem attracted by the idea of the Judeo-Christian God as being the devil (it’s very David Icke!). I’m not. If He isn’t, but is that spiritual reality that pulls order out of chaos and thus the platform upon which we stand that is holding us above the terrifying anti-force of the abyss then such beliefs could be a problem. But I don’t try to persuade people one way or the other. People will believe what they believe and we will all have to take our own personal consequences. Unlike Thiel, I am not a universalist and I actually very much doubt that he is either, but it’s s useful story to tell people.
You might be interested in this fascinating essay from a prof. of theology about the wholism of ancient religions, what happened to that wholism in modernity (from around 17th century) and then the rediscovery of wholism in the last century, and what are the obstacles we face in living that wholism. Quite a profound essay that has a lot more to it than what i just briefly mentioned here. Highly recommended https://oneworldrenaissance.com/2021/01/23/holism-fragmentation-and-our-endangered-future-a-new-vision-and-a-new-hope/
For me, you see, Jesus was very much flesh and blood. I am talking at the limits of my current understanding so I am going to have some difficulties expressing what I think at the moment but I think the whole point is that he was flesh and blood. The thing about Christianity that has drawn a lot of fire is the idea of the Trinity. That is, we do not live in a monist world in which everything is ‘One,’ or the ‘One’ that became all the multiple elements of the world returning to ‘oneness’. But neither do we live in a Gnostic world of extreme platonic duality where some pure spiritual essence is trapped in, and must escape from evil matter. The idea of the Trinity is that reality is something else. Now what this ‘something else’ is, is the subject of much argument, but whatever the Incarnation was about, it must have been something to do with healing the relationship between the ‘material’ and ‘spiritual’ intertwined partners that go together to make up mankind.
It is my interpretation (and thus anything but solid fact!) that the clothes that God gave Adam and Eve were in fact physical bodies as we know them. They were made of matter before this but in the sense of modern quantum physics which says that matter is really solidified light. This ‘matter’ then became the object of a great cosmic battle because the interplay of spirit and matter was the basis and object of creation which then in turn gives mankind an extraordinary role within creation because we are the only beings to be made of divine and material elements. The spiritual rebellion is really the attempt to take control of created matter and despoil it as it cannot be destroyed.
It is my opinion that you cannot understand the Hebrew Bible without some understanding of this battle, and, without it the God of the Bible does indeed look like a homicidal maniac. In the interminable battles within Christianity over the centuries the sense of this spiritual battle has been lost and it has become, in large part, an exercise in virtue signalling and, in even larger part, almost entirely coopted by the forces opposed to Christ. This means that we are left alone to explore the real nature of this battle and when people like Peter Thiel say that we are engaged in a spiritual war with a smirk playing around his lips, it makes me sick! Their astonishing attempts to take control of the human body are then left to go ahead without even a murmur from Christian sources whilst Trump’s ‘spiritual advisor’ Paula White is free to say whatever the hell she likes.
I do believe that most of these people believe that they are on the side of the angels (which ones?) but they are in the grip of the astonishing hubris that took hold in the sixteenth century.
I am sorry you lost your first reply. That’s the internet for you! I think that we all come at this from our own different experiences because what else can we do? Many of us have experiences that are out of the ordinary and then they need to be interpreted. I have interpreted my own in the best way that I can. I also respect that you have done the same. At least we know that the world of the ordinary is not the only one and that the way that most people look at reality is not our way. All we can do is remain true to our own understanding as, again, what else can we do? My best wishes to you.
And for whistleblowers there is a massive gangstalking industry which pays psychopaths to harass you at home while the AI algorithms have you followed by security while shopping, make smart street lights prevent you from crossing the street, keep you waiting on hold forever, make emergency services blast their sirens at you wherever you go, sabotage your smart appliances to blast you with heat/cold, torture your animals with terahertz bullets, hit you with microwave weapons, steal your locked bike(s), sabotage your vehicle beyond repair and destroy your reputation by telling your neighbors you are a pedophile. Gangstalking is a thriving industry.
Just another hit piece from the “Unhinged Hysteria” mob who seek the abolition of all government and a return to a feudal society, which is exactly what the Globalists want.
Is there a new Anti-Government Anarchism movement taking over the alternative news media?
It seems like this Anarchism movement only criticizes all forms of government, government institutions, and government participants.
They never advocate and champion the greatest form of government ever conceived, the U.S. Constitutional Federal Republic.
From Whitney Webb post on X on 11/24/24:
“It's not blackpilled or means i'm on someone's payroll to say that i don't trust the national political class in the US to make Americans lives better or protect them during a crisis.
I trust regular Americans to come together during a crisis to help each other out, which invariably happens. I trust regular people to build parallel systems in their communities when shtf.
The government just executes wealth transfers and wants you dependent, desperate and surveilled bc it benefits the oligarch class they serve. Regular Americans don't do this and I'm very hopeful many will figure it out and weather the storm successfully. Self reliance and community matter more than the political circus and the sooner people figure that out, the better.“
Have you heard of the new Independent Media Alliance (IMA)?
The IMA was the idea of Whitney Webb (Unlimited Hangout), Ryan Cristián (The Last American Vagabond) and Derrick Broze (The Conscious Resistance Network). The IMA is a collaborative effort focused on promoting objective, fact-based media from a diverse team of journalists, podcasters, and writers.
Whitney Webb’s “Unlimited Hangout” website is now the “Unhinged Hysteria” website, and by that I mean intentionally writing hit pieces with the motive of trying to deceptively manipulate a reader into believing what the author wants the reader to believe, because the writer has a political agenda of their own, and the hit piece is designed to confuse the reader into thinking that the writer’s agenda is preferable to the agenda of the hit piece target.
To clarify, “Unhinged Hysteria” used to write hit pieces on the Globalists, but now they are writing hit pieces on the Nationalists because “Unhinged is based upon the total anti-government Anarchism of Spoonerism and the anti-technological innovation of Neo-Luddism.
I wonder if “Unhinged Hysteria” realizes that the type of social order that they seek actually aligns perfectly with the type of social order that the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy seek, and maybe that is why the British authorities have not censored or incarcerated UK Spoonerist authors like Iain Davis???
The British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy seek a return to Feudalism with a One World Global Empire where there are open borders and no independent sovereign nation-states, where the people cluster in small agrarian villages, and where there is no industrialization fueled by technological innovation, which aligns perfectly with the type of society sought by the writers of “Unhinged Hysteria.”
William, you can ignore evidence if you choose but I do not have to agree with your rationale for doing so. I therefore have some questions for you.
1. Do you think Peter Thiel, Elon Musk and let's add the Heritage Foundation among many deep state oligarchs are influential in the current Trump administration?
2. Why did Elon Musk say "Accelerating Starship development to build the Martian Technocracy." Why would he and other oligarchs like Bezos want to live in a Technocracy.
3. What is a Technocracy?
4. Why does Curtis Yarvin, who is obviously closely associated with Peter Thiel, consider him to be "fully enlightened" and what do you think that means.
5. What is accelerationism?
6. If Thiel and his proteges are not accelerationists why did they call the now ubiquitous model of aggressive venture capitalism they use "accelerators"?
I will be interested to hear your views.
BTW: I have never advocated a "return to feudalism," any form of "one world global empire," any agrarian model, any rejection of technology (quite the opposite) nor any of the other things you claim I advocate with the exception of a borderless world.
The whole point of all of my work is that I wholeheartedly oppose oligarchy. You, on the other hand, knowing full well how the oligarchy operates, consistently argue for the system by which they profit. I realise that they are completely ignoring the US Constitution which you venerate but that is because oligarchs don't care about it.
Most unfortunately ppl like this William character will never b able or willing, w/out Divine intervention, 2see Truth - thus I refuse2entertain their particular madness as it is a complete waste of very valuable time. However I do appreciate those who have the energy&fortitude2try2reach such lost souls. Namaste👊
I’m not going to waste my life hyperventilating over the “What ifs” promulgated by the “Unhinged Hysteria” mob, and instead I’m going to cherish and celebrate the “What is” that President Trump has brought to the USA and the World, and all of the “What is going to be” that are forthcoming.
Unfortunately William, despite some of your excellent work on exposing the deep state, your response to the perfectly reasonable question I've put to you means I can no longer take your comments seriously. I realise you are serious about your intentions but the unshakeable faith you have placed in your desired political saviour appears to have overridden your own knowledge and awareness. It seems you have become increasingly vitriolic as a result. At this point, I see no purpose in engaging with you any further. I genuinely wish you all the best.
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table led to the founding in 1921 of both the US-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Chatham House in London, Bilderberg founded in 1954, the Club of Rome (1968) and the Trilateral Commission (1973). All of these organisations are dedicated to global governance, and there is extensive overlap in terms of the principle players. The same forces created the United Nations.
Five Eyes Intelligence Oversight and Review Council (FIORC)
FIORC is composed of the following non-political intelligence oversight, review, and security entities of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
ECFR has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Warsaw and Sofia.
ECFR was founded in 2007 by Mark Leonard together with a council of fifty founding members, chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer, and Mabel van Oranje, with initial funding from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, the Communitas Foundation, Sigrid Rausing, Unicredit and Fundación Para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE).
Trump is filmed sharing drinks and laughs with Obama and saying he has promised to do whatever the Rothschilds wants him to do. That pobably makes him our friend and saviour!
Why do you care what type of society Elon Musk envisions for the people who choose to live in his manufactured environment on Mars?
Personally, I believe trying to establish a manufactured environment on Mars is a complete waste of money and resources.
However, Elon Musk’s reusable rocket will greatly conserve earthly resources and provide the capability to launch larger and more powerful telescopes into space, and to send probes to other planets, moons, asteroids, comets, and whatever else might be out there.
Regardless of Elon Musk’s plans for a Technocracy on Mars in his manufactured Martian environment, down here on good ol’ Earth in the USA, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights are still the Law of the Land, and any new technological innovations will be constrained and regulated by the government, which in the USA is the US Constitution.
Except you're ignoring one of the central points of Iain's essay, which is about the corporate takeover of government. Once that happens, I think you can kiss your beloved constitution goodbye. And the other point is that it's Trump who is enabling this.
It's not 'fascism' in the sense of the state ultimately controlling private corporations, it's the other way around. This is what is meant by 'stakeholder capitalism'.
The corporations and banks, the Overclass if you like, have been running and owning the government long before Elon was born. The rich have always hated the rules, the Constitution, and they certainly hate most people especially the poor.
Yeah - quite true. Perhaps they’re just being a bit more open about it now, out of some new-found confidence in the fact that they no longer have any fear of a revolution. As soon as they did 9/11 right in people’s faces (obvious controlled demolitions etc.) without provoking a revolution, they finally knew just how much they could get away with, and that the vast majority of the population really are subjugated and obedient beyond salvation or redemption.
I can well imagine what an empowering feeling that must’ve been for them. It’s also why they’ve been able to continue doing so many in-your-face ‘events’, knowing full well they are perfectly safe.
Won't happen? What is the PATRIOT ACT and NDAA? What is corporate personhood? Hell the government at all levels is a corporation. Long gone is the common law my friend, because as 'conservative' Romney said 'corporations are people my friend.'
What can be written can be unwritten. Besides, the 'constitution' can be 'temporarily' set aside in favour of 'executive powers' in any time of (manufactured) crisis. And then temporary becomes permanent.
Go watch Star Wars Episode I if you don't believe me.
The only fact that everyone needs to know is that Donald J. Trump is the President of the United States of America, and HIS Cabinet appointees take orders from him and implement HIS policies and agenda that are all explicitly spelled out in HIS Agenda 47 and HIS Executive Orders.
If you and your “Unhinged Hysteria” cohorts are going to write hit pieces on President Trump, then make your arguments against HIS Executive Orders, and not what your unhinged imaginations suspect HE is going to do.
William, Donald Trump isn't a politician he's a businessman and property devoloper, he is the president of a corporation, while his cabinet might take orders from him, he takes his from the directors or shareholders, executive orders are a perk of the president. The rest of his duties are scripted for him, if he goes off script he will be gone. If you can't understand that politicians don't make the big decision, then you will never understand politics
Excellent article packed with information, thank you very much. I am working through it. Frankly this the most disturbing thing I have seen for a long while but I was prepared for it since it comes just about a week after David Hughes made an appearance on the German Corona Investigative Committee where he mentioned your work during his discussion on the same topic of technocracy. I abstracted his part from the very long session video here. As Hughes says, it is above all a spiritual battle of good against evil which we must win. At least we know who the real terrorists are.
President Trump was elected in a landslide victory of Electoral College votes and popular votes and victories in all seven swing states because President Trump’s Agenda 47 represents the type of society that a majority of US citizens want to live in, and that type of society is a Constitutional Federal Republic which protects Personal Liberty, Personal Rights, Personal Prosperity, and Personal Happiness. President Trump’s Executive Orders and Cabinet Appointments prove that he is keeping the promises that he made during his election campaign.
President Trump was elected because his goals and vision for America are preferable to a majority of the citizens of the USA than the goals and vision for the destruction of America that Democratic Party waged over the previous four years.
President Trump is the people’s REPRESENTATIVE, not their SAVIOR.
Yes, and he may offer americans cheap fares to his new Gaza Riviera Casino&Golf (but sadly has to await the deportation of its inhabitants). That is ins*ne, depr*ved, m*d, lun*tic, psych*, self-dec*ived, a fre*king d*vil. No less.
Unfortunately only those VeryVery Few have Eyes2C, Ears2Hear & a Heart2Understand. I no longer engage with the Willfully Blind as they remind me of those "believers" who never let Scripture get in the way of their beliefs.
lol, I hear ya, still God is not willing that any should perish, and we are his workmanship created unto good works. I'll engage up to 3x, that's when I leave off if the person doesn't want to wake up.
Sounds like they’re planning to run humanity as a feed lot. Line up to get your daily rations and mandatory injections. Chris Hedges and Sheldon Wolin talk about inverted totalitarianism which is exactly what you said. It looks superficially Democratic but the corporations wield all the power. If it’s to be run as a business the only thing that will matter is the bottom line and any shred of empathy will be totally eliminated by AI.
They are exploiting the limitations of democracy in order to collapse the entire system and accelerate capitalism to the point of fascism. I would suggest maybe it’s not democracy that is broken, but capitalism. Maybe it’s time for ai regulated market to make it more fair and inclusive and to remove the politicians, their cronies, and grift from it.
The W3C has a Community Group called the "Credible Web" Community Group.
Some comments from a recent meeting:
"we haven’t quite yet reached the level where we understand enough to have a productive f2f meeting"
"if credibility meant anything, climate change would have been tackled decades ago"
"… some people equate credibility with truth… but we don’t associate those"
"… It’s very hard to conclude which credibility signals… can for sure determine truth… truth is a complicated term… let’s say credible or not"
"… W3C works on tech solution… we have implications on social change… everyone here probably agrees that tech is political… technical change is the only way we can have an effect"
"what is reasonably clear is that AI is likely multiplying the challenges we’re facing in that space"
The feudalists or faux libertarians concept of decentralization is "privatized fiefdoms." Corporatized smart cities that's ultimately very centralized, but on a micro level.
Plebs won't even be able to choose their "feudal lord," as they'll be assigned purely based on usefulness. That's as long as they don't become useless eaters. Those types aren't profitable and will be discarded without any social safety nets, as the above-mentioned expenditures were long ago decried as being Ponzi schemes.
Enter, social Darwinism where eugenicists determine whether euthanasia is required. 🤑
Another thought - this 'mimesis' thing. Isn't that just a fancy intellectual term for 'coveting your neighbour's ox'?
See that's their projection tendency again. But here's the interesting psychohistorical/anthropological observation: ancient human beings were never like that at all. Their brains did not evolve to be like that. Remember we're talking several hundred thousand years of brain evolution before the very notion of 'economics' and 'capitalism' and all that even existed. Yes, it's true that human brains may have 'adapted' to several thousand years of this dystopian evil ('it's not healthy to be well-adjusted to a sick society' etc.), but one can't analyse 'normal human beings' by examining 'well-adjusted' modern people (this is the flaw of that modern psyop known as 'psychology').
Further - it all reveals their attitude towards human beings not even as 'subhuman' but 'other' - they view humans as 'units of economic productivity' - and that view is absolutely expressed in all of these ideologies/methods you described, like 'technate' and technocracy and so on. It's revealing that there's zero psychology in any of it. Zero emotion. Zero love. Zero culture. Zero art. Zero spirituality. And so on. All of the things that are at the higher levels of the 'hierarchy of needs' are conspicuously absent from any of these philosophies. It is entirely mechanistic and centred around 'productivity' and 'resources' and 'economy' and 'social mechanism' and so on. Again, it reveals their view of humans as themselves 'resources'.
in other words, as nothing more nor less than 'slaves'.
So if we want to truly understand all of this we simply need to go back in history and ask ourselves where did this view of 'the rest of humanity' come from? I know the answer to that one, of course. It's not natural, it's not normal. It's certainly not ancient/pagan/spiritual - as normal human beings evolved to be. I think that monster group is intended as a kind of vaccination - to look at, rather than from, and by understanding them, develop an immunity. On a species level. That which does not kill us makes us stronger, etc.
This monster group has been conducting a war against the spirit since its inception. It is evil, quite frankly. That's what I shall be doing a series on, I think, rather than get bogged down in all this 'conspiracy' stuff. I think, by virtue of all these cognitive infiltrators, that whole thing is a grand misdirection. Ha, yes, a 'carceral intellectual paradigm'. When the truth is really blindingly simple.
Ramble over. I shall be making blackberry crumble tomorrow, from blackberries picked lovingly from our own garden. I wonder how these technocratic fuckers are going to stop people picking blackberries? Hah - bet they didn't factor that into their dark enlightenment shit, eh! Nature always wins. Love nature, and you win too...
I haven't watched your video yet because I wanted to read your article first. It's very long, of course, but well worth the cognitive effort - it's an amazing piece of research quite frankly, and I've archived it for reference. Thank you for all your effort there. It is very much appreciated.
I was right, though - you did learn me stuff I hadn't encountered before! Like, I'd never heard of this 'dark enlightenment' or 'neoreactionary' or any of these other monstrous concepts, nor the monstrous ideologues espousing them. And it's probably a good thing for my mental health that I hadn't heard about them.
Obviously I've heard of Thiel and I do love your takedown of his pseudo-Christian hypocrisy. Nicely done, Sir. Nicely done.
Personally, I think one could sum up all these people in just one word 'insane'. Actually we should definitely prefix the word 'fucking' to that.
I am now wondering, however, whether all these convoluted theories they are vomiting out at us are 'genuine' (on an intellectual level, I mean - in the sense that they actually believe in them) or whether they are simply misdirecting intellectual types. Getting them to argue over what is ultimately irrelevant, thus wasting their time, doing their heads in ('fucking with them'), and generally constraining them in some carceral intellectual paradigm (that's a good phrase, 'carceral intellectual paradigm' - must use it more often).
What I mean is, like we were discussing a while ago, if we distinguish, or differentiate, between the 'ideology' and 'the method' then it becomes clear that all of these so-called ideologies, or even 'intellectual disputes' are nothing but bickering about the best method or pathway towards totalitarianism. Hence the misdirection and 'keeping people intellectually occupied'. Because what it all boils down to is the same old small minority group of evil monsters pursuing their objective of total domination. They are simply adapting to all this new technology, which, one presumes, the likes of Adam Weishaupt, Amschel Rothe's Child et al. simply couldn't have envisaged. It must excite them, for sure, and probably in an onanistic way, one imagines.
I think you sort of hinted at this fact, though, by suggesting it's all just different sides of the same totalitarian coin. It leads to the same monsters being 'the Cathedral'.
Anyway, what it simply reinforces is that which is revealed by their attitude towards normal human beings. It's that they really do view normal humans as a different species. They may ascribe their own amoral motivations to humans (projection), but ultimately, it kind of reinforces what I myself have definitely come to believe, which is that we truly are dealing with a fundamentally different species here, because they simply do not think like normal human beings. And seeing as thinking is governed by the brain, that means their brains are differently wired. No normal human, after all, would ever come up with the sorts of philosophies you described in your essay. You can of course catch glimpses of it in some of the more Establishment-oriented thinkers in the Enlightenment, but they didn't get anywhere near these new monstrosities, and I strongly suspect even they would be horrified.
So it's back to that word 'insane' again. Not forgetting that all-important prefix...
I thought Tony Gosling made a very good point when he mentioned Rand's objectivism. While I personally agree that reality is not subjective, Tony's inferred observation that it was only the laissez-fairre capitalism aspect that appealed to the oligarchs is a good one. Yarvin has obviously been encouraged by Thiel. Is that because Thiel really thinks Yarvin is on to something or is it because Yarvin is simply saying what Thiel wants to hear? I suspect it is the latter.
I don't think these people have any kind of moral compass at all. I think their philosophy is always self-serving. Look at how Thiel chooses to interpret Christianity! For me philosophy and theology are at their best when they challenge you to honestly reflect and possibly consider your own failings, or at least explore the possibility that you could be more "moral."
These guys consistently select, favour, support (whatever) theology and philosophy that either already justifies or could be engineered to justify their own moral insanity. This happens too frequently for me to accept that they are approaching this with any intellectual, emotional or spiritual honesty. Of course, if they are psychopaths that would be impossible for them to understand anyway.
I think, as you suggest, much of it is simply an attempt to legitimise their own depravity. But, in doing so, as Gosling inferred, they are also creating a rationale other lunatics can adopt to legitimise their own.
Totally excellent points! I agree completely - their use of ideologies is simply a kind of pragmatism and, yes, a form of psychological self-deception used to justify their depravity. In a similar way in which ideas like the theory of evolution were appropriated to justify the British Empire (racism, might is right, a ruling class etc.).
Similarly, 'what Thiel wants to hear' - precisely.
I really don't think these creatures genuinely believe in any ideology except self-gratification and domination. The further one goes down that psychological rabbit hole the more one encounters the evil depravity of the child abuse network, which is in perfect keeping with their psychological profile. Anneke Lucas makes this point, if in slightly different words.
So I do think it's important for us more intellectually minded dissidents to really focus a lot more on the psychology, even if it's pretty obvious. Except it might seem obvious, but it's far more nuanced. And people need to be educated about that. One of the great successes of the bad guys (including the cognitive infiltrators) is the corruption of the science of psychology and the preventing of people in the conspiracy theory subculture from understanding psychology. And thus history too, for that matter. Sorry, I'm in danger of rambling again. My blackberry crumble awaits.
Anyway, hold your other thoughts, though, as I didn't have time to watch the video yet, as I was intently devouring your essay. Hopefully I'll have time to watch it this evening, then I'll do another reply.
Just came across this article from Global Research which you might want to archive for future reference if you haven’t seen it already. it mentions a few of Trump’s immediate executive orders which may have otherwise gone under the radar. https://www.globalresearch.ca/declassification-neurotechnologies-enabling-remote-control-activity-human-brains/5881082
There’s a few other choice snippets too, like Trump saying at an election rally ‘four more years, it’ll be fixed… after this you won’t need to vote anymore’.
Then the revocation of security clearance for an attorney called Mark Zaid who was representing people claiming Havana Syndrome damage. Then indications of the need for a false flag back in 1994, i.e. several years earlier than PNAC.
Just when you thought the rabbit hole didn’t get any deeper, it does. And the deeper, the more disturbing. One aspect I find interesting is that a lot of what’s out in the open about the technocracy is the ‘organisational’ aspects of its method (cf. WEF etc.). The deeper ‘mind control’ aspects are necessarily hidden. And I also get the equally sinister impression that a lot of the cognitive infiltrators are misdirecting people away from the real version of mind control, by getting people to focus on ‘anti-woke’ talking points, and ‘psyops’ - i.e. stuff that really only affects ‘the masses’, not intelligent thinkers. These aspects aren’t unimportant, of course, but they are not the most important. A true technate, after all, does require a serious level of mind control, at all levels of society. Manipulating the masses is relatively easy (call them gammas or lower). Manipulating individuals is a different matter, especially when those individuals are alphas and betas (and it’s alphas and betas who are the real threat to the Cathedral).
I finally got around to your discussion with Tony. Obviously having read the essay I was familiar with all the content. You're right though about that point about Rand - as I said, it seems a lot like pragmatism, I mean without any genuine belief in a particular ideology. It's the utility or otherwise of it which they find important. And, yes, they will create these pragmatic ideologies which suit their underlying purpose (social control etc.). And naturally it's always important for them to dress them up in the kind of language which makes them sound positive and attractive - I think you both made that point, which is an important one.
I liked the reference to Land being a bit of an acid head (and in Brighton too - which is where I first did acid ironically (late 80s/early 90s) - there was a great scene there, for sure.). If only Land had done pills instead of acid then he'd never have come up with a 'dark' enlightenment. It would've been a much brighter one. Lol.
I do have a funny story about doing acid in Brighton actually, just wandering around and ending up meeting these skinheads who claimed to be 'SHARPS' - skinheads against racial prejudice. I mean, FFS! If that's not postmodernism to the extreme I don't know what is.
So yeah, there's a lot of fucking weirdos out there, for sure. Unfortunately, the lunatics are running the asylum now. With high tech shit. I hate to say we're doomed, but it's not looking great right now.
Nevertheless, am looking forward to your part 2.
The darkness goes far deeper than most people realize. And Trump is a part of it.
Gecko1,
Is darkness an evil thing to you?
Most creatures love darkness & without it life wouldn't be possible.
There seems to be a lot of fear about the lack of light these days & that is typically the influence & urge of LUCIFER, the light bringer.
Reading so many 'cowards of darkness' expressing their fear makes me wonder if this is either overt or sublimated Lucifer propaganda or just childish terms we tend not to think about when used. It's strange that often the the 'cowards of darkness' are also busy saying Lucifer is the Devil. Can you explain why we should fear the darkness, especially DEEP DARKNESS which seems very Freudian ?
Maybe I'm getting too old to take much of the conspiracy 'market' seriously anymore, it just seems that talking of darkness as a 'tangible demonic entity' is so corny ,& childish, it makes me inclined to think its a joke comment, or artefact of psychosis.
Deception and darkness go together. And deception is rampant.
I’d argue that the second part you’ve published in the series is even better Iain.
MONUMENTAL work!! 👏👏
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2025/03/investigative-reports/the-dark-maga-gov-corp-technate-part-2/
You are one of the few people who seems to understand that the people orchestrating current developments are not just motivated by mundane concerns of money and power but that there are deeper currents of thought that are now pushing us in terrifying directions.
The secularisation of the Western mind was a deliberate strategy to rob people of any vestiges of the capacity for metaphysical and philosophical thought or religious feeling. Before the eighteenth century, all thought in the West took place in a Christian context or with reference to Christianity. So, this begs the question what is Christianity? It certainly is not a set of values surrounding being nice. This notwithstanding, the obligation to care for the weak and the emphasis on forgiveness and the negation of the idea of an eye for an eye did inject a particular positive tension into human social and political relations that pretty much shaped the development of Western Europe.
But Jesus did not leave any written documents and the biblical compilation arose out of early debates, arguments and reasoning about what it all meant. Early Christian thinkers drew on many sources to help their thinking, and this is still the cause of a lot of bitter disagreement to this day. So, there have been, and are, many different strands of thought within Christianity battling each other for supremacy. This finally descended into the gross indignity of the barking insanity of the charismatic movement, American televangelism and the crass theatricality and sugary cliches of the megachurch movement which have served to render Christianity a circus, pandered to the lowest type of emotionality and obscured all of the profound reasoning that forms the basis of the religion. This has allowed the rise of people like Brand, Peterson, Robinson and the messianism that we first saw in Tony Blair. They can get away with pretty much anything and call it ‘Christian’. But they are using it as a smokescreen for a much darker current of metaphysical thought.
Thiel’s apocalypticism seems to me to be based on the sixteenth century collaboration between Jews and Christians instigated by Pico della Mirandola. This astonishing set of ideas was then infused into the entity that was to become the British Empire. It is encoded in John Dee’s Monas Hieroglyphica and was transported to America by the Puritan alchemists in the seventeenth century. Coincidentally, in the opening of his Monas Dee includes a Y. It is his tree of rarity that demands that the global ruler take the spiritual path if he is to avoid becoming a tyrant. This is the path that Thiel et al seem to believe that they are taking to save humanity from Antichrist and establish the kingdom of God on Earth. As Dee insisted, this would be a world controlled and shaped by those who understood that everything is based on the mystical and practical powers of numbers.
Dee’s programme involved the development of ‘an invincible war machine’ to fight Antichrist. Even more worrying, he appropriated the idea of the ‘mystical vocation of the Jew’ in which God relies upon the actions of his devotees to bring harmony into his own processes. Following Pico this involved a process of divine becoming in which mankind is obliged to metamorphosise into a new creature. Unfortunately, so the argument (based on Plato) goes, most people are incapable of the spiritual focus to bring about their own transformation. The journey from Alpha to Omega is then one in which these self-appointed directors of our spiritual advancement will direct the Second Coming of Christ now interpreted as some kind of collective energetic expression. They will bring about the kingdom of God and our collective absorption into the higher level of angelic intelligence or nous. Whether they actually believe in ‘Christ’ or a God, as we would understand it, is open to question, but they certainly seem to have some kind of ‘religiosity’ that takes their ideas out of the normal pulses and rhythms of purely secular, political thought.
It is futile to argue about ‘Communism’ or ‘Fascism’ when we are facing a phalanx of metaphysicians who believe that anything they do is justified because the very future of humanity depends upon them. And anyone who thinks that the physical and spiritual metamorphosis of humanity is not the endpoint is not taking enough notice of the profound interventions in human biology now being implemented and planned.
I'd say the secularisation of the human mind began with the monotheistic ideology - that's the evil objective it was designed for. It's fundamentally anti-nature, anti-spiritual, anti-human and so on. The 'atheistic' enlightenment is an inevitable outcome of it, because by then it had destroyed all true spirituality as existed pre-Christianity. This is one of the older historical reasons for anti-Judaism of course - contemporary thinkers would've been able to psychologically understand how anti-spiritual and infantilising their ideology was, and an insult to all the gods and assorted other supernatural entities with which humanity had always existed on a daily basis.
That ideology posits the existence of an authoritarian tyrant at the top of the pyramid, with an 'elect' (chosen) to manage the world, and everyone else is a slave. If that doesn't sound exactly like the kind of 'new world order' we're all talking about here then I don't know what does.
The greatest irony is that so many people think 'Christianity' is any different. The original philosophy of Jesus, in terms of the mystery schools, may well have been a warning about all this, but that will understandably have been utterly memory holed. So now we have a Christianity that is indistinguishable from the original monotheistic ideology/cult. Equally ironic how they talk about 'the antichrist' whilst perfectly embodying it themselves. The 'devil' in Judaeo-Christianity is a misdirection, designed to decoy people away from realising that it's the Judaeo-Christian 'god' itself which is the demon. A demon pretending to be a god, as the snake so wisely would've said.
I think if we are to wake people up, these historical and psychological facts are what needs to be discussed, and without fear of being branded with the obvious, predictable smears.
I can see why you say that and I absolutely agree with your last sentence. But do we know what ancient Judaism was or even what monotheism is? Rabbinic Judaism didn’t become the predominant form of the religion until after the destruction of the Second Temple in AD70. People seem to think that monotheism means that there is only one God and one controlling spiritual intelligence. Judaism doesn’t say this. It says there is one creator God and a very elaborate metaphysics involving spiritual intelligences that are called angels and sometimes ‘gods’ in the Old Testament. For me, secularisation is when belief in all of these entities and the hidden forces of nature by which they direct human affairs are consigned to the bin of superstition or greetings cards complete with fat, infantilised cherubs.
In the Old Testament, God rules with a council of intelligences who are given free will which some use to rebel. We are entangled in this war and in fact our fate is the issue being fought over. Secularists just laugh at such an idea. But in the last instance, I am less interested in what any of us think and more interested in the true beliefs of Thiel and those to whom he reports. They are the ones who, almost unhindered, are introducing a cybernetic system with a particular view of humanity at its heart which seems to involve taking human experimentation out of the shadowy laboratories of Operation Paperclip and placing it into pharmacies like Boots where willing subjects line up right next to the Lemsip aisle.
I, rightly or wrongly, think that there is a good chance that they are the heirs of a sixteenth century group of thinkers who took these intelligences very seriously, and, using a complex mix of hermeticism, Kabbalah, mystic Christianity, medieval science, Solomonic magic and alchemy, developed the idea that whilst humanity cannot create matter (only the creator God can do this) we can work with the spiritual intelligences and divorce created matter from its forming forces (based on Plato) to develop our own forms and build a new creation. According to ancient Judaism (books of Jasher and Jubilees), this had happened before in one of the first spiritual rebellions that led to the Flood. Our intrepid explorers ignored this and took very seriously passages from books like Isaiah that argued that nature was ailing and dying. They combined this with the idea that humanity itself had deteriorated from the strength and longevity of the Patriarchs and the vision of the bodily ascension of Enoch into the angelic realms to place the metamorphosis of humanity and the creation of a new ‘nature’ at the heart of its project.
Biologists like Michael Levin are now taking the electromagnetic forces that direct physical growth to make heads grow where tails should be and so on. The implications of such manipulation combined with genetic engineering, the mRNA interventions in protein folding and the forced increase in cancers demanding mutation-inducing radiation are beyond contemplation.
Many people seem attracted by the idea of the Judeo-Christian God as being the devil (it’s very David Icke!). I’m not. If He isn’t, but is that spiritual reality that pulls order out of chaos and thus the platform upon which we stand that is holding us above the terrifying anti-force of the abyss then such beliefs could be a problem. But I don’t try to persuade people one way or the other. People will believe what they believe and we will all have to take our own personal consequences. Unlike Thiel, I am not a universalist and I actually very much doubt that he is either, but it’s s useful story to tell people.
You might be interested in this fascinating essay from a prof. of theology about the wholism of ancient religions, what happened to that wholism in modernity (from around 17th century) and then the rediscovery of wholism in the last century, and what are the obstacles we face in living that wholism. Quite a profound essay that has a lot more to it than what i just briefly mentioned here. Highly recommended https://oneworldrenaissance.com/2021/01/23/holism-fragmentation-and-our-endangered-future-a-new-vision-and-a-new-hope/
Thank you, I will take a look at that.
For me, you see, Jesus was very much flesh and blood. I am talking at the limits of my current understanding so I am going to have some difficulties expressing what I think at the moment but I think the whole point is that he was flesh and blood. The thing about Christianity that has drawn a lot of fire is the idea of the Trinity. That is, we do not live in a monist world in which everything is ‘One,’ or the ‘One’ that became all the multiple elements of the world returning to ‘oneness’. But neither do we live in a Gnostic world of extreme platonic duality where some pure spiritual essence is trapped in, and must escape from evil matter. The idea of the Trinity is that reality is something else. Now what this ‘something else’ is, is the subject of much argument, but whatever the Incarnation was about, it must have been something to do with healing the relationship between the ‘material’ and ‘spiritual’ intertwined partners that go together to make up mankind.
It is my interpretation (and thus anything but solid fact!) that the clothes that God gave Adam and Eve were in fact physical bodies as we know them. They were made of matter before this but in the sense of modern quantum physics which says that matter is really solidified light. This ‘matter’ then became the object of a great cosmic battle because the interplay of spirit and matter was the basis and object of creation which then in turn gives mankind an extraordinary role within creation because we are the only beings to be made of divine and material elements. The spiritual rebellion is really the attempt to take control of created matter and despoil it as it cannot be destroyed.
It is my opinion that you cannot understand the Hebrew Bible without some understanding of this battle, and, without it the God of the Bible does indeed look like a homicidal maniac. In the interminable battles within Christianity over the centuries the sense of this spiritual battle has been lost and it has become, in large part, an exercise in virtue signalling and, in even larger part, almost entirely coopted by the forces opposed to Christ. This means that we are left alone to explore the real nature of this battle and when people like Peter Thiel say that we are engaged in a spiritual war with a smirk playing around his lips, it makes me sick! Their astonishing attempts to take control of the human body are then left to go ahead without even a murmur from Christian sources whilst Trump’s ‘spiritual advisor’ Paula White is free to say whatever the hell she likes.
I do believe that most of these people believe that they are on the side of the angels (which ones?) but they are in the grip of the astonishing hubris that took hold in the sixteenth century.
I am sorry you lost your first reply. That’s the internet for you! I think that we all come at this from our own different experiences because what else can we do? Many of us have experiences that are out of the ordinary and then they need to be interpreted. I have interpreted my own in the best way that I can. I also respect that you have done the same. At least we know that the world of the ordinary is not the only one and that the way that most people look at reality is not our way. All we can do is remain true to our own understanding as, again, what else can we do? My best wishes to you.
Too fkn right!
😂
Take the shot or your fired, pretty much there already
And for whistleblowers there is a massive gangstalking industry which pays psychopaths to harass you at home while the AI algorithms have you followed by security while shopping, make smart street lights prevent you from crossing the street, keep you waiting on hold forever, make emergency services blast their sirens at you wherever you go, sabotage your smart appliances to blast you with heat/cold, torture your animals with terahertz bullets, hit you with microwave weapons, steal your locked bike(s), sabotage your vehicle beyond repair and destroy your reputation by telling your neighbors you are a pedophile. Gangstalking is a thriving industry.
https://911nwo.com/2024/08/15/1-identify-2-villify-3-nullify-4-destroy-community-organized-stalking-ops-exposed-by-david-a-larson-pi-and-eleanor-white-ti/
Holy moly.
🙄😂
like name like nature then.
Just another hit piece from the “Unhinged Hysteria” mob who seek the abolition of all government and a return to a feudal society, which is exactly what the Globalists want.
Is there a new Anti-Government Anarchism movement taking over the alternative news media?
It seems like this Anarchism movement only criticizes all forms of government, government institutions, and government participants.
They never advocate and champion the greatest form of government ever conceived, the U.S. Constitutional Federal Republic.
From Whitney Webb post on X on 11/24/24:
“It's not blackpilled or means i'm on someone's payroll to say that i don't trust the national political class in the US to make Americans lives better or protect them during a crisis.
I trust regular Americans to come together during a crisis to help each other out, which invariably happens. I trust regular people to build parallel systems in their communities when shtf.
The government just executes wealth transfers and wants you dependent, desperate and surveilled bc it benefits the oligarch class they serve. Regular Americans don't do this and I'm very hopeful many will figure it out and weather the storm successfully. Self reliance and community matter more than the political circus and the sooner people figure that out, the better.“
Have you heard of the new Independent Media Alliance (IMA)?
From: Iain Davis, IMA member
https://iaindavis.com/the-independent-media-alliance-first-panel-discussion/
The IMA was the idea of Whitney Webb (Unlimited Hangout), Ryan Cristián (The Last American Vagabond) and Derrick Broze (The Conscious Resistance Network). The IMA is a collaborative effort focused on promoting objective, fact-based media from a diverse team of journalists, podcasters, and writers.
The current roster <of journalists> includes:
Hakeem Anwar, Above Phone / Take Back Our Tech
Catherine Austin-Fitts, Solari Report
Jason Bassler, The Free Thought Project
Jason Bermas, The Jason Bermas Show
Catte Black, Off-Guardian
James Corbett, The Corbett Report
Richard Grove, Grand Theft World Podcast
Kit Knightly, Off-Guardian
Hrvoje Morić, Geopolitics and Empire
Steve Poikonen, Slow News Day / AM Wake Up
Charlie Robinson, Macroaggressions Podcast
Carey Wedler, read about Carey here
Also from Iain Davis:
The Parasite Class
https://iaindavis.com/the-parasite-class/
Whitney Webb’s “Unlimited Hangout” website is now the “Unhinged Hysteria” website, and by that I mean intentionally writing hit pieces with the motive of trying to deceptively manipulate a reader into believing what the author wants the reader to believe, because the writer has a political agenda of their own, and the hit piece is designed to confuse the reader into thinking that the writer’s agenda is preferable to the agenda of the hit piece target.
To clarify, “Unhinged Hysteria” used to write hit pieces on the Globalists, but now they are writing hit pieces on the Nationalists because “Unhinged is based upon the total anti-government Anarchism of Spoonerism and the anti-technological innovation of Neo-Luddism.
I wonder if “Unhinged Hysteria” realizes that the type of social order that they seek actually aligns perfectly with the type of social order that the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy seek, and maybe that is why the British authorities have not censored or incarcerated UK Spoonerist authors like Iain Davis???
The British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy seek a return to Feudalism with a One World Global Empire where there are open borders and no independent sovereign nation-states, where the people cluster in small agrarian villages, and where there is no industrialization fueled by technological innovation, which aligns perfectly with the type of society sought by the writers of “Unhinged Hysteria.”
William, you can ignore evidence if you choose but I do not have to agree with your rationale for doing so. I therefore have some questions for you.
1. Do you think Peter Thiel, Elon Musk and let's add the Heritage Foundation among many deep state oligarchs are influential in the current Trump administration?
2. Why did Elon Musk say "Accelerating Starship development to build the Martian Technocracy." Why would he and other oligarchs like Bezos want to live in a Technocracy.
3. What is a Technocracy?
4. Why does Curtis Yarvin, who is obviously closely associated with Peter Thiel, consider him to be "fully enlightened" and what do you think that means.
5. What is accelerationism?
6. If Thiel and his proteges are not accelerationists why did they call the now ubiquitous model of aggressive venture capitalism they use "accelerators"?
I will be interested to hear your views.
BTW: I have never advocated a "return to feudalism," any form of "one world global empire," any agrarian model, any rejection of technology (quite the opposite) nor any of the other things you claim I advocate with the exception of a borderless world.
The whole point of all of my work is that I wholeheartedly oppose oligarchy. You, on the other hand, knowing full well how the oligarchy operates, consistently argue for the system by which they profit. I realise that they are completely ignoring the US Constitution which you venerate but that is because oligarchs don't care about it.
Most unfortunately ppl like this William character will never b able or willing, w/out Divine intervention, 2see Truth - thus I refuse2entertain their particular madness as it is a complete waste of very valuable time. However I do appreciate those who have the energy&fortitude2try2reach such lost souls. Namaste👊
I’m not going to waste my life hyperventilating over the “What ifs” promulgated by the “Unhinged Hysteria” mob, and instead I’m going to cherish and celebrate the “What is” that President Trump has brought to the USA and the World, and all of the “What is going to be” that are forthcoming.
Unfortunately William, despite some of your excellent work on exposing the deep state, your response to the perfectly reasonable question I've put to you means I can no longer take your comments seriously. I realise you are serious about your intentions but the unshakeable faith you have placed in your desired political saviour appears to have overridden your own knowledge and awareness. It seems you have become increasingly vitriolic as a result. At this point, I see no purpose in engaging with you any further. I genuinely wish you all the best.
Trump is not the Enemy
LONDON IS THE ENEMY OF HUMANITY
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table led to the founding in 1921 of both the US-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Chatham House in London, Bilderberg founded in 1954, the Club of Rome (1968) and the Trilateral Commission (1973). All of these organisations are dedicated to global governance, and there is extensive overlap in terms of the principle players. The same forces created the United Nations.
[https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/](https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/)
THE CFR AND THE FIVE EYES INTELLIGENCE NETWORK
Five Eyes Intelligence Oversight and Review Council (FIORC)
FIORC is composed of the following non-political intelligence oversight, review, and security entities of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
[https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ncsc-how-we-work/217-about/organization/icig-pages/2660-icig-fiorc](https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ncsc-how-we-work/217-about/organization/icig-pages/2660-icig-fiorc)
What Is Five Eyes? Understanding the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance
[https://christophegaron.com/articles/mind/what-is-five-eyes-understanding-the-five-eyes-intelligence-alliance/](https://christophegaron.com/articles/mind/what-is-five-eyes-understanding-the-five-eyes-intelligence-alliance/)
THE CFR / FIVE EYES NETWORK
UK: The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) (Chatham House)
USA: The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
Canada: Canadian International Council (CIC) formerly “The Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA)”
Australia: Australian Institute of International Affairs (AIIA)
New Zealand: New Zealand Institute of International Affairs (NZIIA)
YouTube Video of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Describing The Council on Foreign Relations as “The Mothership”
[https://youtu.be/By61S9Q5Esc](https://youtu.be/By61S9Q5Esc)
[https://youtu.be/-6TXcQpgC9Q](https://youtu.be/-6TXcQpgC9Q)
YouTube Video of Dick Cheney Confessing that He was a Director of The Council on Foreign Relations
[https://youtu.be/BbnpN07J_zg](https://youtu.be/BbnpN07J_zg)
[https://www.c-span.org/clip/public-affairs-event/user-clip-dick-cheney-was-cfr-director/4873458](https://www.c-span.org/clip/public-affairs-event/user-clip-dick-cheney-was-cfr-director/4873458)
The European Council on Foreign Relations:
ECFR has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Warsaw and Sofia.
ECFR was founded in 2007 by Mark Leonard together with a council of fifty founding members, chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer, and Mabel van Oranje, with initial funding from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, the Communitas Foundation, Sigrid Rausing, Unicredit and Fundación Para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE).
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Council_on_Foreign_Relations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Council_on_Foreign_Relations)
[https://ecfr.eu/about/](https://ecfr.eu/about/)
Trump is filmed sharing drinks and laughs with Obama and saying he has promised to do whatever the Rothschilds wants him to do. That pobably makes him our friend and saviour!
Which parts of Trump’s Agenda 47 and Executive Orders are going to take away your (if you are a U.S. citizen) US Constitutional Liberty & Rights?
President Trump’s Agenda 47:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform/
President Trump’s Agenda 47 Videos & Statements:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/videos/
President Trump’s Executive Orders:
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/donald-trump/2025
I think you - you - are the hysterical one here!
Is anyone trying to force you to move to Mars?
Why do you care what type of society Elon Musk envisions for the people who choose to live in his manufactured environment on Mars?
Personally, I believe trying to establish a manufactured environment on Mars is a complete waste of money and resources.
However, Elon Musk’s reusable rocket will greatly conserve earthly resources and provide the capability to launch larger and more powerful telescopes into space, and to send probes to other planets, moons, asteroids, comets, and whatever else might be out there.
Regardless of Elon Musk’s plans for a Technocracy on Mars in his manufactured Martian environment, down here on good ol’ Earth in the USA, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights are still the Law of the Land, and any new technological innovations will be constrained and regulated by the government, which in the USA is the US Constitution.
Except you're ignoring one of the central points of Iain's essay, which is about the corporate takeover of government. Once that happens, I think you can kiss your beloved constitution goodbye. And the other point is that it's Trump who is enabling this.
It's not 'fascism' in the sense of the state ultimately controlling private corporations, it's the other way around. This is what is meant by 'stakeholder capitalism'.
The corporations and banks, the Overclass if you like, have been running and owning the government long before Elon was born. The rich have always hated the rules, the Constitution, and they certainly hate most people especially the poor.
Yeah - quite true. Perhaps they’re just being a bit more open about it now, out of some new-found confidence in the fact that they no longer have any fear of a revolution. As soon as they did 9/11 right in people’s faces (obvious controlled demolitions etc.) without provoking a revolution, they finally knew just how much they could get away with, and that the vast majority of the population really are subjugated and obedient beyond salvation or redemption.
I can well imagine what an empowering feeling that must’ve been for them. It’s also why they’ve been able to continue doing so many in-your-face ‘events’, knowing full well they are perfectly safe.
Regarding your mentioning of the constitution, this might be of interest https://johnspritzler.substack.com/p/the-us-founding-fathers-were-enemies See particulary under the second sub-header 'the us xonstitution' (and see also the link leading out from there, for more on the subject. Here https://www.pdrboston.org/u-s-constitution-help-or-hindrance)
You prove my point that Iain’s article is “Unhinged Hysteria” when you write, “Once that happens.”
It hasn’t happened and it won’t happen because the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court won’t allow it to happen.
Won't happen? What is the PATRIOT ACT and NDAA? What is corporate personhood? Hell the government at all levels is a corporation. Long gone is the common law my friend, because as 'conservative' Romney said 'corporations are people my friend.'
What can be written can be unwritten. Besides, the 'constitution' can be 'temporarily' set aside in favour of 'executive powers' in any time of (manufactured) crisis. And then temporary becomes permanent.
Go watch Star Wars Episode I if you don't believe me.
HaHaHaHaHaHa…..did you honestly tell me to go watch a Hollywood movie to learn how government functions!!!???
President Trump’s Agenda 47 Videos & Statements:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/videos/
The only fact that everyone needs to know is that Donald J. Trump is the President of the United States of America, and HIS Cabinet appointees take orders from him and implement HIS policies and agenda that are all explicitly spelled out in HIS Agenda 47 and HIS Executive Orders.
If you and your “Unhinged Hysteria” cohorts are going to write hit pieces on President Trump, then make your arguments against HIS Executive Orders, and not what your unhinged imaginations suspect HE is going to do.
President Trump’s Agenda 47:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform/
President Trump’s Executive Orders:
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/donald-trump/2025
William, Donald Trump isn't a politician he's a businessman and property devoloper, he is the president of a corporation, while his cabinet might take orders from him, he takes his from the directors or shareholders, executive orders are a perk of the president. The rest of his duties are scripted for him, if he goes off script he will be gone. If you can't understand that politicians don't make the big decision, then you will never understand politics
Which parts of Trump’s Agenda 47 and Executive Orders are going to take away your (if you are a U.S. citizen) US Constitutional Liberty & Rights?
President Trump’s Agenda 47:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform/
President Trump’s Agenda 47 Videos & Statements:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/videos/
President Trump’s Executive Orders:
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/donald-trump/2025
Which parts of Trump’s Agenda 47 and Executive Orders are going to take away your (if you are a U.S. citizen) US Constitutional Liberty & Rights?
President Trump’s Agenda 47:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform/
President Trump’s Agenda 47 Videos & Statements:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/videos/
President Trump’s Executive Orders:
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/donald-trump/2025
Excellent article packed with information, thank you very much. I am working through it. Frankly this the most disturbing thing I have seen for a long while but I was prepared for it since it comes just about a week after David Hughes made an appearance on the German Corona Investigative Committee where he mentioned your work during his discussion on the same topic of technocracy. I abstracted his part from the very long session video here. As Hughes says, it is above all a spiritual battle of good against evil which we must win. At least we know who the real terrorists are.
https://open.substack.com/pub/howard366646/p/dr-david-hughes-on-technocracy
The root issues here are divergent perceptions of objective and subjective morality and reality.
Demi-gods always justify the imposition of their morality, on the basis that their perception of morality is objective not subjective.
Likewise, demi-gods justify their imposition of their reality, on the basis that their perception of reality is objective not subjective.
This logic is obviously tragically flawed.
Objective morality is to treat others as we would like to be treated ourselves.
Demi-gods always flagrantly disregard this law, exposing their own real moral status.
Objective reality is only a perception, not an absolute.
No one person or group can claim, that their perception of reality is absolute.
Demi-gods who think that they are entitled to impose their perception of reality, because it is objective not subjective, are deluded megalomaniacs!
These people cause untold suffering by trying to force their "enlightenment" on others.
History is strewn with the debris of their shattered illusions.
These false gurus could probably be purged by productive hard work, not paper shuffling and money counting!
However, the cult of the pig is an ancient, entrenched pagan religion rooted in greed.
Its all above the heads of the crawling creatures who have trouble even realising what quantification is.
This is like a certificate zone, rated U for compliance, or potential U -TURN ?
President Trump was elected in a landslide victory of Electoral College votes and popular votes and victories in all seven swing states because President Trump’s Agenda 47 represents the type of society that a majority of US citizens want to live in, and that type of society is a Constitutional Federal Republic which protects Personal Liberty, Personal Rights, Personal Prosperity, and Personal Happiness. President Trump’s Executive Orders and Cabinet Appointments prove that he is keeping the promises that he made during his election campaign.
President Trump was elected because his goals and vision for America are preferable to a majority of the citizens of the USA than the goals and vision for the destruction of America that Democratic Party waged over the previous four years.
President Trump is the people’s REPRESENTATIVE, not their SAVIOR.
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/president-trump-is-the-peoples-representative?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnSharet=false
Yes, and he may offer americans cheap fares to his new Gaza Riviera Casino&Golf (but sadly has to await the deportation of its inhabitants). That is ins*ne, depr*ved, m*d, lun*tic, psych*, self-dec*ived, a fre*king d*vil. No less.
Uh, Pres Trump is soon to be King Trump.
https://risingdawn360.substack.com/p/club-of-rome-grants-trump-the-kingdom
Unfortunately only those VeryVery Few have Eyes2C, Ears2Hear & a Heart2Understand. I no longer engage with the Willfully Blind as they remind me of those "believers" who never let Scripture get in the way of their beliefs.
lol, I hear ya, still God is not willing that any should perish, and we are his workmanship created unto good works. I'll engage up to 3x, that's when I leave off if the person doesn't want to wake up.
Eyes R Useless When the Mind is Blind-Hypnotized-Owned. Sigh.
Sounds like they’re planning to run humanity as a feed lot. Line up to get your daily rations and mandatory injections. Chris Hedges and Sheldon Wolin talk about inverted totalitarianism which is exactly what you said. It looks superficially Democratic but the corporations wield all the power. If it’s to be run as a business the only thing that will matter is the bottom line and any shred of empathy will be totally eliminated by AI.
They are exploiting the limitations of democracy in order to collapse the entire system and accelerate capitalism to the point of fascism. I would suggest maybe it’s not democracy that is broken, but capitalism. Maybe it’s time for ai regulated market to make it more fair and inclusive and to remove the politicians, their cronies, and grift from it.
The DOGE-bags Are Full Of It
...operating outside the law
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/the-doge-bags-are-full-of-it
Great work Iain Davis!
btw
The W3C has a Community Group called the "Credible Web" Community Group.
Some comments from a recent meeting:
"we haven’t quite yet reached the level where we understand enough to have a productive f2f meeting"
"if credibility meant anything, climate change would have been tackled decades ago"
"… some people equate credibility with truth… but we don’t associate those"
"… It’s very hard to conclude which credibility signals… can for sure determine truth… truth is a complicated term… let’s say credible or not"
"… W3C works on tech solution… we have implications on social change… everyone here probably agrees that tech is political… technical change is the only way we can have an effect"
"what is reasonably clear is that AI is likely multiplying the challenges we’re facing in that space"
-from https://github.com/w3c/authentic-web-workshop/blob/main/minutes/2025-03-12AuthWeb.md
also see
The Markup Cult is Taking Over
...and deprogramming is an urgent priority
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/the-markup-cult-is-taking-over
BREAKING: Mark Carney voted in as new Liberal leader
https://thecanadianindependent.substack.com/p/breaking-mark-carney-voted-in-as
1941 Una Mae Carlisle - Blitzkrieg Baby (You Can’t Bomb Me)
https://youtu.be/8etx25BXXBk
mrna is post human