The British Government?

Well, here in the UK we have a new Trilaterist. . . . . er, sorry, I meant Labour government, led by the charismatic Keir Starmer. Likened to a wet dish rag, and not without good reason, Keir Starmer now commands the so-called “government” with a whopping 170+ seat majority after nearly 80% of the British electorate didn’t vote for either him or the Labour party. Though, as we shall see, even these figures are somewhat “optimistic” from a UK government perspective.

This all makes sense because people imagine that representative democracy has something to do with democracy, which it doesn’t. Still, who cares! Government is a crap idea anyway, so, if we are going to be ruled by anyone, why not the man who went out of his way to avoid prosecuting Britain’s worst ever paedophile, necrophiliac pimp and was still listed as a “former” member of the Trilateral Commission in 2022 with their little accompanying explanatory note: “former members in public service.”

He’s not an active member of the Trilateral Commission. Honest, he’s not!

Why should we care you may ask? Well, the Trilateral Commission that Keir serves, sorry, there I go again, “served,” is just a Rockefeller aligned globalist think tank that promotes ideas like the “pursuit of the European unification.” This is one component of its plan to form a global government with the added North American and Asia-Pacific union completing the tripod of its regional poles. You could call the Trilateralists’ long-planned technocratic, global dictatorship “multipolar.”

The Trilateral Commissions—that Keir Starmer definitely does not serve for the moment—brings together a global public-private partnership of policymakers, business leaders, media moguls and selected academics, who have taken it upon themselves to decide what the “solutions to some of the world’s toughest problems” are. The policy “solutions” it wants are not going to be promoted by the new UK prime minster because he’s a “former” member, you see?

Sure, you voted to leave the EU but now you’ve elected to rejoin it. OK, so you didn’t vote to have policy decisions forced upon you by some remote oligarch run think tank either. Maybe world government isn’t what you thought you were supporting. But that’s all just too bad. Unfortunately for you, and the rest of us, if you voted in the UK general election, this is what you voted for, so you don’t have any right to complain.

Of course, the largest single group of voters didn’t elect any government at all and do have a right to complain. With 60% general election turnout—the turnout was below 50% in 59 constituencies—Labour’s paltry and “claimed” 20.4% of the total possible vote was resoundingly trounced by the “alleged” 40% of the UK electorate who couldn’t be arsed to vote for anyone. The most popular choice in the UK, by a considerable margin, was no government.

But even this turnout figure of just 60% is questionable. While this was the figure touted by the legacy media and the government, subsequent research by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) discovered the national turnout was actually 52%. This was the lowest ever, since universal suffrage began in the UK in 1928.

This figure was based upon analysis of returned, unspoiled ballots provided by the House of Commons Library, the Office for National Statistics and, for some reason, the BBC. We might, therefore, consider it more accurate. It is the figure we’ll use.

Whether it was apathy, the wet and absolutely bloody freezing July weather—global warming eh?—or just the terminally depressing prospect of having to partake in the state’s quinquennial anointment ceremony, who knows? And frankly, who gives a damn?

The government was threatening us with violence if we didn’t comply and obey yesterday—a threat it can certainly back up by the way—and the government is still threatening us with the same today. Yesterday the government was blue, today it is red, what’s the difference apart from a Downing Street wallpaper change? It’s still the same government.

Globalist thinks tanks like the Trilateral Commission were controlling government policy yesterday and they still are today. Your “vote” meant absolutely jack-shit.

Still, It’s nice to imagine you have some sort of democratic oversight, I guess. That is, of course, if controlling what other people do is something that matters to you.

So what have we got as an alleged “government” at the end of the day?

With 33.7% of the total vote, about 17.5% percent of the electorate successfully imposed the tyranny of their favourite gang on the rest of us. Thanks to the absurdity that is representative democracy, this small minority have chosen Keir Starmer to be the consecrated talking-head fronting whatever policies the oligarchs want to foist on the rest of us. Of the remaining 82.5% of voters, less than half wanted a different gang to wave flags for, but the majority didn’t want any gang at all.

A tiny minority, who certainly didn’t vote, think the idea of forcing someone else to do what you want by sticking a cross in a box once every five years is not only—literally—a box-ticking exercise, but also an absolutely appalling and morally bankrupt thing to do.

With less than 34% of the votes cast, Labour gets 64% of parliamentary seats because reasons. This means it doesn’t have to listen to anybody at all for the next five years. Although it will certainly be listening to a bunch of parasitic oligarchs because that is who government always listens to and actually serves.

The so-called UK government, which is really just a relatively minor “enabling” partner in the global public-private partnership, has absolutely no legitimate democratic mandate at all.

Which is yet another reason, in a very long list of excellent reasons, to ignore it completely.