49 Comments
User's avatar
Iain Davis's avatar

Trolls and bots are not welcome!

********************************

This a Substack comment thread freely open to all. It is intended to provide a space for productive dialogue.

Everyone is free to comment. Please be civil and courteous to each other. Have a laugh, use irony, whit, sarcasm, whatever you like. Argue your point, show your evidence. But please do not be personal, abusive, or accusatory just because someone disagrees with or questions you.

Personal abuse will result in one warning. If abuse persists, after the warning, the abusive account will be blocked and permanently barred from commenting on my Substack posts.

Please, only reply to this message if you wish to alert me to abusive behaviour.

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Charlotte Ruse's avatar

Don't expect justice from gangsters.

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

Quite. And Operation Talla proves they are gangsters.

Expand full comment
Charlotte Ruse's avatar

And the scamdemic proved it's a worldwide operation.

Expand full comment
Andy Boddington's avatar

This twins with the Alex Thompson speech published by UK Column from Cheltenham last August. About just how messed up State run organisations are - the people working there are lacking a moral compass and have no pride in the job, or understand what they are doing. Indoctrinated via dogma , where the exposing of malpractice is more about "just shut up" and hoping it goes away. Thanks Iain

Expand full comment
Andy Boddington's avatar

Just like to add , I saw that out of 17k who applied to be a policeman, 250 would not have been offered a job if their references had been checked. Therefore, it is the hirers who have no moral compass, not just the criminals , correct?

Expand full comment
Mozza B's avatar
6dEdited

Brilliant article explaining what Operation Talla really was and what a dangerous precedent it set.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Whatever a government does, it has nothing to do with safety and concern for the citizen. It is always to further control and take away freedoms. To the government parasites and ghouls, they think this assures they will be in power forever.

Expand full comment
substantial stacks's avatar

You know why the Borg removed the HCID tag from their made-up disease early on? To avoid costs and complications arising from regulations on the spec of HCID clinics, so that they can use any old hospital ward as a "COVID" ward, to easily murder people with ventilators and drugs, so as to satisfy their satanic impulses and to create a horror to justify the unquestioned enforcement of mass poisoning (mRNA vaccines).

The NPCs are wallowing in AI la-la land and the idea that the white coats can have such intent is "nutjob conspiracy" to them, because the truth is freaky as hell and leads to getting mad.

GET FUCKING MAD

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

And then do something constructive with that energy.

Expand full comment
Jonathan McGinlay's avatar

Interesting. I hadnt heard of op talla. I just bought your book. Not sure if it includes anything about sea steading and Peter Theil given his a technocrat. But you had previously said some interesting things about Greenland and with it being in the news a lot just now,your thoughts on that could bring some more attention your way. Nobody else seems to be discussing that aspect of the story.

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

Please tell others.

Expand full comment
Jonathan McGinlay's avatar

I tried to tell Peter Hitchens, who has responded to me in the past on Twitter, but this is too much outside the Overton window for him. I seen Alex from Thinking Coalition put out some good tweets showing Greenland and Venezuela where part of the Technate they planned in the 1930s.

Expand full comment
substantial stacks's avatar

As i noted on your other post on the Magna Carta, the laws are written by the ones who have (and make) the guns...

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

The legal form of the law--administrative law--certainly is but I hope you also noted that I was highlighting we have a constitution where the only legitimate form of evolving the Law of the Land is through jury-led trials through which we, the people, can annul all administrative law. This is why the G3P-state can never acknowledge what our real constitution is.

Expand full comment
substantial stacks's avatar

"The British public was not told this information and could not, therefore, give their informed consent to be jabbed."

Their satanic intent goes beyond lying by omission. They pre-emptively planted a lie in the public's mind both about health, viruses and vaccines but also about the people who would warn them about these lies. We are all Nazi Trump supporters here.

They call it "pre-bunking"....

Expand full comment
Carl Shaw's avatar

My god.

Thank you so much for your extensive research

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

😂🤣😘

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

????

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

My reaction was to what I thought was a sarcastic comment above . Can’t see it now for some reason ?

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

Aah. Perhaps my ego got the better of me. I thought it was someone who was genuinely shocked by the report.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

I'm not defending them but reporting these crimes to the local police is moot because it's not their jurisdiction.

The sad thing is we have no clue whose jurisdiction is it.

That's why we get the run around with fake democracy

..

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

Supposedly, we are all equal under the law and the police have jurisdiction and can arrest anyone, even the PM or the King. So, in the capital that jurisdiction is the province of the MPS. As far as I know, there is no one else you could report SCADs to.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar
6dEdited

I have repeatedly written (e-mails and letters) to my government (in the UK) and had no responses - from my MP or from individual government departments. Letters sent registered mail are not recorded as received. Apparently all mail into the UK government is first "screened" by security so I cannot even know whether this correspondence reached the right desk.

Discussion or questioning of the covid injections is clearly a classified security matter.

Expand full comment
Pighooey's avatar

Thanks for doing this. The fact that your correspondence was screened out is worth knowing and speaks volumes. Your efforts weren't wasted.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar
5dEdited

Recently I have been warning them about the amyloid clotting - the white clots and the microclotting forming in vaccinated blood. Also that the blood supply is contaminated with these dangerous, infectious, proteins.

Everyone appears to be at some risk, as these have been found in unvaccinated people as well, and the mode of spread is not understood..

I note that another commenter (Sleuth) says he was penalised for bringing concerns of illegality to notice. I am sure my name and address are noted and kept for writing these letters, though it would be hard to bring a charge against someone for raising medical safety concerns and bringing them to the notice of their MP and government health authorities.(!!!!)

(Though I would not put it past them in their convoluted scheming ! )

I find it hard to believe that a synthetic agent would be released that was known to be uncontrollable in spread - I am inclined to think that this is an unforeseen consequence of the release of Sars-Cov-2.

In which case we all find ourselves in very dodgy circumstances now- including the perpetrators.

For people's information about blood product safety.

https://drbowden.substack.com/p/hail-mary-for-the-vaccine-injured

30th Dec 2025

Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D.

I can tell you that earlier this month I was sent transplant blood used in a surgery from the US, that contained high levels of amyloidogenic inclusions.

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

Thank you for clarifying.

I live in Australia and tried to report what I believed to be attempted fraud and extortion ( long story ) .

Very long story.

Local police were clearly in the know - at that time I was not .

Outcome - I would not waste my time again….at this point.

Expand full comment
evgnet's avatar
J R's avatar

> If trust in institutions is destroyed, those institutions will find they are no longer believed, no longer obeyed, no longer capable of command. ... we face not merely institutional scandal, but the dissolution of the bond between people and state. That dissolution will leave no one untouched.

All of this is laudable but naive. This was simply a test run for what is coming. The system to enforce the diktats is nearing full operation. There will be no resistance because the system blocks it before it can even organize. The law is irrelevant. Politics is performance art. https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-one-pager

Expand full comment
thelightpaper's avatar

i think the point here is that they WANT the dissolution - it's part of the plan and they tell us so: 'ordo ab chao'.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

Yes, there is a leak from New Zealand to that effect.

20/9/2021 New Zealand. Forum post.

https://archive.org/details/an-elite-confided-in-me-the-covid-end-game

An “elite” confided in me – What you are about to read on the covid end game will make everything crystal clear.

Expand full comment
Sleuth's avatar

Some stuff omitted here.

2 crns were issued not 1.

Why no mention of minerva advisory?

Why no mention of the fact that 3 of the 4 concerned citizens suffered regulatory discipline. In my case 15k fine and 66k costs for writing 2 letters.

Also no mention of the JR.

And the fact that the Met Police failed to disclose the speirs directive.

Not name checking the people who made the complaint and what happened to them misses a crucial point.

Part of the police complaint was weaponisation of the regulators to crush dissent.

Expand full comment
Iain Davis's avatar

There is a massive amount that has been omitted, much more than was included, but I hope I have helped to convey the essence of the issue. I will probably return to the topic at some point.

Expand full comment
currer's avatar

What happened about the fine - have you challenged it? This seems quite illegal.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Thanks for highlighting this Iain. Quite a stunning admission from Police Scotland and all credit to Moira Brown for having the courage to want to do something about what went on the last 5 years without which i doubt any of this would be known. He or she who dares wins. Fortune favours the bold etc

See evidence submited to the Scotish COVID-19 inquiry 24th Feb 2025 by the Scottish Police Federation.

'‘A pandemic can fundamentally alter the "service and consent" model of policing. Policing by consent is a principle that the legitimacy of the Police is based on public support and cooperation..’’

‘‘During this period, the SPF received an unusually high number of web enquiry, contacts from serving officers expressing concerns. I cannot comment further on this.’’

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscotish-covid-19-inquiry24-feb?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
currer's avatar
5dEdited

Well spotted, BP. The problem is, that law has been annulled. All attempts by persons to redress these outrages by law or appeal to legal principles fails -by design. It is not for lack of evidence or reason.

Barbarism works much better for our rulers.

I remember that modifications to legal protections were made which allowed hospital human rights to be bypassed in a pandemic.

See this interview They Weren’t Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy

https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/they-werent-dying-of-covid-a-system

It looks as if some similar exception was worked up for the police, so that they did not need to adhere to previous legal principles.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Agree. We know that but too many don't. All we can do is raise awareness. Strength to resist in numbers or it's over. Morality over legality.

Expand full comment
Sleuth's avatar

Can't say too much but it's far worse than I can print.

The person who sat on the SDT panel was an associate at Minerva Advisory as was the person who complained to the SRA who was a government contractor and Risk Lead at DHSC.

Articles like this miss that the CRNs evidence presented by me had 8 modules - one of which was the vaccine roll out, others suppressed therapeutics, weaponisation of regulators etc.

Expand full comment